Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
It would be desirable if they directly said that their theoretical physics is only guesswork. Then there would be no questions.
Grow up you foolI'm no scientist, but I would assume no one can change the qualities and equations of physics.
Unless you're a DementocRat.
I looked up what #freecain is...........
#FREECAIN
This is from wiki. It explains it better than any of us.Natural science is that which adheres to scientific methodology.
Scientific methodology was put forward by the positivists as a counterbalance to the speculative dogmatism of the church.
The first requirement is that a scientific law is not a dogma, but a pattern derived from experience - a generalization of experience.
Modern physics is not based on the scientific method.
Nonsense!Ringtone
You don't understand the meaning of positivism
By the way, POST #18 should read:Natural science is that which adheres to scientific methodology.
Scientific methodology was put forward by the positivists as a counterbalance to the speculative dogmatism of the church.
The first requirement is that a scientific law is not a dogma, but a pattern derived from experience - a generalization of experience.
Modern physics is not based on the scientific method.
Positivism, in the sense that you are using the term, is the philosophical school of thought that holds that every rationally justifiable assertion can be scientifically verified or can be logically/mathematically proven, howbeit, as if metaphysics were preceded by science. That's silly.
Once again and more accurately, the imperatives of logic and mathematics, and the first principles of metaphysics necessarily precede and have primacy over science. Empirical data does not interpret itself; minds interpret empirical data!
Positivism would have scientists stupidly beg the question, presuppose ontological naturalism, and thereby arbitrarily limit the scope of scientific investigation and justification.
I wrote the first principles of metaphysics.Metaphysics, like astrology, has no primacy over science.
First principles as in the fundamental facts of reality presupposed to be necessarily true in order to do science in the first place.speculations?
Why the hell are you asking me. Study the matter for yourself. LOL!What are the criteria of truth in metaphysics?
''First principles'', (''first principles of metaphysics'' is a favorite of the hyper-religious), because magic and supernaturalism is not of science. Metaphysics is as useful as tarot card reading when introduced into the realm of science. It produces nothing of any real utility for investigating the natural world and ultimately, because it is a philosophical argument, no requirement to be true or factual.First principles as in the fundamental facts of reality presupposed to be necessarily true in order to do science in the first place.
''First principles'', (''first principles of metaphysics'' is a favorite of the hyper-religious), because magic and supernaturalism is not of science. Metaphysics is as useful as tarot card reading when introduced into the realm of science. It produces nothing of any real utility for investigating the natural world and ultimately, because it is a philosophical argument, no requirement to be true or factual.
You're a rank imbecile of a drooling 'tard. Your post is mindless drivel. Athiests—that is to say, myth mumblers, nature botherers, magic whisperers—are notoriously bad thinkers.
Nature whisperer. LOL!Oh, dear. I hurt your tender sensibilities.
The first principles of angry, hyper-religious God botherers would suggest the juvenile, saliva-slinging rant you offered.
Nature whisperer. LOL!
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^Botherer of the gods, LOL!
It is comical though that propagandists of metaphysics insist on magic and supernaturalism as explanations for existence when they're unable to offer a supportable case for their magical, supernatural gods.