toxicmedia
Gold Member
- Jul 5, 2011
- 5,569
- 876
First...you don't think I would defend MSNBC and the NYT do you? Second...before 1996, The NYT wasn't anywhere near as biased as they are now. Since then, all their decent conservative editorial writers went to work for somewhere within Rupert Murdoch's conservative echo chamber.The party decides what the public should be told - the NY Times and MSNBC spread the words of the party.
You're just parrotting the justification for advocacy journalism that conservative media provides. I was actualy alive in the 70's and watching/reading news. If something like Watergate happened in 2006...Fox News would have been involved in the cover up if they were the first to uncover it. Woddward (Conservative) and Bernstein (Liberal) worked together to bring down the Nixon the criminal. Media was biased to the left a bit back then. But Fox/Rush and MSNBC/NYT are nothing but "yes men" for the ideologies of their intended audiences.THEN BAM, Fox comes along and tells the other side - NOT EVEN APPROVED OF BY THE PARTY.
That's really retarded...nobody is proposing Fox be silenced...you're such a drama queen.Silencing the opposition is the primary goal of you fascist democrats - silencing Fox is a good start.
That statement is just more proof that people who have a head full of toxic mush from exposure to things like Fox and MSNBC say some pretty incoherant and hostile things.BTW, do you think all fucking thugs are as impotent as you?
Last edited: