Media Turning Against Obama's Sequester Narrative

Wehrwolfen

Senior Member
May 22, 2012
2,750
340
48
by John Nolte
28 Feb 2013

Over the past weeks, President Obama has been running around the country like Chicken Little spreading falsehoods about sequester, all in the hopes of blaming a 2% budget cut (which he proposed and signed into law) for an anemic economy that might be headed into a double-dip recession. Simply put, the White House and its media are pushing this fabricated Narrative in the hopes of shifting blame away from Obama's failed economic policies and onto the GOP and a lack of government largess.

If our economy crashes, Obama wants to blame sequester; he wants to argue that our economic woes are caused by a government that isn't big enough, and that he needs a Democrat-controlled House to correct that. It's an audaciously dishonest plot, and it almost worked. The monkeys in the wrench, though, have been little things called facts, a Republican Party refusing to blink, and one brave and honest reporter.

Now the Narrative is starting to collapse, and nothing signals that collapse better than this National Journal piece published today that blows the lid off the media's and the White House's sequester lies:

The Overhyped, Overblown, & Overly Politicized Sequester Fears

It turns out that the next big fiscal crisis will seem more like a whimper when it hits on March 1.

Let’s be clear about one thing: The across-the-board spending cuts known as the "sequester” aren’t a doomsday scenario, or a meteorite that will blow up the economy.

Teachers, FBI agents, and Border Patrol officers will not get fired tomorrow, when the sequester kicks in. The Internal Revenue Service will still be able to process your tax return in April. Preschool programs won't kick out 70,000 little kids until the fall, according to Education Secretary Arne Duncan—and that’s if the spending cuts stick. Unemployed people, arguably some of the worst-off of the lot, will not see their federal benefits reduced by 11 percent until April at the earliest, says the National Employment Law Project. This is roughly four weeks away, giving Congress and the White House time to act beyond the March 1 deadline that has been touted in headlines and press conferences for the past week.

The immediate impact of sequester is “absolutely overhyped,” says Steve Bell, senior director for economic policy at the Bipartisan Policy Center and a former Republican staff director for the Senate Budget Committee. “A sequester will occur and, the next day, the likelihood is that almost no one will know that it started.”

Along with other myths, the piece goes on to deconstruct the falsehoods about agencies not having flexibility to choose where these miniscule cuts hit.

[Excerpt]

Read more:
National Journal: Obama's Sequester Narrative Implodes
 
Yep, Maobama cuts every working Americans check by 2% and he's crying like the panty waste he is because his sequester idea is doing the same to the government. Ya think he might should man up a bit.
 
Could this be the first crack in the dam of Obama's credibility? I doubt it, but one can always hope...
 
What's wrong with the Sequester?

What's "wrong" with the sequester is that it avoids the demagoguery and special interest political pressure that usually accompany proposed cuts in specific programs.:clap2:
 

Forum List

Back
Top