Mueller's job.......(in my opinion)

[kyzr]

Mueller is done. Its Barr's report now, and he testifies before the Senate today.
Should be enlightening...no collusion...no obstruction...

Bullshit. It was never "Barr's Report" and Barr should resign

Why? Because Mueller didn't give you what you wanted? Admit it, Lesh...you're pissed off that after two years of your being promised by Democrats like Adam Shiff and Jerry Nadler that there was evidence of collusion...that there isn't any...and it turns out that they were lying to you all along! It isn't Barr who should resign...it's the people that have pushed what they KNEW was a lie!

I guess you missed the fact that three days after Barr's first (lying) letter...Mueller sent HIM a letter calling Barr out

Wrong. They had a cordial phone call after the letter, and agreed that Barr's summary was accurate.

 

[Meathead]

I wrote this in responding to some Trump sycophant in another thread......

Really? I thought you did all your whining here.

 

[dudmuck]

Harvard Law Professor Dershowitz says NO OBSTRUCTION, period:
Dershowitz: Mueller got the law 'all wrong' on obstruction of justice

Both Sekulow and Dershowitz are shills for Trump and Russia.
Nothing either of them say has any value.

Alan Dershowitz is a "shill" for Donald Trump? That's amusing. Dershowitz doesn't like Trump. He never has. The only reason you hate Dershowitz is that he's a liberal but he's unwilling to lie about what Trump did.

This guy said that lying to FBI isnt a crime.
He keeps appearing on Russian propaganda.
Says Trump shouldnt be impeached even if he colluded.

The reason Dershowitz says that Trump shouldn't be impeached even if he colluded is that collusion isn't illegal...therefore it's not grounds to impeach a President. He's a lawyer. He grasps concepts like that! You obviously DON'T!

Everybody knows collusion is slang for "conspiring against the USA".

Its just like when they assert that Hillary colluded, what they're meaning is conspiring against.

 

[Olde Europe]

Why? Because Mueller didn't give you what you wanted? Admit it, Lesh...you're pissed off that after two years of your being promised by Democrats like Adam Shiff and Jerry Nadler that there was evidence of collusion...that there isn't any. ..and it turns out that they were lying to you all along! It isn't Barr who should resign...it's the people that have pushed what they KNEW was a lie!

So, here we have another blockhead who can't but advertise his ignorance and his not having read the Mueller report. He is therefore reduced mindlessly to re-bleat Trumpish talking points.

Nowhere does Mueller say there is "no evidence for collusion". Just that the available evidence wasn't enough to establish beyond a reasonable doubt a criminal conspiracy, so as to sustain a conviction. Moreover, he details that lack of cooperation, the deletion of evidence, the use of encryption and pervasive mendacity on the part of the Trump stooges stood in the way of establishing the whole picture. See Vol I, p9+.

How does it feel, Oldstyle, to have Trump's goo all over you?

 

[Zorro!]

Criminal conduct isn't a requirement for impeachment, as Dershowitz points out:

Let me ALSO add the statement from the most vile hypocrite Lindsey Graham......who, 20 years ago saif this

“You don’t even have to be convicted of a crime to lose your job (as president) in this constitutional republic if this body determines your conduct as a public official is clearly out of bounds in your role,” Graham says of Clinton.

Let me ALSO add the statement from the most vile hypocrite Lindsey Graham......who, 20 years ago saif this

I wonder if Lindsey is auditioning for VP on Trump's 2020 ticket; he has certainly changed his opinion about Trump's competence.

How Lindsey Graham Went From Trump Skeptic to Trump Sidekick

Either hypocrisy PERSONIFIED.........or, Trump has some "compromising" evidence on Lindsey's past proclivities......

If you want to gay-bash Graham, show some balls and do it. No one but you gives a fuck.

LINDSEY GRAHAM CALLS ROBERT MUELLER’S BLUFF:

In response to questions by Senator Blumenthal, the Attorney General testified in essence that you told him in a phone call that you did not challenge the accuracy of the Attorney General’s summary of your report’s principal conclusions, but rather you wanted more of the report, particularly the executive summaries concerning obstruction of justice, to be released promptly. In particular, Attorney General Barr testified that you believed media coverage of your investigation was unfair without the public release of those summaries.

Please inform the Committee if you would like to provide testimony regarding any misrepresentation by the Attorney General of the substance of that phone call.​

Still digging Lindsey 2.0.

 

[nat4900]

LINDSEY GRAHAM CALLS ROBERT MUELLER’S BLUFF:

Go play with yourself in some corner.....Since Mueller has not publicly stated ONE fucking word, sweet Lindsey has no Mueller "bluff" to bitch about.

RedState

RIGHT BIAS

 

[Zorro!]

LINDSEY GRAHAM CALLS ROBERT MUELLER’S BLUFF:

Go play with yourself in some corner.....Since Mueller has not publicly stated ONE fucking word, sweet Lindsey has no Mueller "bluff" to bitch about.

RedState

RIGHT BIAS

If you want to gay-bash Graham, show some balls and do it, no one but you gives a fig.

Mueller wrote a "private" letter to Barr and promptly leaked it to the press.

Barr, who has known him for thirty years, called him up, on a speaker phone, informed him that others were listening and taking notes, because he knows what a liar Mueller is, and he asked him point blank if Mueller could identify a SINGLE false statement in Barr's letter. Dirty Bob could not identify any false statements, and instead whined about how the press was reporting on it.

Barr also gave Mueller the opportunity to review his letter before he released it, and Mueller refused.

Barr then released the full report as quickly as possible, so you are still bitching about a letter, about a report, when the entire report, with some redaction has already been released.

And, you left out the fact that Barr also asked Mueller to identify the information that would need to be redacted when he submitted his report, so that Barr could get the Mueller report into the hands of the public more quickly, but Dirty Bob refused that too. So Mueller had opportunity after opportunity to assist in the process and refused and you are reduced to gay-bashing Graham?

Sad!

 

[nat4900]

Mueller wrote a "private" letter to Barr and promptly leaked it to the press.

Don't be an eternal fuckhead and ignorant Trump ass kisser.......

Mueller wrote his letter to Barr on MARCH 27th....it was released by Barr on MAY 2nd..

 

[Hutch Starskey]

Hard line Trump sycophants CANNOT get through their thick skulls that although Trump and Barr may have "exonerated" Trump, MUELLER DID NOT.

Mueller is now a private citizen.....and if he does agree to testify before one of the House committees, the PRIMARY question that he will be asked is a simple and direct one: "Did your report, Mr. Mueller, exonerate Trump from obstruction of justice, YES or NO?"

What you can't seem to get through YOUR thick skull is that it's never the job of any prosecutor to "exonerate" anyone! It's the job of a prosecutor to determine if a crime has taken place and if so to bring indictments for that crime. Mueller found no evidence that he felt warranted indictments. That's it. End of story. If the House decides it's going to go forward with it's own investigation then it's obviously political.

Mueller found no evidence that he felt warranted indictments.

That is simply not true.

 

[Hutch Starskey]

You would think there's an extent of subservience and sycophancy that would be beyond everyone's limits even to contemplate. And yet, we get to observe the Trumpletons near effortlessly crashing through the most insurmountable of boundaries.

Amazing.

Let me guess...you're one of those sad types that thinks that flowery language makes up for your lack of understanding of the issues? Just what we need here! (eye roll)

Flowery?
LOL....

 

[Crixus]

I wrote this in responding to some Trump sycophant in another thread......Of course, Trump cult members will deride, troll and search for fellow cult members to praise their [half] "wit".........but, somewhere in some forgotten corner of some of these folks' brains, some would possibly agree......doubtful but hope spring eternal that some republicans would finally wake up to reality.

Mueller's job was to "gather evidence"......and he did.

Working within the limiting DOJ policy that he....Mueller.....could NEVER indict a sitting president, no on with a half brain would have "concluded" that the final report would call for an outright indictment.......if that was the expectation, then those expecting it were fools.....conversely, those who expected full "exonerations" are ALSO fools.

So, Mueller's task was two-fold

For providing proof (if any existed.....and it did) for the DOJ to revise its policy and for THAT department to indict a sitting president (very unlikely when Trump made sure that a lackey would take the AG position)...........................Or

For Congress to take up the task and utilize the evidence offered to invoke "high crimes and misdemeanors" as the conduit toward developing articles of impeachment.

There is NO doubt......after reading even the redacted portions of Mueller's report.........that were Trump just an "ordinary citizen" he WOULD HAVE BEEN INDICTED based on the report.

Of course, one extreme necessity for Trump is to be re-elected so that statutes of limitations would lapse, allowing him to escape justice.

Opinions are like assholes. Everyone gots one and they all stink. It’s over. You need to come to terms with that or it’s going to eat you alive. There is better shit to cry about.

 

[nat4900]

What you can't seem to get through YOUR thick skull is that it's never the job of any prosecutor to "exonerate" anyone! It's the job of a prosecutor to determine if a crime has taken place and if so to bring indictments for that crime. Mueller found no evidence that he felt warranted indictments. That's it. End of story. If the House decides it's going to go forward with it's own investigation then it's obviously political.

READ.....COMPREHEND........LEARN

Mueller report recounts 10 episodes involving Trump and questions of ...

Mueller report lays out obstruction evidence against the president ..

Mueller whacks Trump with evidence of obstruction
Nadler says there is 'plenty of evidence of obstruction' in Mueller report ...
6 Key Mueller Findings On Conspiracy, Obstruction and More

 

[Dick Foster]

I wrote this in responding to some Trump sycophant in another thread......Of course, Trump cult members will deride, troll and search for fellow cult members to praise their [half] "wit".........but, somewhere in some forgotten corner of some of these folks' brains, some would possibly agree......doubtful but hope spring eternal that some republicans would finally wake up to reality.

Mueller's job was to "gather evidence"......and he did.

Working within the limiting DOJ policy that he....Mueller.....could NEVER indict a sitting president, no on with a half brain would have "concluded" that the final report would call for an outright indictment.......if that was the expectation, then those expecting it were fools.....conversely, those who expected full "exonerations" are ALSO fools.

So, Mueller's task was two-fold

For providing proof (if any existed.....and it did) for the DOJ to revise its policy and for THAT department to indict a sitting president (very unlikely when Trump made sure that a lackey would take the AG position)...........................Or

For Congress to take up the task and utilize the evidence offered to invoke "high crimes and misdemeanors" as the conduit toward developing articles of impeachment.

There is NO doubt......after reading even the redacted portions of Mueller's report.........that were Trump just an "ordinary citizen" he WOULD HAVE BEEN INDICTED based on the report.

Of course, one extreme necessity for Trump is to be re-elected so that statutes of limitations would lapse, allowing him to escape justice.

I guess it's a good thing your opinion isn't worth a steaming pile of odoriferous dog excrement.

 

[nat4900]

I guess it's a good thing your opinion isn't worth a steaming pile of odoriferous dog excrement.

This is what passes for a Trump ass licker's "intelligentsia"............LMAO

 

[Olde Europe]

If you want to gay-bash Graham, show some balls and do it, no one but you gives a fig.

Mueller wrote a "private" letter to Barr and promptly leaked it to the press.

Barr, who has known him for thirty years, called him up, on a speaker phone, informed him that others were listening and taking notes, because he knows what a liar Mueller is, and he asked him point blank if Mueller could identify a SINGLE false statement in Barr's letter. Dirty Bob could not identify any false statements, and instead whined about how the press was reporting on it.

Barr also gave Mueller the opportunity to review his letter before he released it, and Mueller refused.

Barr then released the full report as quickly as possible, so you are still bitching about a letter, about a report, when the entire report, with some redaction has already been released.

And, you left out the fact that Barr also asked Mueller to identify the information that would need to be redacted when he submitted his report, so that Barr could get the Mueller report into the hands of the public more quickly, but Dirty Bob refused that too. So Mueller had opportunity after opportunity to assist in the process and refused and you are reduced to gay-bashing Graham?

Sad!

That was one heck of a Gish Gallop. Where did you find all that crap? For to me it looks as if, from beginning to the end, you made it all up, or got it from someone who has been paid to make it up.

 

[Zorro!]

If you want to gay-bash Graham, show some balls and do it, no one but you gives a fig.

Mueller wrote a "private" letter to Barr and promptly leaked it to the press.

Barr, who has known him for thirty years, called him up, on a speaker phone, informed him that others were listening and taking notes, because he knows what a liar Mueller is, and he asked him point blank if Mueller could identify a SINGLE false statement in Barr's letter. Dirty Bob could not identify any false statements, and instead whined about how the press was reporting on it.

Barr also gave Mueller the opportunity to review his letter before he released it, and Mueller refused.

Barr then released the full report as quickly as possible, so you are still bitching about a letter, about a report, when the entire report, with some redaction has already been released.

And, you left out the fact that Barr also asked Mueller to identify the information that would need to be redacted when he submitted his report, so that Barr could get the Mueller report into the hands of the public more quickly, but Dirty Bob refused that too. So Mueller had opportunity after opportunity to assist in the process and refused and you are reduced to gay-bashing Graham?

Sad!

That was one heck of a Gish Gallop. Where did you find all that crap? For to me it looks as if, from beginning to the end, you made it all up, or got it from someone who has been paid to make it up.

Are you new to google?

Mueller wrote a "private" letter to Barr and promptly leaked it to the press.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/worl...c8fdb6-6b7b-11e9-a66d-a82d3f3d96d5_story.html

Barr Called Mueller On Speaker phone

Defiant Barr grilled by Senate Judiciary Committee on Mueller report

Barr also gave Mueller the opportunity to review his letter before he released it

https://www.washingtonpost.com/worl...ce673e-6ba4-11e9-be3a-33217240a539_story.html

Barr also asked Mueller to identify the information that would need to be redacted when he submitted his report, so that Barr could more quickly get the report out to the public, Mueller refused.

Key takeaways from Barr's testimony and Mueller's letter

 

[Zorro!]

If you want to gay-bash Graham, show some balls and do it, no one but you gives a fig.

Mueller wrote a "private" letter to Barr and promptly leaked it to the press.

Barr, who has known him for thirty years, called him up, on a speaker phone, informed him that others were listening and taking notes, because he knows what a liar Mueller is, and he asked him point blank if Mueller could identify a SINGLE false statement in Barr's letter. Dirty Bob could not identify any false statements, and instead whined about how the press was reporting on it.

Barr also gave Mueller the opportunity to review his letter before he released it, and Mueller refused.

Barr then released the full report as quickly as possible, so you are still bitching about a letter, about a report, when the entire report, with some redaction has already been released.

And, you left out the fact that Barr also asked Mueller to identify the information that would need to be redacted when he submitted his report, so that Barr could get the Mueller report into the hands of the public more quickly, but Dirty Bob refused that too. So Mueller had opportunity after opportunity to assist in the process and refused and you are reduced to gay-bashing Graham?

Sad!

That was one heck of a Gish Gallop. Where did you find all that crap? For to me it looks as if, from beginning to the end, you made it all up, or got it from someone who has been paid to make it up.

Are you new to google?

Mueller wrote a "private" letter to Barr and promptly leaked it to the press.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/worl...c8fdb6-6b7b-11e9-a66d-a82d3f3d96d5_story.html

Barr Called Mueller On Speaker phone and Mueller could not identify any false statements in Barr's letter.

Defiant Barr grilled by Senate Judiciary Committee on Mueller report

Barr also gave Mueller the opportunity to review his letter before he released it, Mueller refused.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/worl...ce673e-6ba4-11e9-be3a-33217240a539_story.html

Barr also asked Mueller to identify the information that would need to be redacted when he submitted his report, so that Barr could more quickly get the report out to the public, Mueller refused.

Key takeaways from Barr's testimony and Mueller's letter

 

[Zorro!]

If you want to gay-bash Graham, show some balls and do it, no one but you gives a fig.

Mueller wrote a "private" letter to Barr and promptly leaked it to the press.

Barr, who has known him for thirty years, called him up, on a speaker phone, informed him that others were listening and taking notes, because he knows what a liar Mueller is, and he asked him point blank if Mueller could identify a SINGLE false statement in Barr's letter. Dirty Bob could not identify any false statements, and instead whined about how the press was reporting on it.

Barr also gave Mueller the opportunity to review his letter before he released it, and Mueller refused.

Barr then released the full report as quickly as possible, so you are still bitching about a letter, about a report, when the entire report, with some redaction has already been released.

And, you left out the fact that Barr also asked Mueller to identify the information that would need to be redacted when he submitted his report, so that Barr could get the Mueller report into the hands of the public more quickly, but Dirty Bob refused that too. So Mueller had opportunity after opportunity to assist in the process and refused and you are reduced to gay-bashing Graham?

Sad!

That was one heck of a Gish Gallop. Where did you find all that crap? For to me it looks as if, from beginning to the end, you made it all up, or got it from someone who has been paid to make it up.

Are you new to google?

Mueller wrote a "private" letter to Barr and promptly leaked it to the press.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/worl...c8fdb6-6b7b-11e9-a66d-a82d3f3d96d5_story.html

Barr Called Mueller On Speaker phone and Mueller could not identify any false statements in Barr's letter.

Defiant Barr grilled by Senate Judiciary Committee on Mueller report

Barr also gave Mueller the opportunity to review his letter before he released it, Mueller refused.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/worl...ce673e-6ba4-11e9-be3a-33217240a539_story.html

Barr also asked Mueller to identify the information that would need to be redacted when he submitted his report, so that Barr could more quickly get the report out to the public, Mueller refused.

Key takeaways from Barr's testimony and Mueller's letter

 

[Zorro!]

If you want to gay-bash Graham, show some balls and do it, no one but you gives a fig.

Mueller wrote a "private" letter to Barr and promptly leaked it to the press.

Barr, who has known him for thirty years, called him up, on a speaker phone, informed him that others were listening and taking notes, because he knows what a liar Mueller is, and he asked him point blank if Mueller could identify a SINGLE false statement in Barr's letter. Dirty Bob could not identify any false statements, and instead whined about how the press was reporting on it.

Barr also gave Mueller the opportunity to review his letter before he released it, and Mueller refused.

Barr then released the full report as quickly as possible, so you are still bitching about a letter, about a report, when the entire report, with some redaction has already been released.

And, you left out the fact that Barr also asked Mueller to identify the information that would need to be redacted when he submitted his report, so that Barr could get the Mueller report into the hands of the public more quickly, but Dirty Bob refused that too. So Mueller had opportunity after opportunity to assist in the process and refused and you are reduced to gay-bashing Graham?

Sad!

That was one heck of a Gish Gallop. Where did you find all that crap? For to me it looks as if, from beginning to the end, you made it all up, or got it from someone who has been paid to make it up.

Are you new to google?

Mueller wrote a "private" letter to Barr and promptly leaked it to the press.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/worl...c8fdb6-6b7b-11e9-a66d-a82d3f3d96d5_story.html

Barr Called Mueller On Speaker phone and Mueller could not identify any false statements in Barr's letter.

Defiant Barr grilled by Senate Judiciary Committee on Mueller report

Barr also gave Mueller the opportunity to review his letter before he released it, Mueller refused.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/worl...ce673e-6ba4-11e9-be3a-33217240a539_story.html

Barr also asked Mueller to identify the information that would need to be redacted when he submitted his report, so that Barr could more quickly get the report out to the public, Mueller refused.

Key takeaways from Barr's testimony and Mueller's letter

 

[EvilCat Breath]

I've seen crazy people in the throes of an obsession before but nothing like this. Literally your every thought is a Trump hate thought. You are in a literal frenzy over this presidency. You should get some help. It's wildly obvious that you refuse, preferring to wallow in the pit of your own dark daydreams.

Get help. If you have a family they will appreciate it.