uscitizen
Senior Member
- May 6, 2007
- 45,940
- 4,925
MI6 and CIA heard Iraq had no active WMD capability ahead of invasion | World news | guardian.co.uk
Fresh evidence is revealed today about how MI6 and the CIA were told through secret channels by Saddam Hussein's foreign minister and his head of intelligence that Iraq had no active weapons of mass destruction.
Tony Blair told parliament before the war that intelligence showed Iraq's nuclear, chemical, and biological weapons programme was "active", "growing" and "up and running".
A special BBC Panorama programme tonight will reveal how British and US intelligence agencies were informed by top sources months before the invasion that Iraq had no active WMD programme, and that the information was not passed to subsequent inquiries.
It describes how Naji Sabri, Saddam's foreign minister, told the CIA's station chief in Paris at the time, Bill Murray, through an intermediary that Iraq had "virtually nothing" in terms of WMD.
..............
There were a great number of people (both Iraqi and American) who wanted the US to invade Iraq for reasons of their own. Let's consider Iraqi reasons for just a moment. If you're an expatriot Iraqi who wants to go home to your family, but you can't because you're a wanted man by Saddam's secret police, you're going to want Saddam gone. And are you going to care how that happens? No. Would you lie or support a fabricated story that will make it much more likely that the strongest military in the world will get rid of Saddam FOR you...so you can go home because you don't want to live in exile in the West for the rest of your life? Of course you would lie. And professional American foreign policy experts would know that the word of certain Iraqis could not be taken at face value.
Lets not forget Isreals interest in getting the USA to onvade Iraq.