Massachusetts insisting on violating the 2nd, 3rd and 4th Amendment to monitor

The2ndAmendment

Gold Member
Feb 16, 2013
13,383
3,659
245
In a dependant and enslaved country.
Massachusetts insisting on violating the 2nd, 3rd and 4th Amendment to monitor the homes of Gun Owners. This means they could enter the homes of registred gun owners WITHOUT a warrant.

Massachusetts Selectman: Hey, is there any way we can infringe on 2nd and 4th Amendment rights at the same time?

Selectman Wants Gun Safety Enforced - Government - Swampscott, MA Patch

In Washington, this exact same type of legislation was intorduced not too long ago:

Gun bill giving sheriff right to inspect homes pulled by Washington lawmakers - Washington Times

Washington lawmakers have pulled a contentious provision from a gun-control bill posted on the state’s legislative tracking website, after calling a section that gave law enforcement authority to enter homes and check for proper weapons storage a “mistake.”

The Seattle Times reports that Seattle trial lawyer Lance Palmer first raised doubts about Senate Bill 5737 to the newspaper, complaining: “They always say, we’ll never go house to house to take your guns away. But then you see this, and you have to wonder.”

Notice that these laws ONLY target LEGAL and REGISTERED gun owners.

NO GUN REGISTRATION
 
sounds like copying Japan.....where registered gun owners are strictly inspected and (of course) scarce as hen's teeth...

it's high time to kick these anti-American left wing wackos out of office....every last one of them....

:evil:
 
They are quartering soldiers in private homes in Massachusetts?
 
Massachusetts insisting on violating the 2nd, 3rd and 4th Amendment to monitor the homes of Gun Owners. This means they could enter the homes of registred gun owners WITHOUT a warrant.

Massachusetts Selectman: Hey, is there any way we can infringe on 2nd and 4th Amendment rights at the same time?

Selectman Wants Gun Safety Enforced - Government - Swampscott, MA Patch

In Washington, this exact same type of legislation was intorduced not too long ago:

Gun bill giving sheriff right to inspect homes pulled by Washington lawmakers - Washington Times

Washington lawmakers have pulled a contentious provision from a gun-control bill posted on the state’s legislative tracking website, after calling a section that gave law enforcement authority to enter homes and check for proper weapons storage a “mistake.”

The Seattle Times reports that Seattle trial lawyer Lance Palmer first raised doubts about Senate Bill 5737 to the newspaper, complaining: “They always say, we’ll never go house to house to take your guns away. But then you see this, and you have to wonder.”

Notice that these laws ONLY target LEGAL and REGISTERED gun owners.

NO GUN REGISTRATION


One NON-VIOLENT approach would be for Bostonians to get the fuck out of the People's Republic of Taxachussets and move to NEW HAMPSHIRE.

.
 
Massachusetts insisting on violating the 2nd, 3rd and 4th Amendment to monitor
Just 23 and the OP is already a full-fledged rightwing liar.

Sad.

‘Massachusetts’ isn’t ‘insisting’ on anything; a local official has proposed a measure that will never be enacted.

And the Washington State proposal isn’t even under consideration.

The OP is clearly a fool if he thinks he’ll persuade anyone with lies and demagoguery.
 
Massachusetts insisting on violating the 2nd, 3rd and 4th Amendment to monitor
Just 23 and the OP is already a full-fledged rightwing liar.

Sad.

‘Massachusetts’ isn’t ‘insisting’ on anything; a local official has proposed a measure that will never be enacted.

And the Washington State proposal isn’t even under consideration.

The OP is clearly a fool if he thinks he’ll persuade anyone with lies and demagoguery.

The liar here is you. You routinely claim no one actually wants to take away firearms while IGNORING people like JoeB and Naomi on this very board and then poo pooing when actual people make these recommendations.

Either you are amazingly stupid or beyond gullible.
 
Massachusetts insisting on violating the 2nd, 3rd and 4th Amendment to monitor
Just 23 and the OP is already a full-fledged rightwing liar.

Sad.

‘Massachusetts’ isn’t ‘insisting’ on anything; a local official has proposed a measure that will never be enacted.

And the Washington State proposal isn’t even under consideration.

The OP is clearly a fool if he thinks he’ll persuade anyone with lies and demagoguery.

The liar here is you. You routinely claim no one actually wants to take away firearms while IGNORING people like JoeB and Naomi on this very board and then poo pooing when actual people make these recommendations.

Either you are amazingly stupid or beyond gullible.

I pay a great deal of attention to JoeB and Naomi; it’s you I ignore.
 
Massachusetts insisting on violating the 2nd, 3rd and 4th Amendment to monitor
Just 23 and the OP is already a full-fledged rightwing liar.

Sad.

‘Massachusetts’ isn’t ‘insisting’ on anything; a local official has proposed a measure that will never be enacted.

And the Washington State proposal isn’t even under consideration.

The OP is clearly a fool if he thinks he’ll persuade anyone with lies and demagoguery.

23? Wonder how many guns that clinger has? Why would a clinger live in Massachusetts anyway?

As to the OP, its a non-issue, move to Arizona.
 
Massachusetts insisting on violating the 2nd, 3rd and 4th Amendment to monitor
Just 23 and the OP is already a full-fledged rightwing liar.

Sad.

‘Massachusetts’ isn’t ‘insisting’ on anything; a local official has proposed a measure that will never be enacted.

And the Washington State proposal isn’t even under consideration.

The OP is clearly a fool if he thinks he’ll persuade anyone with lies and demagoguery.

23? Wonder how many guns that clinger has? Why would a clinger live in Massachusetts anyway?

As to the OP, its a non-issue, move to Arizona.

This sort of moronic extremism by the right poses a much greater threat to the rights enshrined in the Second Amendment than any ‘gun grabber.’
 
Just 23 and the OP is already a full-fledged rightwing liar.

Sad.

‘Massachusetts’ isn’t ‘insisting’ on anything; a local official has proposed a measure that will never be enacted.

And the Washington State proposal isn’t even under consideration.

The OP is clearly a fool if he thinks he’ll persuade anyone with lies and demagoguery.

23? Wonder how many guns that clinger has? Why would a clinger live in Massachusetts anyway?

As to the OP, its a non-issue, move to Arizona.

This sort of moronic extremism by the right poses a much greater threat to the rights enshrined in the Second Amendment than any ‘gun grabber.’

You are correct as usual. People like the OP are obsessed w/ fire sticks and end up over-compensating thereby horrifying the vast majority of the populace.
 
Last edited:
Massachusetts insisting on violating the 2nd, 3rd and 4th Amendment to monitor the homes of Gun Owners. This means they could enter the homes of registred gun owners WITHOUT a warrant.

Massachusetts Selectman: Hey, is there any way we can infringe on 2nd and 4th Amendment rights at the same time?

Selectman Wants Gun Safety Enforced - Government - Swampscott, MA Patch

In Washington, this exact same type of legislation was intorduced not too long ago:

Gun bill giving sheriff right to inspect homes pulled by Washington lawmakers - Washington Times

Washington lawmakers have pulled a contentious provision from a gun-control bill posted on the state’s legislative tracking website, after calling a section that gave law enforcement authority to enter homes and check for proper weapons storage a “mistake.”

The Seattle Times reports that Seattle trial lawyer Lance Palmer first raised doubts about Senate Bill 5737 to the newspaper, complaining: “They always say, we’ll never go house to house to take your guns away. But then you see this, and you have to wonder.”

Notice that these laws ONLY target LEGAL and REGISTERED gun owners.

NO GUN REGISTRATION

What do you expect from a blue state filled with far left wing moonbats who despite their despicable record in dealing with the great unwashed masses, are enamored with the Kennedys.
 
Massachusetts insisting on violating the 2nd, 3rd and 4th Amendment to monitor

No, Massachusetts isn't insisting on this. One councilman has suggested an ordinance in the town of Swampscott and the Third Amendment plays no part in his asinine proposal.

You have been caught, yet again, in another lie and can't understand why people treat you like the village idiot you are.
 
Massachusetts insisting on violating the 2nd, 3rd and 4th Amendment to monitor the homes of Gun Owners. This means they could enter the homes of registred gun owners WITHOUT a warrant.

Massachusetts Selectman: Hey, is there any way we can infringe on 2nd and 4th Amendment rights at the same time?

Selectman Wants Gun Safety Enforced - Government - Swampscott, MA Patch

In Washington, this exact same type of legislation was intorduced not too long ago:

Gun bill giving sheriff right to inspect homes pulled by Washington lawmakers - Washington Times

Washington lawmakers have pulled a contentious provision from a gun-control bill posted on the state’s legislative tracking website, after calling a section that gave law enforcement authority to enter homes and check for proper weapons storage a “mistake.”

The Seattle Times reports that Seattle trial lawyer Lance Palmer first raised doubts about Senate Bill 5737 to the newspaper, complaining: “They always say, we’ll never go house to house to take your guns away. But then you see this, and you have to wonder.”

Notice that these laws ONLY target LEGAL and REGISTERED gun owners.

NO GUN REGISTRATION
Gun Registration is a requirement of the second amendment. It is part of establishing a well regulated militia

How can you have a well regulated militia if you don't know who they are?
 

Forum List

Back
Top