Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Thank you. These people don't know what they're talking about. Let's say a political party doesn't care to be legal can have the IRS go after the other party reps without kickbacks. DOH!!! oh wait, Obammy did that already. hahahahahahahahahahahaIf privacy trumped murder, you would be able to kill your houseguests with impunity. Mother in-laws (I mean birthing-people in-laws) would be pruned nationwide.
The IRS didn't need one. All the trump fall out folks were taken without cause. Nope, demofks have shown that privacy is not a right.It's limited, of course, but there has to be a valid reason for a warrant. My brother is a cop. He just can't request a warrant for my next door neighbor simply because we don't like the bitch. There has to be reasonable suspicion and just cause.
Because they didn't do that and took it upon themselves to change the Constitution every election in my lifetime and every Supreme Court nomination has been a battle of monkeys throwing shit at each other over abortion, abortion, abortion. It's fucking nauseating.
He's simply wrong, and can't admit, about the scotus creating privacy rights.He is trying to throw a blanket over the elephant in the room.
.these issues were absolutely NOT decided well by legislation, which is why relief had to be found in the SCOTUS.
It's literally the entire issue.
But he thinks what we are seeing and hearing is not what is happening. I heard that somewhere before...
That's an adorable take..
More than anything else, this is what irritates so many in the political world.
For 50 years politicians ran around talking about their views on abortion as a cornerstone of their political platform.
All the Supreme Court did was tell them to ... "shit or get off the pot" ...
.
The Fourth, Ninth, and Fourteenthnope, not at all.
Why don't you post the constitutional amendment you feel gives you that right? You just spout off continuously like a fking parrot repeat and repeat and say fking nothing.
That's an adorable take.
In reality, the Supreme Court ruined the principle of Stare Decisis forever, while also deleting a constitutionally protected right for half the population.
The first part is probably the worst of all.
Yeah, stare decisis is now "we don't like it" as opposed to separate is not equal or there is no logical reason whites and blacks can't marry, and the rational reason for the law is no longer rational, ie protecting societal beliefs is not a justifiable reason.That's an adorable take.
In reality, the Supreme Court ruined the principle of Stare Decisis forever, while also deleting a constitutionally protected right for half the population.
The first part is probably the worst of all.
So women and men are treated equally by abortion bans?.
Constitutionally Protected Rights don't apply to "half the population" ... Equal Protection Under the Law is more than a catchphrase.
No Constitutionally Protected Right was deleted for anyone.
The Supreme Court didn't even demand the States write a Law that allows or forbids abortions ...
That's up to the State Legislatures.
.
"the Supreme Court ruined the principle of Stare Decisis forever"That's an adorable take.
In reality, the Supreme Court ruined the principle of Stare Decisis forever, while also deleting a constitutionally protected right for half the population.
The first part is probably the worst of all.
So women and men are treated equally by abortion bans?
But never taken AWAY rights"the Supreme Court ruined the principle of Stare Decisis forever"
"The first part is probably the worst of all."
That's an adorable take.
The Supreme Court has overturned over 200 decisions in it's history.
.
Abortion bans, or the lack thereof, are Constitutionally Protected Rights ...
You can include them in your State's Constitution per the Tenth Amendment.
.
So why wasnt any other over turn of a supreme court ruling the same retard?That's an adorable take.
In reality, the Supreme Court ruined the principle of Stare Decisis forever, while also deleting a constitutionally protected right for half the population.
The first part is probably the worst of all.
Yep. NOT EVEN the Right to OWN another person. What they decided was a fetus has a superior right to the female bodyBut never taken AWAY rights
The equal protection clause does not require a right to be enumerated. (and the current group of Nine recognized unenumerated rights too) It means a state cannot create a law that treats any group differently than another unless there's a rational reason, and women are a group that
intermediate scrutiny
www.law.cornell.edu
A man will never have an abortion. Men do not share the same burden in raising an unwanted bastard.
So you decided I need to mind my own fucking business? Are you the champion irony retard around here? If you can't put the choice in the correct place, you should be neutered to help mankind.Not for you to decide. Mind your own fucking business.
you are literally either insane or intentionally ignorant of const law. The 10th amend is irrelevant in Dobbs..
So what ... The Supreme Court protected the Constitutionally Protected Right enumerated in the Tenth Amendment.
If it isn't an Enumerated Right, the States have the Right to handle it with their own Constitution and Legislation.
If it doesn't violate the Equal Protection Under the Law, then there isn't a problem.
The Law doesn't treat women as a group, unless you want to create a Law that does ...
That's not what the Supreme Court did (besides the fact that they cannot create Law anyway, and the reversal addressed that).
.
But never taken AWAY rights
I rarely agree with Progressives. Indeed, both genders are guilty of destruction of potential life on enormous scale.Life begins at ejaculation. Every sperm is sacred. Masturbation is MURDER!!!!
