Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Gods.But I would prove their data is false from the 1880 global average temperature
By denying the scientific consensus that human activity emitted greenhouse gases are the primary driver of climate change. By denying the temperature data presented and agreed by consensus. That means you are a denier. Your table is that way-------------->How the fuck am I denying it
By denying the scientific consensus that human activity emitted greenhouse gases are the primary driver of climate change. By denying the temperature data presented and accepted by consensus. That means you are a denier. Your table is that way-------------->How the fuck am I denying it
It's an issue that isn't frightening America, as intended.Watching Meet the Press. They have dedicated the whole hour to climate change. They have no deniers on the panel and as Chuck Todd correctly stated the science is long since settled. Now it is time to discuss solutions.
A recent poll shows even a majority of Republicans do not dispute anthropogenic climate change.
Opinion | More Republicans Than You Think Support Action on Climate Change
I applaud Meet the Press. Time to push deniers and their pseudo science to the curb or back into closet. Choose your metaphor. They are just standing in the way and are no more than obstructionists.
We need to discuss only solutions and adaptations.
A "real" debate where the side you don't like is just ignored and excluded? Why do I think this is scientific laziness, intellectual cowardice and more fascist zealotry from the left.One side debating facts, and another farting or making otherwise vulgar, ignorant noises, is not diversity, and excluding the farters isn't "bias". It's just common sense, and a necessary precondition for a real debate.
You said you would prove their data false. Go ahead and fucking prove it, denier.Because they are lying
Because US rightards won't accept AGW exists or is a problem, how can they be expected to agree on a solution?There is no consensus as to what should be done or if anything can be done short of a regression to an 18th century
life style.
Most likely because you are a denier. Are you?Why do I think this is scientific laziness, intellectual cowardice and more fascist zealotry from the left.
Gods.But I would prove their data is false from the 1880 global average temperature
What I like is the way temperatures from the Medieval warm period are used to deny recent 'warming' as being unusual or excessive. As if daily temperatures were recorded then.
Temperature record of the past 1000 years - Wikipedia
You can't even say with certainty to what degree AGW is a problem and no one certainly has come upon a solution that isn't worse than the problem itself (which again, is uncertain).Because US rightards won't accept AGW is a problem, how can they be expected to agree on a solution?
I don't deny the premise. I do deny and doubt everything that comes after that. We can't say with any certainty to what degree the earth is imperiled and even more importantly, if AGW is true we can't say what can be done about it aside from going back to a pre industrial revolution lifestyle.Most likely because you are a denier. Are you?
Do you accept the scientific consensus that human activity emitted greenhouse gases are the primary driver of climate change?
So, you accept it?I don't deny the premise.Most likely because you are a denier. Are you?
Do you accept the scientific consensus that human activity emitted greenhouse gases are the primary driver of climate change?
If it quacks like a denier...but in any case, I have the impression the end state of greenhouse warming might be Venus. Would that be a problem?You can't even say with certainty to what degree AGW is a problem
No. Your impressions make no difference to me.If it quacks like a denier...but in any case, I have the impression the end state of greenhouse warming might be Venus. Would that be a problem?
Yes. Stop the blatant politicization of global warming.. Nothing good can happen until the left stops using this issue as a Trojan Horse for socialism.Further, this thread is about possible solutions. Got any?
What a denier load---------------------->I would respect and see this as a bright sign if one single leftist admitted the issue has been hijacked to achieve socialized redistribution of wealth from the West to the third world.
Deniers that way----------------------->After all the cooked data, exposed emails, and disastrous Michael Mann hockey stick lie why anyone believes these global warming nuts is beyond me.
Watching Meet the Press. They have dedicated the whole hour to climate change. They have no deniers on the panel and as Chuck Todd correctly stated the science is long since settled. Now it is time to discuss solutions.
A recent poll shows even a majority of Republicans do not dispute anthropogenic climate change.
Opinion | More Republicans Than You Think Support Action on Climate Change
I applaud Meet the Press. Time to push deniers and their pseudo science to the curb or back into closet. Choose your metaphor. They are just standing in the way and are no more than obstructionists.
We need to discuss only solutions and adaptations.
