Maybe , AZ should not say that sharpies didnt affect then maybe erase the youtube you made four weeks ago

[Lovebears65]

VERIFY: Evidence suggests Sharpie markers have no impact on Arizona vote counting here they say are not causing problems ...https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5qbYV9BHKak&feature=youtu.be&fbclid=IwAR2TqoO0__hRvANeLZGxbIf2X-sVxlyrCAqCw3u4PXWV8gxGiCwJ3knzBT8

 

[The Original Tree]

If True, Dems are sunk

 

[mudwhistle]

VERIFY: Evidence suggests Sharpie markers have no impact on Arizona vote counting here they say are not causing problems ...https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5qbYV9BHKak&feature=youtu.be&fbclid=IwAR2TqoO0__hRvANeLZGxbIf2X-sVxlyrCAqCw3u4PXWV8gxGiCwJ3knzBT8

Yep....evidence provided by Democrat operatives shows that Sharpies don't cause problems.
Apparently they still rejected those ballots anyway and it's too late to verify anything because the ballots have disappeared, right?

 

[Osiris-ODS]

If True, Dems are sunk

View attachment 411808

I posted this in another thread in response to a similar story. I first saw this early yesterday, and it seems to be getting around the net today (with varying degrees of detail). After reading more of these stories this morning, my reaction remains the same as yesterday: yeah riiiiight.

First reason this sounds like hogwash -- when have you ever heard of a single example of a of bureaucratic federal gov't agency implementing any large scale project that involves years of planning without a single peep of it leaking out in advance? Our government bureaucracies just don't operate that way. Especially in the Trump era. Too many people would have needed to be involved to pull this off, which would inevitably include many Trump haters, and this would be on CNN/MSDNC and/or Fox News before it even got off the ground.

Second reason -- if this were true, then surely there would have been some official mention of it by now. Some action taken. If they know for a fact that there's fraud that can be detected and proven this easily, why let the votes continue to be tabulated to the point of states being officially won by Biden and the election being called in his favor? Why not put the brakes on the counting once it could be shown that ballots were faked, and then at that point put the DHS in charge of (or in coordination with state election officials) to scan all remaining ballots to make sure the radio-isotope marker these articles are describing is present? Waiting until after the race is called, then going back and saying "but we're now invalidating ___________ number of ballots which we can prove were fake because of this mark, which we secretly placed there to bait fraudsters into committing fraud, and so the election was not in fact won by the guy who was just told he won" would sound just as sketchy as the shit that's going down in the poll counting locations, and would have an almost equally negative effect on the optics of the integrity of the election.

Third, how much would something like this to cost to investigate and establish after all of the votes in the country were counted? If the DHS was that worried about this to put such an elaborate plan in place, wouldn't it have been much cheaper and more effective to closely monitor the ballot counting process and try to prevent it from being done fraudulently? That's a resounding yes in my mind. The extraordinary cost, secrecy, and optics of all of that, and why? To catch some people committing crimes when they could have stopped it in advance if they were that committed to this concern. The fact is, it's obvious they didn't care about it to the extent necessary for this theory to have legs.

Sorry, there's plenty of sketchy and unlawful stuff going down, but it's going to be addressed in the courts, not by some well planned, secret slow-burn DHS sting designed two years ago to trap people committing crimes in the 2020 election. That's fantasy land stuff.