Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Unlock unbeatable offers today. Shop here: https://amzn.to/4cEkqYs 🎁
What do you still not understand about Mueller failing to prove guilt?Read ya loud and clear. You think it’s useless for Mueller to testify and this thing should be over. Trump and other republicans are saying the same thing. Your buddy HereWeGoAgain is trying to claim that the Dems don’t want him to testify and the reps do.You seriously need to learn to read.What statements have you seen that back up your implication that Dems don’t want mueller to testify? It sound like something extracted directly out of your ass.See HereWeGoAgain this is the rhetoric the Right is pumping out to try and avoid a mueller testimony. Read what easyt65 just wroteMueller already testified. That is all the 2nd half of his report was - failing to prove guilt of collusion and Obstruction, failing to indict or convict anyone for Obstruction and collusion, he gave an opinionated duatribe...
Mueller's job was simple: Report he was recommending or not indictment, state evidence had Benn found - and present it - proving guilt. He could not even do that right due to his personal bias / hatred for the President.
Nothing Mueller can say now will matter.
The investigation is over.
The report was filed.
Zero collusion / obstruction.
Zero indictments / convictions for either.
As I've already said,this is a re do attempt by dems but I think they thought better of it knowing Republicans will be asking questions.
I said Mueller already testified through that useless crap he wrote - the 2nd half of his report. I did NOT say the Democrats do not want him to testify to prolong the political theater.
If Nadler would just go read the damn report Mueller would not HAVE to testify...
.
WHY? Seriously?Why would it be over?
What do you still not understand about Mueller failing to prove guilt?Read ya loud and clear. You think it’s useless for Mueller to testify and this thing should be over. Trump and other republicans are saying the same thing. Your buddy HereWeGoAgain is trying to claim that the Dems don’t want him to testify and the reps do.You seriously need to learn to read.What statements have you seen that back up your implication that Dems don’t want mueller to testify? It sound like something extracted directly out of your ass.See HereWeGoAgain this is the rhetoric the Right is pumping out to try and avoid a mueller testimony. Read what easyt65 just wrote
As I've already said,this is a re do attempt by dems but I think they thought better of it knowing Republicans will be asking questions.
I said Mueller already testified through that useless crap he wrote - the 2nd half of his report. I did NOT say the Democrats do not want him to testify to prolong the political theater.
If Nadler would just go read the damn report Mueller would not HAVE to testify...
.
NO evidence of collusion.
NO crime of collusion.
NO indictment of anyone for collusion.
NO conviction for collusion.
NO indictment of anyone for obstruction.
NO conviction of anyone for obstruction.
Dude, 3 years of butt-hurt is enough.
That little rant of yours has nothing to do with anything that I’ve said. Try againWhat do you still not understand about Mueller failing to prove guilt?Read ya loud and clear. You think it’s useless for Mueller to testify and this thing should be over. Trump and other republicans are saying the same thing. Your buddy HereWeGoAgain is trying to claim that the Dems don’t want him to testify and the reps do.You seriously need to learn to read.What statements have you seen that back up your implication that Dems don’t want mueller to testify? It sound like something extracted directly out of your ass.See HereWeGoAgain this is the rhetoric the Right is pumping out to try and avoid a mueller testimony. Read what easyt65 just wrote
As I've already said,this is a re do attempt by dems but I think they thought better of it knowing Republicans will be asking questions.
I said Mueller already testified through that useless crap he wrote - the 2nd half of his report. I did NOT say the Democrats do not want him to testify to prolong the political theater.
If Nadler would just go read the damn report Mueller would not HAVE to testify...
.
NO evidence of collusion.
NO crime of collusion.
NO indictment of anyone for collusion.
NO conviction for collusion.
NO indictment of anyone for obstruction.
NO conviction of anyone for obstruction.
Dude, 3 years of butt-hurt is enough...especially when all of this has been proven to be a treasonous coup attempt by Barry & his administration.
No evidence of obstruction!What do you still not understand about Mueller failing to prove guilt?Read ya loud and clear. You think it’s useless for Mueller to testify and this thing should be over. Trump and other republicans are saying the same thing. Your buddy HereWeGoAgain is trying to claim that the Dems don’t want him to testify and the reps do.You seriously need to learn to read.What statements have you seen that back up your implication that Dems don’t want mueller to testify? It sound like something extracted directly out of your ass.As I've already said,this is a re do attempt by dems but I think they thought better of it knowing Republicans will be asking questions.
I said Mueller already testified through that useless crap he wrote - the 2nd half of his report. I did NOT say the Democrats do not want him to testify to prolong the political theater.
If Nadler would just go read the damn report Mueller would not HAVE to testify...
.
NO evidence of collusion.
NO crime of collusion.
NO indictment of anyone for collusion.
NO conviction for collusion.
NO indictment of anyone for obstruction.
NO conviction of anyone for obstruction.
Dude, 3 years of butt-hurt is enough.
What crime is "collusion" exactly? Mueller investigated CONSPIRACY.
And interesting your list does not include key element:
evidence of Obstruction.
Why? Because you are just spinning up bullshit, THERE IS SHITLOAD OF SUCH EVIDENCE in the report and you know it.
Actually you LIED. You claimed I said / insinuated something I did not say. Now you're pissy I called you out on it. Great - more butt-hurt.That little rant of yours has nothing to do with anything that I’ve said. Try againWhat do you still not understand about Mueller failing to prove guilt?Read ya loud and clear. You think it’s useless for Mueller to testify and this thing should be over. Trump and other republicans are saying the same thing. Your buddy HereWeGoAgain is trying to claim that the Dems don’t want him to testify and the reps do.You seriously need to learn to read.What statements have you seen that back up your implication that Dems don’t want mueller to testify? It sound like something extracted directly out of your ass.As I've already said,this is a re do attempt by dems but I think they thought better of it knowing Republicans will be asking questions.
I said Mueller already testified through that useless crap he wrote - the 2nd half of his report. I did NOT say the Democrats do not want him to testify to prolong the political theater.
If Nadler would just go read the damn report Mueller would not HAVE to testify...
.
NO evidence of collusion.
NO crime of collusion.
NO indictment of anyone for collusion.
NO conviction for collusion.
NO indictment of anyone for obstruction.
NO conviction of anyone for obstruction.
Dude, 3 years of butt-hurt is enough...especially when all of this has been proven to be a treasonous coup attempt by Barry & his administration.
No COLLUSION dumb ass.Nadler's hypocrisy is almost as large as his belt size...
From the Washington Examiner.....
Rep. Jerrold Nadler, D-N.Y., chairman of the House Judiciary Committee, is the leading Democrat demanding the release of the Mueller Report “in its entirety” without redactions.
His committee is planning to subpoena the Justice Department for the full report.
But back in 1998, as a member of the same committee, he vociferously opposed the release of the full Starr Report, saying that “as a matter of decency and protecting people’s privacy rights, people who may be totally innocent third parties, what must not be released at all.”
a blow job vs Russian's looting the democracy of the country ----
yawnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnn
What did I claim you said that wasn’t true? You think it’s a waste of time for mueller to testify and you think the Russia thing is over... is that not true?Actually you LIED. You claimed I said / insinuated something I did not say. Now you're pissy I called you out on it. Great - more butt-hurt.That little rant of yours has nothing to do with anything that I’ve said. Try againWhat do you still not understand about Mueller failing to prove guilt?Read ya loud and clear. You think it’s useless for Mueller to testify and this thing should be over. Trump and other republicans are saying the same thing. Your buddy HereWeGoAgain is trying to claim that the Dems don’t want him to testify and the reps do.You seriously need to learn to read.What statements have you seen that back up your implication that Dems don’t want mueller to testify? It sound like something extracted directly out of your ass.
I said Mueller already testified through that useless crap he wrote - the 2nd half of his report. I did NOT say the Democrats do not want him to testify to prolong the political theater.
If Nadler would just go read the damn report Mueller would not HAVE to testify...
.
NO evidence of collusion.
NO crime of collusion.
NO indictment of anyone for collusion.
NO conviction for collusion.
NO indictment of anyone for obstruction.
NO conviction of anyone for obstruction.
Dude, 3 years of butt-hurt is enough...especially when all of this has been proven to be a treasonous coup attempt by Barry & his administration.
Deal with it.
No evidence of obstruction!What do you still not understand about Mueller failing to prove guilt?Read ya loud and clear. You think it’s useless for Mueller to testify and this thing should be over. Trump and other republicans are saying the same thing. Your buddy HereWeGoAgain is trying to claim that the Dems don’t want him to testify and the reps do.You seriously need to learn to read.What statements have you seen that back up your implication that Dems don’t want mueller to testify? It sound like something extracted directly out of your ass.
I said Mueller already testified through that useless crap he wrote - the 2nd half of his report. I did NOT say the Democrats do not want him to testify to prolong the political theater.
If Nadler would just go read the damn report Mueller would not HAVE to testify...
.
NO evidence of collusion.
NO crime of collusion.
NO indictment of anyone for collusion.
NO conviction for collusion.
NO indictment of anyone for obstruction.
NO conviction of anyone for obstruction.
Dude, 3 years of butt-hurt is enough.
What crime is "collusion" exactly? Mueller investigated CONSPIRACY.
And interesting your list does not include key element:
evidence of Obstruction.
Why? Because you are just spinning up bullshit, THERE IS SHITLOAD OF SUCH EVIDENCE in the report and you know it.
We're in a constitutional crisis with this constitutional confrontation, my friends!
Firing FBI director over "Russia thing" is not evidence of Obstruction?
Ordering his aides repeatedly to remove Mueller is not evidence of Obstruction?
Pardon dangling and discouraging witnesses from co-operation with investigation is not evidence of Obstruction?
Firing FBI director over "Russia thing" is not evidence of Obstruction?
Ordering his aides repeatedly to remove Mueller is not evidence of Obstruction?
Pardon dangling and discouraging witnesses from co-operation with investigation is not evidence of Obstruction?
Comey is a treasonous POS who admitted to leaking classified, & evidence shows he engaged in FISA Court Abuses by intentionally using a political document paid for by Hillary that he KNEW was unreliable and not legitimate Intel to illegally get warrants to spy on Trump's team during the election.
YOUR BS IS EASILY DEBUNKED WITH THIS:No evidence of obstruction!What do you still not understand about Mueller failing to prove guilt?Read ya loud and clear. You think it’s useless for Mueller to testify and this thing should be over. Trump and other republicans are saying the same thing. Your buddy HereWeGoAgain is trying to claim that the Dems don’t want him to testify and the reps do.You seriously need to learn to read.
I said Mueller already testified through that useless crap he wrote - the 2nd half of his report. I did NOT say the Democrats do not want him to testify to prolong the political theater.
If Nadler would just go read the damn report Mueller would not HAVE to testify...
.
NO evidence of collusion.
NO crime of collusion.
NO indictment of anyone for collusion.
NO conviction for collusion.
NO indictment of anyone for obstruction.
NO conviction of anyone for obstruction.
Dude, 3 years of butt-hurt is enough.
What crime is "collusion" exactly? Mueller investigated CONSPIRACY.
And interesting your list does not include key element:
evidence of Obstruction.
Why? Because you are just spinning up bullshit, THERE IS SHITLOAD OF SUCH EVIDENCE in the report and you know it.
Pressuring FBI Director to drop investigation of Flynn is not evidence of Obstruction?
Firing FBI director over "Russia thing" is not evidence of Obstruction?
Ordering his aides repeatedly to remove Mueller is not evidence of Obstruction?
Pardon dangling and discouraging witnesses from co-operation with investigation is not evidence of Obstruction?
You are a fucking idiot if you seriously belive that.
Mueller report shows in no uncertain terms that Turmp time and time again abused to his office to interfere in the investigations. That is PLENTY of grounds to be removed from office.
there was no coup attempt, the FBI was doing their jobs...The only constitutional crisis we face is Barry's and the Democrats' treasonous coup attempt, Nadler's calling for the US AG to break the law, and holding Barr in Contempt for NOT breaking the law....
Sorry, you lose.there was no coup attempt, the FBI was doing their jobs...
