New Wolff book claimed Mueller had Obstruction indictments ready

[Sunsettommy]

Mueller just finished speaking, you demoncraps lose again.

Correct since by his own words, he didn't file any charges against the President, a power he had as Special Counsel as I have pointed out many times.

Leftists here uses the weaseling claim that since it is against DOJ POLICY, he can't charge the President on anything. Special Counsel LAW according to stupid Democrats can be pushed aside by a simple unlegislated department policy.

BWAHAHAHAHA!!!

Here is the Special Counsel law that was passed by CONGRESS, that shows he has the power to make Prosecution decisions based on his investigation and in the final report he sends to the AG.

28 CFR § 600.8 - Notification and reports by the Special Counsel.

"(c)Closing documentation. At the conclusion of the Special Counsel's work, he or she shall provide the Attorney General with a confidential report explaining the prosecution or declination decisions reached by the Special Counsel."

Watch the leftists fools IGNORE it once again, because it destroys their rationalization over Mueller not providing any Prosecution decisions at all in the report. They also ignore that Attorney General along with his Deputy and a few other DOJ lawyers determined that there is insufficient evidence of Obstruction, thus NO was the result.

The case is closed for most people including most of the Media who finally gets it, but not the stupid TDS sufferers here....

What you said there is NOT CORRECT.

Mueller did NOT have any power to indict a sitting POTUS.

Mueller agrees with DOJ OLC theory that a sitting POTUS cannot be indicted.
He even said so in his brief, 10 minute statement this morning.

Why the fuck are you lying about this point?

BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!

I wrote,

"Leftists here uses the weaseling claim that since it is against DOJ POLICY, he can't charge the President on anything."

I have acknowledged what Mueller stated, but YOU and other leftist fools keeps ignoring the LAW!

The legislated and unopposed by SCOTUS, the Special Counsel LAW always trumps a department policy, even posted the link showing that CONGRESS passed the law, allowing it.

You are so deep into TDS, that you appear to be continuously stupid in your continuous drive to screw the law, because it is against your delusion..

Special Counsel Law can override a policy, that is a fact you can't ignore.

It is certain you will continue to ignore the law because you are an imbecile.

"Here is the Special Counsel law that was passed by CONGRESS, that shows he has the power to make Prosecution decisions based on his investigation and in the final report he sends to the AG.

28 CFR § 600.8 - Notification and reports by the Special Counsel.

"(c)Closing documentation. At the conclusion of the Special Counsel's work, he or she shall provide the Attorney General with a confidential report explaining the prosecution or declination decisions reached by the Special Counsel."

Mueller clearly stated in his report that he agrees with DOJ OLC theory that a sitting POTUS can NOT be indicted.

Mueller even stated this morning in his brief, 10 minute statement that indicting a sitting POTUS would be "unconstitutional."

Why are you lying about this point?

You freaking idiot! I have acknowledged it several times, as shown in MY post YOU replied to, the post that was in reply to YOUR previous post.

"Leftists here uses the weaseling claim that since it is against DOJ POLICY, he can't charge the President on anything."

I have acknowledged what Mueller stated, but YOU and other leftist fools keeps ignoring the LAW!"

it is IRRELEVANT since it is a POLICY, while the Special Counsel LAW that was passed by congress, that is established law, which I have showed to you several times, you have always ignored it because you are an imbecile. Law is a legal directive, while a policy is a department guideline, you can not ignore the law!

Here is the Special Counsel law that was passed by CONGRESS, that shows he has the power to make Prosecution decisions based on his investigation and in the final report he sends to the AG.

28 CFR § 600.8 - Notification and reports by the Special Counsel.

"(c)Closing documentation. At the conclusion of the Special Counsel's work, he or she shall provide the Attorney General with a confidential report explaining the prosecution or declination decisions reached by the Special Counsel."

You can't ignore the LAW, this point will be raised in Court when the stupid Democrats finally go through the impeachment process. Mueller has NO legal justification to ignore the LAW, he is doing it for political purposes. Since he NEVER posted a single prosecution charge, and closed HIS report without one, there is nothing on his plate showing he charged him with something.

This undeniable fact amazingly eludes you!

You are sooooo Dumb on this because you have repeatedly ignored the law, that has been shown to you over and over because you are a partisan idiot!

 

[Sunsettommy]

Mueller did NOT have any power to indict a sitting POTUS.
Mueller agrees with DOJ OLC theory that a sitting POTUS cannot be indicted.

Never mind the fact Mueller would not have indicted him anyway, knowing he could not prove the necessary intent.
Why do you refuse to accept the truth?

He refuse to accept the overwhelming evidence that Mueller didn't charge Trump with anything, then he closed the case in his own words yesterday, still with ZERO Prosecution charges against him, its NOT in the 440 page report at all.

He is that way because he is a yellow bellied knuckledragging drooling leftist hyper partisan bigot.

 

[caddo kid]

Mueller did NOT have any power to indict a sitting POTUS.
Mueller agrees with DOJ OLC theory that a sitting POTUS cannot be indicted.

Never mind the fact Mueller would not have indicted him anyway, knowing he could not prove the necessary intent.
Why do you refuse to accept the truth?

He refuse to accept the overwhelming evidence that Mueller didn't charge Trump with anything, then he closed the case in his own words yesterday, still with ZERO Prosecution charges against him, its NOT in the 440 page report at all.

He is that way because he is a yellow bellied knuckledragging drooling leftist hyper partisan bigot.

from page 213 of the report:

First, a traditional prosecution or declination decision entails a binary determination to initiate or decline a prosecution, but we determined not to make a traditional prosecutorial judgment. The Office of Legal Counsel (OLC) has issued an opinion finding that "the indictment or criminal prosecution of a sitting President would impermissibly undermine the capacity of the executive branch to perform its constitutionally assigned functions" in violation of "the constitutional separation of powers."1 Given the role of the Special Counsel as an attorney in the Department of Justice and the framework of the Special Counsel regulations, see 28 U.S.C. § 515; 28 C.F.R. § 600.7(a), this Office accepted OLC's legal conclusion for the purpose of exercising prosecutorial jurisdiction. And apart from OLC's constitutional view, we recognized that a federal criminal accusation against a sitting President would place burdens on the President's capacity to govern and potentially preempt constitutional processes for addressing presidential misconduct.

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

We can infer from that paragraph that no matter what evidence may have been determined, there was NEVER going to be any charge/indictment leveled at POTUS Dick Weed by Mueller's team.

Capche?

 

[M14 Shooter]

We can infer from that paragraph that no matter what evidence may have been determined, there was NEVER going to be any charge/indictment leveled at POTUS Dick Weed by Mueller's team.

Never mind the fact Mueller would not have indicted him anyway, knowing he could not prove the necessary intent.
Why do you refuse to accept the truth?

 

[Sunsettommy]

Mueller did NOT have any power to indict a sitting POTUS.
Mueller agrees with DOJ OLC theory that a sitting POTUS cannot be indicted.

Never mind the fact Mueller would not have indicted him anyway, knowing he could not prove the necessary intent.
Why do you refuse to accept the truth?

He refuse to accept the overwhelming evidence that Mueller didn't charge Trump with anything, then he closed the case in his own words yesterday, still with ZERO Prosecution charges against him, its NOT in the 440 page report at all.

He is that way because he is a yellow bellied knuckledragging drooling leftist hyper partisan bigot.

from page 213 of the report:

First, a traditional prosecution or declination decision entails a binary determination to initiate or decline a prosecution, but we determined not to make a traditional prosecutorial judgment. The Office of Legal Counsel (OLC) has issued an opinion finding that "the indictment or criminal prosecution of a sitting President would impermissibly undermine the capacity of the executive branch to perform its constitutionally assigned functions" in violation of "the constitutional separation of powers."1 Given the role of the Special Counsel as an attorney in the Department of Justice and the framework of the Special Counsel regulations, see 28 U.S.C. § 515; 28 C.F.R. § 600.7(a), this Office accepted OLC's legal conclusion for the purpose of exercising prosecutorial jurisdiction. And apart from OLC's constitutional view, we recognized that a federal criminal accusation against a sitting President would place burdens on the President's capacity to govern and potentially preempt constitutional processes for addressing presidential misconduct.

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

We can infer from that paragraph that no matter what evidence may have been determined, there was NEVER going to be any charge/indictment leveled at POTUS Dick Weed by Mueller's team.

Capche?

Did you even read YOUR quote?

Did you even bother to look up, 28 U.S.C. § 515; 28 C.F.R. § 600.7(a

Here it is you ignorant dickweed!

§ 600.7 Conduct and accountability.

(a) A Special Counsel shall comply with the rules, regulations, procedures, practices and policies of the Department of Justice. He or she shall consult with appropriate offices within the Department for guidance with respect to established practices, policies and procedures of the Department, including ethics and security regulations and procedures. Should the Special Counsel conclude that the extraordinary circumstances of any particular decision would render compliance with required review and approval procedures by the designated Departmental component inappropriate, he or she may consult directly with the Attorney General."

Meanwhile Mueller ignored the actual LAW

28 CFR § 600.8 - Notification and reports by the Special Counsel.

"(c)Closing documentation. At the conclusion of the Special Counsel's work, he or she shall provide the Attorney General with a confidential report explaining the prosecution or declination decisions reached by the Special Counsel."

Here is the entire Special Counsel Law:
==============================================================================================
The Law is there you keep ignoring it over and over, you never even tried to claim I misinterpreted it, just ignore it all you have done. You KNOW why you ignore as I do because you can't address it as it is.

It says SHALL provide the Attorney General with a report with explanation on why he chose Declination decisions (Which he specifically stated several times in Section one), but on the Obstruction charge, he provided no decision at all. Therefore there are ZERO prosecution charges in his 440 page report.

When are you going to admit he files ZERO prosecution charges in his report he sent to the Attorney General?

ZERO!

Since Mueller punted on it, it fell to AG Barr and several DOJ lawyers and the Deputy AG Rosenstein to make a decision based on what Mueller published in Section two, they decided insufficient evidence, therefore NO.

Case is closed and that you can't deny!
=============================================================================================
Now to drive home on how stupid you really are, the first line in YOUR QUOTE states this:

"A Special Counsel shall comply with the rules, regulations, procedures, practices and policies of the Department of Justice."

Not a word about making Prosecution charges,, not one word!

But this line from the Congressionally passed LAW make a specific statement:

"(c)Closing documentation. At the conclusion of the Special Counsel's work, he or she shall provide the Attorney General with a confidential report explaining the prosecution or declination decisions reached by the Special Counsel."

No conflict with your quote at all.

You have NOTHING!

Mueller knows he is full of shit on this, since he never specified any such conflicts at all, neither have you, You just ignore it.

 

[caddo kid]

Mueller did NOT have any power to indict a sitting POTUS.
Mueller agrees with DOJ OLC theory that a sitting POTUS cannot be indicted.

Never mind the fact Mueller would not have indicted him anyway, knowing he could not prove the necessary intent.
Why do you refuse to accept the truth?

He refuse to accept the overwhelming evidence that Mueller didn't charge Trump with anything, then he closed the case in his own words yesterday, still with ZERO Prosecution charges against him, its NOT in the 440 page report at all.

He is that way because he is a yellow bellied knuckledragging drooling leftist hyper partisan bigot.

from page 213 of the report:

First, a traditional prosecution or declination decision entails a binary determination to initiate or decline a prosecution, but we determined not to make a traditional prosecutorial judgment. The Office of Legal Counsel (OLC) has issued an opinion finding that "the indictment or criminal prosecution of a sitting President would impermissibly undermine the capacity of the executive branch to perform its constitutionally assigned functions" in violation of "the constitutional separation of powers."1 Given the role of the Special Counsel as an attorney in the Department of Justice and the framework of the Special Counsel regulations, see 28 U.S.C. § 515; 28 C.F.R. § 600.7(a), this Office accepted OLC's legal conclusion for the purpose of exercising prosecutorial jurisdiction. And apart from OLC's constitutional view, we recognized that a federal criminal accusation against a sitting President would place burdens on the President's capacity to govern and potentially preempt constitutional processes for addressing presidential misconduct.

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

We can infer from that paragraph that no matter what evidence may have been determined, there was NEVER going to be any charge/indictment leveled at POTUS Dick Weed by Mueller's team.

Capche?

Did you even read YOUR quote?

Did you even bother to look up, 28 U.S.C. § 515; 28 C.F.R. § 600.7(a

Here it is you ignorant dickweed!

§ 600.7 Conduct and accountability.

(a) A Special Counsel shall comply with the rules, regulations, procedures, practices and policies of the Department of Justice. He or she shall consult with appropriate offices within the Department for guidance with respect to established practices, policies and procedures of the Department, including ethics and security regulations and procedures. Should the Special Counsel conclude that the extraordinary circumstances of any particular decision would render compliance with required review and approval procedures by the designated Departmental component inappropriate, he or she may consult directly with the Attorney General."

Meanwhile Mueller ignored the actual LAW

28 CFR § 600.8 - Notification and reports by the Special Counsel.

"(c)Closing documentation. At the conclusion of the Special Counsel's work, he or she shall provide the Attorney General with a confidential report explaining the prosecution or declination decisions reached by the Special Counsel."

Here is the entire Special Counsel Law:
==============================================================================================
The Law is there you keep ignoring it over and over, you never even tried to claim I misinterpreted it, just ignore it all you have done. You KNOW why you ignore as I do because you can't address it as it is.

It says SHALL provide the Attorney General with a report with explanation on why he chose Declination decisions (Which he specifically stated several times in Section one), but on the Obstruction charge, he provided no decision at all. Therefore there are ZERO prosecution charges in his 440 page report.

When are you going to admit he files ZERO prosecution charges in his report he sent to the Attorney General?

ZERO!

Since Mueller punted on it, it fell to AG Barr and several DOJ lawyers and the Deputy AG Rosenstein to make a decision based on what Mueller published in Section two, they decided insufficient evidence, therefore NO.

Case is closed and that you can't deny!
=============================================================================================
Now to drive home on how stupid you really are, the first line in YOUR QUOTE states this:

"A Special Counsel shall comply with the rules, regulations, procedures, practices and policies of the Department of Justice."

Not a word about making Prosecution charges,, not one word!

But this line from the Congressionally passed LAW make a specific statement:

"(c)Closing documentation. At the conclusion of the Special Counsel's work, he or she shall provide the Attorney General with a confidential report explaining the prosecution or declination decisions reached by the Special Counsel."

No conflict with your quote at all.

You have NOTHING!

Mueller knows he is full of shit on this, since he never specified any such conflicts at all, neither have you, You just ignore it.

I replied to another member that questioned Mueller's motive(s) & the report.
I replied with a quote from the report.
I offered my take on the quote.

Just because you are not happy with my post & you obviously have a dick stuck up in your ass, isn't my problem.

 

[M14 Shooter]

I replied to another member that questioned Mueller's motive(s) & the report.
I replied with a quote from the report.
I offered my take on the quote.

Yes - and the immense, near-endless laughter it brought from the sentient was priceless.

 

[JusticeHammer]

We can infer from that paragraph that no matter what evidence may have been determined, there was NEVER going to be any charge/indictm ent leveled at POTUS Dick Weed by Mueller's team.

Never mind the fact Mueller would not have indicted him anyway, knowing he could not prove the necessary intent.
Why do you refuse to accept the truth?

Because he is a stupid lib.

 

[JusticeHammer]

Mueller did NOT have any power to indict a sitting POTUS.
Mueller agrees with DOJ OLC theory that a sitting POTUS cannot be indicted.

Never mind the fact Mueller would not have indicted him anyway, knowing he could not prove the necessary intent.
Why do you refuse to accept the truth?

He refuse to accept the overwhelming evidence that Mueller didn't charge Trump with anything, then he closed the case in his own words yesterday, still with ZERO Prosecution charges against him, its NOT in the 440 page report at all.

He is that way because he is a yellow bellied knuckledragging drooling leftist hyper partisan bigot.

from page 213 of the report:

First, a traditional prosecution or declination decision entails a binary determination to initiate or decline a prosecution, but we determined not to make a traditional prosecutorial judgment. The Office of Legal Counsel (OLC) has issued an opinion finding that "the indictment or criminal prosecution of a sitting President would impermissibly undermine the capacity of the executive branch to perform its constitutionally assigned functions" in violation of "the constitutional separation of powers."1 Given the role of the Special Counsel as an attorney in the Department of Justice and the framework of the Special Counsel regulations, see 28 U.S.C. § 515; 28 C.F.R. § 600.7(a), this Office accepted OLC's legal conclusion for the purpose of exercising prosecutorial jurisdiction. And apart from OLC's constitutional view, we recognized that a federal criminal accusation against a sitting President would place burdens on the President's capacity to govern and potentially preempt constitutional processes for addressing presidential misconduct.

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

We can infer from that paragraph that no matter what evidence may have been determined, there was NEVER going to be any charge/indictment leveled at POTUS Dick Weed by Mueller's team.

Capche?

Did you even read YOUR quote?

Did you even bother to look up, 28 U.S.C. § 515; 28 C.F.R. § 600.7(a

Here it is you ignorant dickweed!

§ 600.7 Conduct and accountability.

(a) A Special Counsel shall comply with the rules, regulations, procedures, practices and policies of the Department of Justice. He or she shall consult with appropriate offices within the Department for guidance with respect to established practices, policies and procedures of the Department, including ethics and security regulations and procedures. Should the Special Counsel conclude that the extraordinary circumstances of any particular decision would render compliance with required review and approval procedures by the designated Departmental component inappropriate, he or she may consult directly with the Attorney General."

Meanwhile Mueller ignored the actual LAW

28 CFR § 600.8 - Notification and reports by the Special Counsel.

"(c)Closing documentation. At the conclusion of the Special Counsel's work, he or she shall provide the Attorney General with a confidential report explaining the prosecution or declination decisions reached by the Special Counsel."

Here is the entire Special Counsel Law:
==============================================================================================
The Law is there you keep ignoring it over and over, you never even tried to claim I misinterpreted it, just ignore it all you have done. You KNOW why you ignore as I do because you can't address it as it is.

It says SHALL provide the Attorney General with a report with explanation on why he chose Declination decisions (Which he specifically stated several times in Section one), but on the Obstruction charge, he provided no decision at all. Therefore there are ZERO prosecution charges in his 440 page report.

When are you going to admit he files ZERO prosecution charges in his report he sent to the Attorney General?

ZERO!

Since Mueller punted on it, it fell to AG Barr and several DOJ lawyers and the Deputy AG Rosenstein to make a decision based on what Mueller published in Section two, they decided insufficient evidence, therefore NO.

Case is closed and that you can't deny!
=============================================================================================
Now to drive home on how stupid you really are, the first line in YOUR QUOTE states this:

"A Special Counsel shall comply with the rules, regulations, procedures, practices and policies of the Department of Justice."

Not a word about making Prosecution charges,, not one word!

But this line from the Congressionally passed LAW make a specific statement:

"(c)Closing documentation. At the conclusion of the Special Counsel's work, he or she shall provide the Attorney General with a confidential report explaining the prosecution or declination decisions reached by the Special Counsel."

No conflict with your quote at all.

You have NOTHING!

Mueller knows he is full of shit on this, since he never specified any such conflicts at all, neither have you, You just ignore it.

I replied to another member that questioned Mueller's motive(s) & the report.
I replied with a quote from the report.
I offered my take on the quote.

Just because you are not happy with my post & you obviously have a dick stuck up in your ass, isn't my problem.

Not happy with it probably because you are a LIAR.