Mueller Spokesman Issues Clarification: OLC Opinion Had NO Impact On Mueller Decision

[easyt65]

Hilarious...Mueller's Office backtracked / issued a 'clarification' of what Mueller claimed in his 'Drive-By' press conference yesterday (and his report), contradicting his own statements while shooting a huge hole in the snowflake narrative of how Trump was not found / declared 'guilty' because of the OLC decision that sitting Presidents can not be indicted....

"Mueller refused to allege a crime. So evidence of something -- something that wasn’t prosecutable right now, and that Mueller refused to suggest amounted to a crime for the future. Mueller himself said the investigation was justified because perhaps it would have resulted in evidence that “could be used if there were co-conspirators who could be charged now.” But Mueller didn’t charge co-conspirators in obstruction."


"Mueller’s second justification is more obvious: he essentially said he was doing Congress’ impeachment groundwork for them. “The Constitution requires a process other than the criminal justice system to formally accuse a sitting president of wrongdoing,” Mueller stated. This is an invitation to impeachment."


"A criminal investigation that cannot possibly result in charges is a conflict in terms. Mueller never should have agreed to such an investigation under the law, and Mueller’s own standard makes that clear."


DOJ, Mueller’s Office Release Joint Statement Clarifying Mueller’s Comments

That flatly contradicts Mueller's words. So Who is lying? Must have been
Mueller as Barr's statement is unchanged. I think Mueller just found himself in peril of legal recourse as he has already destroyed his legacy. Mueller will be known as a partisan hack.

Lol, this "joint statement" actually says there is not difference between the two statements.

Nice claim / opinion...

Dude, you posted the fucking thing, didn't you read it?

From.your link:
The Special Counsel's report and his statement today made clear that the office concluded it would not reach a determination - one way or the other - about whether the President committed a crime. There is no conflict between these statements.

Sorry, my bad - I thought you meant it was saying the same thing as in Mueller's decision was based on the OCL decision, which it was not. My apologies.

 

[easyt65]

Hilarious...Mueller's Office backtracked / issued a 'clarification' of what Mueller claimed in his 'Drive-By' press conference yesterday (and his report), contradicting his own statements while shooting a huge hole in the snowflake narrative of how Trump was not found / declared 'guilty' because of the OLC decision that sitting Presidents can not be indicted....

"Mueller refused to allege a crime. So evidence of something -- something that wasn’t prosecutable right now, and that Mueller refused to suggest amounted to a crime for the future. Mueller himself said the investigation was justified because perhaps it would have resulted in evidence that “could be used if there were co-conspirators who could be charged now.” But Mueller didn’t charge co-conspirators in obstruction."


"Mueller’s second justification is more obvious: he essentially said he was doing Congress’ impeachment groundwork for them. “The Constitution requires a process other than the criminal justice system to formally accuse a sitting president of wrongdoing,” Mueller stated. This is an invitation to impeachment."


"A criminal investigation that cannot possibly result in charges is a conflict in terms. Mueller never should have agreed to such an investigation under the law, and Mueller’s own standard makes that clear."


DOJ, Mueller’s Office Release Joint Statement Clarifying Mueller’s Comments

That flatly contradicts Mueller's words. So Who is lying? Must have been
Mueller as Barr's statement is unchanged. I think Mueller just found himself in peril of legal recourse as he has already destroyed his legacy. Mueller will be known as a partisan hack.

Lol, this "joint statement" actually says there is not difference between the two statements.

Nice claim / opinion...

Dude, you posted the fucking thing, didn't you read it?

From.your link:
The Special Counsel's report and his statement today made clear that the office concluded it would not reach a determination - one way or the other - about whether the President committed a crime. There is no conflict between these statements.

And your name of Stupidus rings true again. You're so dumb you don't know when you're being trolled. Mueller embarrassed himself and his own office contradicted the lying Bobby. Barr likely won't be pleased and Mueller may face some problems later on.

Despite Mueller declaring that he REFUSES to testify under oath before Congress, his report and his decision to do this ' drive-by, BEGS - almost mandates - he do so.

 

[Snouter]

At some point Swamp Rat Mueller will have to testify to Attorney John Durham as the probe into the Russian Hoax moves forward.

 

[B. Kidd]

Hilarious...Mueller's Office backtracked / issued a 'clarification' of what Mueller claimed in his 'Drive-By' press conference yesterday (and his report), contradicting his own statements while shooting a huge hole in the snowflake narrative of how Trump was not found / declared 'guilty' because of the OLC decision that sitting Presidents can not be indicted....

"Mueller refused to allege a crime. So evidence of something -- something that wasn’t prosecutable right now, and that Mueller refused to suggest amounted to a crime for the future. Mueller himself said the investigation was justified because perhaps it would have resulted in evidence that “could be used if there were co-conspirators who could be charged now.” But Mueller didn’t charge co-conspirators in obstruction."


"Mueller’s second justification is more obvious: he essentially said he was doing Congress’ impeachment groundwork for them. “The Constitution requires a process other than the criminal justice system to formally accuse a sitting president of wrongdoing,” Mueller stated. This is an invitation to impeachment."


"A criminal investigation that cannot possibly result in charges is a conflict in terms. Mueller never should have agreed to such an investigation under the law, and Mueller’s own standard makes that clear."


DOJ, Mueller’s Office Release Joint Statement Clarifying Mueller’s Comments

Barr is placing more 'spin' on the SC Mueller report which implies that the DOJ in it's current form & representation is nothing more than a mouth piece for Trump & for Trump's influence.

This is however no surprise; not to those of US that are actually paying attention, like myself.

Trump is getting very nervous & Barr is making attempts to sooth Trump's sore, fucking, butt hurt ass.

Barr made the Constitutionally correct decision on obstruction since Mueller made NO DECISION AT ALL on it.
And the last time we checked, Mueller worked for the DOJ (you need reminding that the DOJ falls under the Executive Branch); even tho' Mueller had a senior moment believing that he worked for Congress!
Civics 101, you ass monkey.

 

[B. Kidd]

That flatly contradicts Mueller's words. So Who is lying? Must have been
Mueller as Barr's statement is unchanged. I think Mueller just found himself in peril of legal recourse as he has already destroyed his legacy. Mueller will be known as a partisan hack.

Lol, this "joint statement" actually says there is not difference between the two statements.

Nice claim / opinion...

Dude, you posted the fucking thing, didn't you read it?

From.your link:
The Special Counsel's report and his statement today made clear that the office concluded it would not reach a determination - one way or the other - about whether the President committed a crime. There is no conflict between these statements.

And your name of Stupidus rings true again. You're so dumb you don't know when you're being trolled. Mueller embarrassed himself and his own office contradicted the lying Bobby. Barr likely won't be pleased and Mueller may face some problems later on.

Despite Mueller declaring that he REFUSES to testify under oath before Congress, his report and his decision to do this ' drive-by, BEGS - almost mandates - he do so.

No reason the Senate Judiciary Committee shouldn't shoot him a subpoena to testify PUBLICLY!

 

[boedicca]

Hilarious...Mueller's Office backtracked / issued a 'clarification' of what Mueller claimed in his 'Drive-By' press conference yesterday (and his report), contradicting his own statements while shooting a huge hole in the snowflake narrative of how Trump was not found / declared 'guilty' because of the OLC decision that sitting Presidents can not be indicted....

"Mueller refused to allege a crime. So evidence of something -- something that wasn’t prosecutable right now, and that Mueller refused to suggest amounted to a crime for the future. Mueller himself said the investigation was justified because perhaps it would have resulted in evidence that “could be used if there were co-conspirators who could be charged now.” But Mueller didn’t charge co-conspirators in obstruction."


"Mueller’s second justification is more obvious: he essentially said he was doing Congress’ impeachment groundwork for them. “The Constitution requires a process other than the criminal justice system to formally accuse a sitting president of wrongdoing,” Mueller stated. This is an invitation to impeachment."


"A criminal investigation that cannot possibly result in charges is a conflict in terms. Mueller never should have agreed to such an investigation under the law, and Mueller’s own standard makes that clear."


DOJ, Mueller’s Office Release Joint Statement Clarifying Mueller’s Comments

Barr probably played him a tape of their phone conversation

Mueller remembers it - which is why he doesn't want to testify under oath before Congress.

 

[Crepitus]

Innocence confirmed? Where?Just today he said Russia helped get him elected.

BULLSHIT! LINK....QUOTE...

THE ONLY PERSON IN THE 2016 ELECTION PROVEN TO HAVE RECEIVED ANYTHING FROM THE RUSSIONS IS HILLARY CLINTON:

-- A RUSSIAN-AUTHORED COUNTER-INTELLIGENCE DOCUMENT DELIVERED BY A TRUMP-HATING FOREIGN SPY THAT SHE PAID FOR AND THAT WAS INTENTIONALLY ILLEGALLY USED TO COMMIT FISA COURT ABUSES, PERJURY BEFORE CONGRESS, AND AN ATTEMPT TO ALTER THE 2016 ELECTION IN HILLARY'S FAVOR

AND

- MILLIONS OF DOLLARS IN 'DONATIONS' TO THE CLINTON FOUNDATION FROM THE RUSSIAN WHO LED THE KGB BANK'S EFFORT TO ACQUIRE URANIUM ONE....AND BILL CLINTON WHO RECEIVED A VERY LUCRATIVE SPEAKING GIG FROM TBE KGB BANK

The link and the quote are two up from your post.

Got link to your nonsense?

 

[Crepitus]

What we need to be doing, now that Trump's innocence has been confirmed, is put pressure on him to balance the effin budget!!!

Innocence confirmed?

Where?

Just today he said Russia helped get him elected.

Got indictments?

No?

Innocence confirmed.

He did not say Russia helped him get elected. You guys did. Deal with it.

• 
  Donald J. Trump
  @realDonaldTrump

Russia, Russia, Russia! That’s all you heard at the beginning of this Witch Hunt Hoax...And now Russia has disappeared because I had nothing to do with Russia helping me to get elected. It was a crime that didn’t exist. So now the Dems and their partner, the Fake News Media,.

LMAO...

Wow, you're a moron. He just said he had NOTHING TO DO with Russia. I thought you guys said it was a done deal that they interfered. It seems Trump agrees with you. However, HE had nothing to do with is, as verified by half a dozen investigations.

So, he did not have anything to do with Russia's interference, and if anything, their interference helped the hag more than it did Trump.

Go cry somewhere else you fucking loser.

Spin little tRumpkin! Spin like the wind!

 

[bripat9643]

Hilarious...Mueller's Office backtracked / issued a 'clarification' of what Mueller claimed in his 'Drive-By' press conference yesterday (and his report), contradicting his own statements while shooting a huge hole in the snowflake narrative of how Trump was not found / declared 'guilty' because of the OLC decision that sitting Presidents can not be indicted....

"Mueller refused to allege a crime. So evidence of something -- something that wasn’t prosecutable right now, and that Mueller refused to suggest amounted to a crime for the future. Mueller himself said the investigation was justified because perhaps it would have resulted in evidence that “could be used if there were co-conspirators who could be charged now.” But Mueller didn’t charge co-conspirators in obstruction."


"Mueller’s second justification is more obvious: he essentially said he was doing Congress’ impeachment groundwork for them. “The Constitution requires a process other than the criminal justice system to formally accuse a sitting president of wrongdoing,” Mueller stated. This is an invitation to impeachment."


"A criminal investigation that cannot possibly result in charges is a conflict in terms. Mueller never should have agreed to such an investigation under the law, and Mueller’s own standard makes that clear."


DOJ, Mueller’s Office Release Joint Statement Clarifying Mueller’s Comments

Barr is placing more 'spin' on the SC Mueller report which implies that the DOJ in it's current form & representation is nothing more than a mouth piece for Trump & for Trump's influence.

This is however no surprise; not to those of US that are actually paying attention, like myself.

Trump is getting very nervous & Barr is making attempts to sooth Trump's sore, fucking, butt hurt ass.

Is "spin" a leftwing euphemism meaning "truth?"

 

[easyt65]

Innocence confirmed? Where?Just today he said Russia helped get him elected.

BULLSHIT! LINK....QUOTE...

THE ONLY PERSON IN THE 2016 ELECTION PROVEN TO HAVE RECEIVED ANYTHING FROM THE RUSSIONS IS HILLARY CLINTON:

-- A RUSSIAN-AUTHORED COUNTER-INTELLIGENCE DOCUMENT DELIVERED BY A TRUMP-HATING FOREIGN SPY THAT SHE PAID FOR AND THAT WAS INTENTIONALLY ILLEGALLY USED TO COMMIT FISA COURT ABUSES, PERJURY BEFORE CONGRESS, AND AN ATTEMPT TO ALTER THE 2016 ELECTION IN HILLARY'S FAVOR

AND

- MILLIONS OF DOLLARS IN 'DONATIONS' TO THE CLINTON FOUNDATION FROM THE RUSSIAN WHO LED THE KGB BANK'S EFFORT TO ACQUIRE URANIUM ONE....AND BILL CLINTON WHO RECEIVED A VERY LUCRATIVE SPEAKING GIG FROM TBE KGB BANK

The link and the quote are two up from your post.

Got link to your nonsense?

Posted them dozens of time on this board, as I am sure you already know, but yet snowflakes still ask for them every time these are brought up...it's part of their 'stupid game' they try to play...

 

[bripat9643]

Joint DOJ?

That's BARR speaking...and we know he's a blatant liar

No Barr didn't lie. Mueller didn't say "But for the OLC opinion, I would have found the President obstructed justice."

We know precisely what he said. He wrote it down for everyone to read.

The rubes needed some red meat and Donnie needs a little butthurt cream.

Mueller stated that if he believed the President had not committed a crime he would have said so....which infers if he had thought the President had committed a crime he WOULD have said so, which he never clearly stated..

He also went to great lengths to insinuate it was because of the OCL that he did not declare Trump has committed a crime and why he did not indict him.

Mueller's spokesman, not the DOJ released the 'clarification' that Mueller did not mean that the OCL decision had anything to do with Mueller's final decision.

Instead of doing what you snowflakes usually do, which is defend the conspirators and claim Trump is lying and Barr is covering up for him, why don't you have Nadler settle this once and for all by subpoenaing Mueller and force him to testify? That way he can clear the air, say what he really meant, and answer some questions about his investigation!

Oh wait...that's right - Mueller begged Nadler not to call him to testify before Congress during his Press Conference...

The last place wants to find himself is under oath before Congress....

Mueller is spinning so furiously that he's going to drill himself right into the ground.

 

[Crepitus]

Hilarious...Mueller's Office backtracked / issued a 'clarification' of what Mueller claimed in his 'Drive-By' press conference yesterday (and his report), contradicting his own statements while shooting a huge hole in the snowflake narrative of how Trump was not found / declared 'guilty' because of the OLC decision that sitting Presidents can not be indicted....

"Mueller refused to allege a crime. So evidence of something -- something that wasn’t prosecutable right now, and that Mueller refused to suggest amounted to a crime for the future. Mueller himself said the investigation was justified because perhaps it would have resulted in evidence that “could be used if there were co-conspirators who could be charged now.” But Mueller didn’t charge co-conspirators in obstruction."


"Mueller’s second justification is more obvious: he essentially said he was doing Congress’ impeachment groundwork for them. “The Constitution requires a process other than the criminal justice system to formally accuse a sitting president of wrongdoing,” Mueller stated. This is an invitation to impeachment."


"A criminal investigation that cannot possibly result in charges is a conflict in terms. Mueller never should have agreed to such an investigation under the law, and Mueller’s own standard makes that clear."


DOJ, Mueller’s Office Release Joint Statement Clarifying Mueller’s Comments

That flatly contradicts Mueller's words. So Who is lying? Must have been
Mueller as Barr's statement is unchanged. I think Mueller just found himself in peril of legal recourse as he has already destroyed his legacy. Mueller will be known as a partisan hack.

Lol, this "joint statement" actually says there is not difference between the two statements.

Nice claim / opinion...

Dude, you posted the fucking thing, didn't you read it?

From.your link:
The Special Counsel's report and his statement today made clear that the office concluded it would not reach a determination - one way or the other - about whether the President committed a crime. There is no conflict between these statements.

And your name of Stupidus rings true again. You're so dumb you don't know when you're being trolled. Mueller embarrassed himself and his own office contradicted the lying Bobby. Barr likely won't be pleased and Mueller may face some problems later on.

A. The very fact that you try to change my name to be an insult labels you as an uneducated moron. Look it up.

Nobody in the tRump *administration* is trolling.

 

[easyt65]

Joint DOJ?

That's BARR speaking...and we know he's a blatant liar

No Barr didn't lie. Mueller didn't say "But for the OLC opinion, I would have found the President obstructed justice."

We know precisely what he said. He wrote it down for everyone to read.

The rubes needed some red meat and Donnie needs a little butthurt cream.

Mueller stated that if he believed the President had not committed a crime he would have said so....which infers if he had thought the President had committed a crime he WOULD have said so, which he never clearly stated..

He also went to great lengths to insinuate it was because of the OCL that he did not declare Trump has committed a crime and why he did not indict him.

Mueller's spokesman, not the DOJ released the 'clarification' that Mueller did not mean that the OCL decision had anything to do with Mueller's final decision.

Instead of doing what you snowflakes usually do, which is defend the conspirators and claim Trump is lying and Barr is covering up for him, why don't you have Nadler settle this once and for all by subpoenaing Mueller and force him to testify? That way he can clear the air, say what he really meant, and answer some questions about his investigation!

Oh wait...that's right - Mueller begged Nadler not to call him to testify before Congress during his Press Conference...

The last place wants to find himself is under oath before Congress....

Mueller is spinning so furiously that he's going to drill himself right into the ground.

Again, he is begging to be subpoenaed to testify...

 

[Crepitus]

Innocence confirmed? Where?Just today he said Russia helped get him elected.

BULLSHIT! LINK....QUOTE...

THE ONLY PERSON IN THE 2016 ELECTION PROVEN TO HAVE RECEIVED ANYTHING FROM THE RUSSIONS IS HILLARY CLINTON:

-- A RUSSIAN-AUTHORED COUNTER-INTELLIGENCE DOCUMENT DELIVERED BY A TRUMP-HATING FOREIGN SPY THAT SHE PAID FOR AND THAT WAS INTENTIONALLY ILLEGALLY USED TO COMMIT FISA COURT ABUSES, PERJURY BEFORE CONGRESS, AND AN ATTEMPT TO ALTER THE 2016 ELECTION IN HILLARY'S FAVOR

AND

- MILLIONS OF DOLLARS IN 'DONATIONS' TO THE CLINTON FOUNDATION FROM THE RUSSIAN WHO LED THE KGB BANK'S EFFORT TO ACQUIRE URANIUM ONE....AND BILL CLINTON WHO RECEIVED A VERY LUCRATIVE SPEAKING GIG FROM TBE KGB BANK

The link and the quote are two up from your post.

Got link to your nonsense?

Posted them dozens of time on this board, as I am sure you already know, but yet snowflakes still ask for them every time these are brought up...it's part of their 'stupid game' they try to play...

Real links not rwnj blogs.

 

[easyt65]

Innocence confirmed? Where?Just today he said Russia helped get him elected.

BULLSHIT! LINK....QUOTE...

THE ONLY PERSON IN THE 2016 ELECTION PROVEN TO HAVE RECEIVED ANYTHING FROM THE RUSSIONS IS HILLARY CLINTON:

-- A RUSSIAN-AUTHORED COUNTER-INTELLIGENCE DOCUMENT DELIVERED BY A TRUMP-HATING FOREIGN SPY THAT SHE PAID FOR AND THAT WAS INTENTIONALLY ILLEGALLY USED TO COMMIT FISA COURT ABUSES, PERJURY BEFORE CONGRESS, AND AN ATTEMPT TO ALTER THE 2016 ELECTION IN HILLARY'S FAVOR

AND

- MILLIONS OF DOLLARS IN 'DONATIONS' TO THE CLINTON FOUNDATION FROM THE RUSSIAN WHO LED THE KGB BANK'S EFFORT TO ACQUIRE URANIUM ONE....AND BILL CLINTON WHO RECEIVED A VERY LUCRATIVE SPEAKING GIG FROM TBE KGB BANK

The link and the quote are two up from your post.

Got link to your nonsense?

Posted them dozens of time on this board, as I am sure you already know, but yet snowflakes still ask for them every time these are brought up...it's part of their 'stupid game' they try to play...

Real links not rwnj blogs.

Again, posted dosend of times, even from faux news sites like CNN...

It's always humerous when snowflakes attempt to discredit the source but never try to disprove what is actually being reported...because they can't...

 

[Crepitus]

Innocence confirmed? Where?Just today he said Russia helped get him elected.

BULLSHIT! LINK....QUOTE...

THE ONLY PERSON IN THE 2016 ELECTION PROVEN TO HAVE RECEIVED ANYTHING FROM THE RUSSIONS IS HILLARY CLINTON:

-- A RUSSIAN-AUTHORED COUNTER-INTELLIGENCE DOCUMENT DELIVERED BY A TRUMP-HATING FOREIGN SPY THAT SHE PAID FOR AND THAT WAS INTENTIONALLY ILLEGALLY USED TO COMMIT FISA COURT ABUSES, PERJURY BEFORE CONGRESS, AND AN ATTEMPT TO ALTER THE 2016 ELECTION IN HILLARY'S FAVOR

AND

- MILLIONS OF DOLLARS IN 'DONATIONS' TO THE CLINTON FOUNDATION FROM THE RUSSIAN WHO LED THE KGB BANK'S EFFORT TO ACQUIRE URANIUM ONE....AND BILL CLINTON WHO RECEIVED A VERY LUCRATIVE SPEAKING GIG FROM TBE KGB BANK

The link and the quote are two up from your post.

Got link to your nonsense?

Posted them dozens of time on this board, as I am sure you already know, but yet snowflakes still ask for them every time these are brought up...it's part of their 'stupid game' they try to play...

Real links not rwnj blogs.

Again, posted dosend of times, even from faux news sites like CNN...

It's always humerous when snowflakes attempt to discredit the source but never try to disprove what is actually being reported...because they can't...

So, are you gonna post the proof or not?

 

[Care4all]

Hilarious...Mueller's Office backtracked / issued a 'clarification' of what Mueller claimed in his 'Drive-By' press conference yesterday (and his report), contradicting his own statements while shooting a huge hole in the snowflake narrative of how Trump was not found / declared 'guilty' because of the OLC decision that sitting Presidents can not be indicted....

"Mueller refused to allege a crime. So evidence of something -- something that wasn’t prosecutable right now, and that Mueller refused to suggest amounted to a crime for the future. Mueller himself said the investigation was justified because perhaps it would have resulted in evidence that “could be used if there were co-conspirators who could be charged now.” But Mueller didn’t charge co-conspirators in obstruction."


"Mueller’s second justification is more obvious: he essentially said he was doing Congress’ impeachment groundwork for them. “The Constitution requires a process other than the criminal justice system to formally accuse a sitting president of wrongdoing,” Mueller stated. This is an invitation to impeachment."


"A criminal investigation that cannot possibly result in charges is a conflict in terms. Mueller never should have agreed to such an investigation under the law, and Mueller’s own standard makes that clear."


DOJ, Mueller’s Office Release Joint Statement Clarifying Mueller’s Comments

How come you did not post the JOINT statement and instead pasted some guy named Shapiro's opinion instead?

Here is the joint statement:

The Attorney General has previously stated that the Special Counsel repeatedly affirmed that he was not saying that, but for the OLC opinion, he would have found the President obstructed justice. The Special Counsel's report and his statement today made clear that the office concluded it would not reach a determination - one way or the other - about whether the President committed a crime. There is no conflict between these statements.

Mueller's office in this statement with the Justice department, is saying EXACTLY what Mueller has said all along.... he did not make a determination on the obstruction, one way, or the other....

 

[easyt65]

0

BULLSHIT! LINK....QUOTE...

THE ONLY PERSON IN THE 2016 ELECTION PROVEN TO HAVE RECEIVED ANYTHING FROM THE RUSSIONS IS HILLARY CLINTON:

-- A RUSSIAN-AUTHORED COUNTER-INTELLIGENCE DOCUMENT DELIVERED BY A TRUMP-HATING FOREIGN SPY THAT SHE PAID FOR AND THAT WAS INTENTIONALLY ILLEGALLY USED TO COMMIT FISA COURT ABUSES, PERJURY BEFORE CONGRESS, AND AN ATTEMPT TO ALTER THE 2016 ELECTION IN HILLARY'S FAVOR

AND

- MILLIONS OF DOLLARS IN 'DONATIONS' TO THE CLINTON FOUNDATION FROM THE RUSSIAN WHO LED THE KGB BANK'S EFFORT TO ACQUIRE URANIUM ONE....AND BILL CLINTON WHO RECEIVED A VERY LUCRATIVE SPEAKING GIG FROM TBE KGB BANK

The link and the quote are two up from your post.

Got link to your nonsense?

Posted them dozens of time on this board, as I am sure you already know, but yet snowflakes still ask for them every time these are brought up...it's part of their 'stupid game' they try to play...

Real links not rwnj blogs.

Again, posted dosend of times, even from faux news sites like CNN...

It's always humerous when snowflakes attempt to discredit the source but never try to disprove what is actually being reported...because they can't...

So, are you gonna post the proof or not?

Sorry, I don't play the 'stupid game. That's why they have a search feature on this board....either put forth any effort to find the links already posted or continue to 'play the game' by yourself...

 

[Care4all]

And the Shapiro guy from your article is also wrong on not being able to investigate a president on criminal actions, ever, because he can't be charged.

The Supreme Court already weighed in on this in a Nixon case.... just because a president can not be indicted, does NOT mean the president can not be investigated for criminal actions by the department of justice...

This guy's opinion in your article is simply flat out WRONG. Probably because he is not familiar with the Watergate court cases that worked this all out in the 70's.... this guy was not even born for another 10 years after watergate.

 

[easyt65]

Hilarious...Mueller's Office backtracked / issued a 'clarification' of what Mueller claimed in his 'Drive-By' press conference yesterday (and his report), contradicting his own statements while shooting a huge hole in the snowflake narrative of how Trump was not found / declared 'guilty' because of the OLC decision that sitting Presidents can not be indicted....

"Mueller refused to allege a crime. So evidence of something -- something that wasn’t prosecutable right now, and that Mueller refused to suggest amounted to a crime for the future. Mueller himself said the investigation was justified because perhaps it would have resulted in evidence that “could be used if there were co-conspirators who could be charged now.” But Mueller didn’t charge co-conspirators in obstruction."


"Mueller’s second justification is more obvious: he essentially said he was doing Congress’ impeachment groundwork for them. “The Constitution requires a process other than the criminal justice system to formally accuse a sitting president of wrongdoing,” Mueller stated. This is an invitation to impeachment."


"A criminal investigation that cannot possibly result in charges is a conflict in terms. Mueller never should have agreed to such an investigation under the law, and Mueller’s own standard makes that clear."


DOJ, Mueller’s Office Release Joint Statement Clarifying Mueller’s Comments

How come you did not post the JOINT statement and instead pasted some guy named Shapiro's opinion instead?

Here is the joint statement:

The Attorney General has previously stated that the Special Counsel repeatedly affirmed that he was not saying that, but for the OLC opinion, he would have found the President obstructed justice. The Special Counsel's report and his statement today made clear that the office concluded it would not reach a determination - one way or the other - about whether the President committed a crime. There is no conflict between these statements.

Mueller's office in this statement with the Justice department, is saying EXACTLY what Mueller has said all along.... he did not make a determination on the obstruction, one way, or the other....

The easy solution is for Nadler to subpoena Mueller and have his testify under oath before Congress to make clear what he is claiming, to defend his decision and investigation, and to answer some questions....

Why is Mueller so afraid to / against doing so?

Why aren't snowflakes insisting he do so and are instead allowing Mueller to dictate what he will do and will not do?

Nadler claimed he wanted to know everything Mueller had to say in his report so badly that he demanded the US AG break the law by releasing Grand Jury information Mueller's team redacted and then voted to hold the US AG in 'Contempt' for refusing to break the law...WHEN ALL HE HAD TO DO WAS / IS SUBPOENA MUELLER AND have him testify under oath before Congress...

Why does he allow Mueller to tell him who can / can't and who should / should not testify under oath before Congress?