🌟 Exclusive 2024 Prime Day Deals! 🌟

Unlock unbeatable offers today. Shop here: https://amzn.to/4cEkqYs 🎁

More Tolerance from Our Fellow Liberal Americans

In all fairness, I really don't think the Left is claiming to be tolerant any more.
.
Most republicans and conservatives advocating that Muslims be 'kept out of the country,' the right's hostility toward immigrants, Hispanics, gay and transgender Americans – given these facts you can see why your post is ridiculous idiocy.

Hostilities against illegal immigrants and muslim refugees that cannot be vetted and being flown over here covertly is a natural reaction to people that believe in the sovereignty of this country. We have ungodly unemployment that is closer to 23 percent than what "da gubermint" is claiming. We have stagnant wages and we are drowning in debt. People are pissed for a reason. 51 percent that even have a job make 30K or less a year....28 percent make 20K or less a year. Liberals don't give a shit...just keep bringing in people that will take way more than they contribute while squirting out dependents. It is the recipe for disaster, plain and simple.
 
ACLU Colorado Board Member Resigns After Encouraging Shooting Trump Supporters - Breitbart

An American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) Board Member in Colorado has resigned after making national news headlines for urging people to kill Donald Trump supporters.
Loring Wirbel of Colorado Springs, posted on Facebook, “The thing is, we have to really reach out to those who might consider voting for Trump and say, ‘This is Goebbels. This is the final solution. If you are voting for him I will have to shoot you before Election Day.’ They’re not going to listen to reason, so when justice is gone, there’s always force…”


Wow, isnt that special?

Derivative too.

"If ballots don't work -- bullets will" -- Joyce Kaufman, Allen West's Chief of Staff

But we don't live in, like, a gun culture or anything.
"If they bring a knife, we bring a gun." -- President Obama to campaign supporters
But we don't live in, like, a gun culture or anything.


And that is also derivative, speaking of gun culture....





Change the subject much?
 
She is neither a "leader", nor is she inciting anyone to "riot".

Brandenburg v. Ohio - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The Brandenburg ruling requires both speech intended to incite others to lawless action, and that it is likely to incite imminent lawless action. While it could be argued that her comments satisfy the first requirement, it certainly doesn't satisfy the second.
So Trump has no blood on his hands, glad to hear it, dude, lol.

Who has claimed that Donald Trump has "blood on his hands"?
Dude it is a metaphor for the people who are saying that Trump is responsible for various attacks and harrassment of Muslims in the country of late.
 
She is neither a "leader", nor is she inciting anyone to "riot".

Brandenburg v. Ohio - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The Brandenburg ruling requires both speech intended to incite others to lawless action, and that it is likely to incite imminent lawless action. While it could be argued that her comments satisfy the first requirement, it certainly doesn't satisfy the second.
So Trump has no blood on his hands, glad to hear it, dude, lol.

Who has claimed that Donald Trump has "blood on his hands"?
Dude it is a metaphor for the people who are saying that Trump is responsible for various attacks and harrassment of Muslims in the country of late.

Whether or not Trump is "responsible" is itrelevant, and impossible to determine.

I'll give you that Trump has not said anything that would be legally actionable as a threat or incitement.
 
How close are democrats to realizing their dream of killing republicans ? What can we do to push them over the edge?

Will a President Trump do it?
 
That's fucked up.

She got to resign vs being fired for not showing up to work b/c she's in jail?

Since she didn't break any laws, yes.

You guys really don't seem to understand how the laws regarding "threats" are dealt with. There's no way this would qualify as a criminal threat.
but the ag has promised to prosecute anti-muslim speech.

and her post is CLEARLY hate speech.
 
That's fucked up.

She got to resign vs being fired for not showing up to work b/c she's in jail?

Since she didn't break any laws, yes.

You guys really don't seem to understand how the laws regarding "threats" are dealt with. There's no way this would qualify as a criminal threat.
but the ag has promised to prosecute anti-muslim speech.

and her post is CLEARLY hate speech.

The AG has not "promised to prosecute anti-Muslim speech", and there's no law against "hate speech".
 
I think this should dispel that long standing myth about the Democratic party being the party of tolerance and understanding. Yes there are tolerant liberals but the idea that the Democratic party respects the views and opinions of all total fantasy.
:lol:
was this the democratic party, or a democratic politician running for office, or simply a person that works for a private institution?

NOTE!

what she said is deplorable! Especially in this day and age with all the crazies out there....



Also, another question, who is this ''Laurie'' person? You guys/Briebart, have CUT OFF her Quote....

...so when justice is gone, there’s always force, as Laurie would say.

Who is ''laurie'' and would this give more context to her statement if we knew?
 
Last edited:
That's fucked up.

She got to resign vs being fired for not showing up to work b/c she's in jail?

Since she didn't break any laws, yes.

You guys really don't seem to understand how the laws regarding "threats" are dealt with. There's no way this would qualify as a criminal threat.
but the ag has promised to prosecute anti-muslim speech.

and her post is CLEARLY hate speech.

The AG has not "promised to prosecute anti-Muslim speech", and there's no law against "hate speech".
Maybe if you would stop watching only liberal news networks, you'd hear about all the bad shit coming out of the Obama regime.
 
That's fucked up.

She got to resign vs being fired for not showing up to work b/c she's in jail?

Since she didn't break any laws, yes.

You guys really don't seem to understand how the laws regarding "threats" are dealt with. There's no way this would qualify as a criminal threat.
She is a leader inciting to riot. That is reason enough? Turn around, what if The president of NRA calls for killing Hillary supporters and Hillary herself, since it was implied that Trump be killed too.

She is neither a "leader", nor is she inciting anyone to "riot".

Brandenburg v. Ohio - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The Brandenburg ruling requires both speech intended to incite others to lawless action, and that it is likely to incite imminent lawless action. While it could be argued that her comments satisfy the first requirement, it certainly doesn't satisfy the second.
Since she is a leader and her speech is inciting to riot, thank you for supporting my case by providing the Brandenburg ruling. Our laws apply to blacks as it does to the rest of us.
 
In all fairness, I really don't think the Left is claiming to be tolerant any more..
Most republicans and conservatives advocating that Muslims be 'kept out of the country,' the right's hostility toward immigrants, Hispanics, gay and transgender Americans – given these facts you can see why your post is ridiculous idiocy.
Deflect, pivot, attack. The traditional strategy of zealots.

Once again you completely ignore my post to make your own hardcore partisan talking points "point".

That intellectual cocoon in which you exist is nice & comfy, huh?
.
 
Last edited:
Lucy, destiny is shaped by demography, and you far right weirdos are on the losing side.

Not that I'm Far Right.
You are not responsible right or mainstream, for sure.
What on earth is "responsible right"? I've never even heard that term.
Those are responsible conservatives who know that Trump is a fraud, Cruz is scummy, and Carson is simply not presidential material. It has to be far far more than "Kenyan Muslim Social Nazi Communist" and not being to define the terms.
But Hillary is worthy of the Oval Office!
Worthy? No more than those three. Vote for Christie, or Kasich, or Rubio.
 
That's fucked up.

She got to resign vs being fired for not showing up to work b/c she's in jail?

Since she didn't break any laws, yes.

You guys really don't seem to understand how the laws regarding "threats" are dealt with. There's no way this would qualify as a criminal threat.
but the ag has promised to prosecute anti-muslim speech.

and her post is CLEARLY hate speech.

The AG has not "promised to prosecute anti-Muslim speech", and there's no law against "hate speech".
Hate Speech Law & Legal Definition

Hate speech is a communication that carries no meaning other than the expression of hatred for some group, especially in circumstances in which the communication is likely to provoke violence. It is an incitement to hatred primarily against a group of persons defined in terms of race, ethnicity, national origin, gender, religion, sexual orientation, and the like. Hate speech can be any form of expression regarded as offensive to racial, ethnic and religious groups and other discrete minorities or to women.
 
Hate speech can be any form of expression regarded as offensive to racial, ethnic and religious groups and other discrete minorities or to women.
 

Forum List

Back
Top