Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Unlock unbeatable offers today. Shop here: https://amzn.to/4cEkqYs 🎁
YOUR BS IS EASILY DEBUNKED WITH THIS:No evidence of obstruction!What do you still not understand about Mueller failing to prove guilt?Read ya loud and clear. You think it’s useless for Mueller to testify and this thing should be over. Trump and other republicans are saying the same thing. Your buddy HereWeGoAgain is trying to claim that the Dems don’t want him to testify and the reps do.
NO evidence of collusion.
NO crime of collusion.
NO indictment of anyone for collusion.
NO conviction for collusion.
NO indictment of anyone for obstruction.
NO conviction of anyone for obstruction.
Dude, 3 years of butt-hurt is enough.
What crime is "collusion" exactly? Mueller investigated CONSPIRACY.
And interesting your list does not include key element:
evidence of Obstruction.
Why? Because you are just spinning up bullshit, THERE IS SHITLOAD OF SUCH EVIDENCE in the report and you know it.
Pressuring FBI Director to drop investigation of Flynn is not evidence of Obstruction?
Firing FBI director over "Russia thing" is not evidence of Obstruction?
Ordering his aides repeatedly to remove Mueller is not evidence of Obstruction?
Pardon dangling and discouraging witnesses from co-operation with investigation is not evidence of Obstruction?
You are a fucking idiot if you seriously belive that.
Mueller report shows in no uncertain terms that Turmp time and time again abused to his office to interfere in the investigations. That is PLENTY of grounds to be removed from office.
NO indictment of anyone for collusion.
NO conviction for collusion.
NO indictment of anyone for obstruction.
NO conviction of anyone for obstruction.
Prove me wrong...that's all you have to do.
Go for it....otherwise, Mueller & his team failed to prove guilt those crimes ever happened, and you're stuck on opinionated butt-hurt Bs.
The no indicting a sitting president thing is a ruse. There was never any obstruction. NOTHING was ever obstructed. Multiple investigations were completed. Result? Mueller & his team failed to prove guilt.YOUR BS IS EASILY DEBUNKED WITH THIS:No evidence of obstruction!What do you still not understand about Mueller failing to prove guilt?
NO evidence of collusion.
NO crime of collusion.
NO indictment of anyone for collusion.
NO conviction for collusion.
NO indictment of anyone for obstruction.
NO conviction of anyone for obstruction.
Dude, 3 years of butt-hurt is enough.
What crime is "collusion" exactly? Mueller investigated CONSPIRACY.
And interesting your list does not include key element:
evidence of Obstruction.
Why? Because you are just spinning up bullshit, THERE IS SHITLOAD OF SUCH EVIDENCE in the report and you know it.
Pressuring FBI Director to drop investigation of Flynn is not evidence of Obstruction?
Firing FBI director over "Russia thing" is not evidence of Obstruction?
Ordering his aides repeatedly to remove Mueller is not evidence of Obstruction?
Pardon dangling and discouraging witnesses from co-operation with investigation is not evidence of Obstruction?
You are a fucking idiot if you seriously belive that.
Mueller report shows in no uncertain terms that Turmp time and time again abused to his office to interfere in the investigations. That is PLENTY of grounds to be removed from office.
NO indictment of anyone for collusion.
NO conviction for collusion.
NO indictment of anyone for obstruction.
NO conviction of anyone for obstruction.
Prove me wrong...that's all you have to do.
Go for it....otherwise, Mueller & his team failed to prove guilt those crimes ever happened, and you're stuck on opinionated butt-hurt Bs.
No flying pigs either.
Because pigs don't fly and Mueller COULDN'T indict a sitting president, as per DOJ guidelines.
He collected the evidence and now it's up to duly elected Congress to hold the president accountable.
The no indicting a sitting president thing is a ruse.YOUR BS IS EASILY DEBUNKED WITH THIS:No evidence of obstruction!What crime is "collusion" exactly? Mueller investigated CONSPIRACY.
And interesting your list does not include key element:
evidence of Obstruction.
Why? Because you are just spinning up bullshit, THERE IS SHITLOAD OF SUCH EVIDENCE in the report and you know it.
Pressuring FBI Director to drop investigation of Flynn is not evidence of Obstruction?
Firing FBI director over "Russia thing" is not evidence of Obstruction?
Ordering his aides repeatedly to remove Mueller is not evidence of Obstruction?
Pardon dangling and discouraging witnesses from co-operation with investigation is not evidence of Obstruction?
You are a fucking idiot if you seriously belive that.
Mueller report shows in no uncertain terms that Turmp time and time again abused to his office to interfere in the investigations. That is PLENTY of grounds to be removed from office.
NO indictment of anyone for collusion.
NO conviction for collusion.
NO indictment of anyone for obstruction.
NO conviction of anyone for obstruction.
Prove me wrong...that's all you have to do.
Go for it....otherwise, Mueller & his team failed to prove guilt those crimes ever happened, and you're stuck on opinionated butt-hurt Bs.
No flying pigs either.
Because pigs don't fly and Mueller COULDN'T indict a sitting president, as per DOJ guidelines.
He collected the evidence and now it's up to duly elected Congress to hold the president accountable.
Nice BS...just show me the link to where ANYONE connected to Trump was indicted / convicted of collusion or obstruction.The no indicting a sitting president thing is a ruse.YOUR BS IS EASILY DEBUNKED WITH THIS:No evidence of obstruction!
Pressuring FBI Director to drop investigation of Flynn is not evidence of Obstruction?
Firing FBI director over "Russia thing" is not evidence of Obstruction?
Ordering his aides repeatedly to remove Mueller is not evidence of Obstruction?
Pardon dangling and discouraging witnesses from co-operation with investigation is not evidence of Obstruction?
You are a fucking idiot if you seriously belive that.
Mueller report shows in no uncertain terms that Turmp time and time again abused to his office to interfere in the investigations. That is PLENTY of grounds to be removed from office.
NO indictment of anyone for collusion.
NO conviction for collusion.
NO indictment of anyone for obstruction.
NO conviction of anyone for obstruction.
Prove me wrong...that's all you have to do.
Go for it....otherwise, Mueller & his team failed to prove guilt those crimes ever happened, and you're stuck on opinionated butt-hurt Bs.
No flying pigs either.
Because pigs don't fly and Mueller COULDN'T indict a sitting president, as per DOJ guidelines.
He collected the evidence and now it's up to duly elected Congress to hold the president accountable.
Cool story, but that is in fact DOJ guideline, but more than that, it is a DOJ guideline Mueller seems to think is in the best interest of this country.
He is an unelected buerocrat who belives it is not his job, but the Constitutionally outlined duty of the Congress to hold POTUS responsible for abuses of power.
good luck with all that garbage.... bring it on!Sorry, you lose.there was no coup attempt, the FBI was doing their jobs...
Leaking classufied...colluding with Ukrainians, Trump-hating foreign spies, & Russians...intentionally using Russian-authored Hillary-purchased fake news while knowing it is unreliable and illegally using it to perpetrate FISA Court Abuses to illegally get warrants to spy on a Presidential candidate and his team is highly illegal and treasonous.
The only overwhelming evidence of crime that exists is that of Democrats, snowflake...
Nice BS...just show me the link to where ANYONE connected to Trump was indicted / convicted of collusion or obstruction.The no indicting a sitting president thing is a ruse.YOUR BS IS EASILY DEBUNKED WITH THIS:Pressuring FBI Director to drop investigation of Flynn is not evidence of Obstruction?
Firing FBI director over "Russia thing" is not evidence of Obstruction?
Ordering his aides repeatedly to remove Mueller is not evidence of Obstruction?
Pardon dangling and discouraging witnesses from co-operation with investigation is not evidence of Obstruction?
You are a fucking idiot if you seriously belive that.
Mueller report shows in no uncertain terms that Turmp time and time again abused to his office to interfere in the investigations. That is PLENTY of grounds to be removed from office.
NO indictment of anyone for collusion.
NO conviction for collusion.
NO indictment of anyone for obstruction.
NO conviction of anyone for obstruction.
Prove me wrong...that's all you have to do.
Go for it....otherwise, Mueller & his team failed to prove guilt those crimes ever happened, and you're stuck on opinionated butt-hurt Bs.
No flying pigs either.
Because pigs don't fly and Mueller COULDN'T indict a sitting president, as per DOJ guidelines.
He collected the evidence and now it's up to duly elected Congress to hold the president accountable.
Cool story, but that is in fact DOJ guideline, but more than that, it is a DOJ guideline Mueller seems to think is in the best interest of this country.
He is an unelected buerocrat who belives it is not his job, but the Constitutionally outlined duty of the Congress to hold POTUS responsible for abuses of power.
As Lindsay Graham stated a couple weeks ago, the Senate Judiciary has the unredacted report. Anyone with clearance, including Chairman Nadler in the House, can go in the classified area and read it. So why hasn't he ?
For the Democrats to continue with this obvious charade they appear to be sabotaging their chances of winning any 2020 elections, especially defeating Trump. His poll numbers are inching up the more it goes on. Americans are quickly waking up to the things going on and as usual, the Democrats probably won't catch on until the next election cycle.
Collins blasts contempt vote as 'desperate' move to discredit Barr.
Ranking member of the House Judiciary Committee Rep. Doug Collins hits back at House Democrats' response to the Mueller report and says he does not believe Mueller will testify on the findings.
Sure he could. Only he couldn't talk about it to anybody nor was he allowed to take notes. So what exactly was he supposed to do after he read it?
It HAS been brought out, dumbass. Evidence, testimony, admission, links....good luck with all that garbage.... bring it on!
AGAIN, nothing was obstructed.Nice BS...just show me the link to where ANYONE connected to Trump was indicted / convicted of collusion or obstruction.The no indicting a sitting president thing is a ruse.YOUR BS IS EASILY DEBUNKED WITH THIS:
NO indictment of anyone for collusion.
NO conviction for collusion.
NO indictment of anyone for obstruction.
NO conviction of anyone for obstruction.
Prove me wrong...that's all you have to do.
Go for it....otherwise, Mueller & his team failed to prove guilt those crimes ever happened, and you're stuck on opinionated butt-hurt Bs.
No flying pigs either.
Because pigs don't fly and Mueller COULDN'T indict a sitting president, as per DOJ guidelines.
He collected the evidence and now it's up to duly elected Congress to hold the president accountable.
Cool story, but that is in fact DOJ guideline, but more than that, it is a DOJ guideline Mueller seems to think is in the best interest of this country.
He is an unelected buerocrat who belives it is not his job, but the Constitutionally outlined duty of the Congress to hold POTUS responsible for abuses of power.
That's true, Trump was obstructing justice all by himself. Everyone else KNEW BETTER than to commit the illegal acts Trump was asking them to commit.
Comey refused to drop Fynn's investigation.
McGhan refused to tell Rosenstein to fire Mueller, refused to enter false records about Trump's request.
Lewadowski refused to tell Sessions to un-recuse and remove Mueller.
They all refused to be a part of these corrupt, illegal acts by our President.
AGAIN, nothing was obstructed.Nice BS...just show me the link to where ANYONE connected to Trump was indicted / convicted of collusion or obstruction.The no indicting a sitting president thing is a ruse.No flying pigs either.
Because pigs don't fly and Mueller COULDN'T indict a sitting president, as per DOJ guidelines.
He collected the evidence and now it's up to duly elected Congress to hold the president accountable.
Cool story, but that is in fact DOJ guideline, but more than that, it is a DOJ guideline Mueller seems to think is in the best interest of this country.
He is an unelected buerocrat who belives it is not his job, but the Constitutionally outlined duty of the Congress to hold POTUS responsible for abuses of power.
That's true, Trump was obstructing justice all by himself. Everyone else KNEW BETTER than to commit the illegal acts Trump was asking them to commit.
Comey refused to drop Fynn's investigation.
McGhan refused to tell Rosenstein to fire Mueller, refused to enter false records about Trump's request.
Lewadowski refused to tell Sessions to un-recuse and remove Mueller.
They all refused to be a part of these corrupt, illegal acts by our President.
Multiple investigations occurred.
A final report was written
So you have no link, you do not have Mueller or his team smseclring TRUMP OBSTRUCTED JUSTICE, you have no indictments for obstruction, and you have no convictions for obstruction...AGAIN, nothing was obstructed.Nice BS...just show me the link to where ANYONE connected to Trump was indicted / convicted of collusion or obstruction.The no indicting a sitting president thing is a ruse.
Cool story, but that is in fact DOJ guideline, but more than that, it is a DOJ guideline Mueller seems to think is in the best interest of this country.
He is an unelected buerocrat who belives it is not his job, but the Constitutionally outlined duty of the Congress to hold POTUS responsible for abuses of power.
That's true, Trump was obstructing justice all by himself. Everyone else KNEW BETTER than to commit the illegal acts Trump was asking them to commit.
Comey refused to drop Fynn's investigation.
McGhan refused to tell Rosenstein to fire Mueller, refused to enter false records about Trump's request.
Lewadowski refused to tell Sessions to un-recuse and remove Mueller.
They all refused to be a part of these corrupt, illegal acts by our President.
Multiple investigations occurred.
A final report was written
1. You clearly don’t understand that Obstruction of justice need not be successful for it to be Obstruction. Acting to obstruct justice (telling FBI Director to drop Flynn’s case) is Obstruction regardless of outcome.
2. You have little idea what the outcomes would be if it were not for Trump’s obstruction. Manafort could have decided to co-operate if it were not for pardon dangling by Trump.
So you have no link, you do not have Mueller or his team smseclring TRUMP OBSTRUCTED JUSTICE, you have no indictments for obstruction, and you have no convictions for obstruction...AGAIN, nothing was obstructed.Nice BS...just show me the link to where ANYONE connected to Trump was indicted / convicted of collusion or obstruction.Cool story, but that is in fact DOJ guideline, but more than that, it is a DOJ guideline Mueller seems to think is in the best interest of this country.
He is an unelected buerocrat who belives it is not his job, but the Constitutionally outlined duty of the Congress to hold POTUS responsible for abuses of power.
That's true, Trump was obstructing justice all by himself. Everyone else KNEW BETTER than to commit the illegal acts Trump was asking them to commit.
Comey refused to drop Fynn's investigation.
McGhan refused to tell Rosenstein to fire Mueller, refused to enter false records about Trump's request.
Lewadowski refused to tell Sessions to un-recuse and remove Mueller.
They all refused to be a part of these corrupt, illegal acts by our President.
Multiple investigations occurred.
A final report was written
1. You clearly don’t understand that Obstruction of justice need not be successful for it to be Obstruction. Acting to obstruct justice (telling FBI Director to drop Flynn’s case) is Obstruction regardless of outcome.
2. You have little idea what the outcomes would be if it were not for Trump’s obstruction. Manafort could have decided to co-operate if it were not for pardon dangling by Trump.
Thank you.
Hillary illegally attempted to delete 15000+ OFFICIAL SUBPOENAED DOCUMENTS, illegally destroyed numerous subpoenaed official devices, illegally withheld official subpoenaed device sim cards, and illegally attempted to bleachbit her subpoenaed server...
...yet you snowflakes claim she did not break the law and did not obstruct justice....proving you have no damn clue what obstruction even is.
Hillary illegally attempted to delete 15000+ OFFICIAL SUBPOENAED DOCUMENTS, illegally destroyed numerous subpoenaed official devices, illegally withheld official subpoenaed device sim cards, and illegally attempted to bleachbit her subpoenaed server...
...yet you snowflakes claim she did not break the law and did not obstruct justice....proving you have no damn clue what obstruction even is.
we expect him to request from the court, the LEGAL release of the grand jury testimony, like every grand jury testimony involved in any investigation done that involved our gvt officials.As Lindsay Graham stated a couple weeks ago, the Senate Judiciary has the unredacted report. Anyone with clearance, including Chairman Nadler in the House, can go in the classified area and read it. So why hasn't he ?
For the Democrats to continue with this obvious charade they appear to be sabotaging their chances of winning any 2020 elections, especially defeating Trump. His poll numbers are inching up the more it goes on. Americans are quickly waking up to the things going on and as usual, the Democrats probably won't catch on until the next election cycle.
Collins blasts contempt vote as 'desperate' move to discredit Barr.
Ranking member of the House Judiciary Committee Rep. Doug Collins hits back at House Democrats' response to the Mueller report and says he does not believe Mueller will testify on the findings.
Sure he could. Only he couldn't talk about it to anybody nor was he allowed to take notes. So what exactly was he supposed to do after he read it?
He would then know the truth. I thought that was what he was after. I thought that was what all of you were after?
But now you know why Barr won't release a wholly unredacted copy. You support the release of classified, grand jury, information.
We have extensive, strong evidence of Obstruction of Justice. That’s all Congress needs to make the case that this president is a crook and does not belong in the office.
The FBI publicly declared they had recovered the 15000+ e-mails, liar. Comey publicly declared she did break laws but was too stupid to know she was doing it....Hillary illegally attempted to delete 15000+ OFFICIAL SUBPOENAED DOCUMENTS, illegally destroyed numerous subpoenaed official devices, illegally withheld official subpoenaed device sim cards, and illegally attempted to bleachbit her subpoenaed server...
...yet you snowflakes claim she did not break the law and did not obstruct justice....proving you have no damn clue what obstruction even is.Hillary illegally attempted to delete 15000+ OFFICIAL SUBPOENAED DOCUMENTS, illegally destroyed numerous subpoenaed official devices, illegally withheld official subpoenaed device sim cards, and illegally attempted to bleachbit her subpoenaed server...
...yet you snowflakes claim she did not break the law and did not obstruct justice....proving you have no damn clue what obstruction even is.
DOJ reported nothing of the sort, but even aside from that Hillary is not POTUS. Trump’s DOJ can indict her (under proper charges) at anytime.
So your “BUUTT CLINTON!!!!” is a total fail.
