Never was a Jewish exodus from Egypt

[rupol2000]

Hittites were just Jews? you must be joking

It is possible

 

[DudleySmith]

lol another thread reduced to idiocy. Oh well, parts of it were good.

 

[The Sage of Main Street]

The word Pitar is Indo-Aryan, it could not have been a Semitic deity. And it arose in the La Tene culture. The semantics there is also similar to the Indo-Aryan Dyaus, this is the god of the sky and thunder. It all fits together.
It is believed that the Jews appeared there after the conquest of the Jews by Rome.
Maybe in later Rome there were deities of Semitic origin. But this is not Jupiter and not the period of the kings.

Historical Facts Don't Necessarily Fit the Conclusions Historians Get From Them

Just because the Hebrews wound up speaking a Semitic language doesn't mean that they are Semites, no more than all Americans are Englishmen. The Kelts had nothing to do with the origins of the Latins. Virgil pushed the myth that the Romans originated in Troy. They probably did come to Italy following the path that Aeneas took, but they weren't Trojans either. Or they came the way of Ulysses, since Ithaca is the closest part of Greece to Italy.

 

[rupol2000]

The Kelts had nothing to do with the origins of the Latins

ancient Celtic language is ancient Latin

in fact, the city itself, Rome, may not have been Keltic / Italic peoples, but this does not change the essence. It may have been an Illyrian colony in italic lands.

 

[surada]

It is possible

They were from Anatolia circa 1750 BC.

 

[rupol2000]

Legend has it that the townspeople of Rome stole Italian women, and when the Italics came to fight them off, they were already raped by the townspeople and had conception, they fell to their knees and the Italics spared them.

 

[rupol2000]

They were from Anatolia circa 1750 BC.

What does this mean? By the way, Mittani is authentically Aryan land, there was even a Vedic language

 

[surada]

Legend has it that the townspeople of Rome stole Italian women, and when the Italics came to fight them off, they were already raped by the townspeople and had conception, they fell to their knees and the Italics spared them.

Who are the Italics?

 

[rupol2000]

Who are the Italics?

italic tribes, apparently Celts settled on the Appenines

 

[rupol2000]

They were Celts by lang

 

[surada]

They were Celts by lang

Most scholars today think the Hebrews emerged from the Northcoast Canaanites and Abraham was from Urfa near Haran.

 

[Litwin]

It is possible

It is possible

No , it is not possible


The Hittite language was a distinct member of the Anatolian branch of the Indo-European language family, and along with the closely related Luwian language, is the oldest historically attested Indo-European language,[4]

and

Hittite | Definition, History, Achievements, & Facts | Britannica​

https://www.britannica.com › ... › Peoples of Asia

Hittite, member of an ancient Indo-European people who appeared in Anatolia at the

 

[rupol2000]

Most scholars today think the Hebrews emerged from the Northcoast Canaanites and Abraham was from Urfa near Haran.

They could migrate.
There is some confusion associated with this Hattie and it seems to be related to politics. The very name exactly has a connection with the Geths and Goths. In ancient times, there were some conquests, and this country changed power, but the name remained approximately the same, something like Hettie/Hattie or something like this.
There, both the cities Mittani and Ishkuza are known as countries. Mittani is an Aryan country, similar to Aryavarta in culture and language, and Ishkuza are the Black Sea Scythians, they could be associated with the Ashkenazi

 

[rupol2000]

The Hittite language was a distinct member of the Anatolian branch of the Indo-European language family, and along with the closely related Luwian language, is the oldest historically attested Indo-European language,[4]

Ashkenazi spoke Yiddish, it is Germanic

 

[rupol2000]

It seems that it was from this place that the primary division of the Indo-Europeans into 2 branches took place, one moved to Europe and formed an agricultural culture, and the other went east and became known as the Tochars, and then the Aryans.

It is believed that all Indo-European languages passed through the Tocharian, but it seems that this is not so, apparently the Germanic and Baltic languages originated directly from the Anatolian

And these were clearly hostile peoples to each other

 

[rupol2000]

According to Germanic mythology, there was a Æsir–Vanir War, then they mixed. This may just coincide with the Assyrians and Ishkuz. The Goths were Indo-Europeans who joined the Protosemites
against Media.
Then union was defeated by the union of Babylon and Media, the Goths migrated to Baltic and Scandinavia, the semites to Arabia. It looks like it was.

 

[rupol2000]

By genetics Ashkenazi are Semites only on the female line, and that is not a fact, on the male line they are mainly IE, so everything fits together

 

[surada]

According to Germanic mythology, there was a Æsir–Vanir War, then they mixed. This may just coincide with the Assyrians and Ishkuz. The Goths were Indo-Europeans who joined the Protosemites
against Media.
Then union was defeated by the union of Babylon and Media, the Goths migrated to Baltic and Scandinavia, the semites to Arabia. It looks like it was.

Who moved to Arabia? As the peninsula became more arid Arabs (Akkadians) migrated north in waves starting 10,000 years ago.

 

[rupol2000]

Who moved to Arabia?

Assyrians. Somewhere I met such information

 

[surada]

Assyrians. Somewhere I met such information

That's odd. Have you looked at the extent of the Akkadian Empire?