Neoliberalism.

[occupied]

...in essence?...a republican.

Democrats.

Actually, neoliberals are what we call "neocons".

They aren't. Neocons are Establishment puppets, and are against reforming the tax code, lowering Federal spending, limiting subsidies, and deregulating businesses.

Though, at this point, I don't think Neolibs even exist.

They never existed in the form stated. They were always just politicians who worked to make big business untouchable by the common rabble.

 

[Pumpkin Row]

If your words and actions define you...prove clinton and obama are dem's.

You must be another Socialist that's upset Hillary and Obama aren't advocating full government takeover of private industry, and are therefor calling them "Center right", "too conservative", or "Neolib". Tell me, do you consider yourself "Centrist", "Moderate", or "Independent"? Teehee~

 

[Disir]

If your words and actions define you...prove clinton and obama are dem's.

You must be another Socialist that's upset Hillary and Obama aren't advocating full government takeover of private industry, and are therefor calling them "Center right", "too conservative", or "Neolib". Tell me, do you consider yourself "Centrist", "Moderate", or "Independent"? Teehee~

I am about as close to a socialist on this forum as you're going to get. Grow up.

 

[Windship]

Democrats.[/QUOTE]
Libertarians and Greens[/QUOTE]

Libertarians and Greens?...lol, no. Ya need to look up what they stand for.

 

[Windship]

If your words and actions define you...prove clinton and obama are dem's.

You must be another Socialist that's upset Hillary and Obama aren't advocating full government takeover of private industry, and are therefor calling them "Center right", "too conservative", or "Neolib". Tell me, do you consider yourself "Centrist", "Moderate", or "Independent"? Teehee~

Right!...so, they're liars too. In a another thread today, I listed 12 porkings to the working class from the new neoliberals. and you ignored them...show me by ACTIONS why they are liberal.

 

[Pumpkin Row]

If your words and actions define you...prove clinton and obama are dem's.

You must be another Socialist that's upset Hillary and Obama aren't advocating full government takeover of private industry, and are therefor calling them "Center right", "too conservative", or "Neolib". Tell me, do you consider yourself "Centrist", "Moderate", or "Independent"? Teehee~

I am about as close to a socialist on this forum as you're going to get. Grow up.

Don't worry, I can tell by your posts. I face-palmed after reading each one. What's ironic here is a Socialist telling someone to grow up, while pedaling a failed ideal that has brought down Nations from within. Why don't you grow up?

 

[Pumpkin Row]

If your words and actions define you...prove clinton and obama are dem's.

You must be another Socialist that's upset Hillary and Obama aren't advocating full government takeover of private industry, and are therefor calling them "Center right", "too conservative", or "Neolib". Tell me, do you consider yourself "Centrist", "Moderate", or "Independent"? Teehee~

In a another thread today, I listed 12 porking to the working class fron the new neoliberals. and you ignored them...show me by ACTIONS why they are liberal.

Ignored them? More like didn't read the thread. You'll have to excuse me for not reading every single post on this forum. Besides, Liberals today, and since the 1950s, have been doing the Establishment's bidding.

On the other hand, if you're looking for proof that Hillary and Obama aren't "Neolibs", you only need to look at Obama's regulations on businesses in general and the coal industry. For example, he has already taxed them per-employee with Obamacare, he's trying to force them to give benefits, and expanded on overtime. Obama hates the private sector. Hillary is advocating everything Bernie has been during the debates. Of course, I'm sure she's lying, but as of right now, we have no idea what her policies actually are, so calling her a Neolib is a bit of a jump. Though, she has promised to be Obama2.0.

 

[Disir]

If your words and actions define you...prove clinton and obama are dem's.

You must be another Socialist that's upset Hillary and Obama aren't advocating full government takeover of private industry, and are therefor calling them "Center right", "too conservative", or "Neolib". Tell me, do you consider yourself "Centrist", "Moderate", or "Independent"? Teehee~

I am about as close to a socialist on this forum as you're going to get. Grow up.

Don't worry, I can tell by your posts. I face-palmed after reading each one. What's ironic here is a Socialist telling someone to grow up, while pedaling a failed ideal that has brought down Nations from within. Why don't you grow up?

No. It hasn't brought down nations. You're already starting off with a jacked up concept. You can't tell shit. Indicating it is necessary for you to grow up.

 

[Pumpkin Row]

If your words and actions define you...prove clinton and obama are dem's.

You must be another Socialist that's upset Hillary and Obama aren't advocating full government takeover of private industry, and are therefor calling them "Center right", "too conservative", or "Neolib". Tell me, do you consider yourself "Centrist", "Moderate", or "Independent"? Teehee~

I am about as close to a socialist on this forum as you're going to get. Grow up.

Don't worry, I can tell by your posts. I face-palmed after reading each one. What's ironic here is a Socialist telling someone to grow up, while pedaling a failed ideal that has brought down Nations from within. Why don't you grow up?

No. It hasn't brought down nations. You're already starting off with a jacked up concept. You can't tell shit. Indicating it is necessary for you to grow up.

So, then, I suppose you're going to tell be that
Afghanistan(Twice), Albania(Three times), Angola, Benin, Bulgaria, Cambodia(Twice), Congo-Brazzaville, Czechoslovakia(twice), Ethiopia(twice), Germany, Hungary, North Korea, Mongolia, Mozambique, Poland, Romania, Somalia, Russia, North Vietnam, South Yemen, Yugoslavia, Venezuela, Greece.
Weren't socialist? Because by definition their government was, and that economic system caused those Nations to fail. Of course, it's only natural for a Socialist not to know that, because if they weren't completely ignorant, they wouldn't be a Socialist.

 

[Windship]

If your words and actions define you...prove clinton and obama are dem's.

You must be another Socialist that's upset Hillary and Obama aren't advocating full government takeover of private industry, and are therefor calling them "Center right", "too conservative", or "Neolib". Tell me, do you consider yourself "Centrist", "Moderate", or "Independent"? Teehee~

In a another thread today, I listed 12 porking to the working class fron the new neoliberals. and you ignored them...show me by ACTIONS why they are liberal.

Ignored them? More like didn't read the thread. You'll have to excuse me for not reading every single post on this forum. Besides, Liberals today, and since the 1950s, have been doing the Establishment's bidding.

On the other hand, if you're looking for proof that Hillary and Obama aren't "Neolibs", you only need to look at Obama's regulations on businesses in general and the coal industry. For example, he has already taxed them per-employee with Obamacare, he's trying to force them to give benefits, and expanded on overtime. Obama hates the private sector. Hillary is advocating everything Bernie has been during the debates. Of course, I'm sure she's lying, but as of right now, we have no idea what her policies actually are, so calling her a Neolib is a bit of a jump. Though, she has promised to be Obama2.0.

Ok, what are all these regulations and neoliberalism encompasses all the things you mention....go look up the word and judge ppl by their actions not their lies then read the 12 items I wrote and comment.

 

[Windship]

If your words and actions define you...prove clinton and obama are dem's.

You must be another Socialist that's upset Hillary and Obama aren't advocating full government takeover of private industry, and are therefor calling them "Center right", "too conservative", or "Neolib". Tell me, do you consider yourself "Centrist", "Moderate", or "Independent"? Teehee~

I am about as close to a socialist on this forum as you're going to get. Grow up.

Don't worry, I can tell by your posts. I face-palmed after reading each one. What's ironic here is a Socialist telling someone to grow up, while pedaling a failed ideal that has brought down Nations from within. Why don't you grow up?

No. It hasn't brought down nations. You're already starting off with a jacked up concept. You can't tell shit. Indicating it is necessary for you to grow up.

So, then, I suppose you're going to tell be that
Afghanistan(Twice), Albania(Three times), Angola, Benin, Bulgaria, Cambodia(Twice), Congo-Brazzaville, Czechoslovakia(twice), Ethiopia(twice), Germany, Hungary, North Korea, Mongolia, Mozambique, Poland, Romania, Somalia, Russia, North Vietnam, South Yemen, Yugoslavia, Venezuela, Greece.
Weren't socialist? Because by definition their government was, and that economic system caused those Nations to fail. Of course, it's only natural for a Socialist not to know that, because if they weren't completely ignorant, they wouldn't be a Socialist.

No. What CAUSED the termoil in the first place?...I can tell you....corrution of wealth from greed.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This article is about the political state. For other uses, see Failed state (disambiguation).
"State collapse" redirects here. For the quantum mechanics phenomenon, see wave function collapse.
"Failed government" redirects here. It is not to be confused with government failure.
A failed state is a political body that has disintegrated to a point where basic conditions and responsibilities of a sovereign government no longer function properly. Likewise, when a nation weakens and its standard of living declines, it introduces the possibility of governmental collapse. The Fund for Peace characterizes a failed state as having the following characteristics:

• Loss of control of its territory, or of the monopoly on the legitimate use of physical force therein
• Erosion of legitimate authority to make collective decisions
• Inability to provide public services
• Inability to interact with other states as a full member of the international community

Common characteristics of a failing state include a central government so weak or ineffective that it has little practical control over much of its territory and there is a non-provision of public services. When this happens widespread corruption and criminality, the intervention of non-state actors, the appearance of refugees and the involuntary movement of populations, and sharp economic decline can occur.[1]

The level of government control required to avoid being considered a failed state varies considerably amongst authorities.[2] Furthermore, the declaration that a state has "failed" is generally controversial and, when made authoritatively, may carry significant geopolitical consequences.[2]

 

[Pumpkin Row]

If your words and actions define you...prove clinton and obama are dem's.

You must be another Socialist that's upset Hillary and Obama aren't advocating full government takeover of private industry, and are therefor calling them "Center right", "too conservative", or "Neolib". Tell me, do you consider yourself "Centrist", "Moderate", or "Independent"? Teehee~

In a another thread today, I listed 12 porking to the working class fron the new neoliberals. and you ignored them...show me by ACTIONS why they are liberal.

Ignored them? More like didn't read the thread. You'll have to excuse me for not reading every single post on this forum. Besides, Liberals today, and since the 1950s, have been doing the Establishment's bidding.

On the other hand, if you're looking for proof that Hillary and Obama aren't "Neolibs", you only need to look at Obama's regulations on businesses in general and the coal industry. For example, he has already taxed them per-employee with Obamacare, he's trying to force them to give benefits, and expanded on overtime. Obama hates the private sector. Hillary is advocating everything Bernie has been during the debates. Of course, I'm sure she's lying, but as of right now, we have no idea what her policies actually are, so calling her a Neolib is a bit of a jump. Though, she has promised to be Obama2.0.

Ok, what are all these regulations and neoliberalism encompasses all the things you mention....go look up the word and judge ppl by their actions not their lies then read the 12 items I wrote and comment.

No, it doesn't. You specifically said that they're pro DE-REGULATION, what I mentioned were ALL regulations on businesses. He also rammed an unconstitutional bill through congress that de-privatized healthcare. Those are the very OPPOSITE of the traits you listed.

 

[Disir]

If your words and actions define you...prove clinton and obama are dem's.

You must be another Socialist that's upset Hillary and Obama aren't advocating full government takeover of private industry, and are therefor calling them "Center right", "too conservative", or "Neolib". Tell me, do you consider yourself "Centrist", "Moderate", or "Independent"? Teehee~

I am about as close to a socialist on this forum as you're going to get. Grow up.

Don't worry, I can tell by your posts. I face-palmed after reading each one. What's ironic here is a Socialist telling someone to grow up, while pedaling a failed ideal that has brought down Nations from within. Why don't you grow up?

No. It hasn't brought down nations. You're already starting off with a jacked up concept. You can't tell shit. Indicating it is necessary for you to grow up.

So, then, I suppose you're going to tell be that
Afghanistan(Twice), Albania(Three times), Angola, Benin, Bulgaria, Cambodia(Twice), Congo-Brazzaville, Czechoslovakia(twice), Ethiopia(twice), Germany, Hungary, North Korea, Mongolia, Mozambique, Poland, Romania, Somalia, Russia, North Vietnam, South Yemen, Yugoslavia, Venezuela, Greece.
Weren't socialist? Because by definition their government was, and that economic system caused those Nations to fail. Of course, it's only natural for a Socialist not to know that, because if they weren't completely ignorant, they wouldn't be a Socialist.

Are you trying to sell me that countries that modeled their policies off of the Soviet Union--qualify? No, little hillbilly. They are not. Socialism is a mixture of public and private. It is not communism. Try again.

 

[Pumpkin Row]

You must be another Socialist that's upset Hillary and Obama aren't advocating full government takeover of private industry, and are therefor calling them "Center right", "too conservative", or "Neolib". Tell me, do you consider yourself "Centrist", "Moderate", or "Independent"? Teehee~

I am about as close to a socialist on this forum as you're going to get. Grow up.

Don't worry, I can tell by your posts. I face-palmed after reading each one. What's ironic here is a Socialist telling someone to grow up, while pedaling a failed ideal that has brought down Nations from within. Why don't you grow up?

No. It hasn't brought down nations. You're already starting off with a jacked up concept. You can't tell shit. Indicating it is necessary for you to grow up.

So, then, I suppose you're going to tell be that
Afghanistan(Twice), Albania(Three times), Angola, Benin, Bulgaria, Cambodia(Twice), Congo-Brazzaville, Czechoslovakia(twice), Ethiopia(twice), Germany, Hungary, North Korea, Mongolia, Mozambique, Poland, Romania, Somalia, Russia, North Vietnam, South Yemen, Yugoslavia, Venezuela, Greece.
Weren't socialist? Because by definition their government was, and that economic system caused those Nations to fail. Of course, it's only natural for a Socialist not to know that, because if they weren't completely ignorant, they wouldn't be a Socialist.

No. What CAUSED the termoil in the first place?...I can tell you....corrution of wealth from greed.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This article is about the political state. For other uses, see Failed state (disambiguation).
"State collapse" redirects here. For the quantum mechanics phenomenon, see wave function collapse.
"Failed government" redirects here. It is not to be confused with government failure.
A failed state is a political body that has disintegrated to a point where basic conditions and responsibilities of a sovereign government no longer function properly. Likewise, when a nation weakens and its standard of living declines, it introduces the possibility of governmental collapse. The Fund for Peace characterizes a failed state as having the following characteristics:

• Loss of control of its territory, or of the monopoly on the legitimate use of physical force therein
• Erosion of legitimate authority to make collective decisions
• Inability to provide public services
• Inability to interact with other states as a full member of the international community

Common characteristics of a failing state include a central government so weak or ineffective that it has little practical control over much of its territory and there is a non-provision of public services. When this happens widespread corruption and criminality, the intervention of non-state actors, the appearance of refugees and the involuntary movement of populations, and sharp economic decline can occur.[1]

The level of government control required to avoid being considered a failed state varies considerably amongst authorities.[2] Furthermore, the declaration that a state has "failed" is generally controversial and, when made authoritatively, may carry significant geopolitical consequences.[2]

None of the four things you listed are applicable to the failures of the Nations I mentioned. Socialism is what brought them down, and the symptoms thereof.

 

[Windship]

Everyone knows that corporate runs everything. We already live in a corporate state, an "oligarchic inverted totalitarian government" , open your eyes so then, why do people try so hard to disprove it when examples are shown?

 

[Pumpkin Row]

You must be another Socialist that's upset Hillary and Obama aren't advocating full government takeover of private industry, and are therefor calling them "Center right", "too conservative", or "Neolib". Tell me, do you consider yourself "Centrist", "Moderate", or "Independent"? Teehee~

I am about as close to a socialist on this forum as you're going to get. Grow up.

Don't worry, I can tell by your posts. I face-palmed after reading each one. What's ironic here is a Socialist telling someone to grow up, while pedaling a failed ideal that has brought down Nations from within. Why don't you grow up?

No. It hasn't brought down nations. You're already starting off with a jacked up concept. You can't tell shit. Indicating it is necessary for you to grow up.

So, then, I suppose you're going to tell be that
Afghanistan(Twice), Albania(Three times), Angola, Benin, Bulgaria, Cambodia(Twice), Congo-Brazzaville, Czechoslovakia(twice), Ethiopia(twice), Germany, Hungary, North Korea, Mongolia, Mozambique, Poland, Romania, Somalia, Russia, North Vietnam, South Yemen, Yugoslavia, Venezuela, Greece.
Weren't socialist? Because by definition their government was, and that economic system caused those Nations to fail. Of course, it's only natural for a Socialist not to know that, because if they weren't completely ignorant, they wouldn't be a Socialist.

Are you trying to sell me that countries that modeled their policies off of the Soviet Union--qualify? No, little hillbilly. They are not. Socialism is a mixture of public and private. It is not communism. Try again.

The Soviet Union was Socialist, they lacked every component of Communism. You also apparently have no idea what Socialism is, as no part of the definition includes "private", the core component is government takeover of private industry and equity.

 

[Windship]

You must be another Socialist that's upset Hillary and Obama aren't advocating full government takeover of private industry, and are therefor calling them "Center right", "too conservative", or "Neolib". Tell me, do you consider yourself "Centrist", "Moderate", or "Independent"? Teehee~

I am about as close to a socialist on this forum as you're going to get. Grow up.

Don't worry, I can tell by your posts. I face-palmed after reading each one. What's ironic here is a Socialist telling someone to grow up, while pedaling a failed ideal that has brought down Nations from within. Why don't you grow up?

No. It hasn't brought down nations. You're already starting off with a jacked up concept. You can't tell shit. Indicating it is necessary for you to grow up.

So, then, I suppose you're going to tell be that
Afghanistan(Twice), Albania(Three times), Angola, Benin, Bulgaria, Cambodia(Twice), Congo-Brazzaville, Czechoslovakia(twice), Ethiopia(twice), Germany, Hungary, North Korea, Mongolia, Mozambique, Poland, Romania, Somalia, Russia, North Vietnam, South Yemen, Yugoslavia, Venezuela, Greece.
Weren't socialist? Because by definition their government was, and that economic system caused those Nations to fail. Of course, it's only natural for a Socialist not to know that, because if they weren't completely ignorant, they wouldn't be a Socialist.

Are you trying to sell me that countries that modeled their policies off of the Soviet Union--qualify? No, little hillbilly. They are not. Socialism is a mixture of public and private. It is not communism. Try again.

!!BINGO!!
It is a balance that ran for 40 years until greed and corruption set in.

 

[Disir]

I am about as close to a socialist on this forum as you're going to get. Grow up.

Don't worry, I can tell by your posts. I face-palmed after reading each one. What's ironic here is a Socialist telling someone to grow up, while pedaling a failed ideal that has brought down Nations from within. Why don't you grow up?

No. It hasn't brought down nations. You're already starting off with a jacked up concept. You can't tell shit. Indicating it is necessary for you to grow up.

So, then, I suppose you're going to tell be that
Afghanistan(Twice), Albania(Three times), Angola, Benin, Bulgaria, Cambodia(Twice), Congo-Brazzaville, Czechoslovakia(twice), Ethiopia(twice), Germany, Hungary, North Korea, Mongolia, Mozambique, Poland, Romania, Somalia, Russia, North Vietnam, South Yemen, Yugoslavia, Venezuela, Greece.
Weren't socialist? Because by definition their government was, and that economic system caused those Nations to fail. Of course, it's only natural for a Socialist not to know that, because if they weren't completely ignorant, they wouldn't be a Socialist.

Are you trying to sell me that countries that modeled their policies off of the Soviet Union--qualify? No, little hillbilly. They are not. Socialism is a mixture of public and private. It is not communism. Try again.

The Soviet Union was Socialist, they lacked every component of Communism. You also apparently have no idea what Socialism is, as no part of the definition includes "private", the core component is government takeover of private industry and equity.

Wrong answer, Corn-flake. Socialism is a mixture of public and private. Try again.

 

[Pumpkin Row]

I am about as close to a socialist on this forum as you're going to get. Grow up.

Don't worry, I can tell by your posts. I face-palmed after reading each one. What's ironic here is a Socialist telling someone to grow up, while pedaling a failed ideal that has brought down Nations from within. Why don't you grow up?

No. It hasn't brought down nations. You're already starting off with a jacked up concept. You can't tell shit. Indicating it is necessary for you to grow up.

So, then, I suppose you're going to tell be that
Afghanistan(Twice), Albania(Three times), Angola, Benin, Bulgaria, Cambodia(Twice), Congo-Brazzaville, Czechoslovakia(twice), Ethiopia(twice), Germany, Hungary, North Korea, Mongolia, Mozambique, Poland, Romania, Somalia, Russia, North Vietnam, South Yemen, Yugoslavia, Venezuela, Greece.
Weren't socialist? Because by definition their government was, and that economic system caused those Nations to fail. Of course, it's only natural for a Socialist not to know that, because if they weren't completely ignorant, they wouldn't be a Socialist.

Are you trying to sell me that countries that modeled their policies off of the Soviet Union--qualify? No, little hillbilly. They are not. Socialism is a mixture of public and private. It is not communism. Try again.

!!BINGO!!
It is a balance that ran for 40 years until greed and corruption set in.

By definition, the Soviet Union was not Communist.

 

[Disir]

Don't worry, I can tell by your posts. I face-palmed after reading each one. What's ironic here is a Socialist telling someone to grow up, while pedaling a failed ideal that has brought down Nations from within. Why don't you grow up?

No. It hasn't brought down nations. You're already starting off with a jacked up concept. You can't tell shit. Indicating it is necessary for you to grow up.

So, then, I suppose you're going to tell be that
Afghanistan(Twice), Albania(Three times), Angola, Benin, Bulgaria, Cambodia(Twice), Congo-Brazzaville, Czechoslovakia(twice), Ethiopia(twice), Germany, Hungary, North Korea, Mongolia, Mozambique, Poland, Romania, Somalia, Russia, North Vietnam, South Yemen, Yugoslavia, Venezuela, Greece.
Weren't socialist? Because by definition their government was, and that economic system caused those Nations to fail. Of course, it's only natural for a Socialist not to know that, because if they weren't completely ignorant, they wouldn't be a Socialist.

Are you trying to sell me that countries that modeled their policies off of the Soviet Union--qualify? No, little hillbilly. They are not. Socialism is a mixture of public and private. It is not communism. Try again.

!!BINGO!!
It is a balance that ran for 40 years until greed and corruption set in.

By definition, the Soviet Union was not Communist.

None of the "communist" countries were by definition communist.