I gave you facts which disproved you ignorant assertion.
Your questions don’t change any of that.
And you still chose to ignore my questions, go fucking figure. Any legitimate reason to continue this discussion has been exhausted.
.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I gave you facts which disproved you ignorant assertion.
Your questions don’t change any of that.
If you had questions which were relevant to the issue, please ask them.And you still chose to ignore my questions, go fucking figure. Any legitimate reason to continue this discussion has been exhausted.
.
If you had questions which were relevant to the issue, please ask them.
Better yet, try to answer them yourself.
You are the one who made it.And that claim would be?????????????????
.
Prove Smith filed the motion late. You just made the accusation but it appears that it’s totally baseless, like the rest of your accusations.I already have, and what did you fail to understand about my last post?
.
There is another thread about Smith engaging in election interference. But this is more about the expert discussion by Megyn Kelly who is actually a lawyer.
Watch her dismiss Smith now. Smith will be dismissed later by a Judge as he was when Cannon Dismissed him earlier.
^^^^^^For those who have no clue what a Gish Gallop is, read the above.We have a right wing Gish Gallop on many of the threads right now.
OK Texas may be using bots to push immediate responses no matter how stupid.
The sooner that Smith responds, the sooner he can get the interlocutory appeals out of the way.Funny, I saw no deadlines handed down by SCOTUS or the judge in the case. The timing was deliberate on smith's part.
.
For all: that wasn't a Gish Gallop^^^^^^For those who have no clue what a Gish Gallop is, read the above.
FWIW, neither is the stuff Slow Horses is accusing folks of.For all: that wasn't a Gish Gallop
It's 165 pages long.Prove Smith filed the motion late. You just made the accusation but it appears that it’s totally baseless, like the rest of your accusations.
Prove Smith filed the motion late. You just made the accusation but it appears that it’s totally baseless, like the rest of your accusations.
That’s not the original motion, which was not filed on the public docket because of the protective order the judge has in place.According to what you posted, it was due Sep 26th, it wasn't filed until Oct 2nd.
View attachment 1023297
The sooner that Smith responds, the sooner he can get the interlocutory appeals out of the way.
That’s not the original motion, which was not filed on the public docket because of the protective order the judge has in place.
That’s the public motion which was redacted and published as a result of the judge’s decision to unseal it.
Are you referring to the motion or the redacted motion.According to what you posted, it was due Sep 26th, it wasn't filed until Oct 2nd.
View attachment 1023297
See the motion to unseal by Jack Smith from Sept 27th.Of course you have a link for that?
.
You're the one who confused the deadlines for the original motion, and the redacted version.Of course you have a link for that?
.