Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
And would that be fair to you in that case?Probably because they produce far more than that in the long run.
My father was an immigrant, and my wife is an immigrant.
I'm fine with immigrants.
The fine for speeding in a school zone would be $1000.00. I almost promise you, though if I did that, the cop would have me bent over the hood of my car while his partner searched my trunk for other things. ANd God Help me if I were black.
Except the banks do not loan millions simply on the word of the applicant. We're right back here again. If they really did that, the bank officers would be liable for malpractice, losing their licenses, and criminal prosecution, AND the bank would swiftly go out of business. Why do you continue to let them off the hook?here's the thing, If I did that, it would have probably been a simple mistake.
Trump and his cronies plotted for years to defraud the banks, the tax agencies, and the public about the value of his company. This is not a simple mistake.
They have gotten so obsessed with getting ANYTHING on TRUMP! to damage him that they don't give a flying rat's patoot if what they're doing is fair, just, or will stand.Can you imagine if this Gestapo tactic was used against Obama or Hillary? The Dems would be crying racist or sexist.
But because it’s Trump, they’ll full steam ahead,
I‘m thinking this is so egregious that it won’t even have to go to the US Supreme Court. The NY Supreme Court could rule its an obvious violation of the 8th Amendment.
They’re also counting on the stupidity and ignorance of Democrat voters to fall for the idea that Trump must have done something so egregious that the penalty was $350 million. And if you try to explain it, they put their palm in your face and silence you.They have gotten so obsessed with getting ANYTHING on TRUMP! to damage him that they don't give a flying rat's patoot if what they're doing is fair, just, or will stand.
The bank would THEN have sued Trump for damages, and Trump would have lost and be forced to pay the bank what he owes.
None of that happened. The bank made $100 million on the deal, and Trump was able to provide hundreds of jobs to NYC taxpayers. Everyone won.
I‘m talking about the unskilled, entitled, lowlifes coming in illegally, and you know it.
Actually, I think that independents are getting a little sick of Trump and his nonsense and don't want this soap opera to go on for another four years.Huh? He paid back the bank, with $100 million interest to boot. There was no crime, no damages, and no victim. This miscarriage of justice designed to interfere with the election will not only be overturned, but independents are more likely to vote AGAINST Biden because they don’t like these Democrat Gestapo tactics.
They’re also counting on the stupidity and ignorance of Democrat voters to fall for the idea that Trump must have done something so egregious that the penalty was $350 million. And if you try to explain it, they put their palm in your face and silence you.
I liken it to Javert and Jon Valjean. Javert was so invested in convincing himself that Valjean was an awful crook that he couldn’t face the fact that he was wrong.
That's what makes the ruling so unconstitutional. You just pointed it out.The court did consider the charactor of the defendant. That's a big part of the reason the judgement was so high.
This kind of shit was done to Hillary- actually much worse.Can you imagine if this Gestapo tactic was used against Obama or Hillary? The Dems would be crying racist or sexist.
But because it’s Trump, they’ll full steam ahead,
I‘m thinking this is so egregious that it won’t even have to go to the US Supreme Court. The NY Supreme Court could rule its an obvious violation of the 8th Amendment.
No bank claimed they were defrauded. The judge refused to consider exculpatory expert witnesses. But they did testify and that testimony will be used for the appeal.One guy. If that was the only testimony this wouldn't have happened.
YOu kids need to learn how to use common sense.
WHich will still fail.No bank claimed they were defrauded. The judge refused to consider exculpatory expert witnesses. But they did testify and that testimony will be used for the appeal.
It wasn't a fine.300 million dollar find for a victimless civil suit brought on by the state is excessive
What was it? Both parties of the contract met their obligations, and the so-called “victim” made out to the tune of $100 million - and said they’re eager to do it again. Hundreds of companies do these transactions just like Trump did, and only Trump was punished.It wasn't a fine.
What was it? Both parties of the contract met their obligations, and the so-called “victim” made out to the tune of $100 million - and said they’re eager to do it again. Hundreds of companies do these transactions just like Trump did, and only Trump was punished.
I say it was an action to interfere with Trump’s campaign, and a violation of his 8th amendment rights.
Then why was ONLY Trump penalized beyond all REASON for the identical victimless infraction that hundreds of others have done, and never even charged?It's a disgorgement verdict.
This is not a banana republic.
Even people running for office are subject to the law.
Who did what Trump did?Then why was ONLY Trump penalized beyond all REASON for the identical victimless infraction that hundreds of others have done, and never even charged?
Because this was politically motivated.
Sure, but you say lots of goofy shit.What was it? Both parties of the contract met their obligations, and the so-called “victim” made out to the tune of $100 million - and said they’re eager to do it again. Hundreds of companies do these transactions just like Trump did, and only Trump was punished.
I say it was an action to interfere with Trump’s campaign, and a violation of his 8th amendment rights.
Common among developers and other companies, according to Mr, Womderful.Who did what Trump did?
ha-ha…..look who is talking.Sure, but you say lots of goofy shit.
If you don't like the law, change it.Common among developers and other companies, according to Mr, Womderful.
And besides, there was no harm nor damages - and the “victim” was made a lucrative deal and would do so again.
This was driven by politics and in violation of Trump’s constitutional rights. And other than the diehard leftists, such as yourself, all of America sees this for what it is and are more Incentivized than ever to vote out Democrats who are turning this country into a Banana Republic.
