Just curious. What other 'strings' do you think should be attached to government assistance?
Shall we say drug testing for those who receive welfare funding?Good point. My point with this thread though is that it is NEVER OK to withold funds (food, clothing, shelter) from children, orphans, for ANY REASON WHATSOEVER. Anyone advocating that this be done is advocating holding children hostage and negligent child abuse. Such people are not fit to adopt children.
LGBT promoters here at USMB have proposed that this be done. That is unforgivable. The number of LGBT posters that have spoken up against this threat by other more outspoken LGBT promoters is "0". Zero. And that is speaking volumes about their community's regard for the wellbeing of kids in general...that and my signature photo.Some would consider placing them in deviant sex couple homes sans a mother or a father is a form of abuse.Really......so if an orphanage was found to have abused children, you think they should continue to get funds? If an orphanage was found to be embezzling money, they should still get funds? If an orphanage refused to let Asians adopt, or Jews adopt, or Republicans adopt, they should continue to get funds?
Your argument is now that adoption agencies and orphanages are outside the bounds of the law?
Yeah and Some are idiots.