Nostra
Diamond Member
- Oct 7, 2019
- 66,097
- 56,911
- 3,615
The government can't do those, moron.I smell a class action suit!!
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
The government can't do those, moron.I smell a class action suit!!
Were you one of the Deutsche Bank employees that evaluated and approved the loan? Because my statements are based on what they told the court at trial.You really should quit talking on the subject, you're clueless.
Testimony at trial.
I thought you guys were claiming to be informed?
The judge through, wait for it, testimony at trial.Who determined that the SFC was incorrect?
Were you one of the Deutsche Bank employees that evaluated and approved the loan? Because my statements are based on what they told the court at trial.
The judge through, wait for it, testimony at trial.
The facts were clearly laid out in the judgement that led him to that conclusion.
Why would I take your word over the people who actually did the work?No I don't work for Deutsche Bank, but I work for another large financial institution in commercial risk, and you have no clue what transpires during a transaction of that magnitude.
I’ve provided a link to the judgement several times already. Have you not read it?Who's testimony, provide a link to the testimony that the judge supposedly used.
Without strong financial statement, he would have been charged a higher interest rate. That's why he lied on it.
Not one loan processor nor underwriter nor loan closer nor settlement attorney ever stated on the stand that they KNEW an appraisal was not performed. In fact federal regulations require such for such type loans.Were you one of the Deutsche Bank employees that evaluated and approved the loan? Because my statements are based on what they told the court at trial.
If they sued, perhaps they would. Their choice.So the bank is going to be compensated for that 'loss' out of the proceeds from the trial, right? lol
What interest rate did he pay, what would have he paid otherwise>
You tried bringing up ramifications, not me.
Again, I’m just going by what the testimony at trial showed.
They said that the used the figures that Trump provided.Not one loan processor nor underwriter nor loan closer nor settlement attorney ever stated on the stand that they KNEW an appraisal was not performed. In fact federal regulations require such for such type loans.
You are way way inexperienced here and are a child throwing stones at adults. Try your bamboozling where it might work
You are dismissed
It’s in the decision which I linked at least twice. Do you need me to do it again?You have yet to link any testimony to corroborate what you're saying.
It wasn't a serious question. My answer provided far more information than the answer to your unserious question, which was an obvious "no".
Why would I take your word over the people who actually did the work?
I’ve provided a link to the judgement several times already. Have you not read it?
Not one loan processor nor underwriter nor loan closer nor settlement attorney ever stated on the stand that they KNEW an appraisal was not performed. In fact federal regulations require such for such type loans.
You are way way inexperienced here and are a child throwing stones at adults. Try your bamboozling where it might work
You are dismissed
I can’t and I don’t have to. I have not claimed to know every detail of the process and I never claimed that all they did was look at the SFC and cut a check.It was a completely seroius question, please go through the loan process with us, what all occurs, the specific steps. You seem to think that they look at an SFC provided by the borrower, they review it,
and then cut a check.