MASSIVE Conflict of Interest - Biden DOJ Injecting Itself Into Az Election Audit

[Faun]

If Democrats truly believed the 2020 elections were legit they would sit back and allow the audits to prove it, not attempt to pack the audit team, control the audit, hide pertinent data, and attempt to derail / kill them.

The propaganda that there was no election fraud has already been debunked, forcing Democrats and snowflakes to change their talking points from 'NO election fraud' to 'NOT ENOUGH to matter'.

Democrats and snowflakes are unnecessarily in an all-out panic, scared to death even more irrefutable evidence will come out as a result of the audit and fear the results will somehow be used to overturn the election results, which will not happen. There is ZERO % chance of that happening. More intelligent Dems realize, despite no chance of the election results being overturned it could justifiably prove to millions of Americans that the Biden Presidency is not Legit.

Biden IS the President of the United States - nothing is going to change that, but his Presidency is 'Tainted' at best, 'illegitimate' at worst.

LOLOL

And the bills he signs into laws are as legitimate as any other laws passed before his presidency.

HORSESHIT.

Low IQ Joe is an illegitimate President and a traitor.

All of his bullshit will be erased when the truth comes out....

Slobbers a deranged nut.

In reality, his laws are as legal, binding and enduring as any other presidents.

 

[Faun]

Here Is Why the Democrats Are Totally Panicked About the Arizona Audit

redstate.com

their bulleted summary:

• Two massive vote dumps occurred in just over an hour after the Arizona polls closed totally ~625,000 and ~1,473,000 votes, respectively.
• The total of those two vote dumps (2,098,619) exceeded the official results total of Maricopa County votes cast (2,089,563) by more than 9,000 votes.
• Biden received more votes in those two vote dumps (1,161,582) than the official vote tally (1,040,774) in Maricopa County. (Was this the reason for that suspicious fire?)
• Those dumps could only have been absentee ballot early voting results that were counted legally in the two weeks before Election Day, as late-arriving absentee ballots and election day in-person voting results could not possibly have been included in those two dumps uploaded just over an hour after the polls closed.
• Those vote dumps were time-stamped making it impossible that those dumps came from any county other than Maricopa, as no other Arizona county delivered more than 525,000 votes, and any two or more counties necessary to contribute to either of those dumps would have had to time their uploads down to the second (an impossibility).
• In-person voting in Maricopa County on Election Day totaled 167,000 votes cast, per multiple sources (here and here); how were those in-person votes accounted for when the two early voter dumps identified above already exceeded the official number of votes cast in the county?

LOL

You don't know what the tilde before a number means, do ya?

sure. but do you see that "approximately" on any other number past the first 2? no. you don't. so sideshow bob, speak to the topic and not insulting people.

refute the verified #'s provided if you can. once you get that done feel free to lob in a few insults but at least try to hit the topic first next time.

No, but the total they claim comes from those first 2 numbers. The numbers they don't have an exact count for.

as usual, you are missing the point and going into a defense mode. pretty telling on its own. at a minimum it would mean 100% voter turnout.

The Highest Voter Turnouts in History of U.S. Elections

The 2020 election saw record voter turnout from both in-person and mail-in voters. Here are other elections that brought people to the polls.

www.newsweek.com

it's never EVER happened. so yes, it deserves a look.

In some cases there was MORE than a 100% voter turnout....nothing to see here.....

 

[iceberg]

Here Is Why the Democrats Are Totally Panicked About the Arizona Audit

redstate.com

their bulleted summary:

• Two massive vote dumps occurred in just over an hour after the Arizona polls closed totally ~625,000 and ~1,473,000 votes, respectively.
• The total of those two vote dumps (2,098,619) exceeded the official results total of Maricopa County votes cast (2,089,563) by more than 9,000 votes.
• Biden received more votes in those two vote dumps (1,161,582) than the official vote tally (1,040,774) in Maricopa County. (Was this the reason for that suspicious fire?)
• Those dumps could only have been absentee ballot early voting results that were counted legally in the two weeks before Election Day, as late-arriving absentee ballots and election day in-person voting results could not possibly have been included in those two dumps uploaded just over an hour after the polls closed.
• Those vote dumps were time-stamped making it impossible that those dumps came from any county other than Maricopa, as no other Arizona county delivered more than 525,000 votes, and any two or more counties necessary to contribute to either of those dumps would have had to time their uploads down to the second (an impossibility).
• In-person voting in Maricopa County on Election Day totaled 167,000 votes cast, per multiple sources (here and here); how were those in-person votes accounted for when the two early voter dumps identified above already exceeded the official number of votes cast in the county?

LOL

You don't know what the tilde before a number means, do ya?

sure. but do you see that "approximately" on any other number past the first 2? no. you don't. so sideshow bob, speak to the topic and not insulting people.

refute the verified #'s provided if you can. once you get that done feel free to lob in a few insults but at least try to hit the topic first next time.

No, but the total they claim comes from those first 2 numbers. The numbers they don't have an exact count for.

as usual, you are missing the point and going into a defense mode. pretty telling on its own. at a minimum it would mean 100% voter turnout.

The Highest Voter Turnouts in History of U.S. Elections

The 2020 election saw record voter turnout from both in-person and mail-in voters. Here are other elections that brought people to the polls.

www.newsweek.com

it's never EVER happened. so yes, it deserves a look.

In some cases there was MORE than a 100% voter turnout....nothing to see here.....

so to be clear - you are simply laughing vs. actually talking the topic with counter views. or do you agree that based on the fact we've not hit these participation rates EVER coupled with extreme last minute voting process changes deserves a look after all?

wondering if you will ever try to debate a topic itself.

 

[colfax_m]

Those vote dumps were time-stamped making it impossible that those dumps came from any county other than Maricopa, as no other Arizona county delivered more than 525,000 votes, and any two or more counties necessary to contribute to either of those dumps would have had to time their uploads down to the second (an impossibility).

This is the weak point in this little argument. The authors don’t even know where these votes came from. They’re assuming.

Verified? No.

 

[Faun]

Here Is Why the Democrats Are Totally Panicked About the Arizona Audit

redstate.com

their bulleted summary:

• Two massive vote dumps occurred in just over an hour after the Arizona polls closed totally ~625,000 and ~1,473,000 votes, respectively.
• The total of those two vote dumps (2,098,619) exceeded the official results total of Maricopa County votes cast (2,089,563) by more than 9,000 votes.
• Biden received more votes in those two vote dumps (1,161,582) than the official vote tally (1,040,774) in Maricopa County. (Was this the reason for that suspicious fire?)
• Those dumps could only have been absentee ballot early voting results that were counted legally in the two weeks before Election Day, as late-arriving absentee ballots and election day in-person voting results could not possibly have been included in those two dumps uploaded just over an hour after the polls closed.
• Those vote dumps were time-stamped making it impossible that those dumps came from any county other than Maricopa, as no other Arizona county delivered more than 525,000 votes, and any two or more counties necessary to contribute to either of those dumps would have had to time their uploads down to the second (an impossibility).
• In-person voting in Maricopa County on Election Day totaled 167,000 votes cast, per multiple sources (here and here); how were those in-person votes accounted for when the two early voter dumps identified above already exceeded the official number of votes cast in the county?

LOL

You don't know what the tilde before a number means, do ya?

sure. but do you see that "approximately" on any other number past the first 2? no. you don't. so sideshow bob, speak to the topic and not insulting people.

refute the verified #'s provided if you can. once you get that done feel free to lob in a few insults but at least try to hit the topic first next time.

No, but the total they claim comes from those first 2 numbers. The numbers they don't have an exact count for.

as usual, you are missing the point and going into a defense mode. pretty telling on its own. at a minimum it would mean 100% voter turnout.

The Highest Voter Turnouts in History of U.S. Elections

The 2020 election saw record voter turnout from both in-person and mail-in voters. Here are other elections that brought people to the polls.

www.newsweek.com

it's never EVER happened. so yes, it deserves a look.

In some cases there was MORE than a 100% voter turnout....nothing to see here.....

so to be clear - you are simply laughing vs. actually talking the topic with counter views. or do you agree that based on the fact we've not hit these participation rates EVER coupled with extreme last minute voting process changes deserves a look after all?

wondering if you will ever try to debate a topic itself.

I'm laughing because there weren't more legal ballots than votes.

 

[Lastamender]

Those vote dumps were time-stamped making it impossible that those dumps came from any county other than Maricopa, as no other Arizona county delivered more than 525,000 votes, and any two or more counties necessary to contribute to either of those dumps would have had to time their uploads down to the second (an impossibility).

This is the weak point in this little argument. The authors don’t even know where these votes came from. They’re assuming.

Verified? No.

Not being able to say where votes came from? It says they came from Maricopa county. Should we assume that votes counted in the election did not? That will nullify those votes.

 

[Lastamender]

Here Is Why the Democrats Are Totally Panicked About the Arizona Audit

redstate.com

their bulleted summary:

• Two massive vote dumps occurred in just over an hour after the Arizona polls closed totally ~625,000 and ~1,473,000 votes, respectively.
• The total of those two vote dumps (2,098,619) exceeded the official results total of Maricopa County votes cast (2,089,563) by more than 9,000 votes.
• Biden received more votes in those two vote dumps (1,161,582) than the official vote tally (1,040,774) in Maricopa County. (Was this the reason for that suspicious fire?)
• Those dumps could only have been absentee ballot early voting results that were counted legally in the two weeks before Election Day, as late-arriving absentee ballots and election day in-person voting results could not possibly have been included in those two dumps uploaded just over an hour after the polls closed.
• Those vote dumps were time-stamped making it impossible that those dumps came from any county other than Maricopa, as no other Arizona county delivered more than 525,000 votes, and any two or more counties necessary to contribute to either of those dumps would have had to time their uploads down to the second (an impossibility).
• In-person voting in Maricopa County on Election Day totaled 167,000 votes cast, per multiple sources (here and here); how were those in-person votes accounted for when the two early voter dumps identified above already exceeded the official number of votes cast in the county?

LOL

You don't know what the tilde before a number means, do ya?

sure. but do you see that "approximately" on any other number past the first 2? no. you don't. so sideshow bob, speak to the topic and not insulting people.

refute the verified #'s provided if you can. once you get that done feel free to lob in a few insults but at least try to hit the topic first next time.

No, but the total they claim comes from those first 2 numbers. The numbers they don't have an exact count for.

as usual, you are missing the point and going into a defense mode. pretty telling on its own. at a minimum it would mean 100% voter turnout.

The Highest Voter Turnouts in History of U.S. Elections

The 2020 election saw record voter turnout from both in-person and mail-in voters. Here are other elections that brought people to the polls.

www.newsweek.com

it's never EVER happened. so yes, it deserves a look.

In some cases there was MORE than a 100% voter turnout....nothing to see here.....

so to be clear - you are simply laughing vs. actually talking the topic with counter views. or do you agree that based on the fact we've not hit these participation rates EVER coupled with extreme last minute voting process changes deserves a look after all?

wondering if you will ever try to debate a topic itself.

I'm laughing because no precinct reported more ballots than votes.

Not true, but no one expects anything near the truth from you.

 

[colfax_m]

Those vote dumps were time-stamped making it impossible that those dumps came from any county other than Maricopa, as no other Arizona county delivered more than 525,000 votes, and any two or more counties necessary to contribute to either of those dumps would have had to time their uploads down to the second (an impossibility).

This is the weak point in this little argument. The authors don’t even know where these votes came from. They’re assuming.

Verified? No.

Not being able to say where votes came from? It says they came from Maricopa county. Should we assume that votes counted in the election did not? That will nullify those votes.

As the author admits, they don’t know they for sure. They don’t know where these votes came from and didn’t bother to ask.

They came from Arizona, but are just assuming they’re from Maricopa.

As is the case with many (most perhaps) this is people who are highly motivated to believe in fraud making assumptions about a process they know little about.

 

[Lastamender]

Those vote dumps were time-stamped making it impossible that those dumps came from any county other than Maricopa, as no other Arizona county delivered more than 525,000 votes, and any two or more counties necessary to contribute to either of those dumps would have had to time their uploads down to the second (an impossibility).

This is the weak point in this little argument. The authors don’t even know where these votes came from. They’re assuming.

Verified? No.

Not being able to say where votes came from? It says they came from Maricopa county. Should we assume that votes counted in the election did not? That will nullify those votes.

As the author admits, they don’t know they for sure. They don’t know where these votes came from and didn’t bother to ask.

They came from Arizona, but are just assuming they’re from Maricopa.

As is the case with many (most perhaps) this is people who are highly motivated to believe in fraud making assumptions about a process they know little about.

The motivation that leans toward fraud may come from the attempts that are still going on to stop any audits or investigations. What are people supposed to think when transparency is blocked and with ridiculous phony reasons like stealing SS numbers.

Ballots have 0 personal information.

 

[colfax_m]

Those vote dumps were time-stamped making it impossible that those dumps came from any county other than Maricopa, as no other Arizona county delivered more than 525,000 votes, and any two or more counties necessary to contribute to either of those dumps would have had to time their uploads down to the second (an impossibility).

This is the weak point in this little argument. The authors don’t even know where these votes came from. They’re assuming.

Verified? No.

Not being able to say where votes came from? It says they came from Maricopa county. Should we assume that votes counted in the election did not? That will nullify those votes.

As the author admits, they don’t know they for sure. They don’t know where these votes came from and didn’t bother to ask.

They came from Arizona, but are just assuming they’re from Maricopa.

As is the case with many (most perhaps) this is people who are highly motivated to believe in fraud making assumptions about a process they know little about.

The motivation that leans toward fraud may come from the attempts that are still going on to stop any audits or investigations. What are people supposed to think when transparency is blocked and with ridiculous phony reasons like stealing SS numbers.

Ballots have 0 personal information.

Incorrect. The motivation comes solely from Trump losing. He and many of his supporters are incapable of accepting he lost the election so they had to invent excuses for it. That’s why you see so many zany conspiracies, like the whole sharpie nonsense.

 

[Lastamender]

Those vote dumps were time-stamped making it impossible that those dumps came from any county other than Maricopa, as no other Arizona county delivered more than 525,000 votes, and any two or more counties necessary to contribute to either of those dumps would have had to time their uploads down to the second (an impossibility).

This is the weak point in this little argument. The authors don’t even know where these votes came from. They’re assuming.

Verified? No.

Not being able to say where votes came from? It says they came from Maricopa county. Should we assume that votes counted in the election did not? That will nullify those votes.

As the author admits, they don’t know they for sure. They don’t know where these votes came from and didn’t bother to ask.

They came from Arizona, but are just assuming they’re from Maricopa.

As is the case with many (most perhaps) this is people who are highly motivated to believe in fraud making assumptions about a process they know little about.

The motivation that leans toward fraud may come from the attempts that are still going on to stop any audits or investigations. What are people supposed to think when transparency is blocked and with ridiculous phony reasons like stealing SS numbers.

Ballots have 0 personal information.

Incorrect. The motivation comes solely from Trump losing. He and many of his supporters are incapable of accepting he lost the election so they had to invent excuses for it. That’s why you see so many zany conspiracies, like the whole sharpie nonsense.

Bullshit. The next day citizens came forward to point out the fraud. Look at my signature.

 

[colfax_m]

Bullshit. The next day citizens came forward to point out the fraud. Look at my signature.

The next day, being the day that it was pretty clear Trump wasn’t doing badly?

Sure.

Trump said that the only way he’d lose was by fraud. So don’t be surprised people start inventing allegations of fraud when he’s losing.

 

[Lastamender]

Bullshit. The next day citizens came forward to point out the fraud. Look at my signature.

The next day, being the day that it was pretty clear Trump wasn’t doing badly?

Sure.

Trump said that the only way he’d lose was by fraud. So don’t be surprised people start inventing allegations of fraud when he’s losing.

They had to invent nothing. You saw the 96% Biden votes crap of vote drops in one state and similar impossible numbers in other states. We saw cardboard on windows and Republican observers removed by police.

None of these numbers have been explained. There has been NO transparency. Why is that?

 

[iceberg]

Those vote dumps were time-stamped making it impossible that those dumps came from any county other than Maricopa, as no other Arizona county delivered more than 525,000 votes, and any two or more counties necessary to contribute to either of those dumps would have had to time their uploads down to the second (an impossibility).

This is the weak point in this little argument. The authors don’t even know where these votes came from. They’re assuming.

Verified? No.

ok boomer. thank you for your input.

 

[iceberg]

Those vote dumps were time-stamped making it impossible that those dumps came from any county other than Maricopa, as no other Arizona county delivered more than 525,000 votes, and any two or more counties necessary to contribute to either of those dumps would have had to time their uploads down to the second (an impossibility).

This is the weak point in this little argument. The authors don’t even know where these votes came from. They’re assuming.

Verified? No.

Not being able to say where votes came from? It says they came from Maricopa county. Should we assume that votes counted in the election did not? That will nullify those votes.

As the author admits, they don’t know they for sure. They don’t know where these votes came from and didn’t bother to ask.

They came from Arizona, but are just assuming they’re from Maricopa.

As is the case with many (most perhaps) this is people who are highly motivated to believe in fraud making assumptions about a process they know little about.

The motivation that leans toward fraud may come from the attempts that are still going on to stop any audits or investigations. What are people supposed to think when transparency is blocked and with ridiculous phony reasons like stealing SS numbers.

Ballots have 0 personal information.

Incorrect. The motivation comes solely from Trump losing. He and many of his supporters are incapable of accepting he lost the election so they had to invent excuses for it. That’s why you see so many zany conspiracies, like the whole sharpie nonsense.

please validate how you know someone elses motivation. it would seem to be it's a guess on your part which makes the rest of your statement opinion disguised as loose fact.

or please - verify this statement on how you know their motivations to validate the rest of your statement.

 

[colfax_m]

please validate how you know someone elses motivation. it would seem to be it's a guess on your part which makes the rest of your statement opinion disguised as loose fact.

It’s my opinion based on observation.

Why else would all these crazies come out of the word work with all these loony stories about imagined fraud?

 

[colfax_m]

Those vote dumps were time-stamped making it impossible that those dumps came from any county other than Maricopa, as no other Arizona county delivered more than 525,000 votes, and any two or more counties necessary to contribute to either of those dumps would have had to time their uploads down to the second (an impossibility).

This is the weak point in this little argument. The authors don’t even know where these votes came from. They’re assuming.

Verified? No.

ok boomer. thank you for your input.

Just saying. You might want to be a little more critical about your sources of information. People make claims they can’t back up.

 

[iceberg]

Those vote dumps were time-stamped making it impossible that those dumps came from any county other than Maricopa, as no other Arizona county delivered more than 525,000 votes, and any two or more counties necessary to contribute to either of those dumps would have had to time their uploads down to the second (an impossibility).

This is the weak point in this little argument. The authors don’t even know where these votes came from. They’re assuming.

Verified? No.

ok boomer. thank you for your input.

Just saying. You might want to be a little more critical about your sources of information. People make claims they can’t back up.

i'd ask you which sources i should trust, but since i don't trust you, it would be pretty pointless.

just sayin.

now - feel free to refute the article with actual evidence this source is wrong. simply saying "hey, that's stupid, my opinion" isn't going to cut it. you wanna call out sources, great. now go use some to refute *this* source.

or sit and bitch that i'm stupid and you're not. and shit.

 

[colfax_m]

Those vote dumps were time-stamped making it impossible that those dumps came from any county other than Maricopa, as no other Arizona county delivered more than 525,000 votes, and any two or more counties necessary to contribute to either of those dumps would have had to time their uploads down to the second (an impossibility).

This is the weak point in this little argument. The authors don’t even know where these votes came from. They’re assuming.

Verified? No.

ok boomer. thank you for your input.

Just saying. You might want to be a little more critical about your sources of information. People make claims they can’t back up.

i'd ask you which sources i should trust, but since i don't trust you, it would be pretty pointless.

just sayin.

now - feel free to refute the article with actual evidence this source is wrong. simply saying "hey, that's stupid, my opinion" isn't going to cut it. you wanna call out sources, great. now go use some to refute *this* source.

or sit and bitch that i'm stupid and you're not. and shit.

You don’t have to trust anything. For your source that you posted, you just have to look at what they say about their information. The source admits they don’t really know where these numbers came from, they’re just assuming.

What that tells me is that they don’t actually know what they’re looking at. Furthermore, they don’t actually make any efforts to find out. Or if they did, they don’t say so.

I did refute it. The entirety of it is based on an unwarranted assumption. They see their assumption as the only one possible, but it just so happens that also leads them to the conclusion they want to believe.

It’s a good example of the type of motivated reasoning that is so pervasive.

 

[iceberg]

Those vote dumps were time-stamped making it impossible that those dumps came from any county other than Maricopa, as no other Arizona county delivered more than 525,000 votes, and any two or more counties necessary to contribute to either of those dumps would have had to time their uploads down to the second (an impossibility).

This is the weak point in this little argument. The authors don’t even know where these votes came from. They’re assuming.

Verified? No.

ok boomer. thank you for your input.

Just saying. You might want to be a little more critical about your sources of information. People make claims they can’t back up.

i'd ask you which sources i should trust, but since i don't trust you, it would be pretty pointless.

just sayin.

now - feel free to refute the article with actual evidence this source is wrong. simply saying "hey, that's stupid, my opinion" isn't going to cut it. you wanna call out sources, great. now go use some to refute *this* source.

or sit and bitch that i'm stupid and you're not. and shit.

You don’t have to trust anything. For your source that you posted, you just have to look at what they say about their information. The source admits they don’t really know where these numbers came from, they’re just assuming.

What that tells me is that they don’t actually know what they’re looking at. Furthermore, they don’t actually make any efforts to find out. Or if they did, they don’t say so.

I did refute it. The entirety of it is based on an unwarranted assumption. They see their assumption as the only one possible, but it just so happens that also leads them to the conclusion they want to believe.

It’s a good example of the type of motivated reasoning that is so pervasive.

so to be clear, you chose sit and bitch, pretending your opinion is enough while you attack sources i choose to use.

got it, boomer.