Michael Savage Donald Trump Interview Following Brussels Attack - 3/22/16

[g5000]

Trump talks like Chicken Little. And Michail Sewage, he is still on the air? He's like a fossilized dinosaur among dinosaurs. Sewage, Alex Jones, Mark Levin. The batshittiest crazies of con-talk-radio. These three are so f#$ked up you actually feel sorry for them.

ok -----you called them all "names" -----now WHAT TO DO?

That's exactly how Savage started his interview with Trump.

 

[irosie91]

Trump talks like Chicken Little. And Michail Sewage, he is still on the air? He's like a fossilized dinosaur among dinosaurs. Sewage, Alex Jones, Mark Levin. The batshittiest crazies of con-talk-radio. These three are so f#$ked up you actually feel sorry for them.

ok -----you called them all "names" -----now WHAT TO DO?

That's exactly how Savage started his interview with Trump.

yes----and THEN they went on to discuss the problem

 

[Vigilante]

It is rather amusing how the MSM has presented R candidates as lacking substance and intelligence for decades...all the while claiming D candidates are so well spoken and intelligent.

One would think all Americans would see the ruse, but one would be wrong.

I don't think I can find much of anything amusing about how the media has mislead the American people.
But if you think I am wrong about the leading nature of the interviewer or the lack of substance from the hopeful candidate then I'm sure you will elaborate.

My use of the amusing my have been inappropriate. The MSM is all about misleading and dividing Americans, which is far from amusing.

The problem is the MSM has presented R candidates as knuckle dragging dunces, while they present D candidates are thoughtful and nuanced. I see the distortion. Do you?

In many instances I wouldn't characterize it as a distortion at all, Bush was a knuckle dragging dunce and it seems to me as though Trump could give Bush a run for his money. I don't know that party bias is as pronounced though as many on the right claim it to be nor do I believe it is the preeminent concern when discussing the failings of the media.

Your bias is revealed...W was certainly a dunce, but no worse than Big Ears or Cankles.

I'm not immune to bias nor can I think of anyone who is. I would characterize Obama and Hillary as deceitful, they don't come across as stupid, they know what they are doing. Bush came across as an idiot, I'm not convinced he understood how he was being manipulated by the neocons in his midst, but that made him no less dangerous.

I believe this subversive actually thinks that he's on the right track, pathetic!

 

[gipper]

It is rather amusing how the MSM has presented R candidates as lacking substance and intelligence for decades...all the while claiming D candidates are so well spoken and intelligent.

One would think all Americans would see the ruse, but one would be wrong.

I don't think I can find much of anything amusing about how the media has mislead the American people.
But if you think I am wrong about the leading nature of the interviewer or the lack of substance from the hopeful candidate then I'm sure you will elaborate.

My use of the amusing my have been inappropriate. The MSM is all about misleading and dividing Americans, which is far from amusing.

The problem is the MSM has presented R candidates as knuckle dragging dunces, while they present D candidates are thoughtful and nuanced. I see the distortion. Do you?

In many instances I wouldn't characterize it as a distortion at all, Bush was a knuckle dragging dunce and it seems to me as though Trump could give Bush a run for his money. I don't know that party bias is as pronounced though as many on the right claim it to be nor do I believe it is the preeminent concern when discussing the failings of the media.

Your bias is revealed...W was certainly a dunce, but no worse than Big Ears or Cankles.

I'm not immune to bias nor can I think of anyone who is. I would characterize Obama and Hillary as deceitful, they don't come across as stupid, they know what they are doing. Bush came across as an idiot, I'm not convinced he understood how he was being manipulated by the neocons in his midst, but that made him no less dangerous.

Obama and Cankles say all sorts of stupid things, but the MSM frames it as intelligent. Both won't name Islamic terror for what it and think government should disarm law abiding Americans....now just those two things clearly identify them as stupid...but if one is biased or easily duped by the MSM, one would not know the truth.