Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Unlock unbeatable offers today. Shop here: https://amzn.to/4cEkqYs 🎁
If you had a link to your claims maybe it would help me with my logic. Your claims carry no weight with me. I need some proof.That must mean you dont have a link.The abiltity to establish context would help you out. The claim was that the NAACP was not in the business of advancing Black people. If this was true the NAACP would not fight for civil rights. Your deflection has nothing to do with that point. Where do you see the NAACP breaking this tax code?
Exemption Requirements - 501 c 3 Organizations
I don't see "must support Republican candidates too" in those rules.
Do you have a link to the NAACP endorsing any candidates or parties?
You don't see the inconsistency of those two statements? Good grief...
That must mean you don't understand logic. "Must support Republican candidates too" acknowledges support of non-Republican candidates.
That must mean you dont have a link.The abiltity to establish context would help you out. The claim was that the NAACP was not in the business of advancing Black people. If this was true the NAACP would not fight for civil rights. Your deflection has nothing to do with that point. Where do you see the NAACP breaking this tax code?
Exemption Requirements - 501 c 3 Organizations
I don't see "must support Republican candidates too" in those rules.
Do you have a link to the NAACP endorsing any candidates or parties?
You don't see the inconsistency of those two statements? Good grief...
That must mean you don't understand logic. "Must support Republican candidates too" acknowledges support of non-Republican candidates.
They get a BET lifetime accomplishment award.How does the NAACP normally acknowledge black winners?
A bowl of fruit, secret handshake, case of beer?
I already posted it numbnuts.Let me guess. You dont have a link to the NAACP officially disparaging one party over the other?They also can not disparage one party over another. Because that in fact is picking a party to support.
I don't see "must support Republican candidates too" in those rules.
Do you have a link to the NAACP endorsing any candidates or parties?
You don't see the inconsistency of those two statements? Good grief...
There are no inconsistencies in my statements.
The rules for 501c3s are not complicated, they are simple.
They cannot explicitly endorse any candidates or parties.
They are not required to be "bipartisan" or fair.
Already linked.They also can not disparage one party over another. Because that in fact is picking a party to support.
I don't see "must support Republican candidates too" in those rules.
Do you have a link to the NAACP endorsing any candidates or parties?
You don't see the inconsistency of those two statements? Good grief...
There are no inconsistencies in my statements.
The rules for 501c3s are not complicated, they are simple.
They cannot explicitly endorse any candidates or parties.
They are not required to be "bipartisan" or fair.
Link to the NAACP "disparaging" the Republican Party?
No you didnt.I already posted it numbnuts.Let me guess. You dont have a link to the NAACP officially disparaging one party over the other?They also can not disparage one party over another. Because that in fact is picking a party to support.I don't see "must support Republican candidates too" in those rules.
Do you have a link to the NAACP endorsing any candidates or parties?
You don't see the inconsistency of those two statements? Good grief...
There are no inconsistencies in my statements.
The rules for 501c3s are not complicated, they are simple.
They cannot explicitly endorse any candidates or parties.
They are not required to be "bipartisan" or fair.
You also claimed it was not the democratic party then went on to claim there are still conservatives in the democratic party.No. I claimed the KKK was conservative.You did not claim that the right was republicans, you did not claim the Republicans are conservative, you did not claim that the KK is conservative?i never claimed the republicans did. Where do you see that?Nor do republicans keep up or provide actual evidence.... I can provide evidence that a prominent Democratic Senator was a former head of the KKK and since 1960. Can you do the same?The KKK was formed after the Civil War. Conservative Democrats nowadays have nothing to do with the KKK.You claimed the KKK was conservative democrats so how is that not relevant?
Are you brain dead? Never mind we all know the answer to that question.No you didnt.I already posted it numbnuts.Let me guess. You dont have a link to the NAACP officially disparaging one party over the other?They also can not disparage one party over another. Because that in fact is picking a party to support.You don't see the inconsistency of those two statements? Good grief...
There are no inconsistencies in my statements.
The rules for 501c3s are not complicated, they are simple.
They cannot explicitly endorse any candidates or parties.
They are not required to be "bipartisan" or fair.
Where is your link?Are you brain dead? Never mind we all know the answer to that question.No you didnt.I already posted it numbnuts.Let me guess. You dont have a link to the NAACP officially disparaging one party over the other?They also can not disparage one party over another. Because that in fact is picking a party to support.There are no inconsistencies in my statements.
The rules for 501c3s are not complicated, they are simple.
They cannot explicitly endorse any candidates or parties.
They are not required to be "bipartisan" or fair.
Try again retard.So much for supporting black republicans, in fact the NAACP has attacked them.I dont care what you need. I simply explained to you that you dont have a clue about what you are saying.I don't need to you need to show that you understand that the words do not mean the same as they did in the 1870's, hell they don't mean the same thing they meant in the 1940's.Are you really this stupid? Link to one KKK member that voted as a liberal.Are you really this stupid? The political meaning of Liberal and conservative have changed even since the 1940's.I'm not a democrat. I have no team. Its not a team sport and you should know this. I know you arent that bright but you dont seem to understand the difference between a party label and an ideology. Liberals can be Republican and conservatives an be Democrats. I feel sorry for you that you went through life not understanding that simple concept.
Further I want you to show me where the NAACP has violated the tax code. Dont think I forgot.
NAACP defends dummy remark against black Republican Tim Scott - Washington Times
No. i said conservative Democrats started the KKK. Your reading comprehension skills need work son.You also claimed it was not the democratic party then went on to claim there are still conservatives in the democratic party.No. I claimed the KKK was conservative.You did not claim that the right was republicans, you did not claim the Republicans are conservative, you did not claim that the KK is conservative?i never claimed the republicans did. Where do you see that?Nor do republicans keep up or provide actual evidence.... I can provide evidence that a prominent Democratic Senator was a former head of the KKK and since 1960. Can you do the same?The KKK was formed after the Civil War. Conservative Democrats nowadays have nothing to do with the KKK.
No. I said the Democrats that started the KKK were conservatives.
i already shot that down as an opinion piece. I need a link where the NAACP states their position against any political candidate running for office. OfficiallyTry again retard.So much for supporting black republicans, in fact the NAACP has attacked them.I dont care what you need. I simply explained to you that you dont have a clue about what you are saying.I don't need to you need to show that you understand that the words do not mean the same as they did in the 1870's, hell they don't mean the same thing they meant in the 1940's.Are you really this stupid? Link to one KKK member that voted as a liberal.Are you really this stupid? The political meaning of Liberal and conservative have changed even since the 1940's.
Further I want you to show me where the NAACP has violated the tax code. Dont think I forgot.
NAACP defends dummy remark against black Republican Tim Scott - Washington Times
It is not an opinion piece, the man said what he said and the NAACP backed him up. It is fact and you have no reply because it clearly violates the provisions of tax exempt status.i already shot that down as an pinion piece. I need a link where the NAACP states their position against any political candidate running for office.Try again retard.So much for supporting black republicans, in fact the NAACP has attacked them.I dont care what you need. I simply explained to you that you dont have a clue about what you are saying.I don't need to you need to show that you understand that the words do not mean the same as they did in the 1870's, hell they don't mean the same thing they meant in the 1940's.Are you really this stupid? Link to one KKK member that voted as a liberal.
Further I want you to show me where the NAACP has violated the tax code. Dont think I forgot.
NAACP defends dummy remark against black Republican Tim Scott - Washington Times
You can specifically show me where the guy was speaking for the NAACP for startersThe link provides a QUOTE of one of the heads of the NAACP stating the GOP is racist and the tea party and goes on to claim a black senator is a mouth piece dummy for them. How more specific can you get?
Yes. it is an opinion piece. Do I need to embarrass you and prove it or will you go back and check your link yourself?It is not an opinion piece, the man said what he said and the NAACP backed him up. It is fact and you have no reply because it clearly violates the provisions of tax exempt status.i already shot that down as an pinion piece. I need a link where the NAACP states their position against any political candidate running for office.Try again retard.So much for supporting black republicans, in fact the NAACP has attacked them.I dont care what you need. I simply explained to you that you dont have a clue about what you are saying.I don't need to you need to show that you understand that the words do not mean the same as they did in the 1870's, hell they don't mean the same thing they meant in the 1940's.
Further I want you to show me where the NAACP has violated the tax code. Dont think I forgot.
NAACP defends dummy remark against black Republican Tim Scott - Washington Times
The NAACP doubled down by announcing they SUPPORTED his statements. Perhaps you can not read?You can specifically show me where the guy was speaking for the NAACP for startersThe link provides a QUOTE of one of the heads of the NAACP stating the GOP is racist and the tea party and goes on to claim a black senator is a mouth piece dummy for them. How more specific can you get?
The link provides a QUOTE of one of the heads of the NAACP stating the GOP is racist and the tea party and goes on to claim a black senator is a mouth piece dummy for them. How more specific can you get?
