Man at Trump Rally Hits 2 Protesters in the Head

[Pogo]

Disrupters who show up at a private event should expect to get bitchslapped. They don't have a right to protest and disrupt an event they aren't paying for. If you want to protest do it outside the venue on the sidewalk.

"private event" huh?

The only real deplorables are the progressive turds that plant themselves inside such events just to disrupt it. Liberals can't stand free speech and will do anything to stop the opposition from having such events.

Yyyyyeah ummmm..... Liberals invented free speech. Or at least we codified it in the First Amendment. That still stands yanno, and by the way you're welcome, Dim Dong.

 

[Pogo]

Imaging how mad and violent these deplorable will be after the election, it will only get worse for them as the demographic leaves them behind


A man in the audience of a Trump rally in North Carolina Monday evening hit two male protesters in the head as they were being escorted out.


Man at Trump Rally Hits 2 Protesters in the Head

He was escorted out though right? everyone else there looked peaceful, so if you want to use the worse example as a stereo type, you know the same thing can be done to Hillary voters, there are plenty of worse examples to be had.

Actually he wasn't --- he stayed. The article I read noted that Asheville police didn't have an explanation for why he was allowed to remain having already committed assault.

 

[Pogo]

Note how Pogo has no problem with a pattern of Democrat supported and paid for violence at Trump rallies which has gone on all year, but has a big problem with one incident of a Trump supporter doing violence.

Notice how Pogo has yet to see documentation thereof, but has noticed a deflection attempt based on a False Dichotomy.

Hey -- don't wanna get busted for fallacies? Then don't commit them.

He posted links for every incident he mentioned. Stop lying.

And not a single one of them supported his claim.

Not one.

You're in denial about reality, but the rest of us don't have to join you in your delusionary world where facts don't matter.

I already checked his links. Every one. Because I do my homework.

Go ahead, by all means --- prove me wrong.

 

[theHawk]

Disrupters who show up at a private event should expect to get bitchslapped. They don't have a right to protest and disrupt an event they aren't paying for. If you want to protest do it outside the venue on the sidewalk.

"private event" huh?

The only real deplorables are the progressive turds that plant themselves inside such events just to disrupt it. Liberals can't stand free speech and will do anything to stop the opposition from having such events.

Yyyyyeah ummmm..... Liberals invented free speech. Or at least we codified it in the First Amendment. That still stands yanno, and by the way you're welcome, Dim Dong.

Yes, you idiot. A political rally held by either party is a private event. They are paying for the facilities, the security, ect. People that go want to listen to their party leaders. Going in as a plant to disrupt is denying those people their first amendment rights to peacefully assemble. If they want to protest, they can do it outside in a public area where it's perfectly legal.

 

[jc456]

Disrupters who show up at a private event should expect to get bitchslapped. They don't have a right to protest and disrupt an event they aren't paying for. If you want to protest do it outside the venue on the sidewalk.

"private event" huh?

The only real deplorables are the progressive turds that plant themselves inside such events just to disrupt it. Liberals can't stand free speech and will do anything to stop the opposition from having such events.

Yyyyyeah ummmm..... Liberals invented free speech. Or at least we codified it in the First Amendment. That still stands yanno, and by the way you're welcome, Dim Dong.

you all hate free speech. why else the need to complain about what we say or visit a rally? You don't want it said end of story. yeppers, can you say ooopss

 

[theHawk]

Disrupters who show up at a private event should expect to get bitchslapped. They don't have a right to protest and disrupt an event they aren't paying for. If you want to protest do it outside the venue on the sidewalk.

"private event" huh?

The only real deplorables are the progressive turds that plant themselves inside such events just to disrupt it. Liberals can't stand free speech and will do anything to stop the opposition from having such events.

Yyyyyeah ummmm..... Liberals invented free speech. Or at least we codified it in the First Amendment. That still stands yanno, and by the way you're welcome, Dim Dong.

you all hate free speech. why else the need to complain about what we say or visit a rally? You don't want it said end of story. yeppers, can you say ooopss

A progressive's idea of "freedom of speech" is screaming in the ears of people who don't agree with them.

 

[Leweman]

How many people have the Clintons had killed again? You know, the actual person trying to run for President and the former President/ rapist.

 

[Yarddog]

Disrupters who show up at a private event should expect to get bitchslapped. They don't have a right to protest and disrupt an event they aren't paying for. If you want to protest do it outside the venue on the sidewalk.

"private event" huh?

The only real deplorables are the progressive turds that plant themselves inside such events just to disrupt it. Liberals can't stand free speech and will do anything to stop the opposition from having such events.

Yyyyyeah ummmm..... Liberals invented free speech. Or at least we codified it in the First Amendment. That still stands yanno, and by the way you're welcome, Dim Dong.

Yes, you idiot. A political rally held by either party is a private event. They are paying for the facilities, the security, ect. People that go want to listen to their party leaders. Going in as a plant to disrupt is denying those people their first amendment rights to peacefully assemble. If they want to protest, they can do it outside in a public area where it's perfectly legal.

that's a very good point, and it does work both ways. Havn't seen many people trying to disrupt Hillary rallies though

 

[Roudy]

Imaging how mad and violent these deplorable will be after the election, it will only get worse for them as the demographic leaves them behind


A man in the audience of a Trump rally in North Carolina Monday evening hit two male protesters in the head as they were being escorted out.


Man at Trump Rally Hits 2 Protesters in the Head

And? It pales in comparison to the rioting, violence, and burning down of cities and businesses exhibited by some of these nutjob left wing groups.

 

[Pogo]

Yes, you idiot. A political rally held by either party is a private event.

--- because they're only looking for votes from a subscription, not the general public --- right?

Fucking dimwit.

They are paying for the facilities, the security, ect.

Guess what Beaver. When you go to see Justin Beaver he's paying for the facilities, the security, etc there --- doesn't mean you can't yell "you suck" at the stage.

Guess what else Beav --- WE pay for security. The Secret Service is in charge of that.

Going in as a plant to disrupt is denying those people their first amendment rights to peacefully assemble.

OMG how fucking stupid can you be. They're *ALREADY* assembled, you great gob of cretinage.

If they want to protest, they can do it outside in a public area where it's perfectly legal.

Which they did.
Wish I hadn't been so busy, I could have got some great video.

 

[Blackrook]

Yes, you idiot. A political rally held by either party is a private event.

--- because they're only looking for votes from a subscription, not the general public --- right?

Fucking dimwit.

They are paying for the facilities, the security, ect.

Guess what Beaver. When you go to see Justin Beaver he's paying for the facilities, the security, etc there --- doesn't mean you can't yell "you suck" at the stage.

Guess what else Beav --- WE pay for security. The Secret Service is in charge of that.

Going in as a plant to disrupt is denying those people their first amendment rights to peacefully assemble.

OMG how fucking stupid can you be. They're *ALREADY* assembled, you great gob of cretinage.

If they want to protest, they can do it outside in a public area where it's perfectly legal.

Which they did.
Wish I hadn't been so busy, I could have got some great video.

You're a loon.

 

[theHawk]

Yes, you idiot. A political rally held by either party is a private event.

--- because they're only looking for votes from a subscription, not the general public --- right?

Fucking dimwit.

They are paying for the facilities, the security, ect.

Guess what Beaver. When you go to see Justin Beaver he's paying for the facilities, the security, etc there --- doesn't mean you can't yell "you suck" at the stage.

Guess what else Beav --- WE pay for security. The Secret Service is in charge of that.

Going in as a plant to disrupt is denying those people their first amendment rights to peacefully assemble.

OMG how fucking stupid can you be. They're *ALREADY* assembled, you great gob of cretinage.

If they want to protest, they can do it outside in a public area where it's perfectly legal.

Which they did.
Wish I hadn't been so busy, I could have got some great video.

The secret service does not pay for the venue. Just because the Secret Service is a government agency doesn't mean you get to disrupt political events they are at. Quite the contrary, I'd like to see you run up and scream at someone under their protection.

If it's these peoples' "right" to protest during these rallies, why are they kicked out by security?

Do you think people should be able to disrupt Hillary and Obama speeches? Even if it's in a government building?

 

[Pogo]

Yes, you idiot. A political rally held by either party is a private event.

--- because they're only looking for votes from a subscription, not the general public --- right?

Fucking dimwit.

They are paying for the facilities, the security, ect.

Guess what Beaver. When you go to see Justin Beaver he's paying for the facilities, the security, etc there --- doesn't mean you can't yell "you suck" at the stage.

Guess what else Beav --- WE pay for security. The Secret Service is in charge of that.

Going in as a plant to disrupt is denying those people their first amendment rights to peacefully assemble.

OMG how fucking stupid can you be. They're *ALREADY* assembled, you great gob of cretinage.

If they want to protest, they can do it outside in a public area where it's perfectly legal.

Which they did.
Wish I hadn't been so busy, I could have got some great video.

The secret service does not pay for the venue. Just because the Secret Service is a government agency doesn't mean you get to disrupt political events they are at. Quite the contrary, I'd like to see you run up and scream at someone under their protection.

If it's these peoples' "right" to protest during these rallies, why are they kicked out by security?

Do you think people should be able to disrupt Hillary and Obama speeches? Even if it's in a government building?

The Secret Service heads security, Dumbass. That's SOP. Which is what I just said --- learn how to read.

And US Cellular Center obviously ain't a "government building'.

 

[Pogo]

Imaging how mad and violent these deplorable will be after the election, it will only get worse for them as the demographic leaves them behind


A man in the audience of a Trump rally in North Carolina Monday evening hit two male protesters in the head as they were being escorted out.


Man at Trump Rally Hits 2 Protesters in the Head

He was escorted out though right? everyone else there looked peaceful, so if you want to use the worse example as a stereo type, you know the same thing can be done to Hillary voters, there are plenty of worse examples to be had.

Actually he wasn't --- he stayed. The article I read noted that Asheville police didn't have an explanation for why he was allowed to remain having already committed assault.

Here it is:

>> NBC News video of the incident shows the man with his hands on a protester's neck. Moments later, his hands furled into fists, the man lobbed a blow at the protester.

After the one protester was escorted out, the man pulled another toward him and shouted back and forth with a third, female protester while a member of Trump's advance team held him back.

He also screamed at a female protester wearing a hijab who was not with the group but was also escorted out.

The unidentified man was allowed to remain for the rest of the rally, and Asheville police did not immediately return NBC News' request for comment on why the aggressive man was allowed to remain inside after his actions.

NBC News was unable to track down the protesters after the event. <<​

 

[theHawk]

Yes, you idiot. A political rally held by either party is a private event.

--- because they're only looking for votes from a subscription, not the general public --- right?

Fucking dimwit.

They are paying for the facilities, the security, ect.

Guess what Beaver. When you go to see Justin Beaver he's paying for the facilities, the security, etc there --- doesn't mean you can't yell "you suck" at the stage.

Guess what else Beav --- WE pay for security. The Secret Service is in charge of that.

Going in as a plant to disrupt is denying those people their first amendment rights to peacefully assemble.

OMG how fucking stupid can you be. They're *ALREADY* assembled, you great gob of cretinage.

If they want to protest, they can do it outside in a public area where it's perfectly legal.

Which they did.
Wish I hadn't been so busy, I could have got some great video.

The secret service does not pay for the venue. Just because the Secret Service is a government agency doesn't mean you get to disrupt political events they are at. Quite the contrary, I'd like to see you run up and scream at someone under their protection.

If it's these peoples' "right" to protest during these rallies, why are they kicked out by security?

Do you think people should be able to disrupt Hillary and Obama speeches? Even if it's in a government building?

The Secret Service heads security, Dumbass. That's SOP. Which is what I just said --- learn how to read.

And US Cellular obviously ain't a "government building'.

That's not what you said. Now your just lying about what you said because you have no arguement.

Then you have to lie about what I said. I never suggested that the secret service doesn't head the security. That has nothing to do with a venue being private or public, they will provide security in either case. I also never said US Cellular is a government building. I asked you a hypothetical question about a speech in a public building, since you seem to think that gives people the right to protest in it.

Now, why don't you learn to read and answer the questions instead of making up more lies?

 

[Blackrook]

Imaging how mad and violent these deplorable will be after the election, it will only get worse for them as the demographic leaves them behind


A man in the audience of a Trump rally in North Carolina Monday evening hit two male protesters in the head as they were being escorted out.


Man at Trump Rally Hits 2 Protesters in the Head

He was escorted out though right? everyone else there looked peaceful, so if you want to use the worse example as a stereo type, you know the same thing can be done to Hillary voters, there are plenty of worse examples to be had.

Actually he wasn't --- he stayed. The article I read noted that Asheville police didn't have an explanation for why he was allowed to remain having already committed assault.

Here it is:

>> NBC News video of the incident shows the man with his hands on a protester's neck. Moments later, his hands furled into fists, the man lobbed a blow at the protester.

After the one protester was escorted out, the man pulled another toward him and shouted back and forth with a third, female protester while a member of Trump's advance team held him back.

He also screamed at a female protester wearing a hijab who was not with the group but was also escorted out.

The unidentified man was allowed to remain for the rest of the rally, and Asheville police did not immediately return NBC News' request for comment on why the aggressive man was allowed to remain inside after his actions.

NBC News was unable to track down the protesters after the event. <<​

If you are against violence you should be against ALL VIOLENCE, but the fact is you are not. You excuse away the violence perpetrated by your own side, thereby making it all the more likely it will happen in the future. Therefore, you are as guilty of violence as the man who actually throws the punches.

 

[Yarddog]

Imaging how mad and violent these deplorable will be after the election, it will only get worse for them as the demographic leaves them behind


A man in the audience of a Trump rally in North Carolina Monday evening hit two male protesters in the head as they were being escorted out.


Man at Trump Rally Hits 2 Protesters in the Head

He was escorted out though right? everyone else there looked peaceful, so if you want to use the worse example as a stereo type, you know the same thing can be done to Hillary voters, there are plenty of worse examples to be had.

Actually he wasn't --- he stayed. The article I read noted that Asheville police didn't have an explanation for why he was allowed to remain having already committed assault.

Here it is:

>> NBC News video of the incident shows the man with his hands on a protester's neck. Moments later, his hands furled into fists, the man lobbed a blow at the protester.

After the one protester was escorted out, the man pulled another toward him and shouted back and forth with a third, female protester while a member of Trump's advance team held him back.

He also screamed at a female protester wearing a hijab who was not with the group but was also escorted out.

The unidentified man was allowed to remain for the rest of the rally, and Asheville police did not immediately return NBC News' request for comment on why the aggressive man was allowed to remain inside after his actions.

NBC News was unable to track down the protesters after the event. <<​

Ok, well point taken. I don't personally agree with the guy's actions, It doesnt paint every Trump supporter any more than protesters smashing car windows, and setting fires is representative of every Hillary Clinton Supporter. First of all people who show up to rallies or demonstrations are more apt to be vocal or reactionary than your average person. Then out of that group youll always have a few that feel the world revolves around them, and they will be the trouble makers. Its basic human nature

 

[Pogo]

Imaging how mad and violent these deplorable will be after the election, it will only get worse for them as the demographic leaves them behind


A man in the audience of a Trump rally in North Carolina Monday evening hit two male protesters in the head as they were being escorted out.


Man at Trump Rally Hits 2 Protesters in the Head

He was escorted out though right? everyone else there looked peaceful, so if you want to use the worse example as a stereo type, you know the same thing can be done to Hillary voters, there are plenty of worse examples to be had.

Actually he wasn't --- he stayed. The article I read noted that Asheville police didn't have an explanation for why he was allowed to remain having already committed assault.

Here it is:

>> NBC News video of the incident shows the man with his hands on a protester's neck. Moments later, his hands furled into fists, the man lobbed a blow at the protester.

After the one protester was escorted out, the man pulled another toward him and shouted back and forth with a third, female protester while a member of Trump's advance team held him back.

He also screamed at a female protester wearing a hijab who was not with the group but was also escorted out.

The unidentified man was allowed to remain for the rest of the rally, and Asheville police did not immediately return NBC News' request for comment on why the aggressive man was allowed to remain inside after his actions.

NBC News was unable to track down the protesters after the event. <<​

Ok, well point taken. I don't personally agree with the guy's actions, It doesnt paint every Trump supporter any more than protesters smashing car windows, and setting fires is representative of every Hillary Clinton Supporter. First of all people who show up to rallies or demonstrations are more apt to be vocal or reactionary than your average person. Then out of that group youll always have a few that feel the world revolves around them, and they will be the trouble makers. Its basic human nature

No of course it doesn't.
That's exactly the point I was making to that 2AClown. The one who looks at protesters and sees "political parties".

 

[Pogo]

Imaging how mad and violent these deplorable will be after the election, it will only get worse for them as the demographic leaves them behind


A man in the audience of a Trump rally in North Carolina Monday evening hit two male protesters in the head as they were being escorted out.


Man at Trump Rally Hits 2 Protesters in the Head

He was escorted out though right? everyone else there looked peaceful, so if you want to use the worse example as a stereo type, you know the same thing can be done to Hillary voters, there are plenty of worse examples to be had.

Actually he wasn't --- he stayed. The article I read noted that Asheville police didn't have an explanation for why he was allowed to remain having already committed assault.

Here it is:

>> NBC News video of the incident shows the man with his hands on a protester's neck. Moments later, his hands furled into fists, the man lobbed a blow at the protester.

After the one protester was escorted out, the man pulled another toward him and shouted back and forth with a third, female protester while a member of Trump's advance team held him back.

He also screamed at a female protester wearing a hijab who was not with the group but was also escorted out.

The unidentified man was allowed to remain for the rest of the rally, and Asheville police did not immediately return NBC News' request for comment on why the aggressive man was allowed to remain inside after his actions.

NBC News was unable to track down the protesters after the event. <<​

If you are against violence you should be against ALL VIOLENCE, but the fact is you are not. You excuse away the violence perpetrated by your own side, thereby making it all the more likely it will happen in the future. Therefore, you are as guilty of violence as the man who actually throws the punches.

Link?



Nope. Didn't think so.

 

[Pogo]

Yes, you idiot. A political rally held by either party is a private event.

--- because they're only looking for votes from a subscription, not the general public --- right?

Fucking dimwit.

They are paying for the facilities, the security, ect.

Guess what Beaver. When you go to see Justin Beaver he's paying for the facilities, the security, etc there --- doesn't mean you can't yell "you suck" at the stage.

Guess what else Beav --- WE pay for security. The Secret Service is in charge of that.

Going in as a plant to disrupt is denying those people their first amendment rights to peacefully assemble.

OMG how fucking stupid can you be. They're *ALREADY* assembled, you great gob of cretinage.

If they want to protest, they can do it outside in a public area where it's perfectly legal.

Which they did.
Wish I hadn't been so busy, I could have got some great video.

The secret service does not pay for the venue. Just because the Secret Service is a government agency doesn't mean you get to disrupt political events they are at. Quite the contrary, I'd like to see you run up and scream at someone under their protection.

If it's these peoples' "right" to protest during these rallies, why are they kicked out by security?

Do you think people should be able to disrupt Hillary and Obama speeches? Even if it's in a government building?

The Secret Service heads security, Dumbass. That's SOP. Which is what I just said --- learn how to read.

And US Cellular obviously ain't a "government building'.

That's not what you said. Now your just lying about what you said because you have no arguement.

Then you have to lie about what I said. I never suggested that the secret service doesn't head the security. That has nothing to do with a venue being private or public, they will provide security in either case. I also never said US Cellular is a government building. I asked you a hypothetical question about a speech in a public building, since you seem to think that gives people the right to protest in it.

Now, why don't you learn to read and answer the questions instead of making up more lies?

Tissue?