Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
That is a pretty far stretch.Manchin may see her as a threat
Her perspective isn’t unique. It’s 100% predictable and in-line with the radical left.She will bring a unique perspective to the Supreme Court
A welcome addition
You are more than likely right.That is a pretty far stretch.
Manchin stood against the BBB agenda for a pretty narrow and specific reason. He will gain no political advantage standing against a SCOTUS nominee, the left has little patience there, and all he will get is a repeat of the same person. Simply put, this pick was rubber stamped the day it was announced there would be an opening.
ExactlyHer perspective isn’t unique. It’s 100% predictable and in-line with the radical left.
We don’t need justices with “unique perspectives”, we just need them to understand and uphold Constitutional law.
Her legal opinions are based on protecting the rights of We the People rather than serving your Corporate mastersHer perspective isn’t unique. It’s 100% predictable and in-line with the radical left.
We don’t need justices with “unique perspectives”, we just need them to understand and uphold Constitutional law.
LOL, you’re the ones serving Corporate masters. How’s that Pfizer juice in your blood?Her legal opinions are based on protecting the rights of We the People rather than serving your Corporate masters
LOL, you’re the ones serving Corporate masters. How’s that Pfizer juice in your blood?
I never celebrated it, Pfizer-Boi.You still celebrating Citizens United declaring Corporations to be citizens?
And you are still monumentally ignorant on what that decision did.You still celebrating Citizens United declaring Corporations to be citizens?
They'd both been soliciter generals. Imo that's more than enough. As was Thurgood Marshall as in Brown v. Board of Educ.I don't care about ideology as long as the judge is qualified. People like Elena Kagan or William Rehnquist who had never judged a case in their lives before being added had no business being on the court.
They'd both been soliciter generals. Imo that's more than enough. As was Thurgood Marshall as in Brown v. Board of Educ.
Must be terrifying for you.With her 22.2% of SC is black and 13% of the population
This over representation is so unfair I may have to find my very first own safe space
Something pretty horrendous might come out.Yes, it pretty much is.
The right has no power to block the nomination and I just do not see the left doing so. Why would they?
But Kav was the Russian collusion coordinating rapist turned space alien I thought from the Orange planet of Crush.
DOCTOR Ford said so, even though she was not a doctor.
It just sound so.........so..........so doctorish and trust worthy to call her a doctor.
Nice pick, I hope she is confirmed
As promised, we all knew Biden would choose a radical left activist judge who will vote up and down the Progressive agenda for America, with a history of defending terrorists at Gitmo Bay and advocating for illegal immigrants more than American citizens.
She will be a good Uncle Tom for the Left as Blacks live in a perpetual cycle of Black on Black violence and despair in Democrat cities around the country with no hope in sight.
HahahahaLook at how poorly Biden has done vetting appointees so far.
she only had to compete with black women for the nominationWe may disagree with her points of view, but nobody can argue she is not eminently qualified for the position.
