JoeB131
Diamond Member
That wasn't the judge's appraisal, it was the state of Florida's based on development and use restrictions.It is more valuable than the judge appraised.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
That wasn't the judge's appraisal, it was the state of Florida's based on development and use restrictions.It is more valuable than the judge appraised.
The only one who would have jurisdiction is Orange County in Florida, and he isn't going to fuck the county's biggest employer.It would be worth a Florida DA's time to dig into all the deals they made. Could unearth some very lucrative court cases.
Oh bull crap, you loons love your pedophiles.Two people were arrested for passing a fraudulent diary without permission.
When Ashley herself holds a press conference and says this happened, then I will take it seriously. Not when someone passes off a fake diary they could have written something on.
And the banks appraisal?That wasn't the judge's appraisal, it was the state of Florida's based on development and use restrictions.
The banks took Trump's word for it, that was the problem.And the banks appraisal?
The banks get their own appraisals. You're an idiot.The banks took Trump's word for it, that was the problem.
Then they should be guilty of financial malpractice and people should be getting fired. Yet, they're not. It couldn't be because there were no damages, could it?The banks took Trump's word for it, that was the problem.
It amazes me that the usual suspects blithely assume that banks don't bother to either make sure they trust an applicant or do due diligence in checking the offered value of collateral. "Oh, no, they'll loan anybody millions based on the stated value of Grandpa's farm".The banks get their own appraisals. You're an idiot.
Not only were there no damages, but the bank made $100 mil on the deal. That’s why they did it: they were eager to get this whale of a client, and were thrilled they did.Then they should be guilty of financial malpractice and people should be getting fired. Yet, they're not. It couldn't be because there were no damages, could it?
And if it turned to shit like so many other Trump deals, who would have been on the hook?Not only were there no damages, but the bank made $100 mil on the deal. That’s why they did it: they were eager to get this whale of a client, and were thrilled they did.
But it didn't, so there were no damages.And if it turned to shit like so many other Trump deals, who would have been on the hook?
The taxpayers.
Again, that's like saying because I didn't hit any kids going through a school zone at 55 MPH, I shouldn't get a ticket.But it didn't, so there were no damages.
No, THEN the bank could sue for damages. As it is nobody was hurt.And if it turned to shit like so many other Trump deals, who would have been on the hook?
The taxpayers.
And would your ticket be $350 million? Nope. The ticket would be about $200.Again, that's like saying because I didn't hit any kids going through a school zone at 55 MPH, I shouldn't get a ticket.
Probably because they produce far more than that in the long run.No, THEN the bank could sue for damages. As it is nobody was hurt.
Besides, I don’t hear you complaining about the illegals costing taxpayers $100 billion year.
The fine for speeding in a school zone would be $1000.00. I almost promise you, though if I did that, the cop would have me bent over the hood of my car while his partner searched my trunk for other things. ANd God Help me if I were black.And would your ticket be $350 million? Nope. The ticket would be about $200.
The penalty of $350 million is politically driven, in an effort to destroy the #1 Republican opponent, and will be overturned.
Actually, it's more like you were in a crowd of people who all crossed the street in the middle of the block at the same time to get to a popular bar on the other side, and a cop arrested you. Only you, no one else. You were eventually found guilty, had your car and house seized to pay a $100,000 fine and you were barred from ever going downtown to visit that bar again. Just you, nobody else got so much as a warning to cross only on the crosswalk. Then the Chief of Police went public to tell everyone that they don't need to worry about getting in trouble because he's only going to apply the law to you. After all, you're icky and weird people hate you. Sure, that's fair and right and just, you broke the law, right? Who cares that you're the only one who got in trouble for doing it and no one was hurt?Again, that's like saying because I didn't hit any kids going through a school zone at 55 MPH, I shouldn't get a ticket.
The bank would THEN have sued Trump for damages, and Trump would have lost and be forced to pay the bank what he owes.And if it turned to shit like so many other Trump deals, who would have been on the hook?
The taxpayers.
The biggest fraud is the judge valuing MAL at $18MMThat amount was based on the amount of fraud documented in the trial.
It doesn't violate anything.
DERP
I‘m talking about the unskilled, entitled, lowlifes coming in illegally, and you know it.Probably because they produce far more than that in the long run.
My father was an immigrant, and my wife is an immigrant.
I'm fine with immigrants.
Huh? He paid back the bank, with $100 million interest to boot. There was no crime, no damages, and no victim. This miscarriage of justice designed to interfere with the election will not only be overturned, but independents are more likely to vote AGAINST Biden because they don’t like these Democrat Gestapo tactics.The fine for speeding in a school zone would be $1000.00. I almost promise you, though if I did that, the cop would have me bent over the hood of my car while his partner searched my trunk for other things. ANd God Help me if I were black.
here's the thing, If I did that, it would have probably been a simple mistake.
Trump and his cronies plotted for years to defraud the banks, the tax agencies, and the public about the value of his company. This is not a simple mistake.
Can you imagine if this Gestapo tactic was used against Obama or Hillary? The Dems would be crying racist or sexist.Actually, it's more like you were in a crowd of people who all crossed the street in the middle of the block at the same time to get to a popular bar on the other side, and a cop arrested you. Only you, no one else. You were eventually found guilty, had your car and house seized to pay a $100,000 fine and you were barred from ever going downtown to visit that bar again. Just you, nobody else got so much as a warning to cross only on the crosswalk. Then the Chief of Police went public to tell everyone that they don't need to worry about getting in trouble because he's only going to apply the law to you. After all, you're icky and weird people hate you. Sure, that's fair and right and just, you broke the law, right? Who cares that you're the only one who got in trouble for doing it and no one was hurt?
I do believe there is something about applying laws equally, and penalties being assigned commensurate with damages suffered. In this case, the bank suffered no losses, the state suffered no losses, no one suffered any losses. But oh, you screech, he broke the law. Yeah, and people who cross the street in the middle of the block when there are no cars coming break the law as well. Do they deserve draconian penalties for doing so?