Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Describing himself as a “skeptic,” not a denier – “that is a word meant to put me down” – the veteran weather forecaster told CNN’s “Reliable Sources” that the news network was promoting an inaccurate view on the issue. “CNN has taken a very strong position on global warming, that it is a consensus,” he said. “Well, there is no consensus in science. Science isn’t a vote, science is about facts.” “And if you get down to the hard, cold facts, there’s no question about it: Climate change is not happening, there is no significant, man-made global warming now, there hasn’t been any in the past, and there’s no reason to expect any in the future. There’s a whole lot of baloney.”
Coleman said climate change has become part of the Democratic Party platform, adding that he regretted that the issue has become “political instead of scientific.” “But the science is on my side,” he declared. Challenged on the assertion that “97 percent of climate scientists” are in agreement on the issue, Coleman charged that the figure was “manipulated.” Since the government only funds scientists who put out results “supporting the global warming hypothesis,” he claimed, “they don’t have any choice.” “If you’re going to get the money, you’ve got to support their position. Therefore 97 percent of the scientific reports published support global warming. Why? Because those are the ones the government pays for and that’s where the money is.”
Weather Channel CEO David Kenny also appeared on the show, and distanced himself from Coleman’s views. “We’re grateful that he got it [the channel] started 32 years ago, but he hasn’t been with us in 31 years, so he’s not really speaking for the Weather Channel in any way today,” he said. “Our position is really clear, it’s scientifically-based and we’ve been unwavering on it for quite some time now.”
Last week the Weather Channel reissued a 2007 statement giving its position on climate change. “More than a century’s worth of detailed climate observations shows a sharp increase in both carbon dioxide and temperature,” the statement says. “These observations, together with computer model simulations and historical climate reconstructions from ice cores, ocean sediments and tree rings all provide strong evidence that the majority of the warming over the past century is a result of human activities. This is also the conclusion drawn, nearly unanimously, by climate scientists.”
Weather Channel Founder Man-Made Global Warming is Baloney CNS News
Total bullshit site. And Coleman has a degree in journalism, not in any science. He has not one published paper in science.Whatever is happening to the climate of our planet, warmer or cooler, man is not causing it, cannot change it, and cannot stop it.
But if you libs continue to engage in stupidity, you are free to send your money to the false prophet algore.
The Global Warming Scam
Everything, and this is not an exaggeration, is a fraudulent claim by the democrats and world's socialist leaders. Everything.
You really have to stand in awe at how skillfully they divide races, classes and whatever else in order to gain political power and keep power.
Those of Us with an ability to think for ourselves see what it is. The usual know it all morons cannot see it and will not see it. Yet, none of them ever attempt to answer why if it is MAN MADE global warming, then why the concerted effort to change the terminology? Their idiotic explanations are childish at best.
It will continue and it will be pushed by the socialist propaganda sheep, in other words the morons in Hollywood.
========Total bullshit site. And Coleman has a degree in journalism, not in any science. He has not one published paper in science.Whatever is happening to the climate of our planet, warmer or cooler, man is not causing it, cannot change it, and cannot stop it.
But if you libs continue to engage in stupidity, you are free to send your money to the false prophet algore.
The Global Warming Scam
Every Scientific Society, every National Academy of Science, and every major university has a policy statement that AGW is real, and a clear and present danger. But, of course, you just know that these millions of scientists from all the differant nations and poltitical systems are in on a nefarious conspriracy. You fools are simply silly.
is you liberfools believe this shit, i am wondering if you liberfools have any knowledge of the Earths history over the past.., let's say ONE HUNDRED MILLION YEARS, there have been warming and cooling periods that lasted thousands of years, do you (liberfools collectively) know what caused the last world wide glacial period and what caused it all to melt ??
Whatever is happening to the climate of our planet, warmer or cooler, man is not causing it, cannot change it, and cannot stop it.
But if you libs continue to engage in stupidity, you are free to send your money to the false prophet algore.
The Global Warming Scam
Whatever is happening to the climate of our planet, warmer or cooler, man is not causing it, cannot change it, and cannot stop it.
Whatever is happening to the climate of our planet, warmer or cooler, man is not causing it, cannot change it, and cannot stop it.
We cannot say that. The truth is that we don't know how much, if any, effect humans are having on climate development. Largely because we can't honestly say that we have a very good understanding of how the climate is developing in the grand scheme of things.
Personally, I hypothesize that humans are likely to impact climate development, and that the main driver of human related climate influence is probably ecological in nature. Deforestation and marked reduction in biodiversity due to human activity are much more likely to have wider ranging climactic repercussions than the antiquated belief that CO2 is going to melt the polar caps. But it's going to take 1000 years of hard data before we can even begin to understand.
<Roll eyes> I'll bet nobody ever accused you of being a quick learner, did they.There's not a single experiment that shows how a 120PPM increase in CO2 can raise temperature
Not One
Granny says she always knowed it's a buncha lib'ral hokem...
Weather Channel Founder: Man-Made Global Warming is ‘Baloney’
November 2, 2014 – On the same day that the U.N. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change issued a major new global warming report, John Coleman, a founder of the Weather Channel, appeared on CNN Sunday to reiterate his stance that “climate change is not happening.”
Describing himself as a “skeptic,” not a denier – “that is a word meant to put me down” – the veteran weather forecaster told CNN’s “Reliable Sources” that the news network was promoting an inaccurate view on the issue. “CNN has taken a very strong position on global warming, that it is a consensus,” he said. “Well, there is no consensus in science. Science isn’t a vote, science is about facts.” “And if you get down to the hard, cold facts, there’s no question about it: Climate change is not happening, there is no significant, man-made global warming now, there hasn’t been any in the past, and there’s no reason to expect any in the future. There’s a whole lot of baloney.”
Coleman said climate change has become part of the Democratic Party platform, adding that he regretted that the issue has become “political instead of scientific.” “But the science is on my side,” he declared. Challenged on the assertion that “97 percent of climate scientists” are in agreement on the issue, Coleman charged that the figure was “manipulated.” Since the government only funds scientists who put out results “supporting the global warming hypothesis,” he claimed, “they don’t have any choice.” “If you’re going to get the money, you’ve got to support their position. Therefore 97 percent of the scientific reports published support global warming. Why? Because those are the ones the government pays for and that’s where the money is.”
Weather Channel CEO David Kenny also appeared on the show, and distanced himself from Coleman’s views. “We’re grateful that he got it [the channel] started 32 years ago, but he hasn’t been with us in 31 years, so he’s not really speaking for the Weather Channel in any way today,” he said. “Our position is really clear, it’s scientifically-based and we’ve been unwavering on it for quite some time now.”
Last week the Weather Channel reissued a 2007 statement giving its position on climate change. “More than a century’s worth of detailed climate observations shows a sharp increase in both carbon dioxide and temperature,” the statement says. “These observations, together with computer model simulations and historical climate reconstructions from ice cores, ocean sediments and tree rings all provide strong evidence that the majority of the warming over the past century is a result of human activities. This is also the conclusion drawn, nearly unanimously, by climate scientists.”
Weather Channel Founder Man-Made Global Warming is Baloney CNS News
Everything, and this is not an exaggeration, is a fraudulent claim by the democrats and world's socialist leaders. Everything.
You really have to stand in awe at how skillfully they divide races, classes and whatever else in order to gain political power and keep power.
Those of Us with an ability to think for ourselves see what it is. The usual know it all morons cannot see it and will not see it. Yet, none of them ever attempt to answer why if it is MAN MADE global warming, then why the concerted effort to change the terminology? Their idiotic explanations are childish at best.
It will continue and it will be pushed by the socialist propaganda sheep, in other words the morons in Hollywood.
What world do you live in? That's a remarkably stupid thing to say, even for an American "conservative."There's not a single experiment that shows how a 120PPM increase in CO2 can raise temperature
Not One
<Roll eyes> I'll bet nobody ever accused you of being a quick learner, did they.There's not a single experiment that shows how a 120PPM increase in CO2 can raise temperature
Not One
What world do you live in? That's a remarkably stupid thing to say, even for an American "conservative."There's not a single experiment that shows how a 120PPM increase in CO2 can raise temperature
Not One
Frank and I have had this conversation on a number of occasions. So who the fuck are you?<Roll eyes> I'll bet nobody ever accused you of being a quick learner, did they.There's not a single experiment that shows how a 120PPM increase in CO2 can raise temperature
Not One
Nor has anyone ever accused you of being a skilled logician. You just committed a double fallacy. Congratulations.
