Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
More new developments....
The Georgia Police Department That Led Arbery Shooting Case Has A Troubled Past
Years before a former policeman and his son were arrested for killing Ahmaud Arbery in February in Glynn County, Ga., the county police had a tangled history of corruption and scandals.
The Glynn County Police Department's track record of protecting its own is coming under scrutiny as the Georgia Bureau of Investigation takes over the case of the shooting death of Arbery, the 25-year-old black man whose killing has drawn comparisons to a modern-day lynching.
"There is not just one prior case. There are many prior cases. And each one is a separate Netflix episode," said Page Pate, a criminal defense attorney in Glynn County.
In 2018, Glynn County Police Lt. Robert Sasser killed his estranged wife and her friend, before taking his own life. The wife's family is now suing the police department because they say authorities failed to intervene before the murders.
Sasser had a well-documented history of problematic behavior. In 2010, he and another officer were involved in a brutal police shooting when they opened fire on a woman who had led the officers on a low-speed police chase. Sasser avoided punishment and remained on the force.
In 2018, the police department also lost its certification with the state because it did not meet basic policing standards. A report by the International Association of Police Chiefs noted that only 12% of the police force was African American, even though African Americans make up 26% of the county's population....
Great, show where. Post the video and tell the forum at what mark in it can he be seen burglarizing.....There was no burglary shown on video. Seems you're still stupid.Umm the one in the video lol many timesWhat burglary? Are you still lying about this?^^^ A moron who think not stealing is looking to steal.He already has a history of stealing, and he was caught on video looking around a house under construction. It seems fairly obvious that he was looking for tools to steal. You can play dumb if you want to, but dont expect the rest of us to join your foolishness.He went around the truck. Your words. Why? Because McMichael was in the road BLOCKING HIS WAY. If he hadn’t felt threatened, if he hadn’t been blocked by McMichael and the truck door which is wide open, he would have passed to the left of the truck. But clearly he was blocked and went to the right.ofIn the video Arbery’s jogging down the road. The truck as you can see is stopped, the truck door is open and to the right there’s one of the McMichaels standing in the road. Arbery’s swerves to the yellow arrow so as not to pass by the door and McMichael in the street waiting for him. After that the camera pans and it’s hard to see until McMichael and Arbery’s are fighting over the gun. They chased, blocked and harassed Arbery. They had no right to do so. They knew they were armed. They killed a 25 year old over nothing. They violated Arbery’s rights. That’s what the jury will see. They will rot in jail now that the feds are investigating and they don’t have the protection of the local police department.View attachment 335679On every news station out there.Where do you see this?Rest assured I saw the video. I saw two armed individuals illegally blocking a jogger.This isn’t self defense when two armed people block the path of an unarmed man for no reason of their own and shoot him in the chest, it’s an execution.Why are these people so perplexed by something so obvious?obviously when? tell me where in the video that occurs. come on son, I've asked now six times. you still avoid the answer. what you said is inadmissible at this point.The suspect obviously points the gun at the victim and in the struggle shoots the victim. Watch the video with your eyes open. That might help, dumbass!well it states pointing a weapon. you still haven't stated when that happened. why not? five times now I've asked you to show us that evidence. Why do you avoid that? so,so far no statute has been posted to describe a crime.post the statute then. The guy in the back of the truck an ex police officer I'd think knows his laws and what he can do. Experience they call that. why does it matter if they had a gun? you still didn't answer. In fact you haven't answered or provided any evidence for your position. I have the video for mine. still waiting.maybe they live across the street or something. why do you think it matters? I can stop anyone and ask them questions. you still haven't answered why you feel that's a crime.There was no reason for them to stop Arbery so there was no reason for why Arbery would know why they wanted him to stop.Which brings me back to ... with Travis block the road with a shotgun, why should Arbery have assumed they only wanted to talk?He was asking him to stop so they could talk..Liar, McMichael couldn't have just been standing there. Scotty didn't beam him from about 4 feet to the left of the truck to being in front of it.We clearly see the black kid darting in front of the truck to attack the son.. standing there with a shotgun is not an active and aggression he saying stop stop we want to talk to youIt wasn't in self defense. Georgia law does not protect the aggressor in an altercation with self defense. And Travis McMichael was the aggressor by arming himself with no knowledge of Arbery but with the intent to chase him down and stop him.In self defense? You terroristWell they murdered someone, so why is it unfair for them to face the same consequences?you sound like a terrorist.. you want two innocent men in jail to die for political reasons, to race bait.. you are a terroristOh, they'll be treated fairly -- once they're incarcerated. Inmates love cops.They did nothing wrong, if you stop pretending the black did nothing wrong it might dawn on you that this is serious. These men deserve to be treated fairly. Just stop pretending this kid did nothing wrong it insane.Miscarriage of justice,, poor guys are being lynched by democratsFacts of this case......a father and son associated with law enforcement and never in trouble of any kind, never arrested for anything but are called criminals by the liberals
vs.
The black jogger............who comidtted a felony (brought a gun to school) was convicted placed on 5 yrs probation.
The he engaged in theft thus violating his probation.....but nothing was done...he should have been in jail. If he had been where he belonged he would still be alive.
Yet the liberals want us to believe he is just so innocent...he ranks right up there with Mother Teresa
bwaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa
Then just like the the Zimmerman case the media plays games with photos..........show the best possible photo of the black dude they could find......but show the white dudes in their jail outfit.
Keep tuned this case is getting crazier by the second.
Latest development....video emerges of the black dude visiting that same home at night....what is that all about? Did he have some sort of obsession with that house....maybe Satan lured him there...as in the devil made him do it???
And the Earth is Flat. We faked the moon landing. Artificial Sweeteners are good for you, and Anna Nicole married for Love. Any other insane conspiracy theories you believe in besides these?
Because they had been chasing the person for a good time. There is more info on this in the police report. But it is very inconceivable that at this point, he did not know what the deal was.
They suspected him of burglary.
He was reported to 911.
No reason? Please...
How did they know he was suspected of burglary if the call went to 911?
They don't live across the street. Brandishing a gun is illegal dumbass!
If they just wanted to talk to him, why carry a gun?
Why should I do that? It has been posted numerous times in the thread. Are you too fucking lazy to do your homework. What are you 12 years old?
it happens in front of the truck - the first of three shots. As the shooter and victim struggle for control of the shotgun as the fight moves to the left. The man who was shot for jogging while black is the only one acting in self defense because he was attacked.
View attachment 335636
He was attacked while charging... this must be the stupidest thing I read all day.
Once the person charged at a man with shotgun, yeah he was attacked as SELF DEFENSE.
Because they are adult children aka. leftists.
And then a few conservatives who are very content on never EVER conserving anything.
BTW I’m not a leftist, I’m a church going, God praising,Trump Supporting conservative and a 40 year registered Republican. What I’m not is a conservative sheeple who feels like they have to justify stupidity by making it a political issue.
You must not have watched the video....it is clear as day that the jogger had plenty of room to keep on jogging down the road...his path was not blocked.
It is also very clear that the jogger veered to the left and attacked the guy with the shotgun.
I will tell you what you really are ---a politically correct moron that is very confused....let me try and help you....first quit watching the alphabet media news and fox is not much better.....the media are the ones who have made this case a political case....essentially engaging in race baiting to incite hysteria amongst blacks as well as a lot of duped white folk.
Let me ask you this since you think the white guy shot the black guy in cold blood? Since that is what you believe...if it is true he must have had some reason for committing murder. What was his motive?
Also you need to remember the father called the police before they took off in pursuit of the black criminal...vigilantes do not call the police.
Something else ....do you know the criminal history of the black dude....he took a gun to school....a felony. He was placed on 5yrs probation for that and then violated his probation by stealing...at the time of his death he was in violation of his probation....he should have been in jail but because of black privilege aka the double-standard that comes into play when blacks committ crimes.
Also the black guy had a mental history...the former D.A.cited his mental history as one reason they did not put him in jail....someone had sympathy for him because he had mental problems..
Arberys past has zero to do with this incident unless you are saying that the McMichaels knew Arbreys wrap sheet before this incident which could be seen as some level of premeditation on the part of the McMichaels. The reality is according to the police Arbery had no stolen property on him nor was he armed. Two against one, guns,not good odds to charge someone. It was straight up bullying of Arbery not protecting the neighborhood and not citizens arrest.
First of all he is not standing to the right...he is standing to the left and slightly to the front of the truck. Your first mistake
Now for your second error.....arbery does not swerve to the yellow arrow...instead he goes to the right to get around the truck Then he immediately swerves to the left and attacks the white guy standing there with the shotgun.....if you watch the video again look through the windshield and you will see the black guy crossing
the front of the truck and attacking the white guy trying to take away his gun.
No...they did not chase....they simply followed him in the truck and then went ahead of him and parked....at no time was arbery blocked...he had plenty of room to get around the truck and he did and then instead of jogging on down the road he quickly swerved to the left and attacked the white guy.
When you have a weapon and someone attacks you and tries to get possession of your weapon you are legally entitled to use lethal force in self defense..spelled out by the Georgia law on self defense.
Thus it is easily seen your narrative is full of holes...you have a severe lack of ability to observe and report what is readily seen by most. Why is that? Some kind of cognitive problem?
Watch the video again...I am talking about the complete video.....not the edited one the msm has put out....maybe that is what got you confused...you watched the wrong video???
Chase was the word the police used, not mine. The police said McMichael CHASED Arbery, not followed. Read the articles I posted it’s there.
you are neglecting to acknowledge they fact that the McMichaels aren’t cops. It’s not their job to follow, chase or confront anyone. It’s not their job to assume somebody they don’t know on a property of someone they don’t know is a thief. Their job it to report it and let the cops handle it not go all Wild West on a stranger gun him down in the middle of the road. You refuse to acknowledge that McMichael had no business being in that road committing a traffic violation. Arbery wouldn’t have been anywhere near McMichael if McMichael hadn’t been acting like a dick and instigated the whole thing. They gave chase, confronted a person and shot him for nothing and now they have to pay the price.
Ridiculous commentary. Anyhow.....again.....the white guys did nothing illegal.
The black guy was a criminal...as in had a criminal record. Took a gun to school....stole stuff...violated his probation ....should have been in jail but nothing was done....thus he roamed the streets day and night apparantly doing some very weird stuff....but the mdeia is doing their best to put him up there on the shelf with mother teresa.
Speaking of mothers ahmuad's mother did love him...must have been a difficult thing to do. but i guess once you give birth there is a bond formed even if the kid is a mental defect.
Why should he have been in jail? His probation was over!
Speaking of mental defects, how are you today?
Because he was a burglar.
You know this how?
Why is he so cautious if he was there doing legitimate business?
He was almost certainly a burglar.
hehheh according to one liberal he was studying construction methods...whilst loitering around there at night. bwaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa
Prove he was not. The only location we have any evidence of him actually physically visiting is an under construction house. The owner of that house says that nothing was stolen. Nothing is missing. So The suspicions of burglary are at best shaky. Hard to argue it is reasonable when he visited the house several times, was never told to leave, and nothing was ever found to be missing.
The problem with that theory for you is that all Blacks are criminals in your mind. The problem for the McMichaels is that they need to testify about why they had a reasonable suspicion. If they do they are open to cross examination and that will be their doom. It is likely to remove the reasonable doubt that may save them.
Was never told to leave?
That's not exactly why 911 was called.
Who can tell him to leave since you are the expert in Georgia Law?
Stop being retarded and sounding like a leftist. This was a known thing in the hood, with the last confrontation two weeks prior. Obviously the neighbor can ask him to leave. However, this is not relevant.
Actually it is relevant. You see if the house was open he was not breaking in. He was Trespassing. There the Neighbors could if they had discussed it with the owner tell him to leave. But since they did not either discuss it or tell him to leave he was not even technically in violation of the Trespassing Statute.
Now you say there was a history. Ok. The history was of AA entering the house. The owner of the house said he didn’t know and didn’t care. Nothing was stolen. The history was also of neighbors calling the cops. The reason there was no burglary report is again nothing was taken.
So here we are. Imagine the trial. And there is going to be a trial unless the McMichaels start to smarten up. I had reasonable suspicion that he was stealing things. Ok who told you he had stolen anything? Why did you not discuss it with the owner. Who did you discuss it with who was associated with the house? It goes downhill from there. And before he leaves the stand he looks like one of the Grand Poobahs of the KKK. Not great for the image to the jury.
Or he can refuse to testify. Absolutely his right. Then they play his statement to the police that was recorded on body cameras. Then they ask the police if they believed the story.
Holy wall of irrelevance.
Burglary is what he committed. Call back when you are ready to conserve something, then I am interested.
I highly dispute that there was no burglary shown in the video. That was almost certainly a burglary.
In this clip I am sure you have seen.
or this
View attachment 336054
Sure, now point out the moment he either stole something or intended to steal something.....
umm is this a serious question? The hammer and video of him in the house
There is no hammer and just being in a house under construction does not mean someone is there to steal something.
Sadly, your dementia persists.
"None of this should have happened if he hadnt tresspassedc onto a connstruction site where things get stolen from all the time.."Maybe he was just admiring the lawn?The fact that he is there and looks around before going in is enough to show the bad intentions in my book. Remember, he has a record.
lol
But regardless of what he did, we know that there was no stolen property on him at the time, and he paid for his transgressions, whatever they were, in 'vigilante justice'.
None of this should have happened if he hadnt tresspassedc onto a connstruction site where things get stolen from all the time..
More new developments....
The Georgia Police Department That Led Arbery Shooting Case Has A Troubled Past
Years before a former policeman and his son were arrested for killing Ahmaud Arbery in February in Glynn County, Ga., the county police had a tangled history of corruption and scandals.
The Glynn County Police Department's track record of protecting its own is coming under scrutiny as the Georgia Bureau of Investigation takes over the case of the shooting death of Arbery, the 25-year-old black man whose killing has drawn comparisons to a modern-day lynching.
"There is not just one prior case. There are many prior cases. And each one is a separate Netflix episode," said Page Pate, a criminal defense attorney in Glynn County.
In 2018, Glynn County Police Lt. Robert Sasser killed his estranged wife and her friend, before taking his own life. The wife's family is now suing the police department because they say authorities failed to intervene before the murders.
Sasser had a well-documented history of problematic behavior. In 2010, he and another officer were involved in a brutal police shooting when they opened fire on a woman who had led the officers on a low-speed police chase. Sasser avoided punishment and remained on the force.
In 2018, the police department also lost its certification with the state because it did not meet basic policing standards. A report by the International Association of Police Chiefs noted that only 12% of the police force was African American, even though African Americans make up 26% of the county's population....
This is not news, this is a fake media attack piece. To be expected.
Nothing to do with the case. Now the crazy SJWs are trying to take over the police department. Will conservatives, REAL conservatives stop them?
Black panthers are now patrolling in the neighborhood. Will conservative, REAL conservatives stop them?
Great, show where. Post the video and tell the forum at what mark in it can he be seen burglarizing.....There was no burglary shown on video. Seems you're still stupid.Umm the one in the video lol many timesWhat burglary? Are you still lying about this?^^^ A moron who think not stealing is looking to steal.He already has a history of stealing, and he was caught on video looking around a house under construction. It seems fairly obvious that he was looking for tools to steal. You can play dumb if you want to, but dont expect the rest of us to join your foolishness.He went around the truck. Your words. Why? Because McMichael was in the road BLOCKING HIS WAY. If he hadn’t felt threatened, if he hadn’t been blocked by McMichael and the truck door which is wide open, he would have passed to the left of the truck. But clearly he was blocked and went to the right.ofIn the video Arbery’s jogging down the road. The truck as you can see is stopped, the truck door is open and to the right there’s one of the McMichaels standing in the road. Arbery’s swerves to the yellow arrow so as not to pass by the door and McMichael in the street waiting for him. After that the camera pans and it’s hard to see until McMichael and Arbery’s are fighting over the gun. They chased, blocked and harassed Arbery. They had no right to do so. They knew they were armed. They killed a 25 year old over nothing. They violated Arbery’s rights. That’s what the jury will see. They will rot in jail now that the feds are investigating and they don’t have the protection of the local police department.View attachment 335679On every news station out there.Where do you see this?Rest assured I saw the video. I saw two armed individuals illegally blocking a jogger.This isn’t self defense when two armed people block the path of an unarmed man for no reason of their own and shoot him in the chest, it’s an execution.Why are these people so perplexed by something so obvious?obviously when? tell me where in the video that occurs. come on son, I've asked now six times. you still avoid the answer. what you said is inadmissible at this point.The suspect obviously points the gun at the victim and in the struggle shoots the victim. Watch the video with your eyes open. That might help, dumbass!well it states pointing a weapon. you still haven't stated when that happened. why not? five times now I've asked you to show us that evidence. Why do you avoid that? so,so far no statute has been posted to describe a crime.post the statute then. The guy in the back of the truck an ex police officer I'd think knows his laws and what he can do. Experience they call that. why does it matter if they had a gun? you still didn't answer. In fact you haven't answered or provided any evidence for your position. I have the video for mine. still waiting.maybe they live across the street or something. why do you think it matters? I can stop anyone and ask them questions. you still haven't answered why you feel that's a crime.There was no reason for them to stop Arbery so there was no reason for why Arbery would know why they wanted him to stop.Which brings me back to ... with Travis block the road with a shotgun, why should Arbery have assumed they only wanted to talk?He was asking him to stop so they could talk..Liar, McMichael couldn't have just been standing there. Scotty didn't beam him from about 4 feet to the left of the truck to being in front of it.We clearly see the black kid darting in front of the truck to attack the son.. standing there with a shotgun is not an active and aggression he saying stop stop we want to talk to youIt wasn't in self defense. Georgia law does not protect the aggressor in an altercation with self defense. And Travis McMichael was the aggressor by arming himself with no knowledge of Arbery but with the intent to chase him down and stop him.In self defense? You terroristWell they murdered someone, so why is it unfair for them to face the same consequences?you sound like a terrorist.. you want two innocent men in jail to die for political reasons, to race bait.. you are a terroristOh, they'll be treated fairly -- once they're incarcerated. Inmates love cops.They did nothing wrong, if you stop pretending the black did nothing wrong it might dawn on you that this is serious. These men deserve to be treated fairly. Just stop pretending this kid did nothing wrong it insane.Miscarriage of justice,, poor guys are being lynched by democratsFacts of this case......a father and son associated with law enforcement and never in trouble of any kind, never arrested for anything but are called criminals by the liberals
vs.
The black jogger............who comidtted a felony (brought a gun to school) was convicted placed on 5 yrs probation.
The he engaged in theft thus violating his probation.....but nothing was done...he should have been in jail. If he had been where he belonged he would still be alive.
Yet the liberals want us to believe he is just so innocent...he ranks right up there with Mother Teresa
bwaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa
Then just like the the Zimmerman case the media plays games with photos..........show the best possible photo of the black dude they could find......but show the white dudes in their jail outfit.
Keep tuned this case is getting crazier by the second.
Latest development....video emerges of the black dude visiting that same home at night....what is that all about? Did he have some sort of obsession with that house....maybe Satan lured him there...as in the devil made him do it???
And the Earth is Flat. We faked the moon landing. Artificial Sweeteners are good for you, and Anna Nicole married for Love. Any other insane conspiracy theories you believe in besides these?
Because they had been chasing the person for a good time. There is more info on this in the police report. But it is very inconceivable that at this point, he did not know what the deal was.
They suspected him of burglary.
He was reported to 911.
No reason? Please...
How did they know he was suspected of burglary if the call went to 911?
They don't live across the street. Brandishing a gun is illegal dumbass!
If they just wanted to talk to him, why carry a gun?
Why should I do that? It has been posted numerous times in the thread. Are you too fucking lazy to do your homework. What are you 12 years old?
it happens in front of the truck - the first of three shots. As the shooter and victim struggle for control of the shotgun as the fight moves to the left. The man who was shot for jogging while black is the only one acting in self defense because he was attacked.
View attachment 335636
He was attacked while charging... this must be the stupidest thing I read all day.
Once the person charged at a man with shotgun, yeah he was attacked as SELF DEFENSE.
Because they are adult children aka. leftists.
And then a few conservatives who are very content on never EVER conserving anything.
BTW I’m not a leftist, I’m a church going, God praising,Trump Supporting conservative and a 40 year registered Republican. What I’m not is a conservative sheeple who feels like they have to justify stupidity by making it a political issue.
You must not have watched the video....it is clear as day that the jogger had plenty of room to keep on jogging down the road...his path was not blocked.
It is also very clear that the jogger veered to the left and attacked the guy with the shotgun.
I will tell you what you really are ---a politically correct moron that is very confused....let me try and help you....first quit watching the alphabet media news and fox is not much better.....the media are the ones who have made this case a political case....essentially engaging in race baiting to incite hysteria amongst blacks as well as a lot of duped white folk.
Let me ask you this since you think the white guy shot the black guy in cold blood? Since that is what you believe...if it is true he must have had some reason for committing murder. What was his motive?
Also you need to remember the father called the police before they took off in pursuit of the black criminal...vigilantes do not call the police.
Something else ....do you know the criminal history of the black dude....he took a gun to school....a felony. He was placed on 5yrs probation for that and then violated his probation by stealing...at the time of his death he was in violation of his probation....he should have been in jail but because of black privilege aka the double-standard that comes into play when blacks committ crimes.
Also the black guy had a mental history...the former D.A.cited his mental history as one reason they did not put him in jail....someone had sympathy for him because he had mental problems..
Arberys past has zero to do with this incident unless you are saying that the McMichaels knew Arbreys wrap sheet before this incident which could be seen as some level of premeditation on the part of the McMichaels. The reality is according to the police Arbery had no stolen property on him nor was he armed. Two against one, guns,not good odds to charge someone. It was straight up bullying of Arbery not protecting the neighborhood and not citizens arrest.
First of all he is not standing to the right...he is standing to the left and slightly to the front of the truck. Your first mistake
Now for your second error.....arbery does not swerve to the yellow arrow...instead he goes to the right to get around the truck Then he immediately swerves to the left and attacks the white guy standing there with the shotgun.....if you watch the video again look through the windshield and you will see the black guy crossing
the front of the truck and attacking the white guy trying to take away his gun.
No...they did not chase....they simply followed him in the truck and then went ahead of him and parked....at no time was arbery blocked...he had plenty of room to get around the truck and he did and then instead of jogging on down the road he quickly swerved to the left and attacked the white guy.
When you have a weapon and someone attacks you and tries to get possession of your weapon you are legally entitled to use lethal force in self defense..spelled out by the Georgia law on self defense.
Thus it is easily seen your narrative is full of holes...you have a severe lack of ability to observe and report what is readily seen by most. Why is that? Some kind of cognitive problem?
Watch the video again...I am talking about the complete video.....not the edited one the msm has put out....maybe that is what got you confused...you watched the wrong video???
Chase was the word the police used, not mine. The police said McMichael CHASED Arbery, not followed. Read the articles I posted it’s there.
you are neglecting to acknowledge they fact that the McMichaels aren’t cops. It’s not their job to follow, chase or confront anyone. It’s not their job to assume somebody they don’t know on a property of someone they don’t know is a thief. Their job it to report it and let the cops handle it not go all Wild West on a stranger gun him down in the middle of the road. You refuse to acknowledge that McMichael had no business being in that road committing a traffic violation. Arbery wouldn’t have been anywhere near McMichael if McMichael hadn’t been acting like a dick and instigated the whole thing. They gave chase, confronted a person and shot him for nothing and now they have to pay the price.
Ridiculous commentary. Anyhow.....again.....the white guys did nothing illegal.
The black guy was a criminal...as in had a criminal record. Took a gun to school....stole stuff...violated his probation ....should have been in jail but nothing was done....thus he roamed the streets day and night apparantly doing some very weird stuff....but the mdeia is doing their best to put him up there on the shelf with mother teresa.
Speaking of mothers ahmuad's mother did love him...must have been a difficult thing to do. but i guess once you give birth there is a bond formed even if the kid is a mental defect.
Why should he have been in jail? His probation was over!
Speaking of mental defects, how are you today?
Because he was a burglar.
You know this how?
Why is he so cautious if he was there doing legitimate business?
He was almost certainly a burglar.
hehheh according to one liberal he was studying construction methods...whilst loitering around there at night. bwaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa
Prove he was not. The only location we have any evidence of him actually physically visiting is an under construction house. The owner of that house says that nothing was stolen. Nothing is missing. So The suspicions of burglary are at best shaky. Hard to argue it is reasonable when he visited the house several times, was never told to leave, and nothing was ever found to be missing.
The problem with that theory for you is that all Blacks are criminals in your mind. The problem for the McMichaels is that they need to testify about why they had a reasonable suspicion. If they do they are open to cross examination and that will be their doom. It is likely to remove the reasonable doubt that may save them.
Was never told to leave?
That's not exactly why 911 was called.
Who can tell him to leave since you are the expert in Georgia Law?
Stop being retarded and sounding like a leftist. This was a known thing in the hood, with the last confrontation two weeks prior. Obviously the neighbor can ask him to leave. However, this is not relevant.
Actually it is relevant. You see if the house was open he was not breaking in. He was Trespassing. There the Neighbors could if they had discussed it with the owner tell him to leave. But since they did not either discuss it or tell him to leave he was not even technically in violation of the Trespassing Statute.
Now you say there was a history. Ok. The history was of AA entering the house. The owner of the house said he didn’t know and didn’t care. Nothing was stolen. The history was also of neighbors calling the cops. The reason there was no burglary report is again nothing was taken.
So here we are. Imagine the trial. And there is going to be a trial unless the McMichaels start to smarten up. I had reasonable suspicion that he was stealing things. Ok who told you he had stolen anything? Why did you not discuss it with the owner. Who did you discuss it with who was associated with the house? It goes downhill from there. And before he leaves the stand he looks like one of the Grand Poobahs of the KKK. Not great for the image to the jury.
Or he can refuse to testify. Absolutely his right. Then they play his statement to the police that was recorded on body cameras. Then they ask the police if they believed the story.
Holy wall of irrelevance.
Burglary is what he committed. Call back when you are ready to conserve something, then I am interested.
I highly dispute that there was no burglary shown in the video. That was almost certainly a burglary.
In this clip I am sure you have seen.
or this
View attachment 336054
Sure, now point out the moment he either stole something or intended to steal something.....
umm is this a serious question? The hammer and video of him in the house
There is no hammer and just being in a house under construction does not mean someone is there to steal something.
Sadly, your dementia persists.
Under ga law The dwelling could be vacant and it’s still a felony.. this place had Veryuipment in there
More new developments....
The Georgia Police Department That Led Arbery Shooting Case Has A Troubled Past
Years before a former policeman and his son were arrested for killing Ahmaud Arbery in February in Glynn County, Ga., the county police had a tangled history of corruption and scandals.
The Glynn County Police Department's track record of protecting its own is coming under scrutiny as the Georgia Bureau of Investigation takes over the case of the shooting death of Arbery, the 25-year-old black man whose killing has drawn comparisons to a modern-day lynching.
"There is not just one prior case. There are many prior cases. And each one is a separate Netflix episode," said Page Pate, a criminal defense attorney in Glynn County.
In 2018, Glynn County Police Lt. Robert Sasser killed his estranged wife and her friend, before taking his own life. The wife's family is now suing the police department because they say authorities failed to intervene before the murders.
Sasser had a well-documented history of problematic behavior. In 2010, he and another officer were involved in a brutal police shooting when they opened fire on a woman who had led the officers on a low-speed police chase. Sasser avoided punishment and remained on the force.
In 2018, the police department also lost its certification with the state because it did not meet basic policing standards. A report by the International Association of Police Chiefs noted that only 12% of the police force was African American, even though African Americans make up 26% of the county's population....
This is not news, this is a fake media attack piece. To be expected.
Nothing to do with the case. Now the crazy SJWs are trying to take over the police department. Will conservatives, REAL conservatives stop them?
Black panthers are now patrolling in the neighborhood. Will conservative, REAL conservatives stop them?
This police department has a lengthy record of misdeeds. Nothing fake about it.
Someone should tell them their two white guys are in the jail. Oh wait, that’s why they’re there, real Americans out the sheep are ready to get eatenMore new developments....
The Georgia Police Department That Led Arbery Shooting Case Has A Troubled Past
Years before a former policeman and his son were arrested for killing Ahmaud Arbery in February in Glynn County, Ga., the county police had a tangled history of corruption and scandals.
The Glynn County Police Department's track record of protecting its own is coming under scrutiny as the Georgia Bureau of Investigation takes over the case of the shooting death of Arbery, the 25-year-old black man whose killing has drawn comparisons to a modern-day lynching.
"There is not just one prior case. There are many prior cases. And each one is a separate Netflix episode," said Page Pate, a criminal defense attorney in Glynn County.
In 2018, Glynn County Police Lt. Robert Sasser killed his estranged wife and her friend, before taking his own life. The wife's family is now suing the police department because they say authorities failed to intervene before the murders.
Sasser had a well-documented history of problematic behavior. In 2010, he and another officer were involved in a brutal police shooting when they opened fire on a woman who had led the officers on a low-speed police chase. Sasser avoided punishment and remained on the force.
In 2018, the police department also lost its certification with the state because it did not meet basic policing standards. A report by the International Association of Police Chiefs noted that only 12% of the police force was African American, even though African Americans make up 26% of the county's population....
This is not news, this is a fake media attack piece. To be expected.
Nothing to do with the case. Now the crazy SJWs are trying to take over the police department. Will conservatives, REAL conservatives stop them?
Black panthers are now patrolling in the neighborhood. Will conservative, REAL conservatives stop them?
Someone should tell them their two white guys are in the jail. Oh wait, that’s why they’re there, real Americans out the sheep are ready to get eatenMore new developments....
The Georgia Police Department That Led Arbery Shooting Case Has A Troubled Past
Years before a former policeman and his son were arrested for killing Ahmaud Arbery in February in Glynn County, Ga., the county police had a tangled history of corruption and scandals.
The Glynn County Police Department's track record of protecting its own is coming under scrutiny as the Georgia Bureau of Investigation takes over the case of the shooting death of Arbery, the 25-year-old black man whose killing has drawn comparisons to a modern-day lynching.
"There is not just one prior case. There are many prior cases. And each one is a separate Netflix episode," said Page Pate, a criminal defense attorney in Glynn County.
In 2018, Glynn County Police Lt. Robert Sasser killed his estranged wife and her friend, before taking his own life. The wife's family is now suing the police department because they say authorities failed to intervene before the murders.
Sasser had a well-documented history of problematic behavior. In 2010, he and another officer were involved in a brutal police shooting when they opened fire on a woman who had led the officers on a low-speed police chase. Sasser avoided punishment and remained on the force.
In 2018, the police department also lost its certification with the state because it did not meet basic policing standards. A report by the International Association of Police Chiefs noted that only 12% of the police force was African American, even though African Americans make up 26% of the county's population....
This is not news, this is a fake media attack piece. To be expected.
Nothing to do with the case. Now the crazy SJWs are trying to take over the police department. Will conservatives, REAL conservatives stop them?
Black panthers are now patrolling in the neighborhood. Will conservative, REAL conservatives stop them?
LOLOLMore new developments....
The Georgia Police Department That Led Arbery Shooting Case Has A Troubled Past
Years before a former policeman and his son were arrested for killing Ahmaud Arbery in February in Glynn County, Ga., the county police had a tangled history of corruption and scandals.
The Glynn County Police Department's track record of protecting its own is coming under scrutiny as the Georgia Bureau of Investigation takes over the case of the shooting death of Arbery, the 25-year-old black man whose killing has drawn comparisons to a modern-day lynching.
"There is not just one prior case. There are many prior cases. And each one is a separate Netflix episode," said Page Pate, a criminal defense attorney in Glynn County.
In 2018, Glynn County Police Lt. Robert Sasser killed his estranged wife and her friend, before taking his own life. The wife's family is now suing the police department because they say authorities failed to intervene before the murders.
Sasser had a well-documented history of problematic behavior. In 2010, he and another officer were involved in a brutal police shooting when they opened fire on a woman who had led the officers on a low-speed police chase. Sasser avoided punishment and remained on the force.
In 2018, the police department also lost its certification with the state because it did not meet basic policing standards. A report by the International Association of Police Chiefs noted that only 12% of the police force was African American, even though African Americans make up 26% of the county's population....
This is not news, this is a fake media attack piece. To be expected.
Nothing to do with the case. Now the crazy SJWs are trying to take over the police department. Will conservatives, REAL conservatives stop them?
Black panthers are now patrolling in the neighborhood. Will conservative, REAL conservatives stop them?
Great, show where. Post the video and tell the forum at what mark in it can he be seen burglarizing.....There was no burglary shown on video. Seems you're still stupid.Umm the one in the video lol many timesWhat burglary? Are you still lying about this?^^^ A moron who think not stealing is looking to steal.He already has a history of stealing, and he was caught on video looking around a house under construction. It seems fairly obvious that he was looking for tools to steal. You can play dumb if you want to, but dont expect the rest of us to join your foolishness.He went around the truck. Your words. Why? Because McMichael was in the road BLOCKING HIS WAY. If he hadn’t felt threatened, if he hadn’t been blocked by McMichael and the truck door which is wide open, he would have passed to the left of the truck. But clearly he was blocked and went to the right.ofIn the video Arbery’s jogging down the road. The truck as you can see is stopped, the truck door is open and to the right there’s one of the McMichaels standing in the road. Arbery’s swerves to the yellow arrow so as not to pass by the door and McMichael in the street waiting for him. After that the camera pans and it’s hard to see until McMichael and Arbery’s are fighting over the gun. They chased, blocked and harassed Arbery. They had no right to do so. They knew they were armed. They killed a 25 year old over nothing. They violated Arbery’s rights. That’s what the jury will see. They will rot in jail now that the feds are investigating and they don’t have the protection of the local police department.View attachment 335679On every news station out there.Where do you see this?Rest assured I saw the video. I saw two armed individuals illegally blocking a jogger.This isn’t self defense when two armed people block the path of an unarmed man for no reason of their own and shoot him in the chest, it’s an execution.Why are these people so perplexed by something so obvious?obviously when? tell me where in the video that occurs. come on son, I've asked now six times. you still avoid the answer. what you said is inadmissible at this point.The suspect obviously points the gun at the victim and in the struggle shoots the victim. Watch the video with your eyes open. That might help, dumbass!well it states pointing a weapon. you still haven't stated when that happened. why not? five times now I've asked you to show us that evidence. Why do you avoid that? so,so far no statute has been posted to describe a crime.post the statute then. The guy in the back of the truck an ex police officer I'd think knows his laws and what he can do. Experience they call that. why does it matter if they had a gun? you still didn't answer. In fact you haven't answered or provided any evidence for your position. I have the video for mine. still waiting.maybe they live across the street or something. why do you think it matters? I can stop anyone and ask them questions. you still haven't answered why you feel that's a crime.There was no reason for them to stop Arbery so there was no reason for why Arbery would know why they wanted him to stop.Which brings me back to ... with Travis block the road with a shotgun, why should Arbery have assumed they only wanted to talk?He was asking him to stop so they could talk..Liar, McMichael couldn't have just been standing there. Scotty didn't beam him from about 4 feet to the left of the truck to being in front of it.We clearly see the black kid darting in front of the truck to attack the son.. standing there with a shotgun is not an active and aggression he saying stop stop we want to talk to youIt wasn't in self defense. Georgia law does not protect the aggressor in an altercation with self defense. And Travis McMichael was the aggressor by arming himself with no knowledge of Arbery but with the intent to chase him down and stop him.In self defense? You terroristWell they murdered someone, so why is it unfair for them to face the same consequences?you sound like a terrorist.. you want two innocent men in jail to die for political reasons, to race bait.. you are a terroristOh, they'll be treated fairly -- once they're incarcerated. Inmates love cops.They did nothing wrong, if you stop pretending the black did nothing wrong it might dawn on you that this is serious. These men deserve to be treated fairly. Just stop pretending this kid did nothing wrong it insane.Miscarriage of justice,, poor guys are being lynched by democratsFacts of this case......a father and son associated with law enforcement and never in trouble of any kind, never arrested for anything but are called criminals by the liberals
vs.
The black jogger............who comidtted a felony (brought a gun to school) was convicted placed on 5 yrs probation.
The he engaged in theft thus violating his probation.....but nothing was done...he should have been in jail. If he had been where he belonged he would still be alive.
Yet the liberals want us to believe he is just so innocent...he ranks right up there with Mother Teresa
bwaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa
Then just like the the Zimmerman case the media plays games with photos..........show the best possible photo of the black dude they could find......but show the white dudes in their jail outfit.
Keep tuned this case is getting crazier by the second.
Latest development....video emerges of the black dude visiting that same home at night....what is that all about? Did he have some sort of obsession with that house....maybe Satan lured him there...as in the devil made him do it???
And the Earth is Flat. We faked the moon landing. Artificial Sweeteners are good for you, and Anna Nicole married for Love. Any other insane conspiracy theories you believe in besides these?
Because they had been chasing the person for a good time. There is more info on this in the police report. But it is very inconceivable that at this point, he did not know what the deal was.
They suspected him of burglary.
He was reported to 911.
No reason? Please...
How did they know he was suspected of burglary if the call went to 911?
They don't live across the street. Brandishing a gun is illegal dumbass!
If they just wanted to talk to him, why carry a gun?
Why should I do that? It has been posted numerous times in the thread. Are you too fucking lazy to do your homework. What are you 12 years old?
it happens in front of the truck - the first of three shots. As the shooter and victim struggle for control of the shotgun as the fight moves to the left. The man who was shot for jogging while black is the only one acting in self defense because he was attacked.
View attachment 335636
He was attacked while charging... this must be the stupidest thing I read all day.
Once the person charged at a man with shotgun, yeah he was attacked as SELF DEFENSE.
Because they are adult children aka. leftists.
And then a few conservatives who are very content on never EVER conserving anything.
BTW I’m not a leftist, I’m a church going, God praising,Trump Supporting conservative and a 40 year registered Republican. What I’m not is a conservative sheeple who feels like they have to justify stupidity by making it a political issue.
You must not have watched the video....it is clear as day that the jogger had plenty of room to keep on jogging down the road...his path was not blocked.
It is also very clear that the jogger veered to the left and attacked the guy with the shotgun.
I will tell you what you really are ---a politically correct moron that is very confused....let me try and help you....first quit watching the alphabet media news and fox is not much better.....the media are the ones who have made this case a political case....essentially engaging in race baiting to incite hysteria amongst blacks as well as a lot of duped white folk.
Let me ask you this since you think the white guy shot the black guy in cold blood? Since that is what you believe...if it is true he must have had some reason for committing murder. What was his motive?
Also you need to remember the father called the police before they took off in pursuit of the black criminal...vigilantes do not call the police.
Something else ....do you know the criminal history of the black dude....he took a gun to school....a felony. He was placed on 5yrs probation for that and then violated his probation by stealing...at the time of his death he was in violation of his probation....he should have been in jail but because of black privilege aka the double-standard that comes into play when blacks committ crimes.
Also the black guy had a mental history...the former D.A.cited his mental history as one reason they did not put him in jail....someone had sympathy for him because he had mental problems..
Arberys past has zero to do with this incident unless you are saying that the McMichaels knew Arbreys wrap sheet before this incident which could be seen as some level of premeditation on the part of the McMichaels. The reality is according to the police Arbery had no stolen property on him nor was he armed. Two against one, guns,not good odds to charge someone. It was straight up bullying of Arbery not protecting the neighborhood and not citizens arrest.
First of all he is not standing to the right...he is standing to the left and slightly to the front of the truck. Your first mistake
Now for your second error.....arbery does not swerve to the yellow arrow...instead he goes to the right to get around the truck Then he immediately swerves to the left and attacks the white guy standing there with the shotgun.....if you watch the video again look through the windshield and you will see the black guy crossing
the front of the truck and attacking the white guy trying to take away his gun.
No...they did not chase....they simply followed him in the truck and then went ahead of him and parked....at no time was arbery blocked...he had plenty of room to get around the truck and he did and then instead of jogging on down the road he quickly swerved to the left and attacked the white guy.
When you have a weapon and someone attacks you and tries to get possession of your weapon you are legally entitled to use lethal force in self defense..spelled out by the Georgia law on self defense.
Thus it is easily seen your narrative is full of holes...you have a severe lack of ability to observe and report what is readily seen by most. Why is that? Some kind of cognitive problem?
Watch the video again...I am talking about the complete video.....not the edited one the msm has put out....maybe that is what got you confused...you watched the wrong video???
Chase was the word the police used, not mine. The police said McMichael CHASED Arbery, not followed. Read the articles I posted it’s there.
you are neglecting to acknowledge they fact that the McMichaels aren’t cops. It’s not their job to follow, chase or confront anyone. It’s not their job to assume somebody they don’t know on a property of someone they don’t know is a thief. Their job it to report it and let the cops handle it not go all Wild West on a stranger gun him down in the middle of the road. You refuse to acknowledge that McMichael had no business being in that road committing a traffic violation. Arbery wouldn’t have been anywhere near McMichael if McMichael hadn’t been acting like a dick and instigated the whole thing. They gave chase, confronted a person and shot him for nothing and now they have to pay the price.
Ridiculous commentary. Anyhow.....again.....the white guys did nothing illegal.
The black guy was a criminal...as in had a criminal record. Took a gun to school....stole stuff...violated his probation ....should have been in jail but nothing was done....thus he roamed the streets day and night apparantly doing some very weird stuff....but the mdeia is doing their best to put him up there on the shelf with mother teresa.
Speaking of mothers ahmuad's mother did love him...must have been a difficult thing to do. but i guess once you give birth there is a bond formed even if the kid is a mental defect.
Why should he have been in jail? His probation was over!
Speaking of mental defects, how are you today?
Because he was a burglar.
You know this how?
Why is he so cautious if he was there doing legitimate business?
He was almost certainly a burglar.
hehheh according to one liberal he was studying construction methods...whilst loitering around there at night. bwaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa
Prove he was not. The only location we have any evidence of him actually physically visiting is an under construction house. The owner of that house says that nothing was stolen. Nothing is missing. So The suspicions of burglary are at best shaky. Hard to argue it is reasonable when he visited the house several times, was never told to leave, and nothing was ever found to be missing.
The problem with that theory for you is that all Blacks are criminals in your mind. The problem for the McMichaels is that they need to testify about why they had a reasonable suspicion. If they do they are open to cross examination and that will be their doom. It is likely to remove the reasonable doubt that may save them.
Was never told to leave?
That's not exactly why 911 was called.
Who can tell him to leave since you are the expert in Georgia Law?
Stop being retarded and sounding like a leftist. This was a known thing in the hood, with the last confrontation two weeks prior. Obviously the neighbor can ask him to leave. However, this is not relevant.
Actually it is relevant. You see if the house was open he was not breaking in. He was Trespassing. There the Neighbors could if they had discussed it with the owner tell him to leave. But since they did not either discuss it or tell him to leave he was not even technically in violation of the Trespassing Statute.
Now you say there was a history. Ok. The history was of AA entering the house. The owner of the house said he didn’t know and didn’t care. Nothing was stolen. The history was also of neighbors calling the cops. The reason there was no burglary report is again nothing was taken.
So here we are. Imagine the trial. And there is going to be a trial unless the McMichaels start to smarten up. I had reasonable suspicion that he was stealing things. Ok who told you he had stolen anything? Why did you not discuss it with the owner. Who did you discuss it with who was associated with the house? It goes downhill from there. And before he leaves the stand he looks like one of the Grand Poobahs of the KKK. Not great for the image to the jury.
Or he can refuse to testify. Absolutely his right. Then they play his statement to the police that was recorded on body cameras. Then they ask the police if they believed the story.
Holy wall of irrelevance.
Burglary is what he committed. Call back when you are ready to conserve something, then I am interested.
I highly dispute that there was no burglary shown in the video. That was almost certainly a burglary.
In this clip I am sure you have seen.
or this
View attachment 336054
Sure, now point out the moment he either stole something or intended to steal something.....
umm is this a serious question? The hammer and video of him in the house
There is no hammer and just being in a house under construction does not mean someone is there to steal something.
Sadly, your dementia persists.
Under ga law The dwelling could be vacant and it’s still a felony.. this place had Veryuipment in there
This nonsense of yours has been thoroughly smashed with actual Georgia law which shows at worst, he trespassed ... and trespassing is not a felony.
LOLOLMore new developments....
The Georgia Police Department That Led Arbery Shooting Case Has A Troubled Past
Years before a former policeman and his son were arrested for killing Ahmaud Arbery in February in Glynn County, Ga., the county police had a tangled history of corruption and scandals.
The Glynn County Police Department's track record of protecting its own is coming under scrutiny as the Georgia Bureau of Investigation takes over the case of the shooting death of Arbery, the 25-year-old black man whose killing has drawn comparisons to a modern-day lynching.
"There is not just one prior case. There are many prior cases. And each one is a separate Netflix episode," said Page Pate, a criminal defense attorney in Glynn County.
In 2018, Glynn County Police Lt. Robert Sasser killed his estranged wife and her friend, before taking his own life. The wife's family is now suing the police department because they say authorities failed to intervene before the murders.
Sasser had a well-documented history of problematic behavior. In 2010, he and another officer were involved in a brutal police shooting when they opened fire on a woman who had led the officers on a low-speed police chase. Sasser avoided punishment and remained on the force.
In 2018, the police department also lost its certification with the state because it did not meet basic policing standards. A report by the International Association of Police Chiefs noted that only 12% of the police force was African American, even though African Americans make up 26% of the county's population....
This is not news, this is a fake media attack piece. To be expected.
Nothing to do with the case. Now the crazy SJWs are trying to take over the police department. Will conservatives, REAL conservatives stop them?
Black panthers are now patrolling in the neighborhood. Will conservative, REAL conservatives stop them?
Not according to you. You call Arbery a criminal because he shoplifted something years ago. So according to you, a corrupt police department is still corrupt even if they haven't done anything corrupt for years.
Explains why they waited months until the public became aware of incriminating evidence against one for their former own before finally charging him with murder for murdering Ahmaud Arbery.
Great, show where. Post the video and tell the forum at what mark in it can he be seen burglarizing.....There was no burglary shown on video. Seems you're still stupid.Umm the one in the video lol many timesWhat burglary? Are you still lying about this?^^^ A moron who think not stealing is looking to steal.He already has a history of stealing, and he was caught on video looking around a house under construction. It seems fairly obvious that he was looking for tools to steal. You can play dumb if you want to, but dont expect the rest of us to join your foolishness.He went around the truck. Your words. Why? Because McMichael was in the road BLOCKING HIS WAY. If he hadn’t felt threatened, if he hadn’t been blocked by McMichael and the truck door which is wide open, he would have passed to the left of the truck. But clearly he was blocked and went to the right.ofIn the video Arbery’s jogging down the road. The truck as you can see is stopped, the truck door is open and to the right there’s one of the McMichaels standing in the road. Arbery’s swerves to the yellow arrow so as not to pass by the door and McMichael in the street waiting for him. After that the camera pans and it’s hard to see until McMichael and Arbery’s are fighting over the gun. They chased, blocked and harassed Arbery. They had no right to do so. They knew they were armed. They killed a 25 year old over nothing. They violated Arbery’s rights. That’s what the jury will see. They will rot in jail now that the feds are investigating and they don’t have the protection of the local police department.View attachment 335679On every news station out there.Where do you see this?Rest assured I saw the video. I saw two armed individuals illegally blocking a jogger.This isn’t self defense when two armed people block the path of an unarmed man for no reason of their own and shoot him in the chest, it’s an execution.Why are these people so perplexed by something so obvious?obviously when? tell me where in the video that occurs. come on son, I've asked now six times. you still avoid the answer. what you said is inadmissible at this point.The suspect obviously points the gun at the victim and in the struggle shoots the victim. Watch the video with your eyes open. That might help, dumbass!well it states pointing a weapon. you still haven't stated when that happened. why not? five times now I've asked you to show us that evidence. Why do you avoid that? so,so far no statute has been posted to describe a crime.post the statute then. The guy in the back of the truck an ex police officer I'd think knows his laws and what he can do. Experience they call that. why does it matter if they had a gun? you still didn't answer. In fact you haven't answered or provided any evidence for your position. I have the video for mine. still waiting.maybe they live across the street or something. why do you think it matters? I can stop anyone and ask them questions. you still haven't answered why you feel that's a crime.There was no reason for them to stop Arbery so there was no reason for why Arbery would know why they wanted him to stop.Which brings me back to ... with Travis block the road with a shotgun, why should Arbery have assumed they only wanted to talk?He was asking him to stop so they could talk..Liar, McMichael couldn't have just been standing there. Scotty didn't beam him from about 4 feet to the left of the truck to being in front of it.We clearly see the black kid darting in front of the truck to attack the son.. standing there with a shotgun is not an active and aggression he saying stop stop we want to talk to youIt wasn't in self defense. Georgia law does not protect the aggressor in an altercation with self defense. And Travis McMichael was the aggressor by arming himself with no knowledge of Arbery but with the intent to chase him down and stop him.In self defense? You terroristWell they murdered someone, so why is it unfair for them to face the same consequences?you sound like a terrorist.. you want two innocent men in jail to die for political reasons, to race bait.. you are a terroristOh, they'll be treated fairly -- once they're incarcerated. Inmates love cops.They did nothing wrong, if you stop pretending the black did nothing wrong it might dawn on you that this is serious. These men deserve to be treated fairly. Just stop pretending this kid did nothing wrong it insane.Miscarriage of justice,, poor guys are being lynched by democratsFacts of this case......a father and son associated with law enforcement and never in trouble of any kind, never arrested for anything but are called criminals by the liberals
vs.
The black jogger............who comidtted a felony (brought a gun to school) was convicted placed on 5 yrs probation.
The he engaged in theft thus violating his probation.....but nothing was done...he should have been in jail. If he had been where he belonged he would still be alive.
Yet the liberals want us to believe he is just so innocent...he ranks right up there with Mother Teresa
bwaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa
Then just like the the Zimmerman case the media plays games with photos..........show the best possible photo of the black dude they could find......but show the white dudes in their jail outfit.
Keep tuned this case is getting crazier by the second.
Latest development....video emerges of the black dude visiting that same home at night....what is that all about? Did he have some sort of obsession with that house....maybe Satan lured him there...as in the devil made him do it???
And the Earth is Flat. We faked the moon landing. Artificial Sweeteners are good for you, and Anna Nicole married for Love. Any other insane conspiracy theories you believe in besides these?
Because they had been chasing the person for a good time. There is more info on this in the police report. But it is very inconceivable that at this point, he did not know what the deal was.
They suspected him of burglary.
He was reported to 911.
No reason? Please...
How did they know he was suspected of burglary if the call went to 911?
They don't live across the street. Brandishing a gun is illegal dumbass!
If they just wanted to talk to him, why carry a gun?
Why should I do that? It has been posted numerous times in the thread. Are you too fucking lazy to do your homework. What are you 12 years old?
it happens in front of the truck - the first of three shots. As the shooter and victim struggle for control of the shotgun as the fight moves to the left. The man who was shot for jogging while black is the only one acting in self defense because he was attacked.
View attachment 335636
He was attacked while charging... this must be the stupidest thing I read all day.
Once the person charged at a man with shotgun, yeah he was attacked as SELF DEFENSE.
Because they are adult children aka. leftists.
And then a few conservatives who are very content on never EVER conserving anything.
BTW I’m not a leftist, I’m a church going, God praising,Trump Supporting conservative and a 40 year registered Republican. What I’m not is a conservative sheeple who feels like they have to justify stupidity by making it a political issue.
You must not have watched the video....it is clear as day that the jogger had plenty of room to keep on jogging down the road...his path was not blocked.
It is also very clear that the jogger veered to the left and attacked the guy with the shotgun.
I will tell you what you really are ---a politically correct moron that is very confused....let me try and help you....first quit watching the alphabet media news and fox is not much better.....the media are the ones who have made this case a political case....essentially engaging in race baiting to incite hysteria amongst blacks as well as a lot of duped white folk.
Let me ask you this since you think the white guy shot the black guy in cold blood? Since that is what you believe...if it is true he must have had some reason for committing murder. What was his motive?
Also you need to remember the father called the police before they took off in pursuit of the black criminal...vigilantes do not call the police.
Something else ....do you know the criminal history of the black dude....he took a gun to school....a felony. He was placed on 5yrs probation for that and then violated his probation by stealing...at the time of his death he was in violation of his probation....he should have been in jail but because of black privilege aka the double-standard that comes into play when blacks committ crimes.
Also the black guy had a mental history...the former D.A.cited his mental history as one reason they did not put him in jail....someone had sympathy for him because he had mental problems..
Arberys past has zero to do with this incident unless you are saying that the McMichaels knew Arbreys wrap sheet before this incident which could be seen as some level of premeditation on the part of the McMichaels. The reality is according to the police Arbery had no stolen property on him nor was he armed. Two against one, guns,not good odds to charge someone. It was straight up bullying of Arbery not protecting the neighborhood and not citizens arrest.
First of all he is not standing to the right...he is standing to the left and slightly to the front of the truck. Your first mistake
Now for your second error.....arbery does not swerve to the yellow arrow...instead he goes to the right to get around the truck Then he immediately swerves to the left and attacks the white guy standing there with the shotgun.....if you watch the video again look through the windshield and you will see the black guy crossing
the front of the truck and attacking the white guy trying to take away his gun.
No...they did not chase....they simply followed him in the truck and then went ahead of him and parked....at no time was arbery blocked...he had plenty of room to get around the truck and he did and then instead of jogging on down the road he quickly swerved to the left and attacked the white guy.
When you have a weapon and someone attacks you and tries to get possession of your weapon you are legally entitled to use lethal force in self defense..spelled out by the Georgia law on self defense.
Thus it is easily seen your narrative is full of holes...you have a severe lack of ability to observe and report what is readily seen by most. Why is that? Some kind of cognitive problem?
Watch the video again...I am talking about the complete video.....not the edited one the msm has put out....maybe that is what got you confused...you watched the wrong video???
Chase was the word the police used, not mine. The police said McMichael CHASED Arbery, not followed. Read the articles I posted it’s there.
you are neglecting to acknowledge they fact that the McMichaels aren’t cops. It’s not their job to follow, chase or confront anyone. It’s not their job to assume somebody they don’t know on a property of someone they don’t know is a thief. Their job it to report it and let the cops handle it not go all Wild West on a stranger gun him down in the middle of the road. You refuse to acknowledge that McMichael had no business being in that road committing a traffic violation. Arbery wouldn’t have been anywhere near McMichael if McMichael hadn’t been acting like a dick and instigated the whole thing. They gave chase, confronted a person and shot him for nothing and now they have to pay the price.
Ridiculous commentary. Anyhow.....again.....the white guys did nothing illegal.
The black guy was a criminal...as in had a criminal record. Took a gun to school....stole stuff...violated his probation ....should have been in jail but nothing was done....thus he roamed the streets day and night apparantly doing some very weird stuff....but the mdeia is doing their best to put him up there on the shelf with mother teresa.
Speaking of mothers ahmuad's mother did love him...must have been a difficult thing to do. but i guess once you give birth there is a bond formed even if the kid is a mental defect.
Why should he have been in jail? His probation was over!
Speaking of mental defects, how are you today?
Because he was a burglar.
You know this how?
Why is he so cautious if he was there doing legitimate business?
He was almost certainly a burglar.
hehheh according to one liberal he was studying construction methods...whilst loitering around there at night. bwaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa
Prove he was not. The only location we have any evidence of him actually physically visiting is an under construction house. The owner of that house says that nothing was stolen. Nothing is missing. So The suspicions of burglary are at best shaky. Hard to argue it is reasonable when he visited the house several times, was never told to leave, and nothing was ever found to be missing.
The problem with that theory for you is that all Blacks are criminals in your mind. The problem for the McMichaels is that they need to testify about why they had a reasonable suspicion. If they do they are open to cross examination and that will be their doom. It is likely to remove the reasonable doubt that may save them.
Was never told to leave?
That's not exactly why 911 was called.
Who can tell him to leave since you are the expert in Georgia Law?
Stop being retarded and sounding like a leftist. This was a known thing in the hood, with the last confrontation two weeks prior. Obviously the neighbor can ask him to leave. However, this is not relevant.
Actually it is relevant. You see if the house was open he was not breaking in. He was Trespassing. There the Neighbors could if they had discussed it with the owner tell him to leave. But since they did not either discuss it or tell him to leave he was not even technically in violation of the Trespassing Statute.
Now you say there was a history. Ok. The history was of AA entering the house. The owner of the house said he didn’t know and didn’t care. Nothing was stolen. The history was also of neighbors calling the cops. The reason there was no burglary report is again nothing was taken.
So here we are. Imagine the trial. And there is going to be a trial unless the McMichaels start to smarten up. I had reasonable suspicion that he was stealing things. Ok who told you he had stolen anything? Why did you not discuss it with the owner. Who did you discuss it with who was associated with the house? It goes downhill from there. And before he leaves the stand he looks like one of the Grand Poobahs of the KKK. Not great for the image to the jury.
Or he can refuse to testify. Absolutely his right. Then they play his statement to the police that was recorded on body cameras. Then they ask the police if they believed the story.
Holy wall of irrelevance.
Burglary is what he committed. Call back when you are ready to conserve something, then I am interested.
I highly dispute that there was no burglary shown in the video. That was almost certainly a burglary.
In this clip I am sure you have seen.
or this
View attachment 336054
Sure, now point out the moment he either stole something or intended to steal something.....
The fact that he is there and looks around before going in is enough to show the bad intentions in my book. Remember, he has a record.
Great, now explain the difference between trespass and burglary...
I don't need to explain anything. He was there to steal stuff in my book. You can believe otherwise. Obviously you believe he was an angel because he was black and that's where your thought processes or rather emoting stops.
Dumbass, your book is meaningless. All that matters is the law. And I'll explain the difference between trespassing and burglary, since you're too big of a coward to do so yourself since deep down, even you know the difference utterly destroys your delusions.
Trespassing [in Georgia] is entering someone else's property without authorization and for an unlawful purpose.
Burglary [in Georgia] that that plus committing, or intending to commit, a felony or theft.
Now you describe him as...
"he is there and looks around before going in"
.... but that does not demonstrate an intent to steal. It's not even possible to say he's looking around since the image is so grainy, but he does stop there for about 3 seconds. But even if he's looking around, that still is not a foreshadowing that he's planning to steal anything. This is obvious by how he got there and how he's dressed. He's not carrying anything to break in; nor is he carrying anything to put stuff in. He also has no transportation to make a "getaway" with stolen property.
Of course that is intent to steal something, are you retarded? People don't randomly go into each other's houses while making sure no one is around.
And of course, if it turns out it was Arbery two weeks ago, he knew he should not be there as he was chased out. I bet good sum of money on that it was. They will have finger prints taken and hair samples collected all over the house, we will see.
Yes, people randomly do enter homes under construction. Happens all the time. I even posted videos yesterday of people doing just that.
At least now we've cleared this up. There was no burglary outside the confines of your demented head.
Great, show where. Post the video and tell the forum at what mark in it can he be seen burglarizing.....There was no burglary shown on video. Seems you're still stupid.Umm the one in the video lol many timesWhat burglary? Are you still lying about this?^^^ A moron who think not stealing is looking to steal.He already has a history of stealing, and he was caught on video looking around a house under construction. It seems fairly obvious that he was looking for tools to steal. You can play dumb if you want to, but dont expect the rest of us to join your foolishness.He went around the truck. Your words. Why? Because McMichael was in the road BLOCKING HIS WAY. If he hadn’t felt threatened, if he hadn’t been blocked by McMichael and the truck door which is wide open, he would have passed to the left of the truck. But clearly he was blocked and went to the right.ofIn the video Arbery’s jogging down the road. The truck as you can see is stopped, the truck door is open and to the right there’s one of the McMichaels standing in the road. Arbery’s swerves to the yellow arrow so as not to pass by the door and McMichael in the street waiting for him. After that the camera pans and it’s hard to see until McMichael and Arbery’s are fighting over the gun. They chased, blocked and harassed Arbery. They had no right to do so. They knew they were armed. They killed a 25 year old over nothing. They violated Arbery’s rights. That’s what the jury will see. They will rot in jail now that the feds are investigating and they don’t have the protection of the local police department.View attachment 335679On every news station out there.Where do you see this?Rest assured I saw the video. I saw two armed individuals illegally blocking a jogger.This isn’t self defense when two armed people block the path of an unarmed man for no reason of their own and shoot him in the chest, it’s an execution.Why are these people so perplexed by something so obvious?obviously when? tell me where in the video that occurs. come on son, I've asked now six times. you still avoid the answer. what you said is inadmissible at this point.The suspect obviously points the gun at the victim and in the struggle shoots the victim. Watch the video with your eyes open. That might help, dumbass!well it states pointing a weapon. you still haven't stated when that happened. why not? five times now I've asked you to show us that evidence. Why do you avoid that? so,so far no statute has been posted to describe a crime.post the statute then. The guy in the back of the truck an ex police officer I'd think knows his laws and what he can do. Experience they call that. why does it matter if they had a gun? you still didn't answer. In fact you haven't answered or provided any evidence for your position. I have the video for mine. still waiting.maybe they live across the street or something. why do you think it matters? I can stop anyone and ask them questions. you still haven't answered why you feel that's a crime.There was no reason for them to stop Arbery so there was no reason for why Arbery would know why they wanted him to stop.Which brings me back to ... with Travis block the road with a shotgun, why should Arbery have assumed they only wanted to talk?He was asking him to stop so they could talk..Liar, McMichael couldn't have just been standing there. Scotty didn't beam him from about 4 feet to the left of the truck to being in front of it.We clearly see the black kid darting in front of the truck to attack the son.. standing there with a shotgun is not an active and aggression he saying stop stop we want to talk to youIt wasn't in self defense. Georgia law does not protect the aggressor in an altercation with self defense. And Travis McMichael was the aggressor by arming himself with no knowledge of Arbery but with the intent to chase him down and stop him.In self defense? You terroristWell they murdered someone, so why is it unfair for them to face the same consequences?you sound like a terrorist.. you want two innocent men in jail to die for political reasons, to race bait.. you are a terroristOh, they'll be treated fairly -- once they're incarcerated. Inmates love cops.They did nothing wrong, if you stop pretending the black did nothing wrong it might dawn on you that this is serious. These men deserve to be treated fairly. Just stop pretending this kid did nothing wrong it insane.Miscarriage of justice,, poor guys are being lynched by democratsFacts of this case......a father and son associated with law enforcement and never in trouble of any kind, never arrested for anything but are called criminals by the liberals
vs.
The black jogger............who comidtted a felony (brought a gun to school) was convicted placed on 5 yrs probation.
The he engaged in theft thus violating his probation.....but nothing was done...he should have been in jail. If he had been where he belonged he would still be alive.
Yet the liberals want us to believe he is just so innocent...he ranks right up there with Mother Teresa
bwaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa
Then just like the the Zimmerman case the media plays games with photos..........show the best possible photo of the black dude they could find......but show the white dudes in their jail outfit.
Keep tuned this case is getting crazier by the second.
Latest development....video emerges of the black dude visiting that same home at night....what is that all about? Did he have some sort of obsession with that house....maybe Satan lured him there...as in the devil made him do it???
And the Earth is Flat. We faked the moon landing. Artificial Sweeteners are good for you, and Anna Nicole married for Love. Any other insane conspiracy theories you believe in besides these?
Because they had been chasing the person for a good time. There is more info on this in the police report. But it is very inconceivable that at this point, he did not know what the deal was.
They suspected him of burglary.
He was reported to 911.
No reason? Please...
How did they know he was suspected of burglary if the call went to 911?
They don't live across the street. Brandishing a gun is illegal dumbass!
If they just wanted to talk to him, why carry a gun?
Why should I do that? It has been posted numerous times in the thread. Are you too fucking lazy to do your homework. What are you 12 years old?
it happens in front of the truck - the first of three shots. As the shooter and victim struggle for control of the shotgun as the fight moves to the left. The man who was shot for jogging while black is the only one acting in self defense because he was attacked.
View attachment 335636
He was attacked while charging... this must be the stupidest thing I read all day.
Once the person charged at a man with shotgun, yeah he was attacked as SELF DEFENSE.
Because they are adult children aka. leftists.
And then a few conservatives who are very content on never EVER conserving anything.
BTW I’m not a leftist, I’m a church going, God praising,Trump Supporting conservative and a 40 year registered Republican. What I’m not is a conservative sheeple who feels like they have to justify stupidity by making it a political issue.
You must not have watched the video....it is clear as day that the jogger had plenty of room to keep on jogging down the road...his path was not blocked.
It is also very clear that the jogger veered to the left and attacked the guy with the shotgun.
I will tell you what you really are ---a politically correct moron that is very confused....let me try and help you....first quit watching the alphabet media news and fox is not much better.....the media are the ones who have made this case a political case....essentially engaging in race baiting to incite hysteria amongst blacks as well as a lot of duped white folk.
Let me ask you this since you think the white guy shot the black guy in cold blood? Since that is what you believe...if it is true he must have had some reason for committing murder. What was his motive?
Also you need to remember the father called the police before they took off in pursuit of the black criminal...vigilantes do not call the police.
Something else ....do you know the criminal history of the black dude....he took a gun to school....a felony. He was placed on 5yrs probation for that and then violated his probation by stealing...at the time of his death he was in violation of his probation....he should have been in jail but because of black privilege aka the double-standard that comes into play when blacks committ crimes.
Also the black guy had a mental history...the former D.A.cited his mental history as one reason they did not put him in jail....someone had sympathy for him because he had mental problems..
Arberys past has zero to do with this incident unless you are saying that the McMichaels knew Arbreys wrap sheet before this incident which could be seen as some level of premeditation on the part of the McMichaels. The reality is according to the police Arbery had no stolen property on him nor was he armed. Two against one, guns,not good odds to charge someone. It was straight up bullying of Arbery not protecting the neighborhood and not citizens arrest.
First of all he is not standing to the right...he is standing to the left and slightly to the front of the truck. Your first mistake
Now for your second error.....arbery does not swerve to the yellow arrow...instead he goes to the right to get around the truck Then he immediately swerves to the left and attacks the white guy standing there with the shotgun.....if you watch the video again look through the windshield and you will see the black guy crossing
the front of the truck and attacking the white guy trying to take away his gun.
No...they did not chase....they simply followed him in the truck and then went ahead of him and parked....at no time was arbery blocked...he had plenty of room to get around the truck and he did and then instead of jogging on down the road he quickly swerved to the left and attacked the white guy.
When you have a weapon and someone attacks you and tries to get possession of your weapon you are legally entitled to use lethal force in self defense..spelled out by the Georgia law on self defense.
Thus it is easily seen your narrative is full of holes...you have a severe lack of ability to observe and report what is readily seen by most. Why is that? Some kind of cognitive problem?
Watch the video again...I am talking about the complete video.....not the edited one the msm has put out....maybe that is what got you confused...you watched the wrong video???
Chase was the word the police used, not mine. The police said McMichael CHASED Arbery, not followed. Read the articles I posted it’s there.
you are neglecting to acknowledge they fact that the McMichaels aren’t cops. It’s not their job to follow, chase or confront anyone. It’s not their job to assume somebody they don’t know on a property of someone they don’t know is a thief. Their job it to report it and let the cops handle it not go all Wild West on a stranger gun him down in the middle of the road. You refuse to acknowledge that McMichael had no business being in that road committing a traffic violation. Arbery wouldn’t have been anywhere near McMichael if McMichael hadn’t been acting like a dick and instigated the whole thing. They gave chase, confronted a person and shot him for nothing and now they have to pay the price.
Ridiculous commentary. Anyhow.....again.....the white guys did nothing illegal.
The black guy was a criminal...as in had a criminal record. Took a gun to school....stole stuff...violated his probation ....should have been in jail but nothing was done....thus he roamed the streets day and night apparantly doing some very weird stuff....but the mdeia is doing their best to put him up there on the shelf with mother teresa.
Speaking of mothers ahmuad's mother did love him...must have been a difficult thing to do. but i guess once you give birth there is a bond formed even if the kid is a mental defect.
Why should he have been in jail? His probation was over!
Speaking of mental defects, how are you today?
Because he was a burglar.
You know this how?
Why is he so cautious if he was there doing legitimate business?
He was almost certainly a burglar.
hehheh according to one liberal he was studying construction methods...whilst loitering around there at night. bwaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa
Prove he was not. The only location we have any evidence of him actually physically visiting is an under construction house. The owner of that house says that nothing was stolen. Nothing is missing. So The suspicions of burglary are at best shaky. Hard to argue it is reasonable when he visited the house several times, was never told to leave, and nothing was ever found to be missing.
The problem with that theory for you is that all Blacks are criminals in your mind. The problem for the McMichaels is that they need to testify about why they had a reasonable suspicion. If they do they are open to cross examination and that will be their doom. It is likely to remove the reasonable doubt that may save them.
Was never told to leave?
That's not exactly why 911 was called.
Who can tell him to leave since you are the expert in Georgia Law?
Stop being retarded and sounding like a leftist. This was a known thing in the hood, with the last confrontation two weeks prior. Obviously the neighbor can ask him to leave. However, this is not relevant.
Actually it is relevant. You see if the house was open he was not breaking in. He was Trespassing. There the Neighbors could if they had discussed it with the owner tell him to leave. But since they did not either discuss it or tell him to leave he was not even technically in violation of the Trespassing Statute.
Now you say there was a history. Ok. The history was of AA entering the house. The owner of the house said he didn’t know and didn’t care. Nothing was stolen. The history was also of neighbors calling the cops. The reason there was no burglary report is again nothing was taken.
So here we are. Imagine the trial. And there is going to be a trial unless the McMichaels start to smarten up. I had reasonable suspicion that he was stealing things. Ok who told you he had stolen anything? Why did you not discuss it with the owner. Who did you discuss it with who was associated with the house? It goes downhill from there. And before he leaves the stand he looks like one of the Grand Poobahs of the KKK. Not great for the image to the jury.
Or he can refuse to testify. Absolutely his right. Then they play his statement to the police that was recorded on body cameras. Then they ask the police if they believed the story.
Holy wall of irrelevance.
Burglary is what he committed. Call back when you are ready to conserve something, then I am interested.
I highly dispute that there was no burglary shown in the video. That was almost certainly a burglary.
In this clip I am sure you have seen.
or this
View attachment 336054
Sure, now point out the moment he either stole something or intended to steal something.....
The fact that he is there and looks around before going in is enough to show the bad intentions in my book. Remember, he has a record.
Great, now explain the difference between trespass and burglary...
I don't need to explain anything. He was there to steal stuff in my book. You can believe otherwise. Obviously you believe he was an angel because he was black and that's where your thought processes or rather emoting stops.
Dumbass, your book is meaningless. All that matters is the law. And I'll explain the difference between trespassing and burglary, since you're too big of a coward to do so yourself since deep down, even you know the difference utterly destroys your delusions.
Trespassing [in Georgia] is entering someone else's property without authorization and for an unlawful purpose.
Burglary [in Georgia] that that plus committing, or intending to commit, a felony or theft.
Now you describe him as...
"he is there and looks around before going in"
.... but that does not demonstrate an intent to steal. It's not even possible to say he's looking around since the image is so grainy, but he does stop there for about 3 seconds. But even if he's looking around, that still is not a foreshadowing that he's planning to steal anything. This is obvious by how he got there and how he's dressed. He's not carrying anything to break in; nor is he carrying anything to put stuff in. He also has no transportation to make a "getaway" with stolen property.
Of course that is intent to steal something, are you retarded? People don't randomly go into each other's houses while making sure no one is around.
And of course, if it turns out it was Arbery two weeks ago, he knew he should not be there as he was chased out. I bet good sum of money on that it was. They will have finger prints taken and hair samples collected all over the house, we will see.
Yes, people randomly do enter homes under construction. Happens all the time. I even posted videos yesterday of people doing just that.
At least now we've cleared this up. There was no burglary outside the confines of your demented head.
People do check out homes under construction, but i find it hard to believe that someone who doesnt live in the neighborhood would do so. He has a history of theft, and his reaction seems to indicate that he felt like he was guilty of something.
Great, show where. Post the video and tell the forum at what mark in it can he be seen burglarizing.....There was no burglary shown on video. Seems you're still stupid.Umm the one in the video lol many timesWhat burglary? Are you still lying about this?^^^ A moron who think not stealing is looking to steal.He already has a history of stealing, and he was caught on video looking around a house under construction. It seems fairly obvious that he was looking for tools to steal. You can play dumb if you want to, but dont expect the rest of us to join your foolishness.He went around the truck. Your words. Why? Because McMichael was in the road BLOCKING HIS WAY. If he hadn’t felt threatened, if he hadn’t been blocked by McMichael and the truck door which is wide open, he would have passed to the left of the truck. But clearly he was blocked and went to the right.ofIn the video Arbery’s jogging down the road. The truck as you can see is stopped, the truck door is open and to the right there’s one of the McMichaels standing in the road. Arbery’s swerves to the yellow arrow so as not to pass by the door and McMichael in the street waiting for him. After that the camera pans and it’s hard to see until McMichael and Arbery’s are fighting over the gun. They chased, blocked and harassed Arbery. They had no right to do so. They knew they were armed. They killed a 25 year old over nothing. They violated Arbery’s rights. That’s what the jury will see. They will rot in jail now that the feds are investigating and they don’t have the protection of the local police department.View attachment 335679On every news station out there.Where do you see this?Rest assured I saw the video. I saw two armed individuals illegally blocking a jogger.This isn’t self defense when two armed people block the path of an unarmed man for no reason of their own and shoot him in the chest, it’s an execution.Why are these people so perplexed by something so obvious?obviously when? tell me where in the video that occurs. come on son, I've asked now six times. you still avoid the answer. what you said is inadmissible at this point.The suspect obviously points the gun at the victim and in the struggle shoots the victim. Watch the video with your eyes open. That might help, dumbass!well it states pointing a weapon. you still haven't stated when that happened. why not? five times now I've asked you to show us that evidence. Why do you avoid that? so,so far no statute has been posted to describe a crime.post the statute then. The guy in the back of the truck an ex police officer I'd think knows his laws and what he can do. Experience they call that. why does it matter if they had a gun? you still didn't answer. In fact you haven't answered or provided any evidence for your position. I have the video for mine. still waiting.maybe they live across the street or something. why do you think it matters? I can stop anyone and ask them questions. you still haven't answered why you feel that's a crime.There was no reason for them to stop Arbery so there was no reason for why Arbery would know why they wanted him to stop.Which brings me back to ... with Travis block the road with a shotgun, why should Arbery have assumed they only wanted to talk?He was asking him to stop so they could talk..Liar, McMichael couldn't have just been standing there. Scotty didn't beam him from about 4 feet to the left of the truck to being in front of it.We clearly see the black kid darting in front of the truck to attack the son.. standing there with a shotgun is not an active and aggression he saying stop stop we want to talk to youIt wasn't in self defense. Georgia law does not protect the aggressor in an altercation with self defense. And Travis McMichael was the aggressor by arming himself with no knowledge of Arbery but with the intent to chase him down and stop him.In self defense? You terroristWell they murdered someone, so why is it unfair for them to face the same consequences?you sound like a terrorist.. you want two innocent men in jail to die for political reasons, to race bait.. you are a terroristOh, they'll be treated fairly -- once they're incarcerated. Inmates love cops.They did nothing wrong, if you stop pretending the black did nothing wrong it might dawn on you that this is serious. These men deserve to be treated fairly. Just stop pretending this kid did nothing wrong it insane.Miscarriage of justice,, poor guys are being lynched by democratsFacts of this case......a father and son associated with law enforcement and never in trouble of any kind, never arrested for anything but are called criminals by the liberals
vs.
The black jogger............who comidtted a felony (brought a gun to school) was convicted placed on 5 yrs probation.
The he engaged in theft thus violating his probation.....but nothing was done...he should have been in jail. If he had been where he belonged he would still be alive.
Yet the liberals want us to believe he is just so innocent...he ranks right up there with Mother Teresa
bwaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa
Then just like the the Zimmerman case the media plays games with photos..........show the best possible photo of the black dude they could find......but show the white dudes in their jail outfit.
Keep tuned this case is getting crazier by the second.
Latest development....video emerges of the black dude visiting that same home at night....what is that all about? Did he have some sort of obsession with that house....maybe Satan lured him there...as in the devil made him do it???
And the Earth is Flat. We faked the moon landing. Artificial Sweeteners are good for you, and Anna Nicole married for Love. Any other insane conspiracy theories you believe in besides these?
Because they had been chasing the person for a good time. There is more info on this in the police report. But it is very inconceivable that at this point, he did not know what the deal was.
They suspected him of burglary.
He was reported to 911.
No reason? Please...
How did they know he was suspected of burglary if the call went to 911?
They don't live across the street. Brandishing a gun is illegal dumbass!
If they just wanted to talk to him, why carry a gun?
Why should I do that? It has been posted numerous times in the thread. Are you too fucking lazy to do your homework. What are you 12 years old?
it happens in front of the truck - the first of three shots. As the shooter and victim struggle for control of the shotgun as the fight moves to the left. The man who was shot for jogging while black is the only one acting in self defense because he was attacked.
View attachment 335636
He was attacked while charging... this must be the stupidest thing I read all day.
Once the person charged at a man with shotgun, yeah he was attacked as SELF DEFENSE.
Because they are adult children aka. leftists.
And then a few conservatives who are very content on never EVER conserving anything.
BTW I’m not a leftist, I’m a church going, God praising,Trump Supporting conservative and a 40 year registered Republican. What I’m not is a conservative sheeple who feels like they have to justify stupidity by making it a political issue.
You must not have watched the video....it is clear as day that the jogger had plenty of room to keep on jogging down the road...his path was not blocked.
It is also very clear that the jogger veered to the left and attacked the guy with the shotgun.
I will tell you what you really are ---a politically correct moron that is very confused....let me try and help you....first quit watching the alphabet media news and fox is not much better.....the media are the ones who have made this case a political case....essentially engaging in race baiting to incite hysteria amongst blacks as well as a lot of duped white folk.
Let me ask you this since you think the white guy shot the black guy in cold blood? Since that is what you believe...if it is true he must have had some reason for committing murder. What was his motive?
Also you need to remember the father called the police before they took off in pursuit of the black criminal...vigilantes do not call the police.
Something else ....do you know the criminal history of the black dude....he took a gun to school....a felony. He was placed on 5yrs probation for that and then violated his probation by stealing...at the time of his death he was in violation of his probation....he should have been in jail but because of black privilege aka the double-standard that comes into play when blacks committ crimes.
Also the black guy had a mental history...the former D.A.cited his mental history as one reason they did not put him in jail....someone had sympathy for him because he had mental problems..
Arberys past has zero to do with this incident unless you are saying that the McMichaels knew Arbreys wrap sheet before this incident which could be seen as some level of premeditation on the part of the McMichaels. The reality is according to the police Arbery had no stolen property on him nor was he armed. Two against one, guns,not good odds to charge someone. It was straight up bullying of Arbery not protecting the neighborhood and not citizens arrest.
First of all he is not standing to the right...he is standing to the left and slightly to the front of the truck. Your first mistake
Now for your second error.....arbery does not swerve to the yellow arrow...instead he goes to the right to get around the truck Then he immediately swerves to the left and attacks the white guy standing there with the shotgun.....if you watch the video again look through the windshield and you will see the black guy crossing
the front of the truck and attacking the white guy trying to take away his gun.
No...they did not chase....they simply followed him in the truck and then went ahead of him and parked....at no time was arbery blocked...he had plenty of room to get around the truck and he did and then instead of jogging on down the road he quickly swerved to the left and attacked the white guy.
When you have a weapon and someone attacks you and tries to get possession of your weapon you are legally entitled to use lethal force in self defense..spelled out by the Georgia law on self defense.
Thus it is easily seen your narrative is full of holes...you have a severe lack of ability to observe and report what is readily seen by most. Why is that? Some kind of cognitive problem?
Watch the video again...I am talking about the complete video.....not the edited one the msm has put out....maybe that is what got you confused...you watched the wrong video???
Chase was the word the police used, not mine. The police said McMichael CHASED Arbery, not followed. Read the articles I posted it’s there.
you are neglecting to acknowledge they fact that the McMichaels aren’t cops. It’s not their job to follow, chase or confront anyone. It’s not their job to assume somebody they don’t know on a property of someone they don’t know is a thief. Their job it to report it and let the cops handle it not go all Wild West on a stranger gun him down in the middle of the road. You refuse to acknowledge that McMichael had no business being in that road committing a traffic violation. Arbery wouldn’t have been anywhere near McMichael if McMichael hadn’t been acting like a dick and instigated the whole thing. They gave chase, confronted a person and shot him for nothing and now they have to pay the price.
Ridiculous commentary. Anyhow.....again.....the white guys did nothing illegal.
The black guy was a criminal...as in had a criminal record. Took a gun to school....stole stuff...violated his probation ....should have been in jail but nothing was done....thus he roamed the streets day and night apparantly doing some very weird stuff....but the mdeia is doing their best to put him up there on the shelf with mother teresa.
Speaking of mothers ahmuad's mother did love him...must have been a difficult thing to do. but i guess once you give birth there is a bond formed even if the kid is a mental defect.
Why should he have been in jail? His probation was over!
Speaking of mental defects, how are you today?
Because he was a burglar.
You know this how?
Why is he so cautious if he was there doing legitimate business?
He was almost certainly a burglar.
hehheh according to one liberal he was studying construction methods...whilst loitering around there at night. bwaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa
Prove he was not. The only location we have any evidence of him actually physically visiting is an under construction house. The owner of that house says that nothing was stolen. Nothing is missing. So The suspicions of burglary are at best shaky. Hard to argue it is reasonable when he visited the house several times, was never told to leave, and nothing was ever found to be missing.
The problem with that theory for you is that all Blacks are criminals in your mind. The problem for the McMichaels is that they need to testify about why they had a reasonable suspicion. If they do they are open to cross examination and that will be their doom. It is likely to remove the reasonable doubt that may save them.
Was never told to leave?
That's not exactly why 911 was called.
Who can tell him to leave since you are the expert in Georgia Law?
Stop being retarded and sounding like a leftist. This was a known thing in the hood, with the last confrontation two weeks prior. Obviously the neighbor can ask him to leave. However, this is not relevant.
Actually it is relevant. You see if the house was open he was not breaking in. He was Trespassing. There the Neighbors could if they had discussed it with the owner tell him to leave. But since they did not either discuss it or tell him to leave he was not even technically in violation of the Trespassing Statute.
Now you say there was a history. Ok. The history was of AA entering the house. The owner of the house said he didn’t know and didn’t care. Nothing was stolen. The history was also of neighbors calling the cops. The reason there was no burglary report is again nothing was taken.
So here we are. Imagine the trial. And there is going to be a trial unless the McMichaels start to smarten up. I had reasonable suspicion that he was stealing things. Ok who told you he had stolen anything? Why did you not discuss it with the owner. Who did you discuss it with who was associated with the house? It goes downhill from there. And before he leaves the stand he looks like one of the Grand Poobahs of the KKK. Not great for the image to the jury.
Or he can refuse to testify. Absolutely his right. Then they play his statement to the police that was recorded on body cameras. Then they ask the police if they believed the story.
Holy wall of irrelevance.
Burglary is what he committed. Call back when you are ready to conserve something, then I am interested.
I highly dispute that there was no burglary shown in the video. That was almost certainly a burglary.
In this clip I am sure you have seen.
or this
View attachment 336054
Sure, now point out the moment he either stole something or intended to steal something.....
umm is this a serious question? The hammer and video of him in the house
There is no hammer and just being in a house under construction does not mean someone is there to steal something.
Sadly, your dementia persists.
Under ga law The dwelling could be vacant and it’s still a felony.. this place had Veryuipment in there
This nonsense of yours has been thoroughly smashed with actual Georgia law which shows at worst, he trespassed ... and trespassing is not a felony.
who cares what it was they called the cops on the perp, and were attacked
How many times must you be reminded that your opinion isn't worth the toilet paper I wipe my ass with?LOLOLMore new developments....
The Georgia Police Department That Led Arbery Shooting Case Has A Troubled Past
Years before a former policeman and his son were arrested for killing Ahmaud Arbery in February in Glynn County, Ga., the county police had a tangled history of corruption and scandals.
The Glynn County Police Department's track record of protecting its own is coming under scrutiny as the Georgia Bureau of Investigation takes over the case of the shooting death of Arbery, the 25-year-old black man whose killing has drawn comparisons to a modern-day lynching.
"There is not just one prior case. There are many prior cases. And each one is a separate Netflix episode," said Page Pate, a criminal defense attorney in Glynn County.
In 2018, Glynn County Police Lt. Robert Sasser killed his estranged wife and her friend, before taking his own life. The wife's family is now suing the police department because they say authorities failed to intervene before the murders.
Sasser had a well-documented history of problematic behavior. In 2010, he and another officer were involved in a brutal police shooting when they opened fire on a woman who had led the officers on a low-speed police chase. Sasser avoided punishment and remained on the force.
In 2018, the police department also lost its certification with the state because it did not meet basic policing standards. A report by the International Association of Police Chiefs noted that only 12% of the police force was African American, even though African Americans make up 26% of the county's population....
This is not news, this is a fake media attack piece. To be expected.
Nothing to do with the case. Now the crazy SJWs are trying to take over the police department. Will conservatives, REAL conservatives stop them?
Black panthers are now patrolling in the neighborhood. Will conservative, REAL conservatives stop them?
Not according to you. You call Arbery a criminal because he shoplifted something years ago. So according to you, a corrupt police department is still corrupt even if they haven't done anything corrupt for years.
Explains why they waited months until the public became aware of incriminating evidence against one for their former own before finally charging him with murder for murdering Ahmaud Arbery.
Arbery was criminal for the burglary (which again happened in my opinion) and especially for an ARMED ASSAULT.
Great, show where. Post the video and tell the forum at what mark in it can he be seen burglarizing.....There was no burglary shown on video. Seems you're still stupid.Umm the one in the video lol many timesWhat burglary? Are you still lying about this?^^^ A moron who think not stealing is looking to steal.He already has a history of stealing, and he was caught on video looking around a house under construction. It seems fairly obvious that he was looking for tools to steal. You can play dumb if you want to, but dont expect the rest of us to join your foolishness.He went around the truck. Your words. Why? Because McMichael was in the road BLOCKING HIS WAY. If he hadn’t felt threatened, if he hadn’t been blocked by McMichael and the truck door which is wide open, he would have passed to the left of the truck. But clearly he was blocked and went to the right.ofIn the video Arbery’s jogging down the road. The truck as you can see is stopped, the truck door is open and to the right there’s one of the McMichaels standing in the road. Arbery’s swerves to the yellow arrow so as not to pass by the door and McMichael in the street waiting for him. After that the camera pans and it’s hard to see until McMichael and Arbery’s are fighting over the gun. They chased, blocked and harassed Arbery. They had no right to do so. They knew they were armed. They killed a 25 year old over nothing. They violated Arbery’s rights. That’s what the jury will see. They will rot in jail now that the feds are investigating and they don’t have the protection of the local police department.View attachment 335679On every news station out there.Where do you see this?Rest assured I saw the video. I saw two armed individuals illegally blocking a jogger.This isn’t self defense when two armed people block the path of an unarmed man for no reason of their own and shoot him in the chest, it’s an execution.Why are these people so perplexed by something so obvious?obviously when? tell me where in the video that occurs. come on son, I've asked now six times. you still avoid the answer. what you said is inadmissible at this point.The suspect obviously points the gun at the victim and in the struggle shoots the victim. Watch the video with your eyes open. That might help, dumbass!well it states pointing a weapon. you still haven't stated when that happened. why not? five times now I've asked you to show us that evidence. Why do you avoid that? so,so far no statute has been posted to describe a crime.post the statute then. The guy in the back of the truck an ex police officer I'd think knows his laws and what he can do. Experience they call that. why does it matter if they had a gun? you still didn't answer. In fact you haven't answered or provided any evidence for your position. I have the video for mine. still waiting.maybe they live across the street or something. why do you think it matters? I can stop anyone and ask them questions. you still haven't answered why you feel that's a crime.There was no reason for them to stop Arbery so there was no reason for why Arbery would know why they wanted him to stop.Which brings me back to ... with Travis block the road with a shotgun, why should Arbery have assumed they only wanted to talk?He was asking him to stop so they could talk..Liar, McMichael couldn't have just been standing there. Scotty didn't beam him from about 4 feet to the left of the truck to being in front of it.We clearly see the black kid darting in front of the truck to attack the son.. standing there with a shotgun is not an active and aggression he saying stop stop we want to talk to youIt wasn't in self defense. Georgia law does not protect the aggressor in an altercation with self defense. And Travis McMichael was the aggressor by arming himself with no knowledge of Arbery but with the intent to chase him down and stop him.In self defense? You terroristWell they murdered someone, so why is it unfair for them to face the same consequences?you sound like a terrorist.. you want two innocent men in jail to die for political reasons, to race bait.. you are a terroristOh, they'll be treated fairly -- once they're incarcerated. Inmates love cops.They did nothing wrong, if you stop pretending the black did nothing wrong it might dawn on you that this is serious. These men deserve to be treated fairly. Just stop pretending this kid did nothing wrong it insane.Miscarriage of justice,, poor guys are being lynched by democratsFacts of this case......a father and son associated with law enforcement and never in trouble of any kind, never arrested for anything but are called criminals by the liberals
vs.
The black jogger............who comidtted a felony (brought a gun to school) was convicted placed on 5 yrs probation.
The he engaged in theft thus violating his probation.....but nothing was done...he should have been in jail. If he had been where he belonged he would still be alive.
Yet the liberals want us to believe he is just so innocent...he ranks right up there with Mother Teresa
bwaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa
Then just like the the Zimmerman case the media plays games with photos..........show the best possible photo of the black dude they could find......but show the white dudes in their jail outfit.
Keep tuned this case is getting crazier by the second.
Latest development....video emerges of the black dude visiting that same home at night....what is that all about? Did he have some sort of obsession with that house....maybe Satan lured him there...as in the devil made him do it???
And the Earth is Flat. We faked the moon landing. Artificial Sweeteners are good for you, and Anna Nicole married for Love. Any other insane conspiracy theories you believe in besides these?
Because they had been chasing the person for a good time. There is more info on this in the police report. But it is very inconceivable that at this point, he did not know what the deal was.
They suspected him of burglary.
He was reported to 911.
No reason? Please...
How did they know he was suspected of burglary if the call went to 911?
They don't live across the street. Brandishing a gun is illegal dumbass!
If they just wanted to talk to him, why carry a gun?
Why should I do that? It has been posted numerous times in the thread. Are you too fucking lazy to do your homework. What are you 12 years old?
it happens in front of the truck - the first of three shots. As the shooter and victim struggle for control of the shotgun as the fight moves to the left. The man who was shot for jogging while black is the only one acting in self defense because he was attacked.
View attachment 335636
He was attacked while charging... this must be the stupidest thing I read all day.
Once the person charged at a man with shotgun, yeah he was attacked as SELF DEFENSE.
Because they are adult children aka. leftists.
And then a few conservatives who are very content on never EVER conserving anything.
BTW I’m not a leftist, I’m a church going, God praising,Trump Supporting conservative and a 40 year registered Republican. What I’m not is a conservative sheeple who feels like they have to justify stupidity by making it a political issue.
You must not have watched the video....it is clear as day that the jogger had plenty of room to keep on jogging down the road...his path was not blocked.
It is also very clear that the jogger veered to the left and attacked the guy with the shotgun.
I will tell you what you really are ---a politically correct moron that is very confused....let me try and help you....first quit watching the alphabet media news and fox is not much better.....the media are the ones who have made this case a political case....essentially engaging in race baiting to incite hysteria amongst blacks as well as a lot of duped white folk.
Let me ask you this since you think the white guy shot the black guy in cold blood? Since that is what you believe...if it is true he must have had some reason for committing murder. What was his motive?
Also you need to remember the father called the police before they took off in pursuit of the black criminal...vigilantes do not call the police.
Something else ....do you know the criminal history of the black dude....he took a gun to school....a felony. He was placed on 5yrs probation for that and then violated his probation by stealing...at the time of his death he was in violation of his probation....he should have been in jail but because of black privilege aka the double-standard that comes into play when blacks committ crimes.
Also the black guy had a mental history...the former D.A.cited his mental history as one reason they did not put him in jail....someone had sympathy for him because he had mental problems..
Arberys past has zero to do with this incident unless you are saying that the McMichaels knew Arbreys wrap sheet before this incident which could be seen as some level of premeditation on the part of the McMichaels. The reality is according to the police Arbery had no stolen property on him nor was he armed. Two against one, guns,not good odds to charge someone. It was straight up bullying of Arbery not protecting the neighborhood and not citizens arrest.
First of all he is not standing to the right...he is standing to the left and slightly to the front of the truck. Your first mistake
Now for your second error.....arbery does not swerve to the yellow arrow...instead he goes to the right to get around the truck Then he immediately swerves to the left and attacks the white guy standing there with the shotgun.....if you watch the video again look through the windshield and you will see the black guy crossing
the front of the truck and attacking the white guy trying to take away his gun.
No...they did not chase....they simply followed him in the truck and then went ahead of him and parked....at no time was arbery blocked...he had plenty of room to get around the truck and he did and then instead of jogging on down the road he quickly swerved to the left and attacked the white guy.
When you have a weapon and someone attacks you and tries to get possession of your weapon you are legally entitled to use lethal force in self defense..spelled out by the Georgia law on self defense.
Thus it is easily seen your narrative is full of holes...you have a severe lack of ability to observe and report what is readily seen by most. Why is that? Some kind of cognitive problem?
Watch the video again...I am talking about the complete video.....not the edited one the msm has put out....maybe that is what got you confused...you watched the wrong video???
Chase was the word the police used, not mine. The police said McMichael CHASED Arbery, not followed. Read the articles I posted it’s there.
you are neglecting to acknowledge they fact that the McMichaels aren’t cops. It’s not their job to follow, chase or confront anyone. It’s not their job to assume somebody they don’t know on a property of someone they don’t know is a thief. Their job it to report it and let the cops handle it not go all Wild West on a stranger gun him down in the middle of the road. You refuse to acknowledge that McMichael had no business being in that road committing a traffic violation. Arbery wouldn’t have been anywhere near McMichael if McMichael hadn’t been acting like a dick and instigated the whole thing. They gave chase, confronted a person and shot him for nothing and now they have to pay the price.
Ridiculous commentary. Anyhow.....again.....the white guys did nothing illegal.
The black guy was a criminal...as in had a criminal record. Took a gun to school....stole stuff...violated his probation ....should have been in jail but nothing was done....thus he roamed the streets day and night apparantly doing some very weird stuff....but the mdeia is doing their best to put him up there on the shelf with mother teresa.
Speaking of mothers ahmuad's mother did love him...must have been a difficult thing to do. but i guess once you give birth there is a bond formed even if the kid is a mental defect.
Why should he have been in jail? His probation was over!
Speaking of mental defects, how are you today?
Because he was a burglar.
You know this how?
Why is he so cautious if he was there doing legitimate business?
He was almost certainly a burglar.
hehheh according to one liberal he was studying construction methods...whilst loitering around there at night. bwaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa
Prove he was not. The only location we have any evidence of him actually physically visiting is an under construction house. The owner of that house says that nothing was stolen. Nothing is missing. So The suspicions of burglary are at best shaky. Hard to argue it is reasonable when he visited the house several times, was never told to leave, and nothing was ever found to be missing.
The problem with that theory for you is that all Blacks are criminals in your mind. The problem for the McMichaels is that they need to testify about why they had a reasonable suspicion. If they do they are open to cross examination and that will be their doom. It is likely to remove the reasonable doubt that may save them.
Was never told to leave?
That's not exactly why 911 was called.
Who can tell him to leave since you are the expert in Georgia Law?
Stop being retarded and sounding like a leftist. This was a known thing in the hood, with the last confrontation two weeks prior. Obviously the neighbor can ask him to leave. However, this is not relevant.
Actually it is relevant. You see if the house was open he was not breaking in. He was Trespassing. There the Neighbors could if they had discussed it with the owner tell him to leave. But since they did not either discuss it or tell him to leave he was not even technically in violation of the Trespassing Statute.
Now you say there was a history. Ok. The history was of AA entering the house. The owner of the house said he didn’t know and didn’t care. Nothing was stolen. The history was also of neighbors calling the cops. The reason there was no burglary report is again nothing was taken.
So here we are. Imagine the trial. And there is going to be a trial unless the McMichaels start to smarten up. I had reasonable suspicion that he was stealing things. Ok who told you he had stolen anything? Why did you not discuss it with the owner. Who did you discuss it with who was associated with the house? It goes downhill from there. And before he leaves the stand he looks like one of the Grand Poobahs of the KKK. Not great for the image to the jury.
Or he can refuse to testify. Absolutely his right. Then they play his statement to the police that was recorded on body cameras. Then they ask the police if they believed the story.
Holy wall of irrelevance.
Burglary is what he committed. Call back when you are ready to conserve something, then I am interested.
I highly dispute that there was no burglary shown in the video. That was almost certainly a burglary.
In this clip I am sure you have seen.
or this
View attachment 336054
Sure, now point out the moment he either stole something or intended to steal something.....
The fact that he is there and looks around before going in is enough to show the bad intentions in my book. Remember, he has a record.
Great, now explain the difference between trespass and burglary...
I don't need to explain anything. He was there to steal stuff in my book. You can believe otherwise. Obviously you believe he was an angel because he was black and that's where your thought processes or rather emoting stops.
Dumbass, your book is meaningless. All that matters is the law. And I'll explain the difference between trespassing and burglary, since you're too big of a coward to do so yourself since deep down, even you know the difference utterly destroys your delusions.
Trespassing [in Georgia] is entering someone else's property without authorization and for an unlawful purpose.
Burglary [in Georgia] that that plus committing, or intending to commit, a felony or theft.
Now you describe him as...
"he is there and looks around before going in"
.... but that does not demonstrate an intent to steal. It's not even possible to say he's looking around since the image is so grainy, but he does stop there for about 3 seconds. But even if he's looking around, that still is not a foreshadowing that he's planning to steal anything. This is obvious by how he got there and how he's dressed. He's not carrying anything to break in; nor is he carrying anything to put stuff in. He also has no transportation to make a "getaway" with stolen property.
Of course that is intent to steal something, are you retarded? People don't randomly go into each other's houses while making sure no one is around.
And of course, if it turns out it was Arbery two weeks ago, he knew he should not be there as he was chased out. I bet good sum of money on that it was. They will have finger prints taken and hair samples collected all over the house, we will see.
Yes, people randomly do enter homes under construction. Happens all the time. I even posted videos yesterday of people doing just that.
At least now we've cleared this up. There was no burglary outside the confines of your demented head.
People do check out homes under construction, but i find it hard to believe that someone who doesnt live in the neighborhood would do so. He has a history of theft, and his reaction seems to indicate that he felt like he was guilty of something.
Yeah, not miles away from home. Especially not in a segregated community.
He was there to rob, not to jog. Most likely the plan was to check if there is something valuable there and come back at night. Maybe he had a phone and took some pictures to perhaps id if there is something valuable? His phone should be fine...
How many times must you be reminded that your opinion isn't worth the toilet paper I wipe my ass with?LOLOLMore new developments....
The Georgia Police Department That Led Arbery Shooting Case Has A Troubled Past
Years before a former policeman and his son were arrested for killing Ahmaud Arbery in February in Glynn County, Ga., the county police had a tangled history of corruption and scandals.
The Glynn County Police Department's track record of protecting its own is coming under scrutiny as the Georgia Bureau of Investigation takes over the case of the shooting death of Arbery, the 25-year-old black man whose killing has drawn comparisons to a modern-day lynching.
"There is not just one prior case. There are many prior cases. And each one is a separate Netflix episode," said Page Pate, a criminal defense attorney in Glynn County.
In 2018, Glynn County Police Lt. Robert Sasser killed his estranged wife and her friend, before taking his own life. The wife's family is now suing the police department because they say authorities failed to intervene before the murders.
Sasser had a well-documented history of problematic behavior. In 2010, he and another officer were involved in a brutal police shooting when they opened fire on a woman who had led the officers on a low-speed police chase. Sasser avoided punishment and remained on the force.
In 2018, the police department also lost its certification with the state because it did not meet basic policing standards. A report by the International Association of Police Chiefs noted that only 12% of the police force was African American, even though African Americans make up 26% of the county's population....
This is not news, this is a fake media attack piece. To be expected.
Nothing to do with the case. Now the crazy SJWs are trying to take over the police department. Will conservatives, REAL conservatives stop them?
Black panthers are now patrolling in the neighborhood. Will conservative, REAL conservatives stop them?
Not according to you. You call Arbery a criminal because he shoplifted something years ago. So according to you, a corrupt police department is still corrupt even if they haven't done anything corrupt for years.
Explains why they waited months until the public became aware of incriminating evidence against one for their former own before finally charging him with murder for murdering Ahmaud Arbery.
Arbery was criminal for the burglary (which again happened in my opinion) and especially for an ARMED ASSAULT.
This case is going to a court of law. All that matters are facts, not Norman's opinion.
There's no factual basis shown thus far that Arbery possessed any criminal intent by looking around that construction site. Nothing was taken, though he may have been in there more than once. Videos inside the dwelling show nothing but him looking around and not even touching anything.
Great, show where. Post the video and tell the forum at what mark in it can he be seen burglarizing.....There was no burglary shown on video. Seems you're still stupid.Umm the one in the video lol many timesWhat burglary? Are you still lying about this?^^^ A moron who think not stealing is looking to steal.He already has a history of stealing, and he was caught on video looking around a house under construction. It seems fairly obvious that he was looking for tools to steal. You can play dumb if you want to, but dont expect the rest of us to join your foolishness.He went around the truck. Your words. Why? Because McMichael was in the road BLOCKING HIS WAY. If he hadn’t felt threatened, if he hadn’t been blocked by McMichael and the truck door which is wide open, he would have passed to the left of the truck. But clearly he was blocked and went to the right.ofIn the video Arbery’s jogging down the road. The truck as you can see is stopped, the truck door is open and to the right there’s one of the McMichaels standing in the road. Arbery’s swerves to the yellow arrow so as not to pass by the door and McMichael in the street waiting for him. After that the camera pans and it’s hard to see until McMichael and Arbery’s are fighting over the gun. They chased, blocked and harassed Arbery. They had no right to do so. They knew they were armed. They killed a 25 year old over nothing. They violated Arbery’s rights. That’s what the jury will see. They will rot in jail now that the feds are investigating and they don’t have the protection of the local police department.View attachment 335679On every news station out there.Where do you see this?Rest assured I saw the video. I saw two armed individuals illegally blocking a jogger.This isn’t self defense when two armed people block the path of an unarmed man for no reason of their own and shoot him in the chest, it’s an execution.Why are these people so perplexed by something so obvious?obviously when? tell me where in the video that occurs. come on son, I've asked now six times. you still avoid the answer. what you said is inadmissible at this point.The suspect obviously points the gun at the victim and in the struggle shoots the victim. Watch the video with your eyes open. That might help, dumbass!well it states pointing a weapon. you still haven't stated when that happened. why not? five times now I've asked you to show us that evidence. Why do you avoid that? so,so far no statute has been posted to describe a crime.post the statute then. The guy in the back of the truck an ex police officer I'd think knows his laws and what he can do. Experience they call that. why does it matter if they had a gun? you still didn't answer. In fact you haven't answered or provided any evidence for your position. I have the video for mine. still waiting.maybe they live across the street or something. why do you think it matters? I can stop anyone and ask them questions. you still haven't answered why you feel that's a crime.There was no reason for them to stop Arbery so there was no reason for why Arbery would know why they wanted him to stop.Which brings me back to ... with Travis block the road with a shotgun, why should Arbery have assumed they only wanted to talk?He was asking him to stop so they could talk..Liar, McMichael couldn't have just been standing there. Scotty didn't beam him from about 4 feet to the left of the truck to being in front of it.We clearly see the black kid darting in front of the truck to attack the son.. standing there with a shotgun is not an active and aggression he saying stop stop we want to talk to youIt wasn't in self defense. Georgia law does not protect the aggressor in an altercation with self defense. And Travis McMichael was the aggressor by arming himself with no knowledge of Arbery but with the intent to chase him down and stop him.In self defense? You terroristWell they murdered someone, so why is it unfair for them to face the same consequences?you sound like a terrorist.. you want two innocent men in jail to die for political reasons, to race bait.. you are a terroristOh, they'll be treated fairly -- once they're incarcerated. Inmates love cops.They did nothing wrong, if you stop pretending the black did nothing wrong it might dawn on you that this is serious. These men deserve to be treated fairly. Just stop pretending this kid did nothing wrong it insane.Miscarriage of justice,, poor guys are being lynched by democratsFacts of this case......a father and son associated with law enforcement and never in trouble of any kind, never arrested for anything but are called criminals by the liberals
vs.
The black jogger............who comidtted a felony (brought a gun to school) was convicted placed on 5 yrs probation.
The he engaged in theft thus violating his probation.....but nothing was done...he should have been in jail. If he had been where he belonged he would still be alive.
Yet the liberals want us to believe he is just so innocent...he ranks right up there with Mother Teresa
bwaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa
Then just like the the Zimmerman case the media plays games with photos..........show the best possible photo of the black dude they could find......but show the white dudes in their jail outfit.
Keep tuned this case is getting crazier by the second.
Latest development....video emerges of the black dude visiting that same home at night....what is that all about? Did he have some sort of obsession with that house....maybe Satan lured him there...as in the devil made him do it???
And the Earth is Flat. We faked the moon landing. Artificial Sweeteners are good for you, and Anna Nicole married for Love. Any other insane conspiracy theories you believe in besides these?
Because they had been chasing the person for a good time. There is more info on this in the police report. But it is very inconceivable that at this point, he did not know what the deal was.
They suspected him of burglary.
He was reported to 911.
No reason? Please...
How did they know he was suspected of burglary if the call went to 911?
They don't live across the street. Brandishing a gun is illegal dumbass!
If they just wanted to talk to him, why carry a gun?
Why should I do that? It has been posted numerous times in the thread. Are you too fucking lazy to do your homework. What are you 12 years old?
it happens in front of the truck - the first of three shots. As the shooter and victim struggle for control of the shotgun as the fight moves to the left. The man who was shot for jogging while black is the only one acting in self defense because he was attacked.
View attachment 335636
He was attacked while charging... this must be the stupidest thing I read all day.
Once the person charged at a man with shotgun, yeah he was attacked as SELF DEFENSE.
Because they are adult children aka. leftists.
And then a few conservatives who are very content on never EVER conserving anything.
BTW I’m not a leftist, I’m a church going, God praising,Trump Supporting conservative and a 40 year registered Republican. What I’m not is a conservative sheeple who feels like they have to justify stupidity by making it a political issue.
You must not have watched the video....it is clear as day that the jogger had plenty of room to keep on jogging down the road...his path was not blocked.
It is also very clear that the jogger veered to the left and attacked the guy with the shotgun.
I will tell you what you really are ---a politically correct moron that is very confused....let me try and help you....first quit watching the alphabet media news and fox is not much better.....the media are the ones who have made this case a political case....essentially engaging in race baiting to incite hysteria amongst blacks as well as a lot of duped white folk.
Let me ask you this since you think the white guy shot the black guy in cold blood? Since that is what you believe...if it is true he must have had some reason for committing murder. What was his motive?
Also you need to remember the father called the police before they took off in pursuit of the black criminal...vigilantes do not call the police.
Something else ....do you know the criminal history of the black dude....he took a gun to school....a felony. He was placed on 5yrs probation for that and then violated his probation by stealing...at the time of his death he was in violation of his probation....he should have been in jail but because of black privilege aka the double-standard that comes into play when blacks committ crimes.
Also the black guy had a mental history...the former D.A.cited his mental history as one reason they did not put him in jail....someone had sympathy for him because he had mental problems..
Arberys past has zero to do with this incident unless you are saying that the McMichaels knew Arbreys wrap sheet before this incident which could be seen as some level of premeditation on the part of the McMichaels. The reality is according to the police Arbery had no stolen property on him nor was he armed. Two against one, guns,not good odds to charge someone. It was straight up bullying of Arbery not protecting the neighborhood and not citizens arrest.
First of all he is not standing to the right...he is standing to the left and slightly to the front of the truck. Your first mistake
Now for your second error.....arbery does not swerve to the yellow arrow...instead he goes to the right to get around the truck Then he immediately swerves to the left and attacks the white guy standing there with the shotgun.....if you watch the video again look through the windshield and you will see the black guy crossing
the front of the truck and attacking the white guy trying to take away his gun.
No...they did not chase....they simply followed him in the truck and then went ahead of him and parked....at no time was arbery blocked...he had plenty of room to get around the truck and he did and then instead of jogging on down the road he quickly swerved to the left and attacked the white guy.
When you have a weapon and someone attacks you and tries to get possession of your weapon you are legally entitled to use lethal force in self defense..spelled out by the Georgia law on self defense.
Thus it is easily seen your narrative is full of holes...you have a severe lack of ability to observe and report what is readily seen by most. Why is that? Some kind of cognitive problem?
Watch the video again...I am talking about the complete video.....not the edited one the msm has put out....maybe that is what got you confused...you watched the wrong video???
Chase was the word the police used, not mine. The police said McMichael CHASED Arbery, not followed. Read the articles I posted it’s there.
you are neglecting to acknowledge they fact that the McMichaels aren’t cops. It’s not their job to follow, chase or confront anyone. It’s not their job to assume somebody they don’t know on a property of someone they don’t know is a thief. Their job it to report it and let the cops handle it not go all Wild West on a stranger gun him down in the middle of the road. You refuse to acknowledge that McMichael had no business being in that road committing a traffic violation. Arbery wouldn’t have been anywhere near McMichael if McMichael hadn’t been acting like a dick and instigated the whole thing. They gave chase, confronted a person and shot him for nothing and now they have to pay the price.
Ridiculous commentary. Anyhow.....again.....the white guys did nothing illegal.
The black guy was a criminal...as in had a criminal record. Took a gun to school....stole stuff...violated his probation ....should have been in jail but nothing was done....thus he roamed the streets day and night apparantly doing some very weird stuff....but the mdeia is doing their best to put him up there on the shelf with mother teresa.
Speaking of mothers ahmuad's mother did love him...must have been a difficult thing to do. but i guess once you give birth there is a bond formed even if the kid is a mental defect.
Why should he have been in jail? His probation was over!
Speaking of mental defects, how are you today?
Because he was a burglar.
You know this how?
Why is he so cautious if he was there doing legitimate business?
He was almost certainly a burglar.
hehheh according to one liberal he was studying construction methods...whilst loitering around there at night. bwaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa
Prove he was not. The only location we have any evidence of him actually physically visiting is an under construction house. The owner of that house says that nothing was stolen. Nothing is missing. So The suspicions of burglary are at best shaky. Hard to argue it is reasonable when he visited the house several times, was never told to leave, and nothing was ever found to be missing.
The problem with that theory for you is that all Blacks are criminals in your mind. The problem for the McMichaels is that they need to testify about why they had a reasonable suspicion. If they do they are open to cross examination and that will be their doom. It is likely to remove the reasonable doubt that may save them.
Was never told to leave?
That's not exactly why 911 was called.
Who can tell him to leave since you are the expert in Georgia Law?
Stop being retarded and sounding like a leftist. This was a known thing in the hood, with the last confrontation two weeks prior. Obviously the neighbor can ask him to leave. However, this is not relevant.
Actually it is relevant. You see if the house was open he was not breaking in. He was Trespassing. There the Neighbors could if they had discussed it with the owner tell him to leave. But since they did not either discuss it or tell him to leave he was not even technically in violation of the Trespassing Statute.
Now you say there was a history. Ok. The history was of AA entering the house. The owner of the house said he didn’t know and didn’t care. Nothing was stolen. The history was also of neighbors calling the cops. The reason there was no burglary report is again nothing was taken.
So here we are. Imagine the trial. And there is going to be a trial unless the McMichaels start to smarten up. I had reasonable suspicion that he was stealing things. Ok who told you he had stolen anything? Why did you not discuss it with the owner. Who did you discuss it with who was associated with the house? It goes downhill from there. And before he leaves the stand he looks like one of the Grand Poobahs of the KKK. Not great for the image to the jury.
Or he can refuse to testify. Absolutely his right. Then they play his statement to the police that was recorded on body cameras. Then they ask the police if they believed the story.
Holy wall of irrelevance.
Burglary is what he committed. Call back when you are ready to conserve something, then I am interested.
I highly dispute that there was no burglary shown in the video. That was almost certainly a burglary.
In this clip I am sure you have seen.
or this
View attachment 336054
Sure, now point out the moment he either stole something or intended to steal something.....
umm is this a serious question? The hammer and video of him in the house
There is no hammer and just being in a house under construction does not mean someone is there to steal something.
Sadly, your dementia persists.
Under ga law The dwelling could be vacant and it’s still a felony.. this place had Veryuipment in there
This nonsense of yours has been thoroughly smashed with actual Georgia law which shows at worst, he trespassed ... and trespassing is not a felony.
who cares what it was they called the cops on the perp, and were attacked
LOLOL
You dumbfuck -- the law cares what it is.
Have you always been this retarded? Or have you been hitting yourself in the head with your mysterious hammer?
Great, show where. Post the video and tell the forum at what mark in it can he be seen burglarizing.....There was no burglary shown on video. Seems you're still stupid.Umm the one in the video lol many timesWhat burglary? Are you still lying about this?^^^ A moron who think not stealing is looking to steal.He already has a history of stealing, and he was caught on video looking around a house under construction. It seems fairly obvious that he was looking for tools to steal. You can play dumb if you want to, but dont expect the rest of us to join your foolishness.He went around the truck. Your words. Why? Because McMichael was in the road BLOCKING HIS WAY. If he hadn’t felt threatened, if he hadn’t been blocked by McMichael and the truck door which is wide open, he would have passed to the left of the truck. But clearly he was blocked and went to the right.ofIn the video Arbery’s jogging down the road. The truck as you can see is stopped, the truck door is open and to the right there’s one of the McMichaels standing in the road. Arbery’s swerves to the yellow arrow so as not to pass by the door and McMichael in the street waiting for him. After that the camera pans and it’s hard to see until McMichael and Arbery’s are fighting over the gun. They chased, blocked and harassed Arbery. They had no right to do so. They knew they were armed. They killed a 25 year old over nothing. They violated Arbery’s rights. That’s what the jury will see. They will rot in jail now that the feds are investigating and they don’t have the protection of the local police department.View attachment 335679On every news station out there.Where do you see this?Rest assured I saw the video. I saw two armed individuals illegally blocking a jogger.This isn’t self defense when two armed people block the path of an unarmed man for no reason of their own and shoot him in the chest, it’s an execution.Why are these people so perplexed by something so obvious?obviously when? tell me where in the video that occurs. come on son, I've asked now six times. you still avoid the answer. what you said is inadmissible at this point.The suspect obviously points the gun at the victim and in the struggle shoots the victim. Watch the video with your eyes open. That might help, dumbass!well it states pointing a weapon. you still haven't stated when that happened. why not? five times now I've asked you to show us that evidence. Why do you avoid that? so,so far no statute has been posted to describe a crime.post the statute then. The guy in the back of the truck an ex police officer I'd think knows his laws and what he can do. Experience they call that. why does it matter if they had a gun? you still didn't answer. In fact you haven't answered or provided any evidence for your position. I have the video for mine. still waiting.maybe they live across the street or something. why do you think it matters? I can stop anyone and ask them questions. you still haven't answered why you feel that's a crime.There was no reason for them to stop Arbery so there was no reason for why Arbery would know why they wanted him to stop.Which brings me back to ... with Travis block the road with a shotgun, why should Arbery have assumed they only wanted to talk?He was asking him to stop so they could talk..Liar, McMichael couldn't have just been standing there. Scotty didn't beam him from about 4 feet to the left of the truck to being in front of it.We clearly see the black kid darting in front of the truck to attack the son.. standing there with a shotgun is not an active and aggression he saying stop stop we want to talk to youIt wasn't in self defense. Georgia law does not protect the aggressor in an altercation with self defense. And Travis McMichael was the aggressor by arming himself with no knowledge of Arbery but with the intent to chase him down and stop him.In self defense? You terroristWell they murdered someone, so why is it unfair for them to face the same consequences?you sound like a terrorist.. you want two innocent men in jail to die for political reasons, to race bait.. you are a terroristOh, they'll be treated fairly -- once they're incarcerated. Inmates love cops.They did nothing wrong, if you stop pretending the black did nothing wrong it might dawn on you that this is serious. These men deserve to be treated fairly. Just stop pretending this kid did nothing wrong it insane.Miscarriage of justice,, poor guys are being lynched by democratsFacts of this case......a father and son associated with law enforcement and never in trouble of any kind, never arrested for anything but are called criminals by the liberals
vs.
The black jogger............who comidtted a felony (brought a gun to school) was convicted placed on 5 yrs probation.
The he engaged in theft thus violating his probation.....but nothing was done...he should have been in jail. If he had been where he belonged he would still be alive.
Yet the liberals want us to believe he is just so innocent...he ranks right up there with Mother Teresa
bwaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa
Then just like the the Zimmerman case the media plays games with photos..........show the best possible photo of the black dude they could find......but show the white dudes in their jail outfit.
Keep tuned this case is getting crazier by the second.
Latest development....video emerges of the black dude visiting that same home at night....what is that all about? Did he have some sort of obsession with that house....maybe Satan lured him there...as in the devil made him do it???
And the Earth is Flat. We faked the moon landing. Artificial Sweeteners are good for you, and Anna Nicole married for Love. Any other insane conspiracy theories you believe in besides these?
Because they had been chasing the person for a good time. There is more info on this in the police report. But it is very inconceivable that at this point, he did not know what the deal was.
They suspected him of burglary.
He was reported to 911.
No reason? Please...
How did they know he was suspected of burglary if the call went to 911?
They don't live across the street. Brandishing a gun is illegal dumbass!
If they just wanted to talk to him, why carry a gun?
Why should I do that? It has been posted numerous times in the thread. Are you too fucking lazy to do your homework. What are you 12 years old?
it happens in front of the truck - the first of three shots. As the shooter and victim struggle for control of the shotgun as the fight moves to the left. The man who was shot for jogging while black is the only one acting in self defense because he was attacked.
View attachment 335636
He was attacked while charging... this must be the stupidest thing I read all day.
Once the person charged at a man with shotgun, yeah he was attacked as SELF DEFENSE.
Because they are adult children aka. leftists.
And then a few conservatives who are very content on never EVER conserving anything.
BTW I’m not a leftist, I’m a church going, God praising,Trump Supporting conservative and a 40 year registered Republican. What I’m not is a conservative sheeple who feels like they have to justify stupidity by making it a political issue.
You must not have watched the video....it is clear as day that the jogger had plenty of room to keep on jogging down the road...his path was not blocked.
It is also very clear that the jogger veered to the left and attacked the guy with the shotgun.
I will tell you what you really are ---a politically correct moron that is very confused....let me try and help you....first quit watching the alphabet media news and fox is not much better.....the media are the ones who have made this case a political case....essentially engaging in race baiting to incite hysteria amongst blacks as well as a lot of duped white folk.
Let me ask you this since you think the white guy shot the black guy in cold blood? Since that is what you believe...if it is true he must have had some reason for committing murder. What was his motive?
Also you need to remember the father called the police before they took off in pursuit of the black criminal...vigilantes do not call the police.
Something else ....do you know the criminal history of the black dude....he took a gun to school....a felony. He was placed on 5yrs probation for that and then violated his probation by stealing...at the time of his death he was in violation of his probation....he should have been in jail but because of black privilege aka the double-standard that comes into play when blacks committ crimes.
Also the black guy had a mental history...the former D.A.cited his mental history as one reason they did not put him in jail....someone had sympathy for him because he had mental problems..
Arberys past has zero to do with this incident unless you are saying that the McMichaels knew Arbreys wrap sheet before this incident which could be seen as some level of premeditation on the part of the McMichaels. The reality is according to the police Arbery had no stolen property on him nor was he armed. Two against one, guns,not good odds to charge someone. It was straight up bullying of Arbery not protecting the neighborhood and not citizens arrest.
First of all he is not standing to the right...he is standing to the left and slightly to the front of the truck. Your first mistake
Now for your second error.....arbery does not swerve to the yellow arrow...instead he goes to the right to get around the truck Then he immediately swerves to the left and attacks the white guy standing there with the shotgun.....if you watch the video again look through the windshield and you will see the black guy crossing
the front of the truck and attacking the white guy trying to take away his gun.
No...they did not chase....they simply followed him in the truck and then went ahead of him and parked....at no time was arbery blocked...he had plenty of room to get around the truck and he did and then instead of jogging on down the road he quickly swerved to the left and attacked the white guy.
When you have a weapon and someone attacks you and tries to get possession of your weapon you are legally entitled to use lethal force in self defense..spelled out by the Georgia law on self defense.
Thus it is easily seen your narrative is full of holes...you have a severe lack of ability to observe and report what is readily seen by most. Why is that? Some kind of cognitive problem?
Watch the video again...I am talking about the complete video.....not the edited one the msm has put out....maybe that is what got you confused...you watched the wrong video???
Chase was the word the police used, not mine. The police said McMichael CHASED Arbery, not followed. Read the articles I posted it’s there.
you are neglecting to acknowledge they fact that the McMichaels aren’t cops. It’s not their job to follow, chase or confront anyone. It’s not their job to assume somebody they don’t know on a property of someone they don’t know is a thief. Their job it to report it and let the cops handle it not go all Wild West on a stranger gun him down in the middle of the road. You refuse to acknowledge that McMichael had no business being in that road committing a traffic violation. Arbery wouldn’t have been anywhere near McMichael if McMichael hadn’t been acting like a dick and instigated the whole thing. They gave chase, confronted a person and shot him for nothing and now they have to pay the price.
Ridiculous commentary. Anyhow.....again.....the white guys did nothing illegal.
The black guy was a criminal...as in had a criminal record. Took a gun to school....stole stuff...violated his probation ....should have been in jail but nothing was done....thus he roamed the streets day and night apparantly doing some very weird stuff....but the mdeia is doing their best to put him up there on the shelf with mother teresa.
Speaking of mothers ahmuad's mother did love him...must have been a difficult thing to do. but i guess once you give birth there is a bond formed even if the kid is a mental defect.
Why should he have been in jail? His probation was over!
Speaking of mental defects, how are you today?
Because he was a burglar.
You know this how?
Why is he so cautious if he was there doing legitimate business?
He was almost certainly a burglar.
hehheh according to one liberal he was studying construction methods...whilst loitering around there at night. bwaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa
Prove he was not. The only location we have any evidence of him actually physically visiting is an under construction house. The owner of that house says that nothing was stolen. Nothing is missing. So The suspicions of burglary are at best shaky. Hard to argue it is reasonable when he visited the house several times, was never told to leave, and nothing was ever found to be missing.
The problem with that theory for you is that all Blacks are criminals in your mind. The problem for the McMichaels is that they need to testify about why they had a reasonable suspicion. If they do they are open to cross examination and that will be their doom. It is likely to remove the reasonable doubt that may save them.
Was never told to leave?
That's not exactly why 911 was called.
Who can tell him to leave since you are the expert in Georgia Law?
Stop being retarded and sounding like a leftist. This was a known thing in the hood, with the last confrontation two weeks prior. Obviously the neighbor can ask him to leave. However, this is not relevant.
Actually it is relevant. You see if the house was open he was not breaking in. He was Trespassing. There the Neighbors could if they had discussed it with the owner tell him to leave. But since they did not either discuss it or tell him to leave he was not even technically in violation of the Trespassing Statute.
Now you say there was a history. Ok. The history was of AA entering the house. The owner of the house said he didn’t know and didn’t care. Nothing was stolen. The history was also of neighbors calling the cops. The reason there was no burglary report is again nothing was taken.
So here we are. Imagine the trial. And there is going to be a trial unless the McMichaels start to smarten up. I had reasonable suspicion that he was stealing things. Ok who told you he had stolen anything? Why did you not discuss it with the owner. Who did you discuss it with who was associated with the house? It goes downhill from there. And before he leaves the stand he looks like one of the Grand Poobahs of the KKK. Not great for the image to the jury.
Or he can refuse to testify. Absolutely his right. Then they play his statement to the police that was recorded on body cameras. Then they ask the police if they believed the story.
Holy wall of irrelevance.
Burglary is what he committed. Call back when you are ready to conserve something, then I am interested.
I highly dispute that there was no burglary shown in the video. That was almost certainly a burglary.
In this clip I am sure you have seen.
or this
View attachment 336054
Sure, now point out the moment he either stole something or intended to steal something.....
The fact that he is there and looks around before going in is enough to show the bad intentions in my book. Remember, he has a record.
Great, now explain the difference between trespass and burglary...
I don't need to explain anything. He was there to steal stuff in my book. You can believe otherwise. Obviously you believe he was an angel because he was black and that's where your thought processes or rather emoting stops.
Dumbass, your book is meaningless. All that matters is the law. And I'll explain the difference between trespassing and burglary, since you're too big of a coward to do so yourself since deep down, even you know the difference utterly destroys your delusions.
Trespassing [in Georgia] is entering someone else's property without authorization and for an unlawful purpose.
Burglary [in Georgia] that that plus committing, or intending to commit, a felony or theft.
Now you describe him as...
"he is there and looks around before going in"
.... but that does not demonstrate an intent to steal. It's not even possible to say he's looking around since the image is so grainy, but he does stop there for about 3 seconds. But even if he's looking around, that still is not a foreshadowing that he's planning to steal anything. This is obvious by how he got there and how he's dressed. He's not carrying anything to break in; nor is he carrying anything to put stuff in. He also has no transportation to make a "getaway" with stolen property.
Of course that is intent to steal something, are you retarded? People don't randomly go into each other's houses while making sure no one is around.
And of course, if it turns out it was Arbery two weeks ago, he knew he should not be there as he was chased out. I bet good sum of money on that it was. They will have finger prints taken and hair samples collected all over the house, we will see.
Yes, people randomly do enter homes under construction. Happens all the time. I even posted videos yesterday of people doing just that.
At least now we've cleared this up. There was no burglary outside the confines of your demented head.
People do check out homes under construction, but i find it hard to believe that someone who doesnt live in the neighborhood would do so. He has a history of theft, and his reaction seems to indicate that he felt like he was guilty of something.
Parking and standing in the road is not being aggressive whether or not you are armed makes no difference.
Here's the frame at the precise moment of the first shot. You can see by their shadows, which lean slightly to the right, that they're about 2½ to 3 feet apart. Good luck to the McMichaels in court proving he didn't shoot until he was attacked even though Travis by that point, had already run about 6 feet towards Arbery.
bwaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa those may be shadows or maybe just a dark spot on the pavement....certainly not evidence of anything except to someone like you with your biased opinion.
According to the prosecutor report it can't even be ruled out that Arbery himself pulled the shotgun which made it go off.
