Fort Fun Indiana
Diamond Member
- Mar 10, 2017
- 98,153
- 75,308
- 3,645
And Hogwarts was made by magicians.Noahs ark was made from laymen -
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
And Hogwarts was made by magicians.Noahs ark was made from laymen -
You post insane/Incoherent gibrish, you need to be in an institution.abu afak
What for heavens sake do you call "funny" in my words about the close proximity between natural science and the Christian faith? And what kind of argument is this at all?
And Hogwarts was made by magicians.Noahs ark was made from laymen -
You post insane/Incoherent gibrish, you need to be in an institution.abu afak
What for heavens sake do you call "funny" in my words about the close proximity between natural science and the Christian faith? And what kind of argument is this at all?
EDIT: and they All have WACKY Youtubes.
This board needs a 'Crazy' rule.
`
I certainly don't think that. Even the smartest people can be fooled into believing utter nonsense. It's part of being human.There's absolutely no need to think everyone, who is a Christian, is an idiot.
Kaku’s conclusion is pretty is clear.
“The final solution resolution could be that God is a mathematician,” says Kaku. “The mind of God, we believe, is cosmic music. The music of strings resonating through 11-dimensional hyperspace.”
“To me it is clear that we exist in a plan which is governed by rules that were created, shaped by a universal intelligence and not by chance.”
World-Famous Scientist: God Created the Universe
String Theory Co-Founder: Sub-Atomic Particles Are Evidence the Universe Was Created
I certainly don't think that. Even the smartest people can be fooled into believing utter nonsense. It's part of being human.There's absolutely no need to think everyone, who is a Christian, is an idiot.
Because default atheism is not a belief. Atheists simply don't accept a belief in gods. Thanks for asking!So why do you call the Christian religion a "foolishing utter nonsense" but not so the belief in atheism?
Lab just reproduced evidence of Hawkins radiation.Universe or planetary things of Great time-and-scale like Astronomy (and Macro-Evolution) are Not necessarily reproducible.Michio Kaku Clears up God Discovery
Michio Kaku Clears up God Discovery
OCTOBER 16TH, 2017
P.K. FRENCH
Several months ago there was a flurry of headlines claiming that Michio Kaku had proven the existence of God. In this exclusive interview with the famous physicist, Kaku elaborates on what happened.`
I&T Today: You recently made a lot of headlines with your discoveries regarding the possible existence of a higher intelligence. Could you explain what you found?
Michio Kaku: There is a website that quoted me incorrectly. That’s one of the drawbacks of being in a public sphere: sometimes you get quoted incorrectly. And the reference I saw said that I said that you can prove the existence of God. My point of view is different. My own point of view is that you can neither prove nor disprove the existence of God.
Science is based on what is testable, reproducible, and falsifiable. That’s called science. However, there are certain things that are not testable, not reproducible, and not falsifiable. And that would include the existence of God.
For example, look at reincarnation. If somebody at a cocktail party says that they are Cleopatra or Julius Caesar, how do you disprove that? How do you falsify that? Well, you ask some simple question and they get it wrong. Then you say, “Ha! I falsified your statement.” And they say, “No, the history books are wrong…How do I know the history books are wrong? Because I am Cleopatra. I am Julius Caesar.”
At that point, the conversation is over....
Shouldn't AGW be "testable, reproducible, and falsifiable"?
We can test it in other ways however, and we have.
You're too Stupid to debate me, and I won't humor for another 10 pages like some others will.
You lose again.
bye
You poor little ego refuses to acknowledge it.Maybe there are gods...and unicorns, and fairies...but I am quite sure Michio Kaku does not know if there are or not.
We can simply look at the climate and see that....Lab just reproduced evidence of Hawkins radiation.Universe or planetary things of Great time-and-scale like Astronomy (and Macro-Evolution) are Not necessarily reproducible.Michio Kaku Clears up God Discovery
Michio Kaku Clears up God Discovery
OCTOBER 16TH, 2017
P.K. FRENCH
Several months ago there was a flurry of headlines claiming that Michio Kaku had proven the existence of God. In this exclusive interview with the famous physicist, Kaku elaborates on what happened.`
I&T Today: You recently made a lot of headlines with your discoveries regarding the possible existence of a higher intelligence. Could you explain what you found?
Michio Kaku: There is a website that quoted me incorrectly. That’s one of the drawbacks of being in a public sphere: sometimes you get quoted incorrectly. And the reference I saw said that I said that you can prove the existence of God. My point of view is different. My own point of view is that you can neither prove nor disprove the existence of God.
Science is based on what is testable, reproducible, and falsifiable. That’s called science. However, there are certain things that are not testable, not reproducible, and not falsifiable. And that would include the existence of God.
For example, look at reincarnation. If somebody at a cocktail party says that they are Cleopatra or Julius Caesar, how do you disprove that? How do you falsify that? Well, you ask some simple question and they get it wrong. Then you say, “Ha! I falsified your statement.” And they say, “No, the history books are wrong…How do I know the history books are wrong? Because I am Cleopatra. I am Julius Caesar.”
At that point, the conversation is over....
Shouldn't AGW be "testable, reproducible, and falsifiable"?
We can test it in other ways however, and we have.
You're too Stupid to debate me, and I won't humor for another 10 pages like some others will.
You lose again.
bye
LOL.
You stupid fucks refuse to show what happens to the temperature when you control for 120PPM additional CO2. (Hint: nothing happens to temperature)
That's not science.We can simply look at the climate and see that....Lab just reproduced evidence of Hawkins radiation.Universe or planetary things of Great time-and-scale like Astronomy (and Macro-Evolution) are Not necessarily reproducible.Michio Kaku Clears up God Discovery
Michio Kaku Clears up God Discovery
OCTOBER 16TH, 2017
P.K. FRENCH
Several months ago there was a flurry of headlines claiming that Michio Kaku had proven the existence of God. In this exclusive interview with the famous physicist, Kaku elaborates on what happened.`
I&T Today: You recently made a lot of headlines with your discoveries regarding the possible existence of a higher intelligence. Could you explain what you found?
Michio Kaku: There is a website that quoted me incorrectly. That’s one of the drawbacks of being in a public sphere: sometimes you get quoted incorrectly. And the reference I saw said that I said that you can prove the existence of God. My point of view is different. My own point of view is that you can neither prove nor disprove the existence of God.
Science is based on what is testable, reproducible, and falsifiable. That’s called science. However, there are certain things that are not testable, not reproducible, and not falsifiable. And that would include the existence of God.
For example, look at reincarnation. If somebody at a cocktail party says that they are Cleopatra or Julius Caesar, how do you disprove that? How do you falsify that? Well, you ask some simple question and they get it wrong. Then you say, “Ha! I falsified your statement.” And they say, “No, the history books are wrong…How do I know the history books are wrong? Because I am Cleopatra. I am Julius Caesar.”
At that point, the conversation is over....
Shouldn't AGW be "testable, reproducible, and falsifiable"?
We can test it in other ways however, and we have.
You're too Stupid to debate me, and I won't humor for another 10 pages like some others will.
You lose again.
bye
LOL.
You stupid fucks refuse to show what happens to the temperature when you control for 120PPM additional CO2. (Hint: nothing happens to temperature)
Gotcha. I know when I want an opinion of what is science and what isn't, I run to the first uneducated, ignorant, conspiracy-gobbling slob I can find on USMB. Thanks!That's not science.We can simply look at the climate and see that....Lab just reproduced evidence of Hawkins radiation.Universe or planetary things of Great time-and-scale like Astronomy (and Macro-Evolution) are Not necessarily reproducible.Michio Kaku Clears up God Discovery
Michio Kaku Clears up God Discovery
OCTOBER 16TH, 2017
P.K. FRENCH
Several months ago there was a flurry of headlines claiming that Michio Kaku had proven the existence of God. In this exclusive interview with the famous physicist, Kaku elaborates on what happened.`
I&T Today: You recently made a lot of headlines with your discoveries regarding the possible existence of a higher intelligence. Could you explain what you found?
Michio Kaku: There is a website that quoted me incorrectly. That’s one of the drawbacks of being in a public sphere: sometimes you get quoted incorrectly. And the reference I saw said that I said that you can prove the existence of God. My point of view is different. My own point of view is that you can neither prove nor disprove the existence of God.
Science is based on what is testable, reproducible, and falsifiable. That’s called science. However, there are certain things that are not testable, not reproducible, and not falsifiable. And that would include the existence of God.
For example, look at reincarnation. If somebody at a cocktail party says that they are Cleopatra or Julius Caesar, how do you disprove that? How do you falsify that? Well, you ask some simple question and they get it wrong. Then you say, “Ha! I falsified your statement.” And they say, “No, the history books are wrong…How do I know the history books are wrong? Because I am Cleopatra. I am Julius Caesar.”
At that point, the conversation is over....
Shouldn't AGW be "testable, reproducible, and falsifiable"?
We can test it in other ways however, and we have.
You're too Stupid to debate me, and I won't humor for another 10 pages like some others will.
You lose again.
bye
LOL.
You stupid fucks refuse to show what happens to the temperature when you control for 120PPM additional CO2. (Hint: nothing happens to temperature)
Maybe there are gods...and unicorns, and fairies...but I am quite sure Michio Kaku does not know if there are or not.