More Bad News for Trump: Federal Judge Blocks Enforcement Of His Transgender Ban

[radical right]

The judge is out of line. the judiciary has no authority in regards to military policy

Judges don't do military policy, they do the US Constitution. And the commander in chief isn't allowed to violate the Constitution.

Setting military policy doesn't violate the Constitution

Sure it does. If Trump tried to segregate the military, it would be unconstitutional.

 

[Avatar4321]

The judge is out of line. the judiciary has no authority in regards to military policy

Judges don't do military policy, they do the US Constitution. And the commander in chief isn't allowed to violate the Constitution.

Setting military policy doesn't violate the Constitution

Sure it does. If Trump tried to segregate the military, it would be unconstitutional.

You don't know what segregation is do you?

 

[radical right]

Sure it does. If Trump tried to segregate the military, it would be unconstitutional.

You don't know what segregation is do you?

It includes separate but equal.

 

[jillian]

On the day Indictments were handed out and his approval ratings hit a new low again..., his bigoted transgendered ban gets blocked.

Trump’s reasons for the controversial ban “do not appear to be supported by any facts,” the judge found.

Federal Judge Blocks Enforcement Of Trump's Transgender Military Ban | HuffPost

Donald is having a very bad day.

 

[OKTexas]

The reasons the Trump administration gave for enacting the ban, she continued, “do not appear to be supported by any facts.” While Trump defended the policy change as a cost-saving measure, analyses of the military budget found that spending on health care for transgender service members would be minuscule.


Trump’s memorandum came just over a year after the Pentagon’s 2016 decision to lift the ban on transgender service members, which followed an exhaustive review of military readiness policies. However, Trump claimed he reversed the decision after consulting military experts.

Liar.

Unjustified spending, no matter how minuscule, is still unjustified spending. What possible justification is there to give a male soldier medication that would make them less effective?


.

 

[radical right]

Donald is having a very bad day.

George Papadopoulos

 

[radical right]

Unjustified spending, no matter how minuscule, is still unjustified spending. What possible justification is there to give a male soldier medication that would make them less effective?
.

The flip side, sounds like you'd advocate putting soldiers on steroids, HGH, and amphetamines.

 

[OKTexas]

The judge is out of line. the judiciary has no authority in regards to military policy

Judges don't do military policy, they do the US Constitution. And the commander in chief isn't allowed to violate the Constitution.

Setting military policy doesn't violate the Constitution

Sure it does. If Trump tried to segregate the military, it would be unconstitutional.

Funny, no judges weighed in when the military was actually segregated. Go figure.


.

 

[OKTexas]

Unjustified spending, no matter how minuscule, is still unjustified spending. What possible justification is there to give a male soldier medication that would make them less effective?
.

The flip side, sounds like you'd advocate putting soldiers on steroids, HGH, and amphetamines.

Wrong, long term use of all those make people less effective also. Short term use can speed healing in some cases and could be medically justified to get the soldier back to full duty.


.

 

[radical right]

Funny, no judges weighed in when the military was actually segregated. Go figure.
.

That was before Thurgood Marshall, and after Truman integrated the military.

Executive Order 9981 was an executive order issued on July 26, 1948, by President Harry S. Truman. It abolished racial discrimination in the United States Armed Forces and eventually led to the end of segregation in the services

Brown v. Board of Education of Topeka, 347 U.S. 483 (1954), was a landmark United States Supreme Court case in which the Court declared state laws establishing separate public schools for black and white students to be unconstitutional.

 

[Avatar4321]

Sure it does. If Trump tried to segregate the military, it would be unconstitutional.

You don't know what segregation is do you?

It includes separate but equal.

Which has nothing to do with this military policy

 

[radical right]

The flip side, sounds like you'd advocate putting soldiers on steroids, HGH, and amphetamines.

Wrong, long term use of all those make people less effective also. Short term use can speed healing in some cases and could be medically justified to get the soldier back to full duty.


.

Wars aren't fought on the long term. That's why they used agent orange.

 

[Reasonable]

More bad news for liberals, Trump is POTUS

Not for long.
Bannon gives him a 30% chance of finishing his term and in case you don’t know this he’s still one of his biggest supporters.

 

[radical right]

Which has nothing to do with this military policy

It sounds like Trump violated due process.

 

[Reasonable]

The judge is out of line. the judiciary has no authority in regards to military policy

The military had no problem with their transgendered military members so you’re full of shit..
This is just your mango Mussolini being a bigot again.

Donald Trump is the commander in chief of the military. He determines military policy. Not an unelected judge.

Name a single clause in the constitution that allows a judge to change military policy regardless of the reason

Trump’s policy is discriminatory, bigoted, baseless and a wet kiss to his base.
Thus it was stopped by impartial federal judges.
So no transgendered ban
No repealing and replacing Ocare on day one.
No wall built.
No president acting presidential.
You were duped by a carnival barker and you’re still too vacuous to see it.

 

[Avatar4321]

Which has nothing to do with this military policy

It sounds like Trump violated due process.

Please go to school. This is embarrassing

 

[Avatar4321]

The judge is out of line. the judiciary has no authority in regards to military policy

The military had no problem with their transgendered military members so you’re full of shit..
This is just your mango Mussolini being a bigot again.

Donald Trump is the commander in chief of the military. He determines military policy. Not an unelected judge.

Name a single clause in the constitution that allows a judge to change military policy regardless of the reason

Trump’s policy is discriminatory, bigoted, baseless and a wet kiss to his base.
Thus it was stopped by impartial federal judges.
So no transgendered ban
No repealing and replacing Ocare on day one.
No wall built.
No president acting presidential.
You were duped by a carnival barker and you’re still too vacuous to see it.

The judges ruling is illegal. Judges have no authority to dictate military policy. Doesn't matter if you think they are right

 

[OKTexas]

Funny, no judges weighed in when the military was actually segregated. Go figure.
.

That was before Thurgood Marshall, and after Truman integrated the military.

Executive Order 9981 was an executive order issued on July 26, 1948, by President Harry S. Truman. It abolished racial discrimination in the United States Armed Forces and eventually led to the end of segregation in the services

Brown v. Board of Education of Topeka, 347 U.S. 483 (1954), was a landmark United States Supreme Court case in which the Court declared state laws establishing separate public schools for black and white students to be unconstitutional.

Apples and oranges.


.

 

[Hossfly]

Which has nothing to do with this military policy

It sounds like Trump violated due process.

Please go to school. This is embarrassing

They're all lawyers. Don't argue with them.

 

[AsianTrumpSupporter]

See you at Gorsuch.