Message To NRA: "Security" Is Not About One Individual Household, Arming Against The Others!

[mascale]

Many Liberals support Gun Control has having its origins in the famous Amendment II of the U. S. Constitution. The wording is clear.
_________________________
Amendment II
A well regulated militia, being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms, shall not be infringed.
________________________

The example of the one household in San Bernardino is compelling evidence for a liberal interpretation of Amendment II. A well-regulated militia is nowhere construed as the one household of secular kamikazes, creating armed transport to then wreak havoc on all the other households. Even the Deer and some poor, dumb, Antelope: Were not in play, or construed a basis for a well-regulated militia.

"Crow, James Crow: Shaken, Not Stirred!
(NRA maybe need now bend over, five times daily toward Mecca, celebrating deity rights in USA(?)! Deity of Moses Atrocity is of Jews, Christians, and Moslems, alike!)

 

[deltex1]

Oh.

 

[SassyIrishLass]

the right of the people to keep and bear arms, shall not be infringed.

 

[mascale]

With logical basis, the right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed. Aspects apart from the logical basis would not be said included. There would be said solid basis for control of personal, mitigating against, for example: Secular Kamikazes.

"Crow, James Crow: Shaken, Not Stirred!"
(Lands of Many Nations--maybe now get nuclear missiles: What with terrorists underneath all beds of White Eyes!)

 

[Rustic]

 

[mascale]

So the basis US Liberal Response is that the household shooting is an atrocity. The basis US Republican response that this is a matter Constitutional Rights, which the kamikaze terrorists had a right to do!

"Crow, James Crow, Shaken, Not Stirred!
(Man always kill neighbors in other tent, honoring great spirit, "Seven Come Eleven!," if they are winning more!)