The FBI publicly declared they had recovered the 15000+ e-mails, liar. Comey publicly declared she did break laws but was too stupid to know she was doing it....Hillary illegally attempted to delete 15000+ OFFICIAL SUBPOENAED DOCUMENTS, illegally destroyed numerous subpoenaed official devices, illegally withheld official subpoenaed device sim cards, and illegally attempted to bleachbit her subpoenaed server...
...yet you snowflakes claim she did not break the law and did not obstruct justice....proving you have no damn clue what obstruction even is.Hillary illegally attempted to delete 15000+ OFFICIAL SUBPOENAED DOCUMENTS, illegally destroyed numerous subpoenaed official devices, illegally withheld official subpoenaed device sim cards, and illegally attempted to bleachbit her subpoenaed server...
...yet you snowflakes claim she did not break the law and did not obstruct justice....proving you have no damn clue what obstruction even is.
DOJ reported nothing of the sort, but even aside from that Hillary is not POTUS. Trump’s DOJ can indict her (under proper charges) at anytime.
So your “BUUTT CLINTON!!!!” is a total fail.
https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&source=web&rct=j&url=https://abcnews.go.com/amp/Politics/fbi-found-15000-clinton-emails/story?id=41576112&ved=2ahUKEwij3MuxpJbiAhVtiOAKHe6WCnoQFjACegQIBhAB&usg=AOvVaw3ERuV1NMHTADVWVX0cW1M4&cf=1
"The FBI uncovered nearly 15,000 more emails and materials sent to or from Hillary Clinton as part of the agency's investigation into her use of private email at the State Department.
The documents were not among the 30,000 work-related emails turned over to the State Department by her attorneys in December 2014."
...and even YOU should be smart enough to know ignorance of the law is no excuse for breaking the law.
Your continued willful ignorance / denial of Hillary having done what snowflakes claim Trump did is pathetic.
Comey.....the lying liar.
For any who imagine that the lying liar, Comey, is either telling the truth, or knows anything about the law involved, here is the reality vis-a-vis guilt of Trump vs Hillary
The crime of obstruction of justice requires corrupt intent. There can be no such corrupt intent with no underlying crime. All Trump has done is complain about him.
No such intent is necessary as an element of the crime of mishandling classified material: simply doing so carries the liability. So Hillary is clearly guilty, and Comey was lying when he claimed he needed intent to find her so.
Again?
Trump is not guilty of obstruction of justice, but Hillary Clinton is clearly guilty of mishandling classified material. Lock her up!!!!
“Mueller writes that the federal obstruction statutes share three common elements: (1) an obstructive act; (2) a nexus between the obstructive act and an official proceeding; and (3) a corrupt intent. Justice Antonin Scalia’s partial dissent in U.S. v. Aguilar stated that “the term ‘corruptly’ in criminal laws has a long-standing and well-accepted meaning.” The term “denotes ‘[a]n act done with an intent to give some advantage inconsistent with official duty and the rights of others....” Mueller’s report adopts Justice Scalia’s conception of “corruptly.” The Special Counsel’s Constitutional Analysis: Corrupt Intent and the Take Care Clause