Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Unlock unbeatable offers today. Shop here: https://amzn.to/4cEkqYs 🎁
point is still the same.The OP talks about an investigation, not a lawsuit.The OP?What suit are you specifically referring to?then why is the suit against an organization rather than the man? tell us genius.It really isn't.Am I the only one who realizes that the Trump Organization is a different entity than Donald Trump, the individual?
The funny thing is, that stupid person who you replied to has no idea what it's taking about.
But then, when you're dealing with people who believe Barak Obama is a muslim from Kenya and Michelle is a man, there really is no limit to the stupidity.
How did he do that? He just refused to cooperate and given he was the chief executive, no one could force him to do so.how did he do that? Mueller was out of his control and so were he impeachments. you're seriously confused.
refused to coorperate? how does anyone under investigation owe an obligation to the investigation? explain how our law actually works, can you say it? innocent until proven........ Not obligated to cooperate. you are a strange bird indeed. you should learn about America.How did he do that? He just refused to cooperate and given he was the chief executive, no one could force him to do so.how did he do that? Mueller was out of his control and so were he impeachments. you're seriously confused.
Did you not notice all the obstruction of investigations?
It’s not. A lawsuit has to specifically name parties. The announcement from the AG office doesn’t.point is still the same.
my point is still the same.It’s not. A lawsuit has to specifically name parties. The announcement from the AG office doesn’t.point is still the same.
Have you heard of this thing called a subpoena?how does anyone under investigation owe an obligation to the investigation?
Your point is ignorant. Who runs the Trump Organization?my point is still the same.It’s not. A lawsuit has to specifically name parties. The announcement from the AG office doesn’t.point is still the same.
Letitia James is the biggest douchebag ever elected to public office. She campaigned on investigating Trump. That alone is sufficient justification for throwing out of court any case she files. Only a woke Trump-hating douchebag would support this behavior.Apparently it has moved from civil to criminal.
“We have informed the Trump Organization that our investigation into the Organization is no longer purely civil in nature,” Fabien Levy, New York AG Letitia James’s press secretary, said in an email Tuesday night. “We are now actively investigating the Trump Organization in a criminal capacity, along with the Manhattan DA. We have no additional comment.”
Trump Organization Now Under Criminal Investigation, New York Attorney General Says
That's not an obligation, numskull. It's a legal weapon.Have you heard of this thing called a subpoena?how does anyone under investigation owe an obligation to the investigation?
sure, a subpoena is something a court hands out, a subpoena from congress isn't legal. Trump merely told them to get one from the courts. the rest is history. again, he owed no one an obligation until the law said so.Have you heard of this thing called a subpoena?how does anyone under investigation owe an obligation to the investigation?
It doesn't matter because the whole thing will get thrown out. You can't make campaign promises that you are going to prosecute someone and expect any charges to stick. That is a clear case of malicious prosecution.Your point is ignorant. Who runs the Trump Organization?my point is still the same.It’s not. A lawsuit has to specifically name parties. The announcement from the AG office doesn’t.point is still the same.
No it won't. Letitia is barking up the wrong tree. She's a unscrupulous piece of shit.The following act may spell big trouble for Trump:
The Martin Act: New York State's Most Notorious Business Law
She will get her ass handed to her court.I finally found a link:
“We have informed the Trump Organization that our investigation into the Organization is no longer purely civil in nature,” Fabien Levy, New York AG Letitia James’s press secretary, said in an email Tuesday night. “We are now actively investigating the Trump Organization in a criminal capacity, along with the Manhattan DA. We have no additional comment.”
Trump Organization Now Under Criminal Investigation, New York Attorney General Says
I think that's correct, which means Trump's company can't be prosecuted under that act.I thought that Trump's companies were privately owned.Lawrence O'Donnell is now discussing the OP. Apparently it relates to the Martin Act.
The Martin Act: New York State's Most Notorious Business Law
Lawrence O'Donnell is now discussing the OP. Apparently it relates to the Martin Act.
The Martin Act: New York State's Most Notorious Business Law
His bigger crime is being racist and stupid. Of course, the two naturally go together.You are a racist and you should be ashamed of yourself.I like to hang stupid dunce Republicans like MeBelle by their own words.That's exactly what trump told the cops to do.
I don’t really get what their point is here. I don’t know exactly how the Trump Organization is structured.Trump does not have a LLC, fool. There is no Trump LLC. There is a "Trump Organization", and a Trump Group, but there is no Trump LLC.
Please stop talking about things you have no knowledge of. You're embarassing yourself
But being a LLC or any kind of corporation doesn’t shield the people in they corporation from liability if they commit crimes. There seems to be some serious confusion about that point.
There isn’t really a lot of difference between Trump and his companies. He owns them, runs them, he profits from them. He can’t escape criminal prosecution by claiming his company did something and not him.
The main thing a corporation does is separate the owner from the business.
It's not a complete separation. The owners are sill liable for all crimes they commit.
Being incorporated doesn't absolve anyone from any crime they committed, just makes it take longer for the authorities to enforce the law on the criminals in the company.
With private companies, if an accounting firm certifies their financial statements, and their tax returns, the IRS doesn’t look too closely at them. Unless a victim of the crime comes forward and complains, i.e. Mary Trump and her brother, there will be no investigation of criminal wrongdoing.
Law-enforcement needs evidence of a crime before they can begin an investigation. You can’t go on broad fishing expeditions against private companies just because you don’t like their ownership or you suspect they may be doing something sketchy.
Private companies are notoriously difficult to prosecute unless someone on the inside comes forward with the information needed to press on with the prosecutions. Michael Cohen is that someone. He has implicated both Trump and the Trump organization in financial wrongdoing.
Allen Weisselberg is now under criminal investigation for his role in Trump’s crimes. So is Gulliani.
Now that Trump is out of the White House, there is no shield against his prosecution. He’s now under criminal investigation in three different states. This will not end well for Trump
Letitia James is a corrupt douchebag who campaigned on prosecuting Trump. In other words, she announced to the entire world that she intended to abuse the powers of her office.I don’t really get what their point is here. I don’t know exactly how the Trump Organization is structured.Trump does not have a LLC, fool. There is no Trump LLC. There is a "Trump Organization", and a Trump Group, but there is no Trump LLC.
Please stop talking about things you have no knowledge of. You're embarassing yourself
But being a LLC or any kind of corporation doesn’t shield the people in they corporation from liability if they commit crimes. There seems to be some serious confusion about that point.
There isn’t really a lot of difference between Trump and his companies. He owns them, runs them, he profits from them. He can’t escape criminal prosecution by claiming his company did something and not him.
The main thing a corporation does is separate the owner from the business.
It's not a complete separation. The owners are sill liable for all crimes they commit.
Being incorporated doesn't absolve anyone from any crime they committed, just makes it take longer for the authorities to enforce the law on the criminals in the company.
With private companies, if an accounting firm certifies their financial statements, and their tax returns, the IRS doesn’t look too closely at them. Unless a victim of the crime comes forward and complains, i.e. Mary Trump and her brother, there will be no investigation of criminal wrongdoing.
Law-enforcement needs evidence of a crime before they can begin an investigation. You can’t go on broad fishing expeditions against private companies just because you don’t like their ownership or you suspect they may be doing something sketchy.
Private companies are notoriously difficult to prosecute unless someone on the inside comes forward with the information needed to press on with the prosecutions. Michael Cohen is that someone. He has implicated both Trump and the Trump organization in financial wrongdoing.
Allen Weisselberg is now under criminal investigation for his role in Trump’s crimes. So is Gulliani.
Now that Trump is out of the White House, there is no shield against his prosecution. He’s now under criminal investigation in three different states. This will not end well for Trump
"the only thing in the way of justice is evidence"I don’t really get what their point is here. I don’t know exactly how the Trump Organization is structured.Trump does not have a LLC, fool. There is no Trump LLC. There is a "Trump Organization", and a Trump Group, but there is no Trump LLC.
Please stop talking about things you have no knowledge of. You're embarassing yourself
But being a LLC or any kind of corporation doesn’t shield the people in they corporation from liability if they commit crimes. There seems to be some serious confusion about that point.
There isn’t really a lot of difference between Trump and his companies. He owns them, runs them, he profits from them. He can’t escape criminal prosecution by claiming his company did something and not him.
The main thing a corporation does is separate the owner from the business.
It's not a complete separation. The owners are sill liable for all crimes they commit.
Being incorporated doesn't absolve anyone from any crime they committed, just makes it take longer for the authorities to enforce the law on the criminals in the company.
With private companies, if an accounting firm certifies their financial statements, and their tax returns, the IRS doesn’t look too closely at them. Unless a victim of the crime comes forward and complains, i.e. Mary Trump and her brother, there will be no investigation of criminal wrongdoing.
Law-enforcement needs evidence of a crime before they can begin an investigation. You can’t go on broad fishing expeditions against private companies just because you don’t like their ownership or you suspect they may be doing something sketchy.
Private companies are notoriously difficult to prosecute unless someone on the inside comes forward with the information needed to press on with the prosecutions. Michael Cohen is that someone. He has implicated both Trump and the Trump organization in financial wrongdoing.
Allen Weisselberg is now under criminal investigation for his role in Trump’s crimes. So is Gulliani.
Now that Trump is out of the White House, there is no shield against his prosecution. He’s now under criminal investigation in three different states. This will not end well for Trump
And by not incorporating trump didn't separate himself from his company which means the only thing in the way of justice is evidence. As you said. Finding it in a private company isn't as easy as a public one. The private company doesn't have to file disclosure papers with the government for the public to see so they can keep their business dealings more secret.
Once that evidence is found, the owners of the company are screwed if they have been breaking the law. For the reason mostly being, the company and owner are the same. So the owner of a non incorporated company is easier to prosecute once that evidence is found.
It looks like michael Cohen has been giving the authorities that information. Hopefully weisselberg will do the same. We will have to wait to find out what he does.