Norman
Diamond Member
- Sep 24, 2010
- 31,254
- 15,182
- 1,590
New York times has just published a new regressive masterpiece, here is just an excerpt:
"For most of history, we’ve taken for granted the implicit brutality of male sexuality. In 1976, the radical feminist and pornography opponent Andrea Dworkin said that the only sex between a man and a woman that could be undertaken without violence was sex with a flaccid penis: “I think that men will have to give up their precious erections,” she wrote. In the third century A.D., it is widely believed, the great Catholic theologian Origen, working on roughly the same principle, castrated himself.
Acknowledging the brutality of male libido is not, of course, some kind of excuse. Sigmund Freud recognized the id, and knew it as “a chaos, a caldron full of seething excitations.” But the point of Freud was not that boys will be boys. Rather the opposite: The idea of the Oedipus complex contained an implicit case for the requirements of strenuous repression: If you let boys be boys, they will murder their fathers and sleep with their mothers."
Opinion | The Unexamined Brutality of the Male Libido
I doubt this cuck of a writer has any erection to speak of, and balls equal to the person who castrated himself, so at least it's not completely hypocritical. If you don't let boys be boys, this is the result.
Once again they have got everything backwards, modern men are generally the least sexually aggressive around and do not approve of Weiner's actions. Apart from these lefties who want to import a bunch of rapefugees at least. Men are also the ones who pay the taxes so these lefties can leech off the system not working, this is their thank you.
"For most of history, we’ve taken for granted the implicit brutality of male sexuality. In 1976, the radical feminist and pornography opponent Andrea Dworkin said that the only sex between a man and a woman that could be undertaken without violence was sex with a flaccid penis: “I think that men will have to give up their precious erections,” she wrote. In the third century A.D., it is widely believed, the great Catholic theologian Origen, working on roughly the same principle, castrated himself.
Acknowledging the brutality of male libido is not, of course, some kind of excuse. Sigmund Freud recognized the id, and knew it as “a chaos, a caldron full of seething excitations.” But the point of Freud was not that boys will be boys. Rather the opposite: The idea of the Oedipus complex contained an implicit case for the requirements of strenuous repression: If you let boys be boys, they will murder their fathers and sleep with their mothers."
Opinion | The Unexamined Brutality of the Male Libido
I doubt this cuck of a writer has any erection to speak of, and balls equal to the person who castrated himself, so at least it's not completely hypocritical. If you don't let boys be boys, this is the result.
Once again they have got everything backwards, modern men are generally the least sexually aggressive around and do not approve of Weiner's actions. Apart from these lefties who want to import a bunch of rapefugees at least. Men are also the ones who pay the taxes so these lefties can leech off the system not working, this is their thank you.
Last edited: