More & more states seek constitutional convention to reign in spending

[Remodeling Maidiac]

Wisconsin conservatives seek constitutional convention on balanced budget

Refreshing to see that some realize were on track to insolvency.

And of course the left's response is "THEY WANT TO TAKE AWAY YOUR FREE SPEECH!"
It's painfully obvious the left are irresponsible & devoid of ideas to right the ship.

 

[thanatos144]

A convention of states is not a constitutional convention ... they are two separate things . Your link is being misleading

Sent from my SM-G386T1 using Tapatalk

 

[TheOldSchool]

Way more boring than a revolution

 

[task0778]

Maybe a balanced budget amendment would simply mean the end of the budget process. Congress would just pass continuing resolutions and appropriations and we'd still have deficits.

 

[TheOldSchool]

Maybe a balanced budget amendment would simply mean the end of the budget process. Congress would just pass continuing resolutions and appropriations and we'd still have deficits.

Yep. It costs a lot of money to maintain a global empire.

 

[candycorn]

Makes you wonder how we’re all going to get tax breaks, build a 2,000 mile wall, and spend a trillion on infrastructure while increasing the military spending to heights it’s never seen before….

 

[TNHarley]

Doesn't matter. I am sure the activist SC would rule it invalid based on the commerce clause fucking rapists

 

[thanatos144]

Maybe a balanced budget amendment would simply mean the end of the budget process. Congress would just pass continuing resolutions and appropriations and we'd still have deficits.

Yep. It costs a lot of money to maintain a global empire.

Then you regressives need to stop trying to make one

Sent from my SM-G386T1 using Tapatalk

 

[TNHarley]

Maybe a balanced budget amendment would simply mean the end of the budget process. Congress would just pass continuing resolutions and appropriations and we'd still have deficits.

Yep. It costs a lot of money to maintain a global empire.

Then you regressives need to stop trying to make one

Sent from my SM-G386T1 using Tapatalk

yea, conservatives don't do that, do they?

 

[TheOldSchool]

Maybe a balanced budget amendment would simply mean the end of the budget process. Congress would just pass continuing resolutions and appropriations and we'd still have deficits.

Yep. It costs a lot of money to maintain a global empire.

Then you regressives need to stop trying to make one

Sent from my SM-G386T1 using Tapatalk

^ idiot voted for orange moron who ran on vastly increasing military spending

 

[LordBrownTrout]

Way more boring than a revolution

Go get your guns, annie.

 

[thanatos144]

Maybe a balanced budget amendment would simply mean the end of the budget process. Congress would just pass continuing resolutions and appropriations and we'd still have deficits.

Yep. It costs a lot of money to maintain a global empire.

Then you regressives need to stop trying to make one

Sent from my SM-G386T1 using Tapatalk

^ idiot voted for orange moron who ran on vastly increasing military spending

Increased defense spending isn't war mongering you moron

Sent from my SM-G386T1 using Tapatalk

 

[TheOldSchool]

Maybe a balanced budget amendment would simply mean the end of the budget process. Congress would just pass continuing resolutions and appropriations and we'd still have deficits.

Yep. It costs a lot of money to maintain a global empire.

Then you regressives need to stop trying to make one

Sent from my SM-G386T1 using Tapatalk

^ idiot voted for orange moron who ran on vastly increasing military spending

Increased defense spending isn't war mongering you moron

Sent from my SM-G386T1 using Tapatalk

I didn't say "war mongering" you jackass

 

[thanatos144]

Maybe a balanced budget amendment would simply mean the end of the budget process. Congress would just pass continuing resolutions and appropriations and we'd still have deficits.

Yep. It costs a lot of money to maintain a global empire.

Then you regressives need to stop trying to make one

Sent from my SM-G386T1 using Tapatalk

^ idiot voted for orange moron who ran on vastly increasing military spending

Increased defense spending isn't war mongering you moron

Sent from my SM-G386T1 using Tapatalk

I didn't say "war mongering" you jackass

Nope you didn't . You just infer it

Sent from my SM-G386T1 using Tapatalk

 

[TheOldSchool]

Yep. It costs a lot of money to maintain a global empire.

Then you regressives need to stop trying to make one

Sent from my SM-G386T1 using Tapatalk

^ idiot voted for orange moron who ran on vastly increasing military spending

Increased defense spending isn't war mongering you moron

Sent from my SM-G386T1 using Tapatalk

I didn't say "war mongering" you jackass

Nope you didn't . You just infer it

Sent from my SM-G386T1 using Tapatalk

No. What I said was it costs a lot of money to maintain a global empire. Then I pointed out that you're an idiot who voted to spend more money on it after you tried to pass off the blame.

 

[thanatos144]

Then you regressives need to stop trying to make one

Sent from my SM-G386T1 using Tapatalk

^ idiot voted for orange moron who ran on vastly increasing military spending

Increased defense spending isn't war mongering you moron

Sent from my SM-G386T1 using Tapatalk

I didn't say "war mongering" you jackass

Nope you didn't . You just infer it

Sent from my SM-G386T1 using Tapatalk

No. What I said was it costs a lot of money to maintain a global empire. Then I pointed out that you're an idiot who voted to spend more money on it after you tried to pass off the blame.

Son let me clue you in on something. Defense is constitutional spending health care is not. Defense also doesn't just start at our borders. Also those bombs you regressives like to shoot off that makes you feal strong costs a lot of money .

Sent from my SM-G386T1 using Tapatalk