Nadler could have read the unredacted report and chose not to.

[PoliticalChic]

Hillary illegally attempted to delete 15000+ OFFICIAL SUBPOENAED DOCUMENTS, illegally destroyed numerous subpoenaed official devices, illegally withheld official subpoenaed device sim cards, and illegally attempted to bleachbit her subpoenaed server...

...yet you snowflakes claim she did not break the law and did not obstruct justice....proving you have no damn clue what obstruction even is.

Hillary illegally attempted to delete 15000+ OFFICIAL SUBPOENAED DOCUMENTS, illegally destroyed numerous subpoenaed official devices, illegally withheld official subpoenaed device sim cards, and illegally attempted to bleachbit her subpoenaed server...

...yet you snowflakes claim she did not break the law and did not obstruct justice....proving you have no damn clue what obstruction even is.

DOJ reported nothing of the sort, but even aside from that Hillary is not POTUS. Trump’s DOJ can indict her (under proper charges) at anytime.

So your “BUUTT CLINTON!!!!” is a total fail.

The FBI publicly declared they had recovered the 15000+ e-mails, liar. Comey publicly declared she did break laws but was too stupid to know she was doing it....

https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&source=web&rct=j&url=https://abcnews.go.com/amp/Politics/fbi-found-15000-clinton-emails/story?id=41576112&ved=2ahUKEwij3MuxpJbiAhVtiOAKHe6WCnoQFjACegQIBhAB&usg=AOvVaw3ERuV1NMHTADVWVX0cW1M4&ampcf=1


"The FBI uncovered nearly 15,000 more emails and materials sent to or from Hillary Clinton as part of the agency's investigation into her use of private email at the State Department.

The documents were not among the 30,000 work-related emails turned over to the State Department by her attorneys in December 2014."



...and even YOU should be smart enough to know ignorance of the law is no excuse for breaking the law.

Your continued willful ignorance / denial of Hillary having done what snowflakes claim Trump did is pathetic.

Comey.....the lying liar.

For any who imagine that the lying liar, Comey, is either telling the truth, or knows anything about the law involved, here is the reality vis-a-vis guilt of Trump vs Hillary



The crime of obstruction of justice requires corrupt intent. There can be no such corrupt intent with no underlying crime. All Trump has done is complain about him.


No such intent is necessary as an element of the crime of mishandling classified material: simply doing so carries the liability. So Hillary is clearly guilty, and Comey was lying when he claimed he needed intent to find her so.

Again?

Trump is not guilty of obstruction of justice, but Hillary Clinton is clearly guilty of mishandling classified material. Lock her up!!!!

“Mueller writes that the federal obstruction statutes share three common elements: (1) an obstructive act; (2) a nexus between the obstructive act and an official proceeding; and (3) a corrupt intent. Justice Antonin Scalia’s partial dissent in U.S. v. Aguilar stated that “the term ‘corruptly’ in criminal laws has a long-standing and well-accepted meaning.” The term “denotes ‘[a]n act done with an intent to give some advantage inconsistent with official duty and the rights of others....” Mueller’s report adopts Justice Scalia’s conception of “corruptly.” The Special Counsel’s Constitutional Analysis: Corrupt Intent and the Take Care Clause

 

[easyt65]

FBI found extensive evidence Hillary emails violated federal records laws

"Each email transmission of a government document that was not preserved or turned over to the State Department from Mrs. Clinton's tenure could theoretically be considered a violation of the Federal Records Act, the main law governing preservation of government records and data.

Other federal laws make it a felony to intentionally conceal, remove or destroy federal records as defined under the act, punishable with a fine and imprisonment of up to three years.

A single conviction also carries a devastating impact for anyone looking to work again in government because the law declares that any violator "shall forfeit his office and be disqualified from holding any office under the United States."

The FBI "indirectly documented hundreds, and likely thousands, of violations of the Records Act"

Lie, deny, justify...snowflakes do it all in defense of their criminals and traitors....while accusing others of what they have done / do...

 

[justoffal]

As Lindsay Graham stated a couple weeks ago, the Senate Judiciary has the unredacted report. Anyone with clearance, including Chairman Nadler in the House, can go in the classified area and read it. So why hasn't he ?

For the Democrats to continue with this obvious charade they appear to be sabotaging their chances of winning any 2020 elections, especially defeating Trump. His poll numbers are inching up the more it goes on. Americans are quickly waking up to the things going on and as usual, the Democrats probably won't catch on until the next election cycle.

Collins blasts contempt vote as 'desperate' move to discredit Barr.
Ranking member of the House Judiciary Committee Rep. Doug Collins hits back at House Democrats' response to the Mueller report and says he does not believe Mueller will testify on the findings.

Sure he could. Only he couldn't talk about it to anybody nor was he allowed to take notes. So what exactly was he supposed to do after he read it?

Come to the conclusion that the redacted parts have no smoking gun in them....so like the coward he really is he chose not to spoil the surprise and come back with the disappointing news.

Jo

 

[PoliticalChic]

FBI found extensive evidence Hillary emails violated federal records laws

"Each email transmission of a government document that was not preserved or turned over to the State Department from Mrs. Clinton's tenure could theoretically be considered a violation of the Federal Records Act, the main law governing preservation of government records and data.

Other federal laws make it a felony to intentionally conceal, remove or destroy federal records as defined under the act, punishable with a fine and imprisonment of up to three years.

A single conviction also carries a devastating impact for anyone looking to work again in government because the law declares that any violator "shall forfeit his office and be disqualified from holding any office under the United States."

The FBI "indirectly documented hundreds, and likely thousands, of violations of the Records Act"

Lie, deny, justify...snowflakes do it all in defense of their criminals and traitors....while accusing others of what they have done / do...

18 U.S. Code § 793 - Gathering, transmitting or losing defense information

(f)

Whoever, being entrusted with or having lawful possession or control of any document, writing, code book, signal book, sketch, photograph, photographic negative, blueprint, plan, map, model, instrument, appliance, note, or information, relating to the national defense, (1) through gross negligence permits the same to be removed from its proper place of custody or delivered to anyone in violation of his trust, or to be lost, stolen, abstracted, or destroyed, or (2) having knowledge that the same has been illegally removed from its proper place of custody or delivered to anyone in violation of its trust, or lost, or stolen, abstracted, or destroyed, and fails to make prompt report of such loss, theft, abstraction, or destruction to his superior officer—

Shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than ten years, or both.



Clinton also has to worry about government rules for handling secrets. In December 2009, President Obama signed Executive Order 13526, which renewed the long-running rules for classifying information and the penalties for revealing it.

Under that order, agency heads like Clinton are responsible for keeping secrets safe throughout their departments. And all officers of the government can be suspended, fired or have their security clearance revoked if they “knowingly, willfully, or negligently” disclosed secrets or broke the rules in any other way.




I sure hope that Barr has the stones.....

 

[the other mike]

If I was Donald Trump, John Brennan would be in Guantanamo right now, and if there was jail for journalists, Rachel Maddow should get at least 20 years.

 

[the other mike]

Hillary illegally attempted to delete 15000+ OFFICIAL SUBPOENAED DOCUMENTS, illegally destroyed numerous subpoenaed official devices, illegally withheld official subpoenaed device sim cards, and illegally attempted to bleachbit her subpoenaed server...

...yet you snowflakes claim she did not break the law and did not obstruct justice....proving you have no damn clue what obstruction even is.

Hillary illegally attempted to delete 15000+ OFFICIAL SUBPOENAED DOCUMENTS, illegally destroyed numerous subpoenaed official devices, illegally withheld official subpoenaed device sim cards, and illegally attempted to bleachbit her subpoenaed server...

...yet you snowflakes claim she did not break the law and did not obstruct justice....proving you have no damn clue what obstruction even is.

DOJ reported nothing of the sort, but even aside from that Hillary is not POTUS. Trump’s DOJ can indict her (under proper charges) at anytime.

So your “BUUTT CLINTON!!!!” is a total fail.

The FBI publicly declared they had recovered the 15000+ e-mails, liar. Comey publicly declared she did break laws but was too stupid to know she was doing it....

https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&source=web&rct=j&url=https://abcnews.go.com/amp/Politics/fbi-found-15000-clinton-emails/story?id=41576112&ved=2ahUKEwij3MuxpJbiAhVtiOAKHe6WCnoQFjACegQIBhAB&usg=AOvVaw3ERuV1NMHTADVWVX0cW1M4&ampcf=1


"The FBI uncovered nearly 15,000 more emails and materials sent to or from Hillary Clinton as part of the agency's investigation into her use of private email at the State Department.

The documents were not among the 30,000 work-related emails turned over to the State Department by her attorneys in December 2014."



...and even YOU should be smart enough to know ignorance of the law is no excuse for breaking the law.

Your continued willful ignorance / denial of Hillary having done what snowflakes claim Trump did is pathetic.

Comey.....the lying liar.

For any who imagine that the lying liar, Comey, is either telling the truth, or knows anything about the law involved, here is the reality vis-a-vis guilt of Trump vs Hillary



The crime of obstruction of justice requires corrupt intent. There can be no such corrupt intent with no underlying crime. All Trump has done is complain about him.


No such intent is necessary as an element of the crime of mishandling classified material: simply doing so carries the liability. So Hillary is clearly guilty, and Comey was lying when he claimed he needed intent to find her so.

Again?

Trump is not guilty of obstruction of justice, but Hillary Clinton is clearly guilty of mishandling classified material. Lock her up!!!!

“Mueller writes that the federal obstruction statutes share three common elements: (1) an obstructive act; (2) a nexus between the obstructive act and an official proceeding; and (3) a corrupt intent. Justice Antonin Scalia’s partial dissent in U.S. v. Aguilar stated that “the term ‘corruptly’ in criminal laws has a long-standing and well-accepted meaning.” The term “denotes ‘[a]n act done with an intent to give some advantage inconsistent with official duty and the rights of others....” Mueller’s report adopts Justice Scalia’s conception of “corruptly.” The Special Counsel’s Constitutional Analysis: Corrupt Intent and the Take Care Clause

 

[PoliticalChic]

Hillary illegally attempted to delete 15000+ OFFICIAL SUBPOENAED DOCUMENTS, illegally destroyed numerous subpoenaed official devices, illegally withheld official subpoenaed device sim cards, and illegally attempted to bleachbit her subpoenaed server...

...yet you snowflakes claim she did not break the law and did not obstruct justice....proving you have no damn clue what obstruction even is.

Hillary illegally attempted to delete 15000+ OFFICIAL SUBPOENAED DOCUMENTS, illegally destroyed numerous subpoenaed official devices, illegally withheld official subpoenaed device sim cards, and illegally attempted to bleachbit her subpoenaed server...

...yet you snowflakes claim she did not break the law and did not obstruct justice....proving you have no damn clue what obstruction even is.

DOJ reported nothing of the sort, but even aside from that Hillary is not POTUS. Trump’s DOJ can indict her (under proper charges) at anytime.

So your “BUUTT CLINTON!!!!” is a total fail.

The FBI publicly declared they had recovered the 15000+ e-mails, liar. Comey publicly declared she did break laws but was too stupid to know she was doing it....

https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&source=web&rct=j&url=https://abcnews.go.com/amp/Politics/fbi-found-15000-clinton-emails/story?id=41576112&ved=2ahUKEwij3MuxpJbiAhVtiOAKHe6WCnoQFjACegQIBhAB&usg=AOvVaw3ERuV1NMHTADVWVX0cW1M4&ampcf=1


"The FBI uncovered nearly 15,000 more emails and materials sent to or from Hillary Clinton as part of the agency's investigation into her use of private email at the State Department.

The documents were not among the 30,000 work-related emails turned over to the State Department by her attorneys in December 2014."



...and even YOU should be smart enough to know ignorance of the law is no excuse for breaking the law.

Your continued willful ignorance / denial of Hillary having done what snowflakes claim Trump did is pathetic.

Comey.....the lying liar.

For any who imagine that the lying liar, Comey, is either telling the truth, or knows anything about the law involved, here is the reality vis-a-vis guilt of Trump vs Hillary



The crime of obstruction of justice requires corrupt intent. There can be no such corrupt intent with no underlying crime. All Trump has done is complain about him.


No such intent is necessary as an element of the crime of mishandling classified material: simply doing so carries the liability. So Hillary is clearly guilty, and Comey was lying when he claimed he needed intent to find her so.

Again?

Trump is not guilty of obstruction of justice, but Hillary Clinton is clearly guilty of mishandling classified material. Lock her up!!!!

“Mueller writes that the federal obstruction statutes share three common elements: (1) an obstructive act; (2) a nexus between the obstructive act and an official proceeding; and (3) a corrupt intent. Justice Antonin Scalia’s partial dissent in U.S. v. Aguilar stated that “the term ‘corruptly’ in criminal laws has a long-standing and well-accepted meaning.” The term “denotes ‘[a]n act done with an intent to give some advantage inconsistent with official duty and the rights of others....” Mueller’s report adopts Justice Scalia’s conception of “corruptly.” The Special Counsel’s Constitutional Analysis: Corrupt Intent and the Take Care Clause

Maybe money more than fear....


. ….."Russian Collusion"….Hillary's tale, picked up by her colleagues in the sale of American uranium to Russia for $ millions in bribes…er, 'donations.'

…..Mueller, Comey and Rosenstein were all government officials when Hillary received the $145 million bribe for the sale of our uranium.

....Robert Mueller was the FBI Director during the time of the Russian uranium probe, and so was his successor James Comey who took over in 2013 as the FBI was still developing the case. Rod Rosenstein, then-U.S. Attorney....


The reason for the Mueller Investigation?
....to camouflage the fact that every major Democrat elite was both knowledgeable and a participant in the corruption of the uranium deal: Muller, Comey and Rosenstein knew and probably wet their beaks in the payoffs.


They took what didn't belong to them....sold the purloined property of the American people.....and now need to hide the dirty deed.

 

[WEATHER53]

Hillary illegally attempted to delete 15000+ OFFICIAL SUBPOENAED DOCUMENTS, illegally destroyed numerous subpoenaed official devices, illegally withheld official subpoenaed device sim cards, and illegally attempted to bleachbit her subpoenaed server...

...yet you snowflakes claim she did not break the law and did not obstruct justice....proving you have no damn clue what obstruction even is.

THE most inexplicable and amazing thing is years were spent searching for Trumps Russian “paperwork” while All Along Hillary stood there waving hers about.

 

[AntonToo]

FBI found extensive evidence Hillary emails violated federal records laws

"Each email transmission of a government document that was not preserved or turned over to the State Department from Mrs. Clinton's tenure could theoretically be considered a violation of the Federal Records Act, the main law governing preservation of government records and data.

Other federal laws make it a felony to intentionally conceal, remove or destroy federal records as defined under the act, punishable with a fine and imprisonment of up to three years.

A single conviction also carries a devastating impact for anyone looking to work again in government because the law declares that any violator "shall forfeit his office and be disqualified from holding any office under the United States."

The FBI "indirectly documented hundreds, and likely thousands, of violations of the Records Act"

Lie, deny, justify...snowflakes do it all in defense of their criminals and traitors....while accusing others of what they have done / do...

Hey idiot it’s been almost three years since investigation into Clinton’s emails was closed, 2 years since Trump got into office, one year since IG issued a review report on this case.

What the fuck do you think is going to happen with this case and what the fuck does it have to do with Mueller report and Congress acting on the evidence against the potus it contains?

 

[easyt65]

Hey idiot it’s been almost three years since investigation into Clinton’s emails was closed,

And overwhelming evidence has exposed she was protected from indictment and prison.

Try looking at the facts, testimony, evidence, etc...instead of a calendar, snowflake...

 

[Darkwind]

As Lindsay Graham stated a couple weeks ago, the Senate Judiciary has the unredacted report. Anyone with clearance, including Chairman Nadler in the House, can go in the classified area and read it. So why hasn't he ?

For the Democrats to continue with this obvious charade they appear to be sabotaging their chances of winning any 2020 elections, especially defeating Trump. His poll numbers are inching up the more it goes on. Americans are quickly waking up to the things going on and as usual, the Democrats probably won't catch on until the next election cycle.

Collins blasts contempt vote as 'desperate' move to discredit Barr.
Ranking member of the House Judiciary Committee Rep. Doug Collins hits back at House Democrats' response to the Mueller report and says he does not believe Mueller will testify on the findings.

Sure he could. Only he couldn't talk about it to anybody nor was he allowed to take notes. So what exactly was he supposed to do after he read it?

He would then know the truth. I thought that was what he was after. I thought that was what all of you were after?

But now you know why Barr won't release a wholly unredacted copy. You support the release of classified, grand jury, information.

we expect him to request from the court, the LEGAL release of the grand jury testimony, like every grand jury testimony involved in any investigation done that involved our gvt officials.

Barr has refused to make this request, like all other AGs have done.

Lest you forget, the House of Representatives is the only representation, we the people have in our gov't.

None have done this. That is NOT his job and he is not a gofer for the Congress.

 

[AntonToo]

Hey idiot it’s been almost three years since investigation into Clinton’s emails was closed,

And overwhelming evidence has exposed she was protected from indictment and prison.

Try looking at the facts, testimony, evidence, etc...instead of a calendar, snowflake...

100% pure bullshit.

See 2018 Inspector General report that reviewed the case, found no bias and appropriate conclusion.

It’s long ago over AND HAS NOTHING TO DO WITH THE TOPIC OF THIS THREAD.

 

[easyt65]

Hey idiot it’s been almost three years since investigation into Clinton’s emails was closed,

And overwhelming evidence has exposed she was protected from indictment and prison.

Try looking at the facts, testimony, evidence, etc...instead of a calendar, snowflake...

100% pure bullshit.

Again, testimony, evidence, links...versus your denial of reality wrapped in snowflake butt-hurt opinion. Pathetic.

Enough time wasted on you - back to the topic....

Nadler still has not read the less-redacted memo...because he is engaged in Trump-hating political theatrics...which is what the Democrats are about these days instead of legislating...

 

[Care4all]

As Lindsay Graham stated a couple weeks ago, the Senate Judiciary has the unredacted report. Anyone with clearance, including Chairman Nadler in the House, can go in the classified area and read it. So why hasn't he ?

For the Democrats to continue with this obvious charade they appear to be sabotaging their chances of winning any 2020 elections, especially defeating Trump. His poll numbers are inching up the more it goes on. Americans are quickly waking up to the things going on and as usual, the Democrats probably won't catch on until the next election cycle.

Collins blasts contempt vote as 'desperate' move to discredit Barr.
Ranking member of the House Judiciary Committee Rep. Doug Collins hits back at House Democrats' response to the Mueller report and says he does not believe Mueller will testify on the findings.

Sure he could. Only he couldn't talk about it to anybody nor was he allowed to take notes. So what exactly was he supposed to do after he read it?

He would then know the truth. I thought that was what he was after. I thought that was what all of you were after?

But now you know why Barr won't release a wholly unredacted copy. You support the release of classified, grand jury, information.

we expect him to request from the court, the LEGAL release of the grand jury testimony, like every grand jury testimony involved in any investigation done that involved our gvt officials.

Barr has refused to make this request, like all other AGs have done.

Lest you forget, the House of Representatives is the only representation, we the people have in our gov't.

None have done this. That is NOT his job and he is not a gofer for the Congress.

that's simply not true...all AG's have done it or had one of their prosecutors do it WITH congress for al the previous investigations in to presidents and other govt investigations... congress and the AG or prosecutors like Kenneth Star and Jaworski, have petitioned the courts for the release of grand jury testimony, with a lawyer from Congress....

Barr is refusing his prosecutors to go to the court and petition them for the release with congress.

 

[easyt65]

Barr sees its not necessary. The report was filed - its over.

If Nadless wants the entire thing he and Congress has the power to do so by changing their law. He won't even take 5 minutes to read the report that is available to him.

 

[WEATHER53]

We got judges that think they are President and we got congressman who think they are private investigators.

 

[AntonToo]

Hey idiot it’s been almost three years since investigation into Clinton’s emails was closed,

And overwhelming evidence has exposed she was protected from indictment and prison.

Try looking at the facts, testimony, evidence, etc...instead of a calendar, snowflake...

100% pure bullshit.

Again, testimony, evidence, links...versus your denial of reality wrapped in snowflake butt-hurt opinion. Pathetic.

Enough time wasted on you - back to the topic....

Nadler still has not read the less-redacted memo...because he is engaged in Trump-hating political theatrics...which is what the Democrats are about these days instead of legislating...

You don’t know wtf you are talking about. Your “testimony, evidence and links” is half baked bullshit from conspiracy mills populated by dumbass politico cranks just like you with ZERO journalistic rigor.

Worse then that, you actively filter out even most blatant counter evidence like the fact that THERE ALREADY WAS A REVIEW OF THE EMAIL CASE IN 2018 by the IG. Go fucking read it.

Final point: All if this is VERY TESTABLE.

If you are so confident that Clinton is guilty and Trump’s DOJ is on the case then just GIVE ME A DATE. A date by when you think Clinton will get indicted. A date by when if nothing happens you will KNOW you are a fucking idiot.

 

[WEATHER53]

Nadler will not read it because that would bring closure and liberals want eternal pot stirring and not closure.

 

[AntonToo]

Nadler will not read it because that would bring closure and liberals want eternal pot stirring and not closure.

Closure?? Even Barr told you straight up Mueller didn’t clear Trump on Obstruction.

What part of that did you not get?

 

[SAYIT]

So you have no link, you do not have Mueller or his team smseclring TRUMP OBSTRUCTED JUSTICE, you have no indictments for obstruction, and you have no convictions for obstruction... Thank you.

We have extensive, strong evidence of Obstruction of Justice. That’s all Congress needs to make the case that this president is a crook and does not belong in the office.

"We?" LOL.
And if that is your last connection to reality you may as well let go now and save yourself months of torment. There will be no DOJ indictments and no Senate conviction because it's O-V-E-R (except for the boomerang).

The House impeachment is a forgone conclusion so what do you suppose is the delay?

Answer: fear of the ridicule and disdain the articles will unleash.