More than 900 people have been fatally shot by police officers in 2015

the criminals aren't the ones that are savages. It is the people trying to protect the general welfare that are the savages.
Said no.
one.
ever.
 
How many of those were justified? Most of them. The WP article says most were armed and most attacked the cop.

So....out of 1,000,000 cops....nation of 350,000,000......they shot dead 900 and probably 800 were justified.

So....if 100 were NOT justified (doubtful but for argument sake) that means.......what....about 0.001%


Thanks Guno for showing us what a statistically TINY issue this is.
 
the criminals aren't the ones that are savages. It is the people trying to protect the general welfare that are the savages.
Said no.
one.
ever.


Trying to protect? Thats a weird way to describe chicken shits shooting people.

Bang Bang! I was trying to protect you....from growing older!
 
How many of those were justified? Most of them. The WP article says most were armed and most attacked the cop.

So....out of 1,000,000 cops....nation of 350,000,000......they shot dead 900 and probably 800 were justified.

So....if 100 were NOT justified (doubtful but for argument sake) that means.......what....about 0.001%


Thanks Guno for showing us what a statistically TINY issue this is.


The only abuses that happen are ones you hear about. Which means that all the other cops are good by default because cops are good except when they are bad.

:spinner:Weeeee


Circular logic is the best because the best logic is circular!!!
 
The Post found "a great majority" of those 900 were ARMED and resisting.

Hmmmm. Guno....that kinda kills your premise.

Oh....premise means hypothesis or point you're trying to make. Sorry Guno.
 
How many of those were justified? Most of them. The WP article says most were armed and most attacked the cop.

So....out of 1,000,000 cops....nation of 350,000,000......they shot dead 900 and probably 800 were justified.

So....if 100 were NOT justified (doubtful but for argument sake) that means.......what....about 0.001%


Thanks Guno for showing us what a statistically TINY issue this is.


The only abuses that happen are ones you hear about. Which means that all the other cops are good by default because cops are good except when they are bad.

:spinner:Weeeee


Circular logic is the best because the best logic is circular!!!

Um....yeah....EVERYONE IS good until they're bad. That's kinda a foundation of our society.



Good to see yet another example of left wingers trashing cops and defending criminals.
 
Its super easy to justify every shooting when you change the criteria for when shootings are justified. From the article:

The Post found that the great majority of people who died at the hands of the police fit at least one of three categories: they were wielding weapons, they were suicidal or mentally troubled, or they ran when officers told them to halt.

Suicidal or mentally troubled? Bang Bang!
Running? Bang Bang

 
How many of those were justified? Most of them. The WP article says most were armed and most attacked the cop.

So....out of 1,000,000 cops....nation of 350,000,000......they shot dead 900 and probably 800 were justified.

So....if 100 were NOT justified (doubtful but for argument sake) that means.......what....about 0.001%


Thanks Guno for showing us what a statistically TINY issue this is.


The only abuses that happen are ones you hear about. Which means that all the other cops are good by default because cops are good except when they are bad.

:spinner:Weeeee


Circular logic is the best because the best logic is circular!!!

Um....yeah....EVERYONE IS good until they're bad. That's kinda a foundation of our society.

Because the bad hasnt been reported that means it doesnt exist!
 
Its super easy to justify every shooting when you change the criteria for when shootings are justified. From the article:

The Post found that the great majority of people who died at the hands of the police fit at least one of three categories: they were wielding weapons, they were suicidal or mentally troubled, or they ran when officers told them to halt.

Suicidal or mentally troubled? Bang Bang!
Running? Bang Bang

For someone as retarded as you....that would make sense. The rest of us know a cop shooting requires far more to justify it.

If mental illness was the only requirement to be shot....a cop would've taken you out of your misery years ago.
 
Its super easy to justify every shooting when you change the criteria for when shootings are justified. From the article:

The Post found that the great majority of people who died at the hands of the police fit at least one of three categories: they were wielding weapons, they were suicidal or mentally troubled, or they ran when officers told them to halt.

Suicidal or mentally troubled? Bang Bang!
Running? Bang Bang
Someone who is armed, bonkers and running from police has to be shot. What are they going to do, let them kill others?
 
How many of those were justified? Most of them. The WP article says most were armed and most attacked the cop.

So....out of 1,000,000 cops....nation of 350,000,000......they shot dead 900 and probably 800 were justified.

So....if 100 were NOT justified (doubtful but for argument sake) that means.......what....about 0.001%


Thanks Guno for showing us what a statistically TINY issue this is.


The only abuses that happen are ones you hear about. Which means that all the other cops are good by default because cops are good except when they are bad.

:spinner:Weeeee


Circular logic is the best because the best logic is circular!!!

Um....yeah....EVERYONE IS good until they're bad. That's kinda a foundation of our society.

Because the bad hasnt been reported that means it doesnt exist!

Prove it does.

You fondle children. Just because you haven't been caught doesn't mean you don't do it. You'll be caught and imprisoned eventually though.
 
Its super easy to justify every shooting when you change the criteria for when shootings are justified. From the article:

The Post found that the great majority of people who died at the hands of the police fit at least one of three categories: they were wielding weapons, they were suicidal or mentally troubled, or they ran when officers told them to halt.

Suicidal or mentally troubled? Bang Bang!
Running? Bang Bang
Someone who is armed, bonkers and running from police has to be shot. What are they going to do, let them kill others?


You cant kill someone from running. Like I said, widen the reasons why shooting someone is ok and every shooting becomes justified.

Hell, you can slap the "mentally unstable" label on a dead body to cover yourself even more
 
Its super easy to justify every shooting when you change the criteria for when shootings are justified. From the article:

The Post found that the great majority of people who died at the hands of the police fit at least one of three categories: they were wielding weapons, they were suicidal or mentally troubled, or they ran when officers told them to halt.

Suicidal or mentally troubled? Bang Bang!
Running? Bang Bang
Someone who is armed, bonkers and running from police has to be shot. What are they going to do, let them kill others?


You cant kill someone from running. Like I said, widen the reasons why shooting someone is ok and every shooting becomes justified.

Hell, you can slap the "mentally unstable" label on a dead body to cover yourself even more

The reasons haven't been widened in decades. Graham v Connor is still the standard for justified shootings.


You libtards love stats....until stats suck.

The raw stats....found by the liberal Washington Post....show 0% of cops will kill someone this year.

Sorry. You libs burned cities and incited violence against cops.....for something 0% of cops do.

Amazing.
 
Its super easy to justify every shooting when you change the criteria for when shootings are justified. From the article:

The Post found that the great majority of people who died at the hands of the police fit at least one of three categories: they were wielding weapons, they were suicidal or mentally troubled, or they ran when officers told them to halt.

Suicidal or mentally troubled? Bang Bang!
Running? Bang Bang

For someone as retarded as you....that would make sense. The rest of us know a cop shooting requires far more to justify it.

If mental illness was the only requirement to be shot....a cop would've taken you out of your misery years ago.

The rest of us know a cop shooting requires far more to justify it.

By golly Bucs I cant wait to hear this extensive list of requirements needed to justify a police shooting. I'm sure its based in something more than feelings. Oh boy!

What are those far more requirements Bucs?

Annnnnd go
 
Its super easy to justify every shooting when you change the criteria for when shootings are justified. From the article:

The Post found that the great majority of people who died at the hands of the police fit at least one of three categories: they were wielding weapons, they were suicidal or mentally troubled, or they ran when officers told them to halt.

Suicidal or mentally troubled? Bang Bang!
Running? Bang Bang
Someone who is armed, bonkers and running from police has to be shot. What are they going to do, let them kill others?


You cant kill someone from running. Like I said, widen the reasons why shooting someone is ok and every shooting becomes justified.

Hell, you can slap the "mentally unstable" label on a dead body to cover yourself even more

The reasons haven't been widened in decades. Graham v Connor is still the standard for justified shootings.




The raw stats....found by the liberal Washington Post....show 0% of cops will kill someone this year.

There is no such stat dude :laugh2: Go ahead and post that quote that shows no killings will happen in the future! Then include the link to the crystal ball they are using!:laugh2:
 

Forum List

Back
Top