progressive hunter
Diamond Member
- Dec 11, 2018
- 62,642
- 38,416
to bad arbrey made a dumb decision or he would be here to tell us his side,,,they never pointed a gun at him until he attacked them,,,at least thats how I've heard it so farthey were right up until the time abrey attacked them,,,we only suspect he was defending himself,,,if he only complied he would be alive and the rednecks would be in jail,,,Legally it is. The only reason it’s an attempt is because he fought back.attempting is not the same as doing it,,,they never tried to detain him,,,all he had to do was continue on his way,,,cause if he did and they tried to detain him he would be alive to file a complaint against them,,,No citizen has any right to detain anyone with a firearm because they think they looked like someone on a video.hes the one that put his own life in jeopordy when he decide to attack them instead of run any of the other 359 different directionsto bad he decided to attack them which resulted in his death or he could have been here to defend his actions,,,The two men are already on record saying they had been attempting to cut him off several times before the final confrontation.obviously you didnt watch the video cause the truck was stopped in the road and not turned crossways to traffic and the black guy swerved to attack the driver when he could have ran on straight uninterrupted,,,when did they not let him leave???
they didnt,,
That is a racist lie.
We know the murderers blocked the joggers path and his freedom of movement. They were using a pickup truck as a weapon against an unarmed man. It’s highly probable the killers were brandishing their weapons the when they tried to stop him.
The gun goobers were violating the jogger’s civil rights the very first time they obstructed his freedom of movement to the final second that they shot him on a public road.
What means of escape from his armed attackers using two vehicles did the jogger have? Run ono Private Prioerty and then be shot for trespassing?
Add yourself to the confirmed racist list.
The idea that they weren’t attempting to impede him is ignorant. Not even the accused murderers have claimed that.
It’s unfortunate the two men put him in a position where he felt necessary to defend himself.
Which is why these two men are now in legal jeopardy when their actions led to his death.hes the one that put his own life in jeopordy when he decide to attack them instead of run any of the other 359 different directionsto bad he decided to attack them which resulted in his death or he could have been here to defend his actions,,,The two men are already on record saying they had been attempting to cut him off several times before the final confrontation.obviously you didnt watch the video cause the truck was stopped in the road and not turned crossways to traffic and the black guy swerved to attack the driver when he could have ran on straight uninterrupted,,,when did they not let him leave???
they didnt,,
That is a racist lie.
We know the murderers blocked the joggers path and his freedom of movement. They were using a pickup truck as a weapon against an unarmed man. It’s highly probable the killers were brandishing their weapons the when they tried to stop him.
The gun goobers were violating the jogger’s civil rights the very first time they obstructed his freedom of movement to the final second that they shot him on a public road.
What means of escape from his armed attackers using two vehicles did the jogger have? Run ono Private Prioerty and then be shot for trespassing?
Add yourself to the confirmed racist list.
The idea that they weren’t attempting to impede him is ignorant. Not even the accused murderers have claimed that.
It’s unfortunate the two men put him in a position where he felt necessary to defend himself.
Which is why these two men are now in legal jeopardy when their actions led to his death.
The only action they were sure he was doing was running. If he had run in any other direction but the road he would have been shot. Running in the road the truck can catch him. Running towards someone’s house in a neighborhood? One of those idiots would have shot him.
Nonsense....if being stupid was illegal you would get at least 20yrs.
How does anyone get so stupid? Do you take a stupid pill when you wake up in the morning?
Again........pointed out before.....but again since you obviously just post crap without checking out what has already been said....the father....the former policeman had investigated the black criminal back when he was a policeman....thus he recognized him on the video doing the burglary....so he knew who he was dealing with.....a black criminal. (Though the media will not report that....they never can be counted on to report the truth.)
The black suspect would not have been shot if he had not attacked the guy with the shot gun....if they just wanted to shoot him they could have done that at any time.
Are you black or just a stupid airhead brainwahed by some sociology professor at some junior college?
End of story.
They were shouting at him to stop, chased him down in their trucks, got out in front of him and then emerged from the truck holding a shotgun.
Unless you’re a complete idiot, that’s attempting to detain someone
in this case both parties have fault,, but the death is a result of arbreys stupidity,,,
Do we now fault people for acting in self defense? Do we now say people are stupid for defending themselves?
Would they be in jail? I doubt it. The local prosecutor already was brushing this under the rug.
His actions are entirely consistent with self defense. Furthermore, the two accused murderer have demonstrated they were behaving outside the law and their legal rights. They are responsible for the outcome of a situation they created.
No they were not. They had no legal authority to approach him brandishing weapons. They had no justification to try and stop him. That means they were committing a crime even with the attempt. What is it called if a citizen holds you at gunpoint and refuses to let you leave when you have committed no crime? If you are a police officer protected by qualified immunity it is a bad or false arrest. What is it when a citizen does it?
What went on when the video could not record what went on between the armed gunman and the unarmed jogger behind the truck? Why was a driver in a second vehicle filming this situation? Who did the person in the second video know to film a recording of a jogger just jogging down a street?
