Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Then how is it you don't know water's vapor pressure goes up with temperature? ...
When do you apply Navier/Stokes to rocks? ...
When you say "greenhouse gas warming" can you please tell us how much "warming" is observed in a controlled setting when CO2 is increased from 280 to 400PPM?
Is there a positive, non-imaginary number that you can provide?
Fluid mechanics not my thing. We used the Stokes equation to model clay particle settling, but other than that...
I understand this is a very important set of equations for you.
∆F = 5.35 x ln (425/280) W/m^2 = 2.2 W/m^2 ... observed is 1.8 W/m^2 ... I think you forgot a term ... could you check your source for this ... and maybe brush up on your arithmetic ... sheesh ...
We've been looking for the numerical relationship between carbon dioxide concentration and radiative forcing
... so that they can participate in the radiative transfer of energy ... or do GHGs act immediately ... look at all the GHG bands on the new GOES imagery ... that's real time ...
I gave you the tools. If you can't use them properly that is not my problem.
And now you have it!
So?
Sunspot activity is growing. Will that mean that the sun is going to increase it's output and the Earth will get warmer?
Oh, noes! It's the SUN causing climate change!
Whodathunkit.
The warming from greenhouse gases will also need to reach down into deeper levels of the ocean (that takes time) as well as other feedbacks. Greenhouse gases are not alone in the process. In the case of forcings like CO2 there are feedbacks which also attend which take time.
I just showed you your formula doesn't work ... go back to your source and read the whole thing
... also note this mistake is greatly magnified over the glacial/interglacial time periods ...
... you wouldn't believe the morons who come on here and say this is exponential ...
When you're ready to move into 20th Century science
... let us know ... Max Planck had some things to add to this to make it all work as observed ... and from this we get the Stefen-Boltzmann Law
T^4 = (S(1 - a))/4eo [where T = temperature, S = solar constant, a = albedo, e = emissivity and o = Stefan-Boltzmann constant (typically lower case sigma)]
Do you mean that energy conducts down the water column? ... that's going to take a very very very long time ... and it's going to take a very very very large amount of energy ...
What feedbacks? ... tell me one positive feedback loop in the climate system
If there's no correct temperature, how can people say it's warming? Maybe Earth has been too cold.There is no "correct temperature" of the earth. Keep up. The key is how will a dramatic change in the climate affect us.
Environmentalists have a far more negative effect on economy and agriculture than the environment.The earth will be fine. We might help usher in some mass extinctions and screw up our ecosystem and we will probably crater our economies and decimate our agricultural infrastructure, but other than that...
Uh huh.Geochemistry
What makes you think I don't understand it? Because I don't regurgitate your dogma?No validation from YOU is needed. Science and nature couldn't care less about your opinion on science you don't understand.
Uh huh.
You can't tax sunspots.Are global warming activists trying to debunk actual astronomical events like sun spots? What's the point?
Has it occurred to you that AGW theory predates the Green New Deal by several decades; that the Green New Deal was developed in response to AGW? Eh?Some scientists have been saying the sun is the cause of global warming for years but that theory doesn’t fit the Democratic Party’s agenda. If the sun was ever proven to be the cause of global warming there would be no reason to push for AOC’s Green New Deal.
What makes you think I don't understand it? Because I don't regurgitate your dogma?
I love science. The scientific method has led to amazing advancements.
But the Kilmate Kult has perverted the scientific method. There is no experimentation possible.
The conclusion was arrived at first, then data cherry-picked and altered to support it.
The goal is world socialism, not helping the human race.
That's not science. It's politics.
Did you know anyone can say anything on the internet?Not sure why you find that funny. I'm going to go with "daveman doesn't know what geochemistry is" for $500.
