Maunder minimum gone missing

Why should I not name people like you for what they are? Willful ignorance is never acceptable, and those that practice it should be chastised at every opportunity. AGW is real, and a clear and present danger.
Scientists come to opposite conclusions about the causes of recent climate change depending on which datasets they consider.

Increased climate fluctuation and environmental uncertainty are artifacts of a bipolar glaciated world where the threshold for extensive northern hemisphere continental glaciation is lower than the threshold for extensive southern hemisphere continental glaciation and our the present temperature is close to the northern hemisphere threshold.

"Mainstream" science has wrongly correlated the recent warming trend with CO2. They have mistaken the increased climate fluctuation and environmental uncertainty of a bipolar glaciated world for man made warming.

The planet is uniquely configured for bipolar glaciation. A configuration which has never existed before in the history of the planet. We are precariously poised for extensive northern hemisphere glaciation. A condition which has led to increased climate fluctuation and environmental uncertainty over the last 2.7 million years. It is that volatility that will be the undoing of "mainstream" science's faulty analysis and conclusion. Within 30 years everything you believe will be proven wrong.

:)
 
That's exactly what they are saying. They are literally saying the radiative forcing of CO2 dominates the radiative forcing of solar irradiance.
No, they're not saying that.

They are literally saying the _change_ in radiative forcing of CO2 dominates the _change_ in radiative forcing of solar irradiance.

That's a completely different thing than what you claimed.

They just haven't thought through the implications of that.
You deniers all having trouble understanding something that basic is only your problem. It does indicate that you all shouldn't be bothering the grownups.
 
Last edited:
The take-home points of this shoddy, dishonest propaganda exercise were:
That you're another boring cut-and-paste cult parrot. Do you really think we've never seen desperate dishonest denier Gish Gallops before? If you had even _one_ good point, you wouldn't have to fake a long list of them. But you don't, so you do.

I'd ask you to discuss the science, but everyone knows you can't. You literally have no idea what the science says, and what's more, you don't care. All you care about is spreading your cult's political dogma, which mostly consists of directing hate against whoever your cult defines as TheEnemy.
 
No, they're not saying that.

They are literally saying the _change_ in radiative forcing of CO2 dominates the _change_ in radiative forcing of solar irradiance.

That's a completely different thing than what you claimed.


You deniers all having trouble understanding something that basic is only your problem. It does indicate that you all shouldn't be bothering the grownups.
But according to them solar irradiance doesn't change much, so yeah that is what they are saying.

Are you saying solar irradiance is why there were so many 5C to 8C temperature changes over the past 2.7 million years? Because it certainly wasn't CO2 that was driving that.

transition to icehouse.png


F2.large.jpg
 
But according to them solar irradiance doesn't change much, so yeah that is what they are saying.
No, that's still totally wrong. What I said was right, what you said was completely wrong. You faked a story about what the rational people were saying, because you don't understand the topic.

Are you saying solar irradiance is why there were so many 5C to 8C temperature changes over the past 2.7 million years?
"Are you saying ...." is almost always a cue that someone is making up a story about someone else's position. This is no exception.

Because it certainly wasn't CO2 that was driving that.
Again, incorrect, of course. Orbital factors are the initial kick, but then the CO2 feedback takes over from there.

Like I said, learn the basics.
 
That you're another boring cut-and-paste cult parrot. Do you really think we've never seen desperate dishonest denier Gish Gallops before? If you had even _one_ good point, you wouldn't have to fake a long list of them. But you don't, so you do.

I'd ask you to discuss the science, but everyone knows you can't. You literally have no idea what the science says, and what's more, you don't care. All you care about is spreading your cult's political dogma, which mostly consists of directing hate against whoever your cult defines as TheEnemy.
Piss off, tosser!!

Greg
 
Yes; the same who pushed Global Warming were pushing "New Ice Age" back in the 70s. But wait; it was all CAPITALISM'S FAULT, ie, the US!!!

Stupid then and the recent incarnation is stupid now!!!

Greg
Didn't view the video, did you. Yet you have an opinion on it in total ignorance of what was said. Typical for the dumb ass willfully ignorant 'Conservatives'. Dunning-Kruger.
 
Didn't view the video, did you. Yet you have an opinion on it in total ignorance of what was said. Typical for the dumb ass willfully ignorant 'Conservatives'. Dunning-Kruger.
View video; Nope. Might look a it later. I was there!!!!

Greg
 

Forum List

Back
Top