Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Wrong again, Joe. They went out, fought and died for something called the Constitution and the rule of Law.
Something you revisionist cocksuckers wouldn't know a damned thing about.
Yes, none of this happened because Lincoln stomped the slave-rapers into the dirt, which is exactly what should have done with them. Absolutely awesome.
Now we need to disabuse their descendents of any notion that there was anything noble about them. Ban the Confederate flag and take down every last monument to a Confederate "War hero" and replace it with an education center about how evil slavery was.
I am amazed that there are people on the right who really hate so much.[/QUOTE[/B]
Joe, think for a minute that not all people in the cofederacy owned slaves, few actually raped slaves and slavery was common practice all over the world even after 1865.
You are comparing apples to kiwi
Yes, the vast majority of people in the south didn't own slaves, but they still stupidly went out and died by the thousands so a few rich assholes could. Just proof that Darwin was right. If you're dumb, you die.
If only we got to the point in history where the rich send their own kids out to die in wars instead of tricking poor people's kids into doing it.
Incidently, most of the world banned slavery well before the US. The last country in the Americas to do so was Brazil in 1871.
silly me.
Thought the soldires fought to defend their homes. that is what they told us, BTW, in their own words.
Oh, and it was the Europen nations and the US that stopped the trans-atlantic slave trade. It was too profitable for the africans to want it stopped. Yet, you only bash southerners?
PS weren't there slave in the midlle east and asia too during this era?
Wrong again, Joe. They went out, fought and died for something called the Constitution and the rule of Law.
Something you revisionist cocksuckers wouldn't know a damned thing about.
Sorry, I don't treat the constitution as though it was on a stone tablet enscribed by God.
A constitution premised on all men being created equal and still allowing slavery and counting slaves as 3/5th of a free man is a flawed document and not worth fighting for...
But they weren't fighting for even that.
They were fighting to get out from that constitution and write their own much more flawed one...
Confederate States Constitution - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Thought the soldires fought to defend their homes. that is what they told us, BTW, in their own words.
Oh, and it was the Europen nations and the US that stopped the trans-atlantic slave trade. It was too profitable for the africans to want it stopped. Yet, you only bash southerners?
PS weren't there slave in the midlle east and asia too during this era?
Wrong again, Joe. They went out, fought and died for something called the Constitution and the rule of Law.
Something you revisionist cocksuckers wouldn't know a damned thing about.
Sorry, I don't treat the constitution as though it was on a stone tablet enscribed by God.
A constitution premised on all men being created equal and still allowing slavery and counting slaves as 3/5th of a free man is a flawed document and not worth fighting for...
But they weren't fighting for even that.
They were fighting to get out from that constitution and write their own much more flawed one...
Confederate States Constitution - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Wrong again, Joe.
It's obvious you haven't bothered with any historical analysis of the 3/5 Clause. If you had, you would know it was written to LIMIT the power of the slave-holding South, not to marginalize black people.
And what they were fighting for was adherence to the 9th & 10th Amendments.
Written in STONE, Joe. The BEDROCK of the nation. Not to be changed lightly, but by the specific process of Amendment.
Moron.
Wrong again, Joe. They went out, fought and died for something called the Constitution and the rule of Law.
Something you revisionist cocksuckers wouldn't know a damned thing about.
Sorry, I don't treat the constitution as though it was on a stone tablet enscribed by God.
A constitution premised on all men being created equal and still allowing slavery and counting slaves as 3/5th of a free man is a flawed document and not worth fighting for...
But they weren't fighting for even that.
They were fighting to get out from that constitution and write their own much more flawed one...
Confederate States Constitution - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Wrong again, Joe.
It's obvious you haven't bothered with any historical analysis of the 3/5 Clause. If you had, you would know it was written to LIMIT the power of the slave-holding South, not to marginalize black people.
And what they were fighting for was adherence to the 9th & 10th Amendments.
Written in STONE, Joe. The BEDROCK of the nation. Not to be changed lightly, but by the specific process of Amendment.
It is becoming one, if not already according to some.
No it's not. Stop being stupid.
Why is it not? It looks like an empire, acts like an empire is run like an empire.
What the hell makes you Master of the Universe to say it is not?
Because you are being a fucking troll and you couldnt care less as long as you mindlessly repeat bullshit you want to hear.
You stupid fucktard.
JimeBowie wants to be the Master of the Universe, apparently.
He is uneducated, ignorant about most topics, and dislikes America and its values.
JimeBowie wants to be the Master of the Universe, apparently.
He is uneducated, ignorant about most topics, and dislikes America and its values.
[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yunSRfnsVck]TROLOLOLOLOL - YouTube[/ame]
Sorry, I don't treat the constitution as though it was on a stone tablet enscribed by God.
A constitution premised on all men being created equal and still allowing slavery and counting slaves as 3/5th of a free man is a flawed document and not worth fighting for...
But they weren't fighting for even that.
They were fighting to get out from that constitution and write their own much more flawed one...
Confederate States Constitution - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Wrong again, Joe.
It's obvious you haven't bothered with any historical analysis of the 3/5 Clause. If you had, you would know it was written to LIMIT the power of the slave-holding South, not to marginalize black people.
And what they were fighting for was adherence to the 9th & 10th Amendments.
Written in STONE, Joe. The BEDROCK of the nation. Not to be changed lightly, but by the specific process of Amendment.
The Constitution is no less fixed in meaning than any other contract between multiple groups.
Hey, Joe, do you think all of your contracts you sign are written in stone or are they 'breathing documents?'
Wrong again, Joe.
It's obvious you haven't bothered with any historical analysis of the 3/5 Clause. If you had, you would know it was written to LIMIT the power of the slave-holding South, not to marginalize black people.
And what they were fighting for was adherence to the 9th & 10th Amendments.
Written in STONE, Joe. The BEDROCK of the nation. Not to be changed lightly, but by the specific process of Amendment.
The Constitution is no less fixed in meaning than any other contract between multiple groups.
Hey, Joe, do you think all of your contracts you sign are written in stone or are they 'breathing documents?'
I think that there's a legal process in which I can appeal a contract if it is flawed.
In fact, I had just that thing happen last month, where a vendor I fired tried to claim we owed them $11,000 for lost and damaged equipment. (They were just upset I fired them.)
I eventually knocked them down to nothing, and I wanted to keep going, but our management didn't want to litigate it further.
But here was the thing.
The great constituitonal thing they were fighting for was so a few assholes could own other people. Something EVERYONE knew was wrong, even most of the guys fighting the war.
As there is a legal process to change the Constitution. A process that was NOT followed, leading to the WBTS. The 9th and 10th Amendments were NOT being upheld, same as it is today.
The Constitution is no less fixed in meaning than any other contract between multiple groups.
Hey, Joe, do you think all of your contracts you sign are written in stone or are they 'breathing documents?'
I think that there's a legal process in which I can appeal a contract if it is flawed.
In fact, I had just that thing happen last month, where a vendor I fired tried to claim we owed them $11,000 for lost and damaged equipment. (They were just upset I fired them.)
I eventually knocked them down to nothing, and I wanted to keep going, but our management didn't want to litigate it further.
But here was the thing.
The great constituitonal thing they were fighting for was so a few assholes could own other people. Something EVERYONE knew was wrong, even most of the guys fighting the war.
As there is a legal process to change the Constitution. A process that was NOT followed, leading to the WBTS. The 9th and 10th Amendments were NOT being upheld, same as it is today.
What was not being followed? Lincoln made it quite clear that he wanted the states to stay. They had to respect electoral, constitutional process; respect federal property in the south; and not export slavery into the territories.
The south then attempted to break the constitutional obligations, waged war against the American people, and were crushed miserably for their political sins.
I think that there's a legal process in which I can appeal a contract if it is flawed.
In fact, I had just that thing happen last month, where a vendor I fired tried to claim we owed them $11,000 for lost and damaged equipment. (They were just upset I fired them.)
I eventually knocked them down to nothing, and I wanted to keep going, but our management didn't want to litigate it further.
But here was the thing.
The great constituitonal thing they were fighting for was so a few assholes could own other people. Something EVERYONE knew was wrong, even most of the guys fighting the war.
As there is a legal process to change the Constitution. A process that was NOT followed, leading to the WBTS. The 9th and 10th Amendments were NOT being upheld, same as it is today.
And lest we forget, it was New England shipping that ran the slave trade for 150 years...
Yes they did...and it was horrible. But they stopped without starting a war over it.
And lest we forget, it was New England shipping that ran the slave trade for 150 years...
Yes they did...and it was horrible. But they stopped without starting a war over it.
Bullshit! They were still running slaves to the Caribbean and hiding under other flags so as not to be exposed as the flaming hypocrites they were.
And if Lincoln had honored the Constitution, specifically the 9th & 10th Amendments, there never would have been a war.
