Michael Brown was 148 feet from Wilson as he was shot to death

[RKMBrown]

Face it, the last two shots to his head was an Execution.

Face it, the grand jury didn't think so.

Do you have a link where the GJ said it wasn't an execution?

I don't need a link, the GJ didn't indict Wilson, so it is obvious they did not believe he executed Brown. Stop being such a moron. What happened with the last two bullets that struck Brown is irrelevant. We can't dismiss everything that transpired up to that point and pretend Michael Brown was innocently bending over to tie his shoes on the way home from the store with his Skittles and Ice Tea. He attacked and assaulted Wilson, tried to take his gun, and was charging toward Wilson when he was fatally shot.

Translation, you got nothing. The GJ let the cop execute the boy.

 

[Boss]

Face it, the last two shots to his head was an Execution.

Face it, the grand jury didn't think so.

Do you have a link where the GJ said it wasn't an execution?

I don't need a link, the GJ didn't indict Wilson, so it is obvious they did not believe he executed Brown. Stop being such a moron. What happened with the last two bullets that struck Brown is irrelevant. We can't dismiss everything that transpired up to that point and pretend Michael Brown was innocently bending over to tie his shoes on the way home from the store with his Skittles and Ice Tea. He attacked and assaulted Wilson, tried to take his gun, and was charging toward Wilson when he was fatally shot.

Translation, you got nothing. The GJ let the cop execute the boy.

No, they would have indicted Wilson had that been the case. You are the one who's got nothing, or at least, you're not offering anything. Do you have evidence the GJ let the cop get away with executing somebody? Nope... it's just your opinion and you're wrong.

 

[RKMBrown]

Face it, the last two shots to his head was an Execution.

Face it, the grand jury didn't think so.

Do you have a link where the GJ said it wasn't an execution?

I don't need a link, the GJ didn't indict Wilson, so it is obvious they did not believe he executed Brown. Stop being such a moron. What happened with the last two bullets that struck Brown is irrelevant. We can't dismiss everything that transpired up to that point and pretend Michael Brown was innocently bending over to tie his shoes on the way home from the store with his Skittles and Ice Tea. He attacked and assaulted Wilson, tried to take his gun, and was charging toward Wilson when he was fatally shot.

Translation, you got nothing. The GJ let the cop execute the boy.

No, they would have indicted Wilson had that been the case. You are the one who's got nothing, or at least, you're not offering anything. Do you have evidence the GJ let the cop get away with executing somebody? Nope... it's just your opinion and you're wrong.

Is the boy alive or dead? This is not hard. Why are you being obtuse? If the boy wasn't executed, he'd be alive.

The reason the GJ did not rule to indict is they were instructed that it is legal for cops to execute escaping suspects.

 

[Boss]

Face it, the grand jury didn't think so.

Do you have a link where the GJ said it wasn't an execution?

I don't need a link, the GJ didn't indict Wilson, so it is obvious they did not believe he executed Brown. Stop being such a moron. What happened with the last two bullets that struck Brown is irrelevant. We can't dismiss everything that transpired up to that point and pretend Michael Brown was innocently bending over to tie his shoes on the way home from the store with his Skittles and Ice Tea. He attacked and assaulted Wilson, tried to take his gun, and was charging toward Wilson when he was fatally shot.

Translation, you got nothing. The GJ let the cop execute the boy.

No, they would have indicted Wilson had that been the case. You are the one who's got nothing, or at least, you're not offering anything. Do you have evidence the GJ let the cop get away with executing somebody? Nope... it's just your opinion and you're wrong.

Is the boy alive or dead? This is not hard. Why are you being obtuse? If the boy wasn't executed, he'd be alive.

The reason the GJ did not rule to indict is they were instructed that it is legal for cops to execute escaping suspects.

Now you are using an ignorant context for the word "execution." And then have the nerve to call me obtuse! An execution is the carrying out of a death sentence. Wilson didn't carry out a death sentence on Brown, unless you're arguing that Brown sentenced himself to death.

 

[RKMBrown]

Do you have a link where the GJ said it wasn't an execution?

I don't need a link, the GJ didn't indict Wilson, so it is obvious they did not believe he executed Brown. Stop being such a moron. What happened with the last two bullets that struck Brown is irrelevant. We can't dismiss everything that transpired up to that point and pretend Michael Brown was innocently bending over to tie his shoes on the way home from the store with his Skittles and Ice Tea. He attacked and assaulted Wilson, tried to take his gun, and was charging toward Wilson when he was fatally shot.

Translation, you got nothing. The GJ let the cop execute the boy.

No, they would have indicted Wilson had that been the case. You are the one who's got nothing, or at least, you're not offering anything. Do you have evidence the GJ let the cop get away with executing somebody? Nope... it's just your opinion and you're wrong.

Is the boy alive or dead? This is not hard. Why are you being obtuse? If the boy wasn't executed, he'd be alive.

The reason the GJ did not rule to indict is they were instructed that it is legal for cops to execute escaping suspects.

Now you are using an ignorant context for the word "execution." And then have the nerve to call me obtuse! An execution is the carrying out of a death sentence. Wilson didn't carry out a death sentence on Brown, unless you're arguing that Brown sentenced himself to death.

What's the difference? Two bullets to the brain and you expected him to live?

 

[Boss]

What's the difference? Two bullets to the brain and you expected him to live?

Execution is not about expectation. If you attempt to do me harm, I fully expect you may die. That is not execution. The carrying out of a death sentence... that is what an "execution" is, and that doesn't apply here.

I don't know... maybe you are so profoundly retarded you actually believe you can get people to think Michael Brown was innocently minding his business when officer Wilson walked up and murdered him for being black? That's the only explanation I can come up with for you.

 

[koshergrl]

Words mean something.
The difference is just as Boss said. It's when a death sentence is carried out.

"Execution-style" killings that are conducted outside of the law involve the pre-meditated decision that someone needs to die, for whatever reason.

There's no pre-meditation in this case, and there certainly was no conviction or death sentence. It wasn't an execution. It was an idiot getting shot because he attacked a cop. The world is better off without this moron terrorizing people.

 

[RKMBrown]

Words mean something.
The difference is just as Boss said. It's when a death sentence is carried out.

"Execution-style" killings that are conducted outside of the law involve the pre-meditated decision that someone needs to die, for whatever reason.

There's no pre-meditation in this case, and there certainly was no conviction or death sentence. It wasn't an execution. It was an idiot getting shot because he attacked a cop. The world is better off without this moron terrorizing people.

Watch the video interview for Wilson. He quite literally admits to pre-mediated thought regarding the killing of Brown.

Wilson had plenty of time to consider his actions. The last two bullets were quite literally an execution. Legal execution, but execution nonetheless. The GJ was read an incorrect explanation regarding the law. The GJ was told that it is legal for a cop to execute a fleeing suspect.

 

[RKMBrown]

What's the difference? Two bullets to the brain and you expected him to live?

Execution is not about expectation. If you attempt to do me harm, I fully expect you may die. That is not execution. The carrying out of a death sentence... that is what an "execution" is, and that doesn't apply here.

I don't know... maybe you are so profoundly retarded you actually believe you can get people to think Michael Brown was innocently minding his business when officer Wilson walked up and murdered him for being black? That's the only explanation I can come up with for you.

Two bullets to the brain is quite literally "execution." Further, the cop admitted to pre-mediation during his interview.

As for your wild accusation about Brown minding his business... WTF kind of drugs are you taking?

 

[theHawk]

And still, no one has gotten the very simple mathematical point presented in the OP that can only lead to one logical conclusion. Almost 700 postings, bitching like schoolchildren, but very little cogent thought.

What a shame.

I did address it, and you ignored it. The distance from the vehicle was irrelevant, Wilson pursued him on foot. The physical evidence showed the bullet casings of the shots fired to be in the same vicinity as Brown, not 170 feet away.

 

[RKMBrown]

And still, no one has gotten the very simple mathematical point presented in the OP that can only lead to one logical conclusion. Almost 700 postings, bitching like schoolchildren, but very little cogent thought.

What a shame.

I did address it, and you ignored it. The distance from the vehicle was irrelevant, Wilson pursued him on foot. The physical evidence showed the bullet casings of the shots fired to be in the same vicinity as Brown, not 170 feet away.

Ayup he was up close when he capped him in the head.

 

[SmarterThanTheAverageBear]

And still, no one has gotten the very simple mathematical point presented in the OP that can only lead to one logical conclusion. Almost 700 postings, bitching like schoolchildren, but very little cogent thought.

What a shame.

I did address it, and you ignored it. The distance from the vehicle was irrelevant, Wilson pursued him on foot. The physical evidence showed the bullet casings of the shots fired to be in the same vicinity as Brown, not 170 feet away.

Ayup he was up close when he capped him in the head.

Ayup, and Brown was still charging until that final round hit him

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

It's really simple to measure the distance, and quite accurately:




Those who measured started at the fire-hydrant that was near the police car from which officer Wilson fired the deadly shots:

Distance from the driver's side door (when officer Wilson claims he fired the shots) to the fire hydrant: 17 feet.

Distance from the fire hydrant to the spot where Michael Brown was standing when he was shot: 131 feet.

131 +17 = 148.

Now, there is an angle involved between the cop car and the hydrant, which means that actual distance of 17 feet, calculated as a straight line, will be somewhat less, maybe one third less. So, the true distance may be 140 to 141 feet. The angle represented by the yellow line looks to be about 35 degrees to the plain, if you consider the straight path of the sidewalk next to the hydrant to be the plain.

The police report says 35 feet. And a police officer said TWICE in a press conference that the distance was 35 feet:



(1:13 and 6:01)

35 feet and 148 are nowhere close to each other in terms of distance. 148 feet = 49 yards, or just about one-half of a football field.

The film clearly documents the start and end points, and they can be confirmed by police photos and photos shot by witnesses on that day.

35 feet could be an argument for immediate danger for a police officer. But 148 feet? No way.

Why did the Ferguson police lie about this detail?

And if the Ferguson police have lied about this, then we must ask what else they have lied about?

You know, sometimes it's all about simple math. The Ferguson police can lie for a while, but they cannot change geography and they cannot undo so many photos and videos.



Discuss.

Does a suspected perpetrator who is 148 feet away from an officer represent a danger to that officer's life?

Does a suspected perpetrator who is 148 feet away from an officer represent a danger to that officer's life?

Was he a danger when he was wrestling in the car for the officer's gun?

 

[RKMBrown]

And still, no one has gotten the very simple mathematical point presented in the OP that can only lead to one logical conclusion. Almost 700 postings, bitching like schoolchildren, but very little cogent thought.

What a shame.

I did address it, and you ignored it. The distance from the vehicle was irrelevant, Wilson pursued him on foot. The physical evidence showed the bullet casings of the shots fired to be in the same vicinity as Brown, not 170 feet away.

Ayup he was up close when he capped him in the head.

Ayup, and Brown was still charging until that final round hit him

You mean the final four shots. Two to the chest two to the head.

 

[boedicca]

Is the boy alive or dead? This is not hard. Why are you being obtuse? If the boy wasn't executed, he'd be alive.

I wouldn't call a 6'4" 292 Lb. 18 year old a "boy".

 

[RKMBrown]

It's really simple to measure the distance, and quite accurately:




Those who measured started at the fire-hydrant that was near the police car from which officer Wilson fired the deadly shots:

Distance from the driver's side door (when officer Wilson claims he fired the shots) to the fire hydrant: 17 feet.

Distance from the fire hydrant to the spot where Michael Brown was standing when he was shot: 131 feet.

131 +17 = 148.

Now, there is an angle involved between the cop car and the hydrant, which means that actual distance of 17 feet, calculated as a straight line, will be somewhat less, maybe one third less. So, the true distance may be 140 to 141 feet. The angle represented by the yellow line looks to be about 35 degrees to the plain, if you consider the straight path of the sidewalk next to the hydrant to be the plain.

The police report says 35 feet. And a police officer said TWICE in a press conference that the distance was 35 feet:



(1:13 and 6:01)

35 feet and 148 are nowhere close to each other in terms of distance. 148 feet = 49 yards, or just about one-half of a football field.

The film clearly documents the start and end points, and they can be confirmed by police photos and photos shot by witnesses on that day.

35 feet could be an argument for immediate danger for a police officer. But 148 feet? No way.

Why did the Ferguson police lie about this detail?

And if the Ferguson police have lied about this, then we must ask what else they have lied about?

You know, sometimes it's all about simple math. The Ferguson police can lie for a while, but they cannot change geography and they cannot undo so many photos and videos.



Discuss.

Does a suspected perpetrator who is 148 feet away from an officer represent a danger to that officer's life?

Does a suspected perpetrator who is 148 feet away from an officer represent a danger to that officer's life?

Was he a danger when he was wrestling in the car for the officer's gun?

Was the officer a danger when he tried to run the teen over? Was the officer a danger when he told the teen he was gonna shoot him?

 

[RKMBrown]

Is the boy alive or dead? This is not hard. Why are you being obtuse? If the boy wasn't executed, he'd be alive.

I wouldn't call a 6'4" 292 Lb. 18 year old a "boy".

Well he didn't act very much like a man, did he?

 

[boedicca]

It's really simple to measure the distance, and quite accurately:




Those who measured started at the fire-hydrant that was near the police car from which officer Wilson fired the deadly shots:

Distance from the driver's side door (when officer Wilson claims he fired the shots) to the fire hydrant: 17 feet.

Distance from the fire hydrant to the spot where Michael Brown was standing when he was shot: 131 feet.

131 +17 = 148.

Now, there is an angle involved between the cop car and the hydrant, which means that actual distance of 17 feet, calculated as a straight line, will be somewhat less, maybe one third less. So, the true distance may be 140 to 141 feet. The angle represented by the yellow line looks to be about 35 degrees to the plain, if you consider the straight path of the sidewalk next to the hydrant to be the plain.

The police report says 35 feet. And a police officer said TWICE in a press conference that the distance was 35 feet:



(1:13 and 6:01)

35 feet and 148 are nowhere close to each other in terms of distance. 148 feet = 49 yards, or just about one-half of a football field.

The film clearly documents the start and end points, and they can be confirmed by police photos and photos shot by witnesses on that day.

35 feet could be an argument for immediate danger for a police officer. But 148 feet? No way.

Why did the Ferguson police lie about this detail?

And if the Ferguson police have lied about this, then we must ask what else they have lied about?

You know, sometimes it's all about simple math. The Ferguson police can lie for a while, but they cannot change geography and they cannot undo so many photos and videos.



Discuss.

Does a suspected perpetrator who is 148 feet away from an officer represent a danger to that officer's life?

Does a suspected perpetrator who is 148 feet away from an officer represent a danger to that officer's life?

Was he a danger when he was wrestling in the car for the officer's gun?

Michael Brown could run 148 feet in 6 or 7 seconds, which isn't a long time to contemplate one's mortality.

Just sayin'.

 

[SmarterThanTheAverageBear]

And still, no one has gotten the very simple mathematical point presented in the OP that can only lead to one logical conclusion. Almost 700 postings, bitching like schoolchildren, but very little cogent thought.

What a shame.

I did address it, and you ignored it. The distance from the vehicle was irrelevant, Wilson pursued him on foot. The physical evidence showed the bullet casings of the shots fired to be in the same vicinity as Brown, not 170 feet away.

Ayup he was up close when he capped him in the head.

Ayup, and Brown was still charging until that final round hit him

You mean the final four shots. Two to the chest two to the head.

I said he was still charging when the final round hit him, that automatically means he was still charging when the three before that one him him.

Was Wilson supposed to shit him just a few time and then if he kept charging say fuck it and let the guy either get a hold of him, or get away?

 

[boedicca]

Is the boy alive or dead? This is not hard. Why are you being obtuse? If the boy wasn't executed, he'd be alive.

I wouldn't call a 6'4" 292 Lb. 18 year old a "boy".

Well he didn't act very much like a man, did he?

He acted like the thug he was. He was a legal adult, and posed a credible threat based on his demonstrated behavior.