Jack4jill
Senior Member
- Apr 17, 2016
- 3,599
- 170
- 50
- Banned
- #3,721
Not science.It's happening as we speak. I don't like what NC did with HB2 and I don't like what Obama did with the school mandate. Courts and law makers are now involved with both sides so let the games begin
OK.
Game #1: Define what a "transgender woman" is in precise legal terms to justify letting these men behind doors marked "women"; and why we must force women to accept them behind doors marked "women". Game #1 is for the DOJ and the LGBT cult (same thing) to produce clarification for the American public on how "men are actually women".
Go.In legal terms? 1. A person identified at birth as either male or female who at some point in the future rejects their assigned or anatomical sex for the opposite. 2. A person transitioning from one sex to the other.
1. How were they identified at birth as a male or female? Can they also legally reject the race they were born as? Can they reject being human too or is this just limited to rejecting one's physical sex? And if distinctly different, how; if the sole means of determining reality is the subjective layman's opinion of himself as patient?
2. A person cannot transition from one sex to the other. He can mutilate himself. He can do tons of plastic surgery, take carcinogenic hormones, but he'll never be a female. Ever. Just a mutilated halfling. Statistically depressed and still suicidal.
Your recipe for curing mental illness by attacking the human body is not society's mandate to enable "as normal". I feel for these people you're misleading. I really do. But once misled, we are under no obligation to oblige their self-diagnosis and 'treatments".
![il_570xN.242530686.jpg](https://img0.etsystatic.com/il_570xN.242530686.jpg)
Also, not true.