New Evidence Indicates Enough Illegal Votes In Georgia To Tip 2020 Results

[Oddball]

https://thefederalist.com ^ | By Margot Cleveland JULY 9, 2021

In Georgia, there was both an audit and a statewide recount confirming Biden’s victory, but ignored in the process was evidence that nearly 35,000 Georgians had potentially voted illegally.

New evidence indicates that more than 10,300 illegal votes were cast in Georgia in the November 2020 general election — a number that will continue to rise over the next several months, potentially exceeding the 12,670 votes that separated Joe Biden and Donald Trump.

While this evidence does not change the fact that Joe Biden is our president, all Americans who genuinely care about free and fair elections and the disenfranchisement of voters should demand both transparency and solutions to prevent a repeat in future elections. This evidence also vindicates former President Trump and his legal team for the related public (and private) comments and legal arguments made in challenging the Georgia election results.

Under the cover of COVID-19, Georgia, like many other states, flooded residents with absentee ballot applications. Also like sister states, Georgia ignored various legislative mandates designed to prevent fraud and to ensure the integrity of the vote. These facts, coupled with the closeness of the presidential contest in Georgia and other states, led to a flurry of accusations and litigation charging vote fraud, illegal voting, and violations of the Elector’s Clause of the constitution.

In Georgia, there was both an audit and a statewide recount confirming Biden’s victory, but ignored in the process was evidence that nearly 35,000 Georgians had potentially voted illegally.

Under Georgia law, residents must vote in the county in which they reside, unless they changed their residence within 30 days of the election. As Jake Evans, a well-known Atlanta election lawyer, told me, outside of the 30-day grace period, if people vote in a county in which they no longer reside, “Their vote in that county would be illegal.”

Soon after the November general election, Mark Davis, the president of Data Productions Inc. and an expert in voter data analytics and residency issues, obtained data from the National Change of Address (NCOA) database that identified Georgia residents who had confirmed moves with the U.S. Postal Service. After excluding moves with effective dates within 30 days of the general election, and by using data available from the Georgia Secretary of State’s Office, Davis identified nearly 35,000 Georgia voters who indicated they had moved from one Georgia county to another, but then voted in the 2020 general election in the county from which they had moved.

Casting Doubt on Potential Illegal Votes Some of those moves could have been temporary, involving students or members of the military, Davis stressed, adding that under Georgia law temporary relocations do not alter citizens’ residency status or render their votes illegal. But, given the margin separating the two presidential candidates, approximately one-third of the votes at issue could have altered the outcome of the election. Yet the media, the courts, and the Secretary of State’s Office ignored or downplayed the issue.

“It was disconcerting to see the media and the courts largely ignore serious issues like these, especially since the data I was seeing showed very legitimate issues,” Davis said. “In fact, I heard members of the Secretary of State’s team admit some votes were cast with residency issues, but then claimed there weren’t enough of them to cast the outcome of the election in doubt,” Davis added. “That was not at all what I was seeing, and as far as I am aware the Secretary of State’s Office has never put an actual number on the ones they did see.”

While frustrated, Davis told me that he never stopped working on these issues. “In May I received an updated voter database from the Secretary of State’s office, and I imported the data and compared voter’s addresses to the NCOA information I processed in November.”

The Data Speaks for Itself When Davis ran the data, he found that, of the approximately 35,000 Georgians who indicated they had moved from one county to another county more than 30 days before the November general election, as of May, more than 10,300 had updated their voter registration information, providing the secretary of state the exact address they had previously provided to the USPS. Those same 10,000-plus individuals all also cast ballots in the county in which they had previously lived.

“That number continues to increase every day as more and more people update their registrations,” Davis said. “I have little doubt that the total number will eventually meet and then exceed President Biden’s margin of victory in Georgia.” Davis, who has testified as an expert witness multiple times in disputed election cases, believes Trump might have won a challenge to the Georgia election results had a court actually heard his case.

“Under Georgia law, a judge can order an election be redone if he or she sees there were enough illegal, irregular, or improperly rejected votes to cast the results of the election in doubt, or if they see evidence of ‘systemic irregularities,’” Davis said.

“These issues were absolutely systemic,” Davis stressed, noting “they occurred in every county in the state, in every state house, state senate, and in every congressional district in the state.”

Evans, who holds the distinction of being the only lawyer in Georgia history to successfully overturn two elections in the same race, concurred. Under Georgia law, Evans explained, “an election should be overturned either if (1) more votes than decided the election were illegal, wrongfully rejected or irregular, or (2) when there were systemic irregularities that cast in doubt the results of the election.”

“In the case of the 2020 general election,” Evans told me, Davis’s analysis indicates both factors could have been in play.

Davis’s data proves significant because critics of Trump’s challenge to the certification of Georgia’s election results framed the NCOA information as either unreliable or of an insufficient magnitude to cast the outcome of the election in doubt. But by updating their voter registration information with the same address as contained in the NCOA database, the voters themselves have established the reliability of that information.

Further, by updating their address for purposes of their voter registration, these same voters are confirming their move is not temporary. “When a person updates their voter registration to a new address, they are informing the county board of elections and correspondingly the Secretary of State that they regard the new address as their legal residence,” Evans explained.

What Do Georgia Officials Know? Upon learning of this new development, the Georgia Secretary of State’s Office quietly opened an investigation into potentially illegal voting by residents who had moved between counties. Davis provided his data to the office in May, with a detailed explanation of his analysis. Yet during my interview last week with Georgia Secretary of State Brad Raffensperger, he seemed unfamiliar with this most recent evidence of illegal voting.

Immediately following the interview, both his press secretary, Walter Jones, and his deputy secretary of state, Jordan Fuchs, called me back to follow up on my questions on the status of that investigation. While Jones spoke favorably of Davis, he suggested that Davis’s figure included “false-positives” because Davis lacked access to Social Security numbers and birth dates of voters, and thus Davis’s list likely included different individuals bearing the same name. Fuchs suggested a similar issue with Davis’s analysis.

“There is no need to have access to Social Security numbers or birth dates,” Davis told me. “Every voter has a unique eight-digit voter identification number,” Davis explained that these voter identification numbers tie to the voters’ names and addresses and to vote-history data, which documents when and where their votes are cast and comes from the secretary of state’s own data.

Davis provided access to that data, following the execution of a non-disclosure agreement, and I confirmed Davis’s representation. Davis also provided processing certification verifying receipt of the NCOA data.

“I provided this exact same information to Frances Watson, the chief investigator for the secretary of state,” Davis told me, sharing a copy of the email sent to Watson.

When asked for the status of Watson’s investigation and other details, while both were receptive to questions, neither Jones nor Fuchs could provide definitive answers. While on Friday Fuchs promised to give Watson permission to speak with me, and while both the deputy secretary of state and the press secretary promised to arrange an interview with Watson and to track down answers to several questions, to date, no further information has been provided and no interview has been arranged, notwithstanding several follow-up communications.

Hopefully, that is because Watson is busy investigating the strong evidence of illegal voting and not because the Secretary of State’s Office is attempting to bury the story — and the fact that Trump might have been right after all — until after Raffensperger fights off a primary challenge.

Margot Cleveland is a senior contributor to The Federalist. Cleveland served nearly 25 years as a permanent law clerk to a federal appellate judge and is a former full-time faculty member and adjunct instructor at the college of business at the University of Notre Dame. The views expressed here are those of Cleveland in her private capacity.

-------------------

“While this evidence does not change the fact that Joe Biden is our president, all Americans who genuinely care about free and fair elections and the disenfranchisement of voters should demand both transparency and solutions to prevent a repeat in future elections. “

In other words: “Yes, we stole the election, but it’s too late now and there’s nothing you can do about it. Better luck next time.”

Us: “Oh well, OK, den...”

 

[Winco]

https://thefederalist.com ^ | By Margot Cleveland JULY 9, 2021

In Georgia, there was both an audit and a statewide recount confirming Biden’s victory, but ignored in the process was evidence that nearly 35,000 Georgians had potentially voted illegally.

New evidence indicates that more than 10,300 illegal votes were cast in Georgia in the November 2020 general election — a number that will continue to rise over the next several months, potentially exceeding the 12,670 votes that separated Joe Biden and Donald Trump.

While this evidence does not change the fact that Joe Biden is our president, all Americans who genuinely care about free and fair elections and the disenfranchisement of voters should demand both transparency and solutions to prevent a repeat in future elections. This evidence also vindicates former President Trump and his legal team for the related public (and private) comments and legal arguments made in challenging the Georgia election results.

Under the cover of COVID-19, Georgia, like many other states, flooded residents with absentee ballot applications. Also like sister states, Georgia ignored various legislative mandates designed to prevent fraud and to ensure the integrity of the vote. These facts, coupled with the closeness of the presidential contest in Georgia and other states, led to a flurry of accusations and litigation charging vote fraud, illegal voting, and violations of the Elector’s Clause of the constitution.

In Georgia, there was both an audit and a statewide recount confirming Biden’s victory, but ignored in the process was evidence that nearly 35,000 Georgians had potentially voted illegally.

Under Georgia law, residents must vote in the county in which they reside, unless they changed their residence within 30 days of the election. As Jake Evans, a well-known Atlanta election lawyer, told me, outside of the 30-day grace period, if people vote in a county in which they no longer reside, “Their vote in that county would be illegal.”

Soon after the November general election, Mark Davis, the president of Data Productions Inc. and an expert in voter data analytics and residency issues, obtained data from the National Change of Address (NCOA) database that identified Georgia residents who had confirmed moves with the U.S. Postal Service. After excluding moves with effective dates within 30 days of the general election, and by using data available from the Georgia Secretary of State’s Office, Davis identified nearly 35,000 Georgia voters who indicated they had moved from one Georgia county to another, but then voted in the 2020 general election in the county from which they had moved.

Casting Doubt on Potential Illegal Votes Some of those moves could have been temporary, involving students or members of the military, Davis stressed, adding that under Georgia law temporary relocations do not alter citizens’ residency status or render their votes illegal. But, given the margin separating the two presidential candidates, approximately one-third of the votes at issue could have altered the outcome of the election. Yet the media, the courts, and the Secretary of State’s Office ignored or downplayed the issue.

“It was disconcerting to see the media and the courts largely ignore serious issues like these, especially since the data I was seeing showed very legitimate issues,” Davis said. “In fact, I heard members of the Secretary of State’s team admit some votes were cast with residency issues, but then claimed there weren’t enough of them to cast the outcome of the election in doubt,” Davis added. “That was not at all what I was seeing, and as far as I am aware the Secretary of State’s Office has never put an actual number on the ones they did see.”

While frustrated, Davis told me that he never stopped working on these issues. “In May I received an updated voter database from the Secretary of State’s office, and I imported the data and compared voter’s addresses to the NCOA information I processed in November.”

The Data Speaks for Itself When Davis ran the data, he found that, of the approximately 35,000 Georgians who indicated they had moved from one county to another county more than 30 days before the November general election, as of May, more than 10,300 had updated their voter registration information, providing the secretary of state the exact address they had previously provided to the USPS. Those same 10,000-plus individuals all also cast ballots in the county in which they had previously lived.

“That number continues to increase every day as more and more people update their registrations,” Davis said. “I have little doubt that the total number will eventually meet and then exceed President Biden’s margin of victory in Georgia.” Davis, who has testified as an expert witness multiple times in disputed election cases, believes Trump might have won a challenge to the Georgia election results had a court actually heard his case.

“Under Georgia law, a judge can order an election be redone if he or she sees there were enough illegal, irregular, or improperly rejected votes to cast the results of the election in doubt, or if they see evidence of ‘systemic irregularities,’” Davis said.

“These issues were absolutely systemic,” Davis stressed, noting “they occurred in every county in the state, in every state house, state senate, and in every congressional district in the state.”

Evans, who holds the distinction of being the only lawyer in Georgia history to successfully overturn two elections in the same race, concurred. Under Georgia law, Evans explained, “an election should be overturned either if (1) more votes than decided the election were illegal, wrongfully rejected or irregular, or (2) when there were systemic irregularities that cast in doubt the results of the election.”

“In the case of the 2020 general election,” Evans told me, Davis’s analysis indicates both factors could have been in play.

Davis’s data proves significant because critics of Trump’s challenge to the certification of Georgia’s election results framed the NCOA information as either unreliable or of an insufficient magnitude to cast the outcome of the election in doubt. But by updating their voter registration information with the same address as contained in the NCOA database, the voters themselves have established the reliability of that information.

Further, by updating their address for purposes of their voter registration, these same voters are confirming their move is not temporary. “When a person updates their voter registration to a new address, they are informing the county board of elections and correspondingly the Secretary of State that they regard the new address as their legal residence,” Evans explained.

What Do Georgia Officials Know? Upon learning of this new development, the Georgia Secretary of State’s Office quietly opened an investigation into potentially illegal voting by residents who had moved between counties. Davis provided his data to the office in May, with a detailed explanation of his analysis. Yet during my interview last week with Georgia Secretary of State Brad Raffensperger, he seemed unfamiliar with this most recent evidence of illegal voting.

Immediately following the interview, both his press secretary, Walter Jones, and his deputy secretary of state, Jordan Fuchs, called me back to follow up on my questions on the status of that investigation. While Jones spoke favorably of Davis, he suggested that Davis’s figure included “false-positives” because Davis lacked access to Social Security numbers and birth dates of voters, and thus Davis’s list likely included different individuals bearing the same name. Fuchs suggested a similar issue with Davis’s analysis.

“There is no need to have access to Social Security numbers or birth dates,” Davis told me. “Every voter has a unique eight-digit voter identification number,” Davis explained that these voter identification numbers tie to the voters’ names and addresses and to vote-history data, which documents when and where their votes are cast and comes from the secretary of state’s own data.

Davis provided access to that data, following the execution of a non-disclosure agreement, and I confirmed Davis’s representation. Davis also provided processing certification verifying receipt of the NCOA data.

“I provided this exact same information to Frances Watson, the chief investigator for the secretary of state,” Davis told me, sharing a copy of the email sent to Watson.

When asked for the status of Watson’s investigation and other details, while both were receptive to questions, neither Jones nor Fuchs could provide definitive answers. While on Friday Fuchs promised to give Watson permission to speak with me, and while both the deputy secretary of state and the press secretary promised to arrange an interview with Watson and to track down answers to several questions, to date, no further information has been provided and no interview has been arranged, notwithstanding several follow-up communications.

Hopefully, that is because Watson is busy investigating the strong evidence of illegal voting and not because the Secretary of State’s Office is attempting to bury the story — and the fact that Trump might have been right after all — until after Raffensperger fights off a primary challenge.

Margot Cleveland is a senior contributor to The Federalist. Cleveland served nearly 25 years as a permanent law clerk to a federal appellate judge and is a former full-time faculty member and adjunct instructor at the college of business at the University of Notre Dame. The views expressed here are those of Cleveland in her private capacity.

-------------------

“While this evidence does not change the fact that Joe Biden is our president, all Americans who genuinely care about free and fair elections and the disenfranchisement of voters should demand both transparency and solutions to prevent a repeat in future elections. “

In other words: “Yes, we stole the election, but it’s too late now and there’s nothing you can do about it. Better luck next time.”

Us: “Oh well, OK, den...”

View attachment 511057

More RW Fake News

You continue to be conned.
Hows it feel to be duped everyday?

 

[Hang on Sloopy]

https://thefederalist.com ^ | By Margot Cleveland JULY 9, 2021

In Georgia, there was both an audit and a statewide recount confirming Biden’s victory, but ignored in the process was evidence that nearly 35,000 Georgians had potentially voted illegally.

New evidence indicates that more than 10,300 illegal votes were cast in Georgia in the November 2020 general election — a number that will continue to rise over the next several months, potentially exceeding the 12,670 votes that separated Joe Biden and Donald Trump.

While this evidence does not change the fact that Joe Biden is our president, all Americans who genuinely care about free and fair elections and the disenfranchisement of voters should demand both transparency and solutions to prevent a repeat in future elections. This evidence also vindicates former President Trump and his legal team for the related public (and private) comments and legal arguments made in challenging the Georgia election results.

Under the cover of COVID-19, Georgia, like many other states, flooded residents with absentee ballot applications. Also like sister states, Georgia ignored various legislative mandates designed to prevent fraud and to ensure the integrity of the vote. These facts, coupled with the closeness of the presidential contest in Georgia and other states, led to a flurry of accusations and litigation charging vote fraud, illegal voting, and violations of the Elector’s Clause of the constitution.

In Georgia, there was both an audit and a statewide recount confirming Biden’s victory, but ignored in the process was evidence that nearly 35,000 Georgians had potentially voted illegally.

Under Georgia law, residents must vote in the county in which they reside, unless they changed their residence within 30 days of the election. As Jake Evans, a well-known Atlanta election lawyer, told me, outside of the 30-day grace period, if people vote in a county in which they no longer reside, “Their vote in that county would be illegal.”

Soon after the November general election, Mark Davis, the president of Data Productions Inc. and an expert in voter data analytics and residency issues, obtained data from the National Change of Address (NCOA) database that identified Georgia residents who had confirmed moves with the U.S. Postal Service. After excluding moves with effective dates within 30 days of the general election, and by using data available from the Georgia Secretary of State’s Office, Davis identified nearly 35,000 Georgia voters who indicated they had moved from one Georgia county to another, but then voted in the 2020 general election in the county from which they had moved.

Casting Doubt on Potential Illegal Votes Some of those moves could have been temporary, involving students or members of the military, Davis stressed, adding that under Georgia law temporary relocations do not alter citizens’ residency status or render their votes illegal. But, given the margin separating the two presidential candidates, approximately one-third of the votes at issue could have altered the outcome of the election. Yet the media, the courts, and the Secretary of State’s Office ignored or downplayed the issue.

“It was disconcerting to see the media and the courts largely ignore serious issues like these, especially since the data I was seeing showed very legitimate issues,” Davis said. “In fact, I heard members of the Secretary of State’s team admit some votes were cast with residency issues, but then claimed there weren’t enough of them to cast the outcome of the election in doubt,” Davis added. “That was not at all what I was seeing, and as far as I am aware the Secretary of State’s Office has never put an actual number on the ones they did see.”

While frustrated, Davis told me that he never stopped working on these issues. “In May I received an updated voter database from the Secretary of State’s office, and I imported the data and compared voter’s addresses to the NCOA information I processed in November.”

The Data Speaks for Itself When Davis ran the data, he found that, of the approximately 35,000 Georgians who indicated they had moved from one county to another county more than 30 days before the November general election, as of May, more than 10,300 had updated their voter registration information, providing the secretary of state the exact address they had previously provided to the USPS. Those same 10,000-plus individuals all also cast ballots in the county in which they had previously lived.

“That number continues to increase every day as more and more people update their registrations,” Davis said. “I have little doubt that the total number will eventually meet and then exceed President Biden’s margin of victory in Georgia.” Davis, who has testified as an expert witness multiple times in disputed election cases, believes Trump might have won a challenge to the Georgia election results had a court actually heard his case.

“Under Georgia law, a judge can order an election be redone if he or she sees there were enough illegal, irregular, or improperly rejected votes to cast the results of the election in doubt, or if they see evidence of ‘systemic irregularities,’” Davis said.

“These issues were absolutely systemic,” Davis stressed, noting “they occurred in every county in the state, in every state house, state senate, and in every congressional district in the state.”

Evans, who holds the distinction of being the only lawyer in Georgia history to successfully overturn two elections in the same race, concurred. Under Georgia law, Evans explained, “an election should be overturned either if (1) more votes than decided the election were illegal, wrongfully rejected or irregular, or (2) when there were systemic irregularities that cast in doubt the results of the election.”

“In the case of the 2020 general election,” Evans told me, Davis’s analysis indicates both factors could have been in play.

Davis’s data proves significant because critics of Trump’s challenge to the certification of Georgia’s election results framed the NCOA information as either unreliable or of an insufficient magnitude to cast the outcome of the election in doubt. But by updating their voter registration information with the same address as contained in the NCOA database, the voters themselves have established the reliability of that information.

Further, by updating their address for purposes of their voter registration, these same voters are confirming their move is not temporary. “When a person updates their voter registration to a new address, they are informing the county board of elections and correspondingly the Secretary of State that they regard the new address as their legal residence,” Evans explained.

What Do Georgia Officials Know? Upon learning of this new development, the Georgia Secretary of State’s Office quietly opened an investigation into potentially illegal voting by residents who had moved between counties. Davis provided his data to the office in May, with a detailed explanation of his analysis. Yet during my interview last week with Georgia Secretary of State Brad Raffensperger, he seemed unfamiliar with this most recent evidence of illegal voting.

Immediately following the interview, both his press secretary, Walter Jones, and his deputy secretary of state, Jordan Fuchs, called me back to follow up on my questions on the status of that investigation. While Jones spoke favorably of Davis, he suggested that Davis’s figure included “false-positives” because Davis lacked access to Social Security numbers and birth dates of voters, and thus Davis’s list likely included different individuals bearing the same name. Fuchs suggested a similar issue with Davis’s analysis.

“There is no need to have access to Social Security numbers or birth dates,” Davis told me. “Every voter has a unique eight-digit voter identification number,” Davis explained that these voter identification numbers tie to the voters’ names and addresses and to vote-history data, which documents when and where their votes are cast and comes from the secretary of state’s own data.

Davis provided access to that data, following the execution of a non-disclosure agreement, and I confirmed Davis’s representation. Davis also provided processing certification verifying receipt of the NCOA data.

“I provided this exact same information to Frances Watson, the chief investigator for the secretary of state,” Davis told me, sharing a copy of the email sent to Watson.

When asked for the status of Watson’s investigation and other details, while both were receptive to questions, neither Jones nor Fuchs could provide definitive answers. While on Friday Fuchs promised to give Watson permission to speak with me, and while both the deputy secretary of state and the press secretary promised to arrange an interview with Watson and to track down answers to several questions, to date, no further information has been provided and no interview has been arranged, notwithstanding several follow-up communications.

Hopefully, that is because Watson is busy investigating the strong evidence of illegal voting and not because the Secretary of State’s Office is attempting to bury the story — and the fact that Trump might have been right after all — until after Raffensperger fights off a primary challenge.

Margot Cleveland is a senior contributor to The Federalist. Cleveland served nearly 25 years as a permanent law clerk to a federal appellate judge and is a former full-time faculty member and adjunct instructor at the college of business at the University of Notre Dame. The views expressed here are those of Cleveland in her private capacity.

-------------------

“While this evidence does not change the fact that Joe Biden is our president, all Americans who genuinely care about free and fair elections and the disenfranchisement of voters should demand both transparency and solutions to prevent a repeat in future elections. “

In other words: “Yes, we stole the election, but it’s too late now and there’s nothing you can do about it. Better luck next time.”

Us: “Oh well, OK, den...”

View attachment 511057

More RW Fake News

You continue to be conned.
Hows it feel to be duped everyday?

GD Winky Dink.lolol

Let's say Trump won and you found out that there were more ballots than registered voters, what say you, you dick sucking mother fucker????

 

[my2¢]

Mailing addresses are not the same as legal addresses and both Democrats and Republicans move. So, what should we assume?

 

[Oddball]

https://thefederalist.com ^ | By Margot Cleveland JULY 9, 2021

In Georgia, there was both an audit and a statewide recount confirming Biden’s victory, but ignored in the process was evidence that nearly 35,000 Georgians had potentially voted illegally.

New evidence indicates that more than 10,300 illegal votes were cast in Georgia in the November 2020 general election — a number that will continue to rise over the next several months, potentially exceeding the 12,670 votes that separated Joe Biden and Donald Trump.

While this evidence does not change the fact that Joe Biden is our president, all Americans who genuinely care about free and fair elections and the disenfranchisement of voters should demand both transparency and solutions to prevent a repeat in future elections. This evidence also vindicates former President Trump and his legal team for the related public (and private) comments and legal arguments made in challenging the Georgia election results.

Under the cover of COVID-19, Georgia, like many other states, flooded residents with absentee ballot applications. Also like sister states, Georgia ignored various legislative mandates designed to prevent fraud and to ensure the integrity of the vote. These facts, coupled with the closeness of the presidential contest in Georgia and other states, led to a flurry of accusations and litigation charging vote fraud, illegal voting, and violations of the Elector’s Clause of the constitution.

In Georgia, there was both an audit and a statewide recount confirming Biden’s victory, but ignored in the process was evidence that nearly 35,000 Georgians had potentially voted illegally.

Under Georgia law, residents must vote in the county in which they reside, unless they changed their residence within 30 days of the election. As Jake Evans, a well-known Atlanta election lawyer, told me, outside of the 30-day grace period, if people vote in a county in which they no longer reside, “Their vote in that county would be illegal.”

Soon after the November general election, Mark Davis, the president of Data Productions Inc. and an expert in voter data analytics and residency issues, obtained data from the National Change of Address (NCOA) database that identified Georgia residents who had confirmed moves with the U.S. Postal Service. After excluding moves with effective dates within 30 days of the general election, and by using data available from the Georgia Secretary of State’s Office, Davis identified nearly 35,000 Georgia voters who indicated they had moved from one Georgia county to another, but then voted in the 2020 general election in the county from which they had moved.

Casting Doubt on Potential Illegal Votes Some of those moves could have been temporary, involving students or members of the military, Davis stressed, adding that under Georgia law temporary relocations do not alter citizens’ residency status or render their votes illegal. But, given the margin separating the two presidential candidates, approximately one-third of the votes at issue could have altered the outcome of the election. Yet the media, the courts, and the Secretary of State’s Office ignored or downplayed the issue.

“It was disconcerting to see the media and the courts largely ignore serious issues like these, especially since the data I was seeing showed very legitimate issues,” Davis said. “In fact, I heard members of the Secretary of State’s team admit some votes were cast with residency issues, but then claimed there weren’t enough of them to cast the outcome of the election in doubt,” Davis added. “That was not at all what I was seeing, and as far as I am aware the Secretary of State’s Office has never put an actual number on the ones they did see.”

While frustrated, Davis told me that he never stopped working on these issues. “In May I received an updated voter database from the Secretary of State’s office, and I imported the data and compared voter’s addresses to the NCOA information I processed in November.”

The Data Speaks for Itself When Davis ran the data, he found that, of the approximately 35,000 Georgians who indicated they had moved from one county to another county more than 30 days before the November general election, as of May, more than 10,300 had updated their voter registration information, providing the secretary of state the exact address they had previously provided to the USPS. Those same 10,000-plus individuals all also cast ballots in the county in which they had previously lived.

“That number continues to increase every day as more and more people update their registrations,” Davis said. “I have little doubt that the total number will eventually meet and then exceed President Biden’s margin of victory in Georgia.” Davis, who has testified as an expert witness multiple times in disputed election cases, believes Trump might have won a challenge to the Georgia election results had a court actually heard his case.

“Under Georgia law, a judge can order an election be redone if he or she sees there were enough illegal, irregular, or improperly rejected votes to cast the results of the election in doubt, or if they see evidence of ‘systemic irregularities,’” Davis said.

“These issues were absolutely systemic,” Davis stressed, noting “they occurred in every county in the state, in every state house, state senate, and in every congressional district in the state.”

Evans, who holds the distinction of being the only lawyer in Georgia history to successfully overturn two elections in the same race, concurred. Under Georgia law, Evans explained, “an election should be overturned either if (1) more votes than decided the election were illegal, wrongfully rejected or irregular, or (2) when there were systemic irregularities that cast in doubt the results of the election.”

“In the case of the 2020 general election,” Evans told me, Davis’s analysis indicates both factors could have been in play.

Davis’s data proves significant because critics of Trump’s challenge to the certification of Georgia’s election results framed the NCOA information as either unreliable or of an insufficient magnitude to cast the outcome of the election in doubt. But by updating their voter registration information with the same address as contained in the NCOA database, the voters themselves have established the reliability of that information.

Further, by updating their address for purposes of their voter registration, these same voters are confirming their move is not temporary. “When a person updates their voter registration to a new address, they are informing the county board of elections and correspondingly the Secretary of State that they regard the new address as their legal residence,” Evans explained.

What Do Georgia Officials Know? Upon learning of this new development, the Georgia Secretary of State’s Office quietly opened an investigation into potentially illegal voting by residents who had moved between counties. Davis provided his data to the office in May, with a detailed explanation of his analysis. Yet during my interview last week with Georgia Secretary of State Brad Raffensperger, he seemed unfamiliar with this most recent evidence of illegal voting.

Immediately following the interview, both his press secretary, Walter Jones, and his deputy secretary of state, Jordan Fuchs, called me back to follow up on my questions on the status of that investigation. While Jones spoke favorably of Davis, he suggested that Davis’s figure included “false-positives” because Davis lacked access to Social Security numbers and birth dates of voters, and thus Davis’s list likely included different individuals bearing the same name. Fuchs suggested a similar issue with Davis’s analysis.

“There is no need to have access to Social Security numbers or birth dates,” Davis told me. “Every voter has a unique eight-digit voter identification number,” Davis explained that these voter identification numbers tie to the voters’ names and addresses and to vote-history data, which documents when and where their votes are cast and comes from the secretary of state’s own data.

Davis provided access to that data, following the execution of a non-disclosure agreement, and I confirmed Davis’s representation. Davis also provided processing certification verifying receipt of the NCOA data.

“I provided this exact same information to Frances Watson, the chief investigator for the secretary of state,” Davis told me, sharing a copy of the email sent to Watson.

When asked for the status of Watson’s investigation and other details, while both were receptive to questions, neither Jones nor Fuchs could provide definitive answers. While on Friday Fuchs promised to give Watson permission to speak with me, and while both the deputy secretary of state and the press secretary promised to arrange an interview with Watson and to track down answers to several questions, to date, no further information has been provided and no interview has been arranged, notwithstanding several follow-up communications.

Hopefully, that is because Watson is busy investigating the strong evidence of illegal voting and not because the Secretary of State’s Office is attempting to bury the story — and the fact that Trump might have been right after all — until after Raffensperger fights off a primary challenge.

Margot Cleveland is a senior contributor to The Federalist. Cleveland served nearly 25 years as a permanent law clerk to a federal appellate judge and is a former full-time faculty member and adjunct instructor at the college of business at the University of Notre Dame. The views expressed here are those of Cleveland in her private capacity.

-------------------

“While this evidence does not change the fact that Joe Biden is our president, all Americans who genuinely care about free and fair elections and the disenfranchisement of voters should demand both transparency and solutions to prevent a repeat in future elections. “

In other words: “Yes, we stole the election, but it’s too late now and there’s nothing you can do about it. Better luck next time.”

Us: “Oh well, OK, den...”

View attachment 511057

More RW Fake News

You continue to be conned.
Hows it feel to be duped everyday?

Hows it feel to be duped everyday?

I dunno, tell me....You're the expert on being duped.

 

[struth]

So glad states are doing these audits now. We need to uncover the illegal acts in voting and works to ensure our elections are secure so people have faith in the results.

These sort of lawless elections is the type of thing we see in leftist regimes

 

[toobfreak]

No laws were broken. There was no fraud. He lost. Deal with it. Move on. Believing in fantasies coming true and your alt-right sources lying to you just isn't healthy. Can you believe it? The election was over 9 months ago. Apparently we're gonna have to listen to this bullshit for HOW many more years?

Forever until you come clean or we bust your heinies. You know what you did, and WE know what you did. What, are you waiting like Hillary and the Benghazi and other investigations to simply drag it out until years have past then claim what "old news" it is and therefore, "settled," because you drug your feet forever holding back the evidence?

All you schmucks have been running your mouths since just a few days after the election all running your stinking mouths at how all of the fraud claims were either BASELESS or DEBUNKED, in EVERY report, on EVERY channel, but no one can get an answer out of ANY of you just HOW any of you KNOW this, just HOW it was found or proven baseless, HOW it was debunked, by WHO and WHEN.

That is a CLAIM, it is an allegation, it is an ACCUSATION---- just as the fraud was and still grows in support every day, yet somehow you cretins think you have no burden of proof to back up YOUR claims while thinking that others do!

WHEN WILL YOU LYING FUCKERS QUIT EXPOSING YOUR FRAUD BY CONTINUALLY ALWAYS HOLDING OTHERS TO A DIFFERENT STANDARD OF RULES THAN YOU DO FOR YOURSELVES?

You're just yelling and screaming at the top of your lungs that the other side hasn't proven there WASN'T any fraud.

No, YOU deal with it bud. Do you just ACT stupid and dense Jack or are you really that opaque and circuitous?

For the 9000th time Jack, the Left have claimed TEN THOUSAND TIMES since practically the night of the election that the fraud cases were all BASELESS and DEBUNKED.

BASELESS is a summary charge aimed at implying some investigative effort was taken.

DEBUNKED is a claim of some ACTION taken which proved conclusively a thing wasn't real.

Try making such claims in a court of law with nothing to back it up.

It would be easier to pull Excalibur's emblazoned magical sword from the stone than to get one of you lying jackals to present the secret evidence of HOW, WHERE, WHEN and by WHO all this incredible detective work occurred, especially since it is taking months just to audit one state!

Particularly incredible considering these claims started LONG BEFORE any court cases, and considering 50 organizations long ago TOOK CREDIT for the steal!

Obviously, if there WAS any such proof, it would have been presented long ago.

 

[Care4all]

She writes........New evidence indicates that more than 10,300 illegal votes were cast in Georgia in the November 2020 general election — a number that will continue to rise over the next several months, potentially exceeding the 12,670 votes that separated Joe Biden and Donald Trump.

So all so-called 10,300 illegal votes were cast for Biden?
That is what she is suggesting, otherwise the tally would be nowhere near the 12,670 votes that separated Biden and Trump.

Maybe they only did 10% of the recount so far......It takes time. I'm sure it will be 100k by the time it is over. Lot of dead people to verify who voted beyond the grave

What RECOUNT?

The one you don't want to happen because you are loyal to party rather than country.

I'm fine with it. Nothing will be found or nothing will be changed. Trump's fight was lost, under the rules of the contest. There is a period of time in each state to CONTEST THE ELECTION. that period ended for Trump and Biden and the third party contestants, when the State, certifies their election.

The End.

Otherwise, it breaks the rules of the election contest and constitution with pre assigned dates for specific things that have to be done by.

And if you're going to let The Trump Campaign break the rules, then you have to let Biden break the rules as well. So he then can have his team of auditors go in and do their thing, in whatever states they want or any county in a state they want, and all of the places with Trump's fraudits etc etc etc, and court cases afterwards and on and on and on.....

Which destabilized our Country, and weakens us with our enemies.

Exactly what your side seems to want....because you hate, your own country....

OF COURSE you are fine with it. You don't care if it is fraudulent as long as your ultra-leftist candidate won.

I didn't vote for either candidate, myself, and only want to know the truth. I do not support Stalinism like you do, so think it important that only valid votes be counted.

I do care about fraud, and if there was fraud in this past election, I would most certainly care about it.

But here is the thing, there has been no fraud shown by your side. There has been nothing but made up suppositions, made up accusations, made up potentials of nothingness....

and a lot of chaos and circus commotion, without a single vote shown that was fraudulent or meant for Trump that was counted for Biden....

In 8 months since the election, nothing but carnival barking.


At some point, you need to realize these fake accusations by Trump and team are harmful and hateful towards our country. Accusing more than half the nation of being thieves and crooks and fraudsters, when all us citizens did, was vote....we exercised our constitutional right to vote.

YOU all and your continued lies about Trump winning in a landslide without actual proof is very very very very harmful to our nation, and weakens us and our democracy.

Allowing yourselves to be conned by the world's greatest con artist, in to thinking Trump won in a landslide without any legal and legitimate proof is mind boggling and a huge sign of mental weakness and cult like behavior, and is very concerning.

 

[Care4all]

She writes........New evidence indicates that more than 10,300 illegal votes were cast in Georgia in the November 2020 general election — a number that will continue to rise over the next several months, potentially exceeding the 12,670 votes that separated Joe Biden and Donald Trump.

So all so-called 10,300 illegal votes were cast for Biden?
That is what she is suggesting, otherwise the tally would be nowhere near the 12,670 votes that separated Biden and Trump.

It doesn't matter who they voted for. The votes were illegal and should not be counted.

Exactly how can you do that....? We have a secret ballot in this Nation. Once the absentee ballot envelope is verified with their checks, the ballot is separated from the envelope and put with all ballots to be scanned and counted.

Forensic audits of the ballots (such as is happening in Arizona) can remove mailed-in ballots that a) have never been folded, b) that were filled in by machine printing with identical markings, c) were printed on the wrong kind of paper.

It's likely impossible to correctly identify all illegally cast ballots for the 2020 election. Biden is in until 2024.

What should be done (and is happening in several states) is legislation installing preventive measures for future elections. Of course all of the liberals will claim this is voter suppression when it's actually that they support disenfranchising legal voters by cancelling their vote with an opposing illegal vote.

There will be a certain number of ballots that do not have folds, they are duplicates of original absentee ballots that the counting machines reject. But those unfolded ballots are kept separate, and each one will have a corresponding folded ballot that was originally rejected by the machine. These are logged and legitimate flat ballots.

But any other flat, unfolded ballots should be disregarded and not counted....agree! But very unlikely there is even one, non legitimate, unfolded ballot.... There are too many checks and balances in the system, which prevents such from happening... For example, there can not be more absentee ballots counted, than there are absentee envelopes....( so all should be folded, but the ones the machines rejected duplicates) And there can not be more absentee envelopes returned, than the registered citizens requesting them. ALARMS go off!

 

[JackOfNoTrades]

No laws were broken. There was no fraud. He lost. Deal with it. Move on. Believing in fantasies coming true and your alt-right sources lying to you just isn't healthy. Can you believe it? The election was over 9 months ago. Apparently we're gonna have to listen to this bullshit for HOW many more years?

Forever until you come clean or we bust your heinies. You know what you did, and WE know what you did. What, are you waiting like Hillary and the Benghazi and other investigations to simply drag it out until years have past then claim what "old news" it is and therefore, "settled," because you drug your feet forever holding back the evidence?

All you schmucks have been running your mouths since just a few days after the election all running your stinking mouths at how all of the fraud claims were either BASELESS or DEBUNKED, in EVERY report, on EVERY channel, but no one can get an answer out of ANY of you just HOW any of you KNOW this, just HOW it was found or proven baseless, HOW it was debunked, by WHO and WHEN.

That is a CLAIM, it is an allegation, it is an ACCUSATION---- just as the fraud was and still grows in support every day, yet somehow you cretins think you have no burden of proof to back up YOUR claims while thinking that others do!

WHEN WILL YOU LYING FUCKERS QUIT EXPOSING YOUR FRAUD BY CONTINUALLY ALWAYS HOLDING OTHERS TO A DIFFERENT STANDARD OF RULES THAN YOU DO FOR YOURSELVES?

You're just yelling and screaming at the top of your lungs that the other side hasn't proven there WASN'T any fraud.

No, YOU deal with it bud. Do you just ACT stupid and dense Jack or are you really that opaque and circuitous?

For the 9000th time Jack, the Left have claimed TEN THOUSAND TIMES since practically the night of the election that the fraud cases were all BASELESS and DEBUNKED.

BASELESS is a summary charge aimed at implying some investigative effort was taken.

DEBUNKED is a claim of some ACTION taken which proved conclusively a thing wasn't real.

Try making such claims in a court of law with nothing to back it up.

It would be easier to pull Excalibur's emblazoned magical sword from the stone than to get one of you lying jackals to present the secret evidence of HOW, WHERE, WHEN and by WHO all this incredible detective work occurred, especially since it is taking months just to audit one state!

Particularly incredible considering these claims started LONG BEFORE any court cases, and considering 50 organizations long ago TOOK CREDIT for the steal!

Obviously, if there WAS any such proof, it would have been presented long ago.

Put up or STFU. Or stop responding to my posts, cuck.

 

[Lastamender]

No laws were broken. There was no fraud. He lost. Deal with it. Move on. Believing in fantasies coming true and your alt-right sources lying to you just isn't healthy. Can you believe it? The election was over 9 months ago. Apparently we're gonna have to listen to this bullshit for HOW many more years?

Forever until you come clean or we bust your heinies. You know what you did, and WE know what you did. What, are you waiting like Hillary and the Benghazi and other investigations to simply drag it out until years have past then claim what "old news" it is and therefore, "settled," because you drug your feet forever holding back the evidence?

All you schmucks have been running your mouths since just a few days after the election all running your stinking mouths at how all of the fraud claims were either BASELESS or DEBUNKED, in EVERY report, on EVERY channel, but no one can get an answer out of ANY of you just HOW any of you KNOW this, just HOW it was found or proven baseless, HOW it was debunked, by WHO and WHEN.

That is a CLAIM, it is an allegation, it is an ACCUSATION---- just as the fraud was and still grows in support every day, yet somehow you cretins think you have no burden of proof to back up YOUR claims while thinking that others do!

WHEN WILL YOU LYING FUCKERS QUIT EXPOSING YOUR FRAUD BY CONTINUALLY ALWAYS HOLDING OTHERS TO A DIFFERENT STANDARD OF RULES THAN YOU DO FOR YOURSELVES?

You're just yelling and screaming at the top of your lungs that the other side hasn't proven there WASN'T any fraud.

No, YOU deal with it bud. Do you just ACT stupid and dense Jack or are you really that opaque and circuitous?

For the 9000th time Jack, the Left have claimed TEN THOUSAND TIMES since practically the night of the election that the fraud cases were all BASELESS and DEBUNKED.

BASELESS is a summary charge aimed at implying some investigative effort was taken.

DEBUNKED is a claim of some ACTION taken which proved conclusively a thing wasn't real.

Try making such claims in a court of law with nothing to back it up.

It would be easier to pull Excalibur's emblazoned magical sword from the stone than to get one of you lying jackals to present the secret evidence of HOW, WHERE, WHEN and by WHO all this incredible detective work occurred, especially since it is taking months just to audit one state!

Particularly incredible considering these claims started LONG BEFORE any court cases, and considering 50 organizations long ago TOOK CREDIT for the steal!

Obviously, if there WAS any such proof, it would have been presented long ago.

Put up or STFU. Or stop responding to my posts, cuck.

You are the one with the problem. Fraud is just a conspiracy, right? What are you doing here going on about something you say did not happen?

 

[asaratis]

But very unlikely there is even one, non legitimate, unfolded ballot....

I've seen photos of unfolded ballots ballots that were printed on bogus paper. I've seen photos of multiple unfolded ballots that all appear to have been filled in by a printing machine using the same exact mark in the "Biden" circle...all with the same identical flaw.

I'm not saying these photos are proof yet because the photos themselves could have been be fabricated. However, I believe the Arizona audit included measuring the exact dimensions and the photographing of every ballot that was turned over to the audit workers and this may have been the source of the photographs I saw.

Here is a story about the Pristine identical ballots. (It dies not include photos. I saw them in another article.) Note also that some of these fake mailed-in ballots showed no evidence of ever being folded.

Why a Judge Has Georgia Vote Fraud on His Mind: ‘Pristine’ Biden Ballots That Looked Xeroxed

When Fulton County, Ga., poll manager Suzi Voyles sorted through a large stack of mail-in ballots last November, she noticed an alarmingly odd pattern of uniformity in the markings for Joseph R.

www.realclearinvestigations.com

The final report from Maricopa County forensic audit is supposed to be issued in August. We shall see what they found in that one county.

It is encouraging to me that several of the states that visited the Arizona audit process have decided to promote their own audits. I'm guessing the visiting representatives were made aware of some of the findings.

 

[JackOfNoTrades]

No laws were broken. There was no fraud. He lost. Deal with it. Move on. Believing in fantasies coming true and your alt-right sources lying to you just isn't healthy. Can you believe it? The election was over 9 months ago. Apparently we're gonna have to listen to this bullshit for HOW many more years?

Forever until you come clean or we bust your heinies. You know what you did, and WE know what you did. What, are you waiting like Hillary and the Benghazi and other investigations to simply drag it out until years have past then claim what "old news" it is and therefore, "settled," because you drug your feet forever holding back the evidence?

All you schmucks have been running your mouths since just a few days after the election all running your stinking mouths at how all of the fraud claims were either BASELESS or DEBUNKED, in EVERY report, on EVERY channel, but no one can get an answer out of ANY of you just HOW any of you KNOW this, just HOW it was found or proven baseless, HOW it was debunked, by WHO and WHEN.

That is a CLAIM, it is an allegation, it is an ACCUSATION---- just as the fraud was and still grows in support every day, yet somehow you cretins think you have no burden of proof to back up YOUR claims while thinking that others do!

WHEN WILL YOU LYING FUCKERS QUIT EXPOSING YOUR FRAUD BY CONTINUALLY ALWAYS HOLDING OTHERS TO A DIFFERENT STANDARD OF RULES THAN YOU DO FOR YOURSELVES?

You're just yelling and screaming at the top of your lungs that the other side hasn't proven there WASN'T any fraud.

No, YOU deal with it bud. Do you just ACT stupid and dense Jack or are you really that opaque and circuitous?

For the 9000th time Jack, the Left have claimed TEN THOUSAND TIMES since practically the night of the election that the fraud cases were all BASELESS and DEBUNKED.

BASELESS is a summary charge aimed at implying some investigative effort was taken.

DEBUNKED is a claim of some ACTION taken which proved conclusively a thing wasn't real.

Try making such claims in a court of law with nothing to back it up.

It would be easier to pull Excalibur's emblazoned magical sword from the stone than to get one of you lying jackals to present the secret evidence of HOW, WHERE, WHEN and by WHO all this incredible detective work occurred, especially since it is taking months just to audit one state!

Particularly incredible considering these claims started LONG BEFORE any court cases, and considering 50 organizations long ago TOOK CREDIT for the steal!

Obviously, if there WAS any such proof, it would have been presented long ago.

Put up or STFU. Or stop responding to my posts, cuck.

You are the one with the problem. Fraud is just a conspiracy, right? What are you doing here going on about something you say did not happen?

Because nothing happened. Your savior telegraphed his intention to press the fraud argument months before the election. Again, your redress (and his) was through the courts immediately after the election and they slammed the door on you to a man and woman. I am on here to slam your fingers in the car door of your constant misinformation and conspiracy theory laden campaign. You idiots have parroted these lies long enough. You don't get a free pass to get ignored.

 

[Lastamender]

No laws were broken. There was no fraud. He lost. Deal with it. Move on. Believing in fantasies coming true and your alt-right sources lying to you just isn't healthy. Can you believe it? The election was over 9 months ago. Apparently we're gonna have to listen to this bullshit for HOW many more years?

Forever until you come clean or we bust your heinies. You know what you did, and WE know what you did. What, are you waiting like Hillary and the Benghazi and other investigations to simply drag it out until years have past then claim what "old news" it is and therefore, "settled," because you drug your feet forever holding back the evidence?

All you schmucks have been running your mouths since just a few days after the election all running your stinking mouths at how all of the fraud claims were either BASELESS or DEBUNKED, in EVERY report, on EVERY channel, but no one can get an answer out of ANY of you just HOW any of you KNOW this, just HOW it was found or proven baseless, HOW it was debunked, by WHO and WHEN.

That is a CLAIM, it is an allegation, it is an ACCUSATION---- just as the fraud was and still grows in support every day, yet somehow you cretins think you have no burden of proof to back up YOUR claims while thinking that others do!

WHEN WILL YOU LYING FUCKERS QUIT EXPOSING YOUR FRAUD BY CONTINUALLY ALWAYS HOLDING OTHERS TO A DIFFERENT STANDARD OF RULES THAN YOU DO FOR YOURSELVES?

You're just yelling and screaming at the top of your lungs that the other side hasn't proven there WASN'T any fraud.

No, YOU deal with it bud. Do you just ACT stupid and dense Jack or are you really that opaque and circuitous?

For the 9000th time Jack, the Left have claimed TEN THOUSAND TIMES since practically the night of the election that the fraud cases were all BASELESS and DEBUNKED.

BASELESS is a summary charge aimed at implying some investigative effort was taken.

DEBUNKED is a claim of some ACTION taken which proved conclusively a thing wasn't real.

Try making such claims in a court of law with nothing to back it up.

It would be easier to pull Excalibur's emblazoned magical sword from the stone than to get one of you lying jackals to present the secret evidence of HOW, WHERE, WHEN and by WHO all this incredible detective work occurred, especially since it is taking months just to audit one state!

Particularly incredible considering these claims started LONG BEFORE any court cases, and considering 50 organizations long ago TOOK CREDIT for the steal!

Obviously, if there WAS any such proof, it would have been presented long ago.

Put up or STFU. Or stop responding to my posts, cuck.

You are the one with the problem. Fraud is just a conspiracy, right? What are you doing here going on about something you say did not happen?

Because nothing happened. Your savior telegraphed his intention to press the fraud argument months before the election. Again, your redress (and his) was through the courts immediately after the election and they slammed the door on you to a man and woman. I am on here to slam your fingers in the car door of your constant misinformation and conspiracy theory laden campaign. You idiots have parroted these lies long enough. You don't get a free pass to get ignored.

Again, then why are you here? Has anyone listened to you? Not on this end. Relax you keep saying it did not happen. I get that. So don't you worry about a thing.

 

[toobfreak]

No laws were broken. There was no fraud. He lost. Deal with it. Move on. Believing in fantasies coming true and your alt-right sources lying to you just isn't healthy. Can you believe it? The election was over 9 months ago. Apparently we're gonna have to listen to this bullshit for HOW many more years?

Forever until you come clean or we bust your heinies. You know what you did, and WE know what you did. What, are you waiting like Hillary and the Benghazi and other investigations to simply drag it out until years have past then claim what "old news" it is and therefore, "settled," because you drug your feet forever holding back the evidence?

All you schmucks have been running your mouths since just a few days after the election all running your stinking mouths at how all of the fraud claims were either BASELESS or DEBUNKED, in EVERY report, on EVERY channel, but no one can get an answer out of ANY of you just HOW any of you KNOW this, just HOW it was found or proven baseless, HOW it was debunked, by WHO and WHEN.

That is a CLAIM, it is an allegation, it is an ACCUSATION---- just as the fraud was and still grows in support every day, yet somehow you cretins think you have no burden of proof to back up YOUR claims while thinking that others do!

WHEN WILL YOU LYING FUCKERS QUIT EXPOSING YOUR FRAUD BY CONTINUALLY ALWAYS HOLDING OTHERS TO A DIFFERENT STANDARD OF RULES THAN YOU DO FOR YOURSELVES?

You're just yelling and screaming at the top of your lungs that the other side hasn't proven there WASN'T any fraud.

No, YOU deal with it bud. Do you just ACT stupid and dense Jack or are you really that opaque and circuitous?

For the 9000th time Jack, the Left have claimed TEN THOUSAND TIMES since practically the night of the election that the fraud cases were all BASELESS and DEBUNKED.

BASELESS is a summary charge aimed at implying some investigative effort was taken.

DEBUNKED is a claim of some ACTION taken which proved conclusively a thing wasn't real.

Try making such claims in a court of law with nothing to back it up.

It would be easier to pull Excalibur's emblazoned magical sword from the stone than to get one of you lying jackals to present the secret evidence of HOW, WHERE, WHEN and by WHO all this incredible detective work occurred, especially since it is taking months just to audit one state!

Particularly incredible considering these claims started LONG BEFORE any court cases, and considering 50 organizations long ago TOOK CREDIT for the steal!

Obviously, if there WAS any such proof, it would have been presented long ago.

Put up or STFU. Or stop responding to my posts, cuck.

Speaking of abortions . . . yes, Jack, that is all I ask. PUT UP OR SHUT UP. Since Nov 3 you and the leftwing media and politicians have claimed unchallenged that all questions about the election were not only BASELESS, but thoroughly DEBUNKED (proven wrong). Proving something wrong is a PROCESS which involves TIME and evidence plus WORK.

Never mind that the courts hadn't heard any arguments yet, never mind the admissions of 50 organizations admitting the Steal, all I want is to see now is what work was done by who, how they did it and when, that all you people keep secret from the rest of the world!

PUT UP OR STFU ALREADY.

HOW WAS THE FRAUD DEBUNKED?

HOW WAS THE FRAUD DEBUNKED?

HOW WAS THE FRAUD DEBUNKED?

 

[JackOfNoTrades]

No laws were broken. There was no fraud. He lost. Deal with it. Move on. Believing in fantasies coming true and your alt-right sources lying to you just isn't healthy. Can you believe it? The election was over 9 months ago. Apparently we're gonna have to listen to this bullshit for HOW many more years?

Forever until you come clean or we bust your heinies. You know what you did, and WE know what you did. What, are you waiting like Hillary and the Benghazi and other investigations to simply drag it out until years have past then claim what "old news" it is and therefore, "settled," because you drug your feet forever holding back the evidence?

All you schmucks have been running your mouths since just a few days after the election all running your stinking mouths at how all of the fraud claims were either BASELESS or DEBUNKED, in EVERY report, on EVERY channel, but no one can get an answer out of ANY of you just HOW any of you KNOW this, just HOW it was found or proven baseless, HOW it was debunked, by WHO and WHEN.

That is a CLAIM, it is an allegation, it is an ACCUSATION---- just as the fraud was and still grows in support every day, yet somehow you cretins think you have no burden of proof to back up YOUR claims while thinking that others do!

WHEN WILL YOU LYING FUCKERS QUIT EXPOSING YOUR FRAUD BY CONTINUALLY ALWAYS HOLDING OTHERS TO A DIFFERENT STANDARD OF RULES THAN YOU DO FOR YOURSELVES?

You're just yelling and screaming at the top of your lungs that the other side hasn't proven there WASN'T any fraud.

No, YOU deal with it bud. Do you just ACT stupid and dense Jack or are you really that opaque and circuitous?

For the 9000th time Jack, the Left have claimed TEN THOUSAND TIMES since practically the night of the election that the fraud cases were all BASELESS and DEBUNKED.

BASELESS is a summary charge aimed at implying some investigative effort was taken.

DEBUNKED is a claim of some ACTION taken which proved conclusively a thing wasn't real.

Try making such claims in a court of law with nothing to back it up.

It would be easier to pull Excalibur's emblazoned magical sword from the stone than to get one of you lying jackals to present the secret evidence of HOW, WHERE, WHEN and by WHO all this incredible detective work occurred, especially since it is taking months just to audit one state!

Particularly incredible considering these claims started LONG BEFORE any court cases, and considering 50 organizations long ago TOOK CREDIT for the steal!

Obviously, if there WAS any such proof, it would have been presented long ago.

Put up or STFU. Or stop responding to my posts, cuck.

Speaking of abortions . . . yes, Jack, that is all I ask. PUT UP OR SHUT UP. Since Nov 3 you and the leftwing media and politicians have claimed unchallenged that all questions about the election were not only BASELESS, but thoroughly DEBUNKED (proven wrong). Proving something wrong is a PROCESS which involves TIME and evidence plus WORK.

Never mind that the courts hadn't heard any arguments yet, never mind the admissions of 50 organizations admitting the Steal, all I want is to see now is what work was done by who, how they did it and when, that all you people keep secret from the rest of the world!

PUT UP OR STFU ALREADY.

HOW WAS THE FRAUD DEBUNKED?

HOW WAS THE FRAUD DEBUNKED?

HOW WAS THE FRAUD DEBUNKED?

I will repeat to you it is incumbent upon the side making the accusations to provide the evidence...which they failed to do. There was ample time and an ample amount of cases to present something to courts that they would deem actionable. And the loser's side failed to do that. And your incessant use of bold and capital letters representing your kicking and screaming at the top of your lungs doesn't change that fact.

Put up. Or fold your tent and march on to 2024...cause what you want to happen..ain't gonna happen.

 

[toobfreak]

No laws were broken. There was no fraud. He lost. Deal with it. Move on. Believing in fantasies coming true and your alt-right sources lying to you just isn't healthy. Can you believe it? The election was over 9 months ago. Apparently we're gonna have to listen to this bullshit for HOW many more years?

Forever until you come clean or we bust your heinies. You know what you did, and WE know what you did. What, are you waiting like Hillary and the Benghazi and other investigations to simply drag it out until years have past then claim what "old news" it is and therefore, "settled," because you drug your feet forever holding back the evidence?

All you schmucks have been running your mouths since just a few days after the election all running your stinking mouths at how all of the fraud claims were either BASELESS or DEBUNKED, in EVERY report, on EVERY channel, but no one can get an answer out of ANY of you just HOW any of you KNOW this, just HOW it was found or proven baseless, HOW it was debunked, by WHO and WHEN.

That is a CLAIM, it is an allegation, it is an ACCUSATION---- just as the fraud was and still grows in support every day, yet somehow you cretins think you have no burden of proof to back up YOUR claims while thinking that others do!

WHEN WILL YOU LYING FUCKERS QUIT EXPOSING YOUR FRAUD BY CONTINUALLY ALWAYS HOLDING OTHERS TO A DIFFERENT STANDARD OF RULES THAN YOU DO FOR YOURSELVES?

You're just yelling and screaming at the top of your lungs that the other side hasn't proven there WASN'T any fraud.

No, YOU deal with it bud. Do you just ACT stupid and dense Jack or are you really that opaque and circuitous?

For the 9000th time Jack, the Left have claimed TEN THOUSAND TIMES since practically the night of the election that the fraud cases were all BASELESS and DEBUNKED.

BASELESS is a summary charge aimed at implying some investigative effort was taken.

DEBUNKED is a claim of some ACTION taken which proved conclusively a thing wasn't real.

Try making such claims in a court of law with nothing to back it up.

It would be easier to pull Excalibur's emblazoned magical sword from the stone than to get one of you lying jackals to present the secret evidence of HOW, WHERE, WHEN and by WHO all this incredible detective work occurred, especially since it is taking months just to audit one state!

Particularly incredible considering these claims started LONG BEFORE any court cases, and considering 50 organizations long ago TOOK CREDIT for the steal!

Obviously, if there WAS any such proof, it would have been presented long ago.

Put up or STFU. Or stop responding to my posts, cuck.

You are the one with the problem. Fraud is just a conspiracy, right? What are you doing here going on about something you say did not happen?

Because nothing happened.

WHAT didn't happen, Jack? Why do you talk in riddles?

Your savior telegraphed his intention to press the fraud argument months before the election.

So what? All Trump did was state he knew there was a plan underway to defraud the election to stop him from being reelected, and THAT IS EXACTLY WHAT HAPPENED, as already admitted and published in detail by Time Magazine in February.

Saying you got wind of a plot to rob your house does not alter the fact when indeed, they do come and ROB YOU.

Again, your redress (and his) was through the courts immediately after the election and they slammed the door on you to a man and woman.

All that proves is that relying on the courts to resolve a matter of this SCOPE in so very short a time (a few weeks) is a piss ass failure of a plan to keep elections free and honest. Name a single major court case like OJ, Bill Cosby or any other of national import which was resolved in the court system in just a couple of weeks! NAME IT ASSHOLE!

I am on here to slam your fingers in the car door of your constant misinformation and conspiracy theory laden campaign.

There goes Jack shooting his mouth off again making baseless and unfounded claims with NOTHING he can show to substantiate his accusations. No fingers slammed here, Jack, no misinformation proven, and no conspiracy theories confirmed other than out of the big, fat, puffy lips of your garage-less ASS.

You idiots have parroted these lies long enough.

The only one parroting lies here is YOU, Jack. Put forth how, when and by who all 28 cases brought against the election have been DEBUNKED, not merely thrown out of court declined or dismissed for lack of standing, time of filing or ambiguity of charges.

 

[toobfreak]

No laws were broken. There was no fraud. He lost. Deal with it. Move on. Believing in fantasies coming true and your alt-right sources lying to you just isn't healthy. Can you believe it? The election was over 9 months ago. Apparently we're gonna have to listen to this bullshit for HOW many more years?

Forever until you come clean or we bust your heinies. You know what you did, and WE know what you did. What, are you waiting like Hillary and the Benghazi and other investigations to simply drag it out until years have past then claim what "old news" it is and therefore, "settled," because you drug your feet forever holding back the evidence?

All you schmucks have been running your mouths since just a few days after the election all running your stinking mouths at how all of the fraud claims were either BASELESS or DEBUNKED, in EVERY report, on EVERY channel, but no one can get an answer out of ANY of you just HOW any of you KNOW this, just HOW it was found or proven baseless, HOW it was debunked, by WHO and WHEN.

That is a CLAIM, it is an allegation, it is an ACCUSATION---- just as the fraud was and still grows in support every day, yet somehow you cretins think you have no burden of proof to back up YOUR claims while thinking that others do!

WHEN WILL YOU LYING FUCKERS QUIT EXPOSING YOUR FRAUD BY CONTINUALLY ALWAYS HOLDING OTHERS TO A DIFFERENT STANDARD OF RULES THAN YOU DO FOR YOURSELVES?

You're just yelling and screaming at the top of your lungs that the other side hasn't proven there WASN'T any fraud.

No, YOU deal with it bud. Do you just ACT stupid and dense Jack or are you really that opaque and circuitous?

For the 9000th time Jack, the Left have claimed TEN THOUSAND TIMES since practically the night of the election that the fraud cases were all BASELESS and DEBUNKED.

BASELESS is a summary charge aimed at implying some investigative effort was taken.

DEBUNKED is a claim of some ACTION taken which proved conclusively a thing wasn't real.

Try making such claims in a court of law with nothing to back it up.

It would be easier to pull Excalibur's emblazoned magical sword from the stone than to get one of you lying jackals to present the secret evidence of HOW, WHERE, WHEN and by WHO all this incredible detective work occurred, especially since it is taking months just to audit one state!

Particularly incredible considering these claims started LONG BEFORE any court cases, and considering 50 organizations long ago TOOK CREDIT for the steal!

Obviously, if there WAS any such proof, it would have been presented long ago.

Put up or STFU. Or stop responding to my posts, cuck.

Speaking of abortions . . . yes, Jack, that is all I ask. PUT UP OR SHUT UP. Since Nov 3 you and the leftwing media and politicians have claimed unchallenged that all questions about the election were not only BASELESS, but thoroughly DEBUNKED (proven wrong). Proving something wrong is a PROCESS which involves TIME and evidence plus WORK.

Never mind that the courts hadn't heard any arguments yet, never mind the admissions of 50 organizations admitting the Steal, all I want is to see now is what work was done by who, how they did it and when, that all you people keep secret from the rest of the world!

PUT UP OR STFU ALREADY.

HOW WAS THE FRAUD DEBUNKED?

HOW WAS THE FRAUD DEBUNKED?

HOW WAS THE FRAUD DEBUNKED?

I will repeat to you it is incumbent upon the side making the accusations to provide the evidence...

EXACTLY, Jack. You, the media and politicians have made the accusation TEN THOUSAND FUCKING TIMES that ALL of the questions, doubts and charges against the Fall election have all been proven BASELESS and have all been thoroughly, COMPLETELY DEBUNKED. PROVIDE THE PROOF OF THAT. That's all. Provide ANYTHING, other than YOUR empty claims.

There was ample time

Ample time? Jack, you are just making yourself the LAUGHING STOCK of USMB making such HORSESHIT bogus claims. They had a few weeks. It will take many weeks if not months just to go over all of the fraud allegations here describing them and simply offering up whatever supporting evidence for or against each one of them by me and others!

 

[Hang on Sloopy]

No laws were broken. There was no fraud. He lost. Deal with it. Move on. Believing in fantasies coming true and your alt-right sources lying to you just isn't healthy. Can you believe it? The election was over 9 months ago. Apparently we're gonna have to listen to this bullshit for HOW many more years?

Forever until you come clean or we bust your heinies. You know what you did, and WE know what you did. What, are you waiting like Hillary and the Benghazi and other investigations to simply drag it out until years have past then claim what "old news" it is and therefore, "settled," because you drug your feet forever holding back the evidence?

All you schmucks have been running your mouths since just a few days after the election all running your stinking mouths at how all of the fraud claims were either BASELESS or DEBUNKED, in EVERY report, on EVERY channel, but no one can get an answer out of ANY of you just HOW any of you KNOW this, just HOW it was found or proven baseless, HOW it was debunked, by WHO and WHEN.

That is a CLAIM, it is an allegation, it is an ACCUSATION---- just as the fraud was and still grows in support every day, yet somehow you cretins think you have no burden of proof to back up YOUR claims while thinking that others do!

WHEN WILL YOU LYING FUCKERS QUIT EXPOSING YOUR FRAUD BY CONTINUALLY ALWAYS HOLDING OTHERS TO A DIFFERENT STANDARD OF RULES THAN YOU DO FOR YOURSELVES?

You're just yelling and screaming at the top of your lungs that the other side hasn't proven there WASN'T any fraud.

No, YOU deal with it bud. Do you just ACT stupid and dense Jack or are you really that opaque and circuitous?

For the 9000th time Jack, the Left have claimed TEN THOUSAND TIMES since practically the night of the election that the fraud cases were all BASELESS and DEBUNKED.

BASELESS is a summary charge aimed at implying some investigative effort was taken.

DEBUNKED is a claim of some ACTION taken which proved conclusively a thing wasn't real.

Try making such claims in a court of law with nothing to back it up.

It would be easier to pull Excalibur's emblazoned magical sword from the stone than to get one of you lying jackals to present the secret evidence of HOW, WHERE, WHEN and by WHO all this incredible detective work occurred, especially since it is taking months just to audit one state!

Particularly incredible considering these claims started LONG BEFORE any court cases, and considering 50 organizations long ago TOOK CREDIT for the steal!

Obviously, if there WAS any such proof, it would have been presented long ago.

Put up or STFU. Or stop responding to my posts, cuck.

I never call anyone a cuckhold, but when one accuses, I know he has battery clamps on his nipples while pegged

 

[JackOfNoTrades]

No laws were broken. There was no fraud. He lost. Deal with it. Move on. Believing in fantasies coming true and your alt-right sources lying to you just isn't healthy. Can you believe it? The election was over 9 months ago. Apparently we're gonna have to listen to this bullshit for HOW many more years?

Forever until you come clean or we bust your heinies. You know what you did, and WE know what you did. What, are you waiting like Hillary and the Benghazi and other investigations to simply drag it out until years have past then claim what "old news" it is and therefore, "settled," because you drug your feet forever holding back the evidence?

All you schmucks have been running your mouths since just a few days after the election all running your stinking mouths at how all of the fraud claims were either BASELESS or DEBUNKED, in EVERY report, on EVERY channel, but no one can get an answer out of ANY of you just HOW any of you KNOW this, just HOW it was found or proven baseless, HOW it was debunked, by WHO and WHEN.

That is a CLAIM, it is an allegation, it is an ACCUSATION---- just as the fraud was and still grows in support every day, yet somehow you cretins think you have no burden of proof to back up YOUR claims while thinking that others do!

WHEN WILL YOU LYING FUCKERS QUIT EXPOSING YOUR FRAUD BY CONTINUALLY ALWAYS HOLDING OTHERS TO A DIFFERENT STANDARD OF RULES THAN YOU DO FOR YOURSELVES?

You're just yelling and screaming at the top of your lungs that the other side hasn't proven there WASN'T any fraud.

No, YOU deal with it bud. Do you just ACT stupid and dense Jack or are you really that opaque and circuitous?

For the 9000th time Jack, the Left have claimed TEN THOUSAND TIMES since practically the night of the election that the fraud cases were all BASELESS and DEBUNKED.

BASELESS is a summary charge aimed at implying some investigative effort was taken.

DEBUNKED is a claim of some ACTION taken which proved conclusively a thing wasn't real.

Try making such claims in a court of law with nothing to back it up.

It would be easier to pull Excalibur's emblazoned magical sword from the stone than to get one of you lying jackals to present the secret evidence of HOW, WHERE, WHEN and by WHO all this incredible detective work occurred, especially since it is taking months just to audit one state!

Particularly incredible considering these claims started LONG BEFORE any court cases, and considering 50 organizations long ago TOOK CREDIT for the steal!

Obviously, if there WAS any such proof, it would have been presented long ago.

Put up or STFU. Or stop responding to my posts, cuck.

I never call anyone a cuckhold, but when one accuses, I know he has battery clamps on his nipples while pegged

What you do in the privacy of your own house...stays in your house. Don't bring me into your fantasies.