Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Suggesting that great danes pose the same risk as pit bulls is certified, grade A retarded.
And thinking someone said that is retarded
Learn to read
You said it. Perhaps not verbatim, but you certainly said as much.
Learn to say what you mean.
And thinking someone said that is retarded
Learn to read
You said it. Perhaps not verbatim, but you certainly said as much.
Learn to say what you mean.
Liar
I challenge you to find where I said that GD pose the same risk as PB's. If you find it, I will leave USMB. If you don't, you leave
You said it. Perhaps not verbatim, but you certainly said as much.
Learn to say what you mean.
Liar
I challenge you to find where I said that GD pose the same risk as PB's. If you find it, I will leave USMB. If you don't, you leave
Not worth it. I guess we'll just have to agree to disagree about what you said and what you meant.
But at least after this unfortunate misunderstanding, we can both agree that pit bulls pose a greater risk than great danes. Right?
Because they are dogs?! Domesticated dogs, of every kind, can become a pack. My uncle raised cattle in the mid-west, about 50 miles south of a very large city, where people would dump their dogs in the countryside. The dogs would form packs and would kill the cattle, so at least once a year we would have to hunt them. You name it, I saw every kind breed of dog in those packs. Believe it or not, the worst were the full sized poodles. I was shocked until I found out later that they are actually hunting animals in Europe. Dogs are smart and have very human-like behaviour but they are animals, nonetheless.
I had a river property in Echo, Oregon. It's along the Umatilla River. People who should have known better would let their dogs run, and those dogs were a terror. There was a shepherd mix, a little terrier, a black dog and a couple more - I saw different dogs at different times. We had horses and a couple of cows - and a sheep, come to think of it. Those dogs surrounded my mom once and after that it was war as far as I was concerned.
I came upon them in a circle around our mama cow and her calf; the cows were pushed back against the fence and the dogs were in a semi-circle around her, taking turns at darting in and biting at the calf. They heard my 30-30 click when I cocked it and first the black dog then the rest were gone, that fast.
I shot at one out behind our house in a couple acre open pasture; it was an aussie chasing all of my horses, including a couple of colts, in a big circle.
The neighbors who owned the big dogs said their dogs would never hurt anyone or anything, they just liked to play. The shepherd mix killed a bunch of sheep about 100 yards from my house and the other one bit a little girl in the face as she walked by their house on the way home from school. Both dogs were destroyed.
Any dog running livestock was an instant death warrant on our farm as well.
Coming from an ag community, that's just the way it was.
But at least after this unfortunate misunderstanding, we can both agree that pit bulls pose a greater risk than great danes. Right?
Depends.
Depends on what?
How can the risk of a group of dogs depend upon the dogs or the people?
That's the stupidest thing I've ever heard.
.
Pit bulls are statistically more deadly than any other dog. Period
How can the risk of a group of dogs depend upon the dogs or the people?
That's the stupidest thing I've ever heard.
Pit bulls are statistically more deadly than any other dog. Period.
How can the risk of a group of dogs depend upon the dogs or the people?
That's the stupidest thing I've ever heard.
Pit bulls are statistically more deadly than any other dog. Period.
He's beyond retarded.
First he denies saying what he said.
And then he goes right on saying it.
That's some funny ass fail if I ever did see some.
How can the risk of a group of dogs depend upon the dogs or the people?
That's the stupidest thing I've ever heard.
Pit bulls are statistically more deadly than any other dog. Period.
He's beyond retarded.
First he denies saying what he said.
And then he goes right on saying it.
That's some funny ass fail if I ever did see some.
How can the risk of a group of dogs depend upon the dogs or the people?
That's the stupidest thing I've ever heard.
.
Your ignorance is not an argument. It is a fact, but it is not an argument.
Pit bulls are statistically more deadly than any other dog. Period
Prove it
(I'm taking bets this idiot will cite the debunked Clifton report, or else some website that cites the Clifton report)
How can the risk of a group of dogs depend upon the dogs or the people?
That's the stupidest thing I've ever heard.
Pit bulls are statistically more deadly than any other dog. Period.
He's beyond retarded.
First he denies saying what he said.
And then he goes right on saying it.
That's some funny ass fail if I ever did see some.
ANd yet, when I ask you for proof, you scurry away like a little mouse
He's beyond retarded.
First he denies saying what he said.
And then he goes right on saying it.
That's some funny ass fail if I ever did see some.
ANd yet, when I ask you for proof, you scurry away like a little mouse
You don't even comprehend your own posted words. Clearly only a fool would place any stock in your editorial regarding the words of others.
Keep on fail'n chump.
He's beyond retarded.
First he denies saying what he said.
And then he goes right on saying it.
That's some funny ass fail if I ever did see some.
ANd yet, when I ask you for proof, you scurry away like a little mouse
You don't even comprehend your own posted words. Clearly only a fool would place any stock in your editorial regarding the words of others.
Keep on fail'n chump.
ANd yet, when I ask you for proof, you scurry away like a little mouse
You don't even comprehend your own posted words. Clearly only a fool would place any stock in your editorial regarding the words of others.
Keep on fail'n chump.
My posted words?
Then why can't you quote them, you ninny
ANd yet, when I ask you for proof, you scurry away like a little mouse
You don't even comprehend your own posted words. Clearly only a fool would place any stock in your editorial regarding the words of others.
Keep on fail'n chump.
Hey Manifold, here's all y ou need to know about Sangha's stupidity.
When I posted a link to an article in this thread to support my claim about Pitt Bull's attacking the moron laughed about me posting it and called the link an anecdote. Then he turned right around and posted a link to an article about a bad cop to support his belief that all cops are bad in another thread
He's a stupid piece of shit who has no ability to debate........
You don't even comprehend your own posted words. Clearly only a fool would place any stock in your editorial regarding the words of others.
Keep on fail'n chump.
Hey Manifold, here's all y ou need to know about Sangha's stupidity.
When I posted a link to an article in this thread to support my claim about Pitt Bull's attacking the moron laughed about me posting it and called the link an anecdote. Then he turned right around and posted a link to an article about a bad cop to support his belief that all cops are bad in another thread
He's a stupid piece of shit who has no ability to debate........
And the cowardly conjob, who won't dare take me on face to face, has to once again lie about what I've said, so I'll offer him the same challenge (which he will respond by running away like manifold did)
Find and quote the post where I all cops are bad. If you find it, I will leave USMB. If you don't, you leave USMB
Put up or shut up
Or prove what a coward you are