More Empirical Evidence That Recent Climate Change Warming Is Not A Threat

[Billy_Bob]

I wonder if otto remembers this?

 

[otto105]

Consensus has been wronging many times and isn't part of science research.

Post one article remains unchallenged

When has 98% scientific consensus been wrong before?

 

[otto105]

I wonder if otto remembers this?


View attachment 660253

And what was the full context of his remarks?


Post that, I dare you.

 

[Billy_Bob]

And what was the full context of his remarks?


Post that, I dare you.

You want the whole interview? Iit changes nothing. The context remains.

 

[Billy_Bob]

When has 98% scientific consensus been wrong before?

The earth is flat??

The sun goes around the earth??

Those were both wrong and they were the Consensus of the time.

 

[otto105]

You want the whole interview? Iit changes nothing. The context remains.

You didn't post context.

Post the whole interview.

 

[otto105]

The earth is flat??

The sun goes around the earth??

Those were both wrong and they were the Consensus of the time.

Those where religious and political decisions.

And what happened to the early round earth scientists?


Cracker...

 

[Sunsettommy]

When has 98% scientific consensus been wrong before?

Post one article remains unchallenged

 

[Crick]

C3 Headlines

More Empirical Evidence That Recent Climate Change Warming Is Not A Threat​

September 1, 2021

Excerpt:

As earlier posts (post#1, post#2, post#3) have documented, recent global warming - aka climate change - has been rather uneventful, especially in the context of the last 6-7 years. But how does climate warming in the modern era with its high CO2 emissions compare to earlier periods of the 20th century during a low CO2 emissions era?

Using the same HadCRUT global temperature dataset as used in post #3, we compare the actual temperature change differences over multiple periods for the 20.5 year span ending June 31, 2021 versus the 20.5 year ending June 31, 1931.

This first chart has rolling 12-Month (1yr) temperature changes on the left, comparing those changes for for the span of time from January 1910 through June 1931 versus they same span length for the January 2000 through June 2021 span; and, on the right is a column chart of total cumulative growth of CO2 (ppm) in the atmosphere during those respective spans of calendar time.

The correlation between the temperature change and the CO2 ppm growth is shown on the CO2 chart. Both correlations are negative, strongly indicating that CO2 growth has no impact on short-term temperatures.

LINK

=====

Charts are in the link

Absolutely classic cherry picked bullshit.

 

[Crick]

Empirical evidence trumps your political statements. Please show us how CO2 is the driver. I'll wait.

This empirical data

 

[Sunsettommy]

Absolutely classic cherry picked bullshit.

Post one article remains unchallenged

 

[Crick]

Post one article remains unchallenged

I'd say I just threw it in the shitter.

 

[Sunsettommy]

I'd say I just threw it in the shitter.

You make no case against it.

Post one article remains unchallenged

You are a science free little boy.

 

[CrusaderFrank]

When has 98% scientific consensus been wrong before?

Flat Earth, Galileo

 

[CrusaderFrank]

This empirical data

View attachment 660268

120PPM of CO2 adds less than a rounding error of heat, Ottmar.

 

[Billy_Bob]

This empirical data

View attachment 660268

Too funny... Please explain how CO2 drives anything. You still do not have a clue what this graph represents.

 

[Billy_Bob]

I love it...

Every single AGW poster has no clue what they are posting. Not one of them understands the Anthropogenic Global Warming Hypothesis. Not one of them understands that most everything is agreed upon except how the atmospheric gases and water vapor responds. It is utterly amazing how ill-informed these people are..

 

[otto105]

Post one article remains unchallenged

Post ONE IS A CHERRY PICKED LIE

So there's that.

 

[Sunsettommy]

Post ONE IS A CHERRY PICKED LIE

So there's that.

Still no counterpoint from you, dog ate your toilet paper science report?

Post one article remains unchallenged

 

[Sunsettommy]

This empirical data

View attachment 660268

What data?