To be fair, you have to admit that the analogy was vague.No, that's not what I said or meant. Not even close. They can believe what they want. They can teach what they want. All I was saying was that biblical Christianity is not compatible with many of the ideas this world pushes, which go directly against the Scriptures.
It's not absurd in my opinion. The CC has done irreparable damage to Christianity by not remaining silent on the fact (that I believe) Those facts of evolution that you don't believe. I see why you call it absurd.Why would you say something as absurd as "they shouldn't have been granted permission"?
Their church in fact did grant the permission.Who would grant or not grant them permission?
You're not a Catholic and so I wouldn't expect that you would support it. Dog knows, it compromises all their beliefs. Permission to accept Darwinian evolution while necessarily rejecting creation, seems to leave them with nothing to believe as pertaining to their bibles. Do you agree?And why on earth would you think that I would support something as dictatorial as that?
I haven't argued against that. I've only said that your meaning was vague and suggested that you would be fair about that.You completely missed the point. Again. I'm seeing a pattern now.
I was just saying that I think it's an interesting topic that Christianity teaches that we (Christians) are supposed to be set apart and different than the world. We're not supposed to look exactly like the world and follow the world's ways, most of which go against God's will...
And since this thread is specifically about morality being a natural as opposed to supernatural phenomenon, I was just saying that I believe that other topic could be good for a thread of its own.
Why do some of you seem so opposed to new topics being created? It's like you want to pile everything into one thread. Heck, if we did that, we would have one thread on this entire site, with 10 million pages.
I'm not opposed to new topics. I'm opposed to ding's and others dishonest attempts t censor others by claiming something is off topic. Otherwise, I'll trust in moderator decisions.
That can hardly apply to this forum. We should be able to agree on that. In fact, we're both engaged in off topic discussion right now! Let's not waste our time arguing what is and what isn't.It makes it so much easier to search for something when threads are actually about the topic that the title says it's about.
That's all. No biggie.![]()
I agree in that I would suggest that has already happened.OK. Well, time will tell. I have zero doubt that one day it will become very clear who is right and who is wrong.
If you want me to understand that, you're going to have to stop being vague. I tried once already to understand it and you told me I had it wrong. I'll try again even though I shouldn't. I think you mean that religion and science need to be separated.Well, I was making a statement in theory. The point was, in theory, no church or denomination is supposed to have one foot in the world and one foot in Christianity. Jesus and the scriptures going back to the beginning teach against that.
The Catholic church did permit their flock to believe in Darwinian evolution. I don't agree with that being off-topic. It's a repudiation of all Christian beliefs. It's void of morality and therefore immoral from a Christian's POV.That said, I don't want to get into a discussion about the Catholic Church, but IF they are teaching that evolution is true, it wouldn't be the first time that the Catholic Church put worldly ideas above the Scriptures, they have done that with other things as well, but again, that's off topic and I don't really want to talk about it at the moment anyway.