Massive Obama-Backed “One Nation” Rally...

At last count....over 1.2 million are crowding the Mall

Largest turnout in 16 years!

How did you manage to get out of your Special Ed class to post here? You show good imagination, keep on keeping on. :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:

That paid turn out was pretty pathetic. ;)

He of course has absolutely NOTHING to back up the wildly exaggerated claim.

33471_1410101449105_1129548511_30942268_2086345_n-550x643.jpg


1.2 Million MY ASS. If one Nation was 1.2 Million then 8/28 was freaking 4 Million lol

Source of pics please...
 
Photo-shopped pictures. OK. Typical of the far right loons. Here's one for you mainstream Americans. Who said, "Starkey you are a lying ******. You are a worthless piece of shit. Which after all that is what a ****** is a lazy good for nothing trashy piece of shit, no matter what their race maybe ******* are scum and that would be you starkey. White black red Brown yellow. Skin color matters not with what a ****** is but their character does, and yours is that of a ******." Yepper, you are all true Americans.

Your conspiracy theory of photoshopped images does not dignify a response.
 
True. Capitalism is not in the Constitution.

Capitalism is the natural law of economics. It's what happens when the government isn't controlling the economy. In a free society, it's what will naturally happen.

I don't understand why this is so difficult to understand for some people.
It's not difficult to understand at all. Doesn't change the fact that Capitalism isn't in the Constitution. If someone is a Socialist, that does not make them anti-American.
 
True. Capitalism is not in the Constitution.

Capitalism is the natural law of economics. It's what happens when the government isn't controlling the economy. In a free society, it's what will naturally happen.

I don't understand why this is so difficult to understand for some people.
It's not difficult to understand at all. Doesn't change the fact that Capitalism isn't in the Constitution. If someone is a Socialist, that does not make them anti-American.

Considering that the Constitution allows private property, yes it does.
 
[
It's not difficult to understand at all. Doesn't change the fact that Capitalism isn't in the Constitution. If someone is a Socialist, that does not make them anti-American.
Um...Yeah, it does.

The American republic was based upon individual rights and private property, not collectivized privileges and all property controlled by a ruling class.
 
[
It's not difficult to understand at all. Doesn't change the fact that Capitalism isn't in the Constitution. If someone is a Socialist, that does not make them anti-American.
Um...Yeah, it does.

The American republic was based upon individual rights and private property, not collectivized privileges and all property controlled by a ruling class.

Um, no it doesn't. America was founded on people being able to do what they want to. If a group of people - um say hippies, want to live in a commune and pool resources, they can. The way they live is a socialist concept, yet they live in America....

Same goes for all those cults...
 
uh-huh...Do what they want to under the premise that what they produced and accumulated belonged to them first, as opposed to socialized societies of Europe, which viewed the the people as chattel property and their productivity a possession of the state.
 
[
It's not difficult to understand at all. Doesn't change the fact that Capitalism isn't in the Constitution. If someone is a Socialist, that does not make them anti-American.
Um...Yeah, it does.

The American republic was based upon individual rights and private property, not collectivized privileges and all property controlled by a ruling class.
You're confused. You are not describing Socialism.
 
uh-huh...Do what they want to under the premise that what they produced and accumulated belonged to them first, as opposed to socialized societies of Europe, which viewed the the people as chattel property and their productivity a possession of the state.

uh huh . . . go read. Pilgrims began as a socialistic structure, which they later changed to individual freeholds. Jamestown agriculture began as an imitation of tenant serf, with the Indians then indentured whites then African slaves as captive labor. You say some of the stupidest things. I am beginning to understand that you are not deliberately being a toid; to the contrary, you really don't know.
 
uh-huh...Do what they want to under the premise that what they produced and accumulated belonged to them first, as opposed to socialized societies of Europe, which viewed the the people as chattel property and their productivity a possession of the state.

uh huh . . . go read. Pilgrims began as a socialistic structure, which they later changed to individual freeholds. Jamestown agriculture began as an imitation of tenant serf, with the Indians then indentured whites then African slaves as captive labor. You say some of the stupidest things. I am beginning to understand that you are not deliberately being a toid; to the contrary, you really don't know.
You keep talking about europeans.
You seem confused, again.
 
[
It's not difficult to understand at all. Doesn't change the fact that Capitalism isn't in the Constitution. If someone is a Socialist, that does not make them anti-American.
Um...Yeah, it does.

The American republic was based upon individual rights and private property, not collectivized privileges and all property controlled by a ruling class.

Um, no it doesn't. America was founded on people being able to do what they want to. If a group of people - um say hippies, want to live in a commune and pool resources, they can. The way they live is a socialist concept, yet they live in America....

Same goes for all those cults...

wouldn't being able to do what they want fall under individual rights ? Are the hippies forcing their communal life on America?
 
Last edited:
Um...Yeah, it does.

The American republic was based upon individual rights and private property, not collectivized privileges and all property controlled by a ruling class.

Um, no it doesn't. America was founded on people being able to do what they want to. If a group of people - um say hippies, want to live in a commune and pool resources, they can. The way they live is a socialist concept, yet they live in America....

Same goes for all those cults...

wouldn't being able to do what they want fall under individual rights ?
Depends.
We have some limitations on "being able to do what they want to".
 
uh-huh...Do what they want to under the premise that what they produced and accumulated belonged to them first, as opposed to socialized societies of Europe, which viewed the the people as chattel property and their productivity a possession of the state.

uh huh . . . go read. Pilgrims began as a socialistic structure, which they later changed to individual freeholds. Jamestown agriculture began as an imitation of tenant serf, with the Indians then indentured whites then African slaves as captive labor. You say some of the stupidest things. I am beginning to understand that you are not deliberately being a toid; to the contrary, you really don't know.
You keep talking about europeans.
You seem confused, again.

Don't got a clue, do you, Capitalist, concerning the parameters of this discussion.
 
Last edited:
Um, no it doesn't. America was founded on people being able to do what they want to. If a group of people - um say hippies, want to live in a commune and pool resources, they can. The way they live is a socialist concept, yet they live in America....

Same goes for all those cults...

wouldn't being able to do what they want fall under individual rights ?
Depends.
We have some limitations on "being able to do what they want to".

Well, I thought that was a given
 
"one nation" official website using picture of mlk's "i have a dream" demonstration in place of their own....
Hmmmmm, wonder why......








(official website)





what it really looked like....:lol:

again, that picture was taken way early in a 5 hour event. Nice try though. Pathetic you righties have gotta use fake video, and pictures from early on to cover up the fact real americans fighting for change got just as many people in 30 days as you guys did in 8 mos.

why do you and others from the left continue to lie n.y. Times has the true stroy when this evenmt was being plan i say april is more than 30 days. And the groupos there were professionals at getting rally's going.







lmbo
 
Did anyone else see the video of all the garbage those trailer trash Beck lovers left behind?

no?

That's b/c they didn't leave any behind.

But those 10/2 commie lovers had no issue with dumping trash everywhere including on the WW2 memorial.

I learned something yesterday. Cons are not to the right and libs are not to the left.

Conservatives are on the top and liberals are on the bottom, and digging.
 
Two Thumbs, please share what you are smoking. Son, cons and libs each have their trashtards, son. Grow up. You ever been around on the grounds after a Baptist gospel hour concert?
 
Two Thumbs, please share what you are smoking. Son, cons and libs each have their trashtards, son. Grow up. You ever been around on the grounds after a Baptist gospel hour concert?

So are you defending those fucks that tossed trash on a Memeorial out of ignorance or is this you defending your own by saying other people do it?

It's an easy search. You can see how little the people that cared left and how much the libs left.

Good lord man. They dropped the signs in thier hands on the ground instead of taking them away.



They burned they trash when they were done at the gathering I went to. It was allowed by law, no special permits needed.

At a Methodist gathering they had the kids pick up trash before everyone left.
 

Forum List

Back
Top