Next big debate : banning kill bots !

Militarizing of our police ! It's a real thing .
 
Who even knew the police had kamikaze robots !?

Or maybe the overdid stun grenades in order to make the blast fatal??
The robot survived, so no kamikaze.

Was the intent to kill the suspect or simply incapacitate him?

This guy killed five cops.....no way they were taking him alive
They probably didn't know the body count at that time. I don't know the exact nature of how Johnson holed himself up, but he seemed to have a good handle on tactics and had thought this through. He was in a parking garage, IIRC, and there was lot of concrete around which would make a highly defensible position.

Do you recall the 1973 sniper rampage? Similar stories...and endings:
Dallas shooting bears eerie similarities to 1973 New Orleans sniper rampage
 
Militarizing of our police ! It's a real thing .
Yes, it is thanks all you LW anti-gunners who have been pushing hard for years to let only the police and the military have guns.

Boston Marathon Bombing:
boston3.jpg


Ferguson:
police-in-ferguson.jpg
 
Next weapon for cops.....machine gun jubblies

075d99c8f02e0456.gif
 
Militarizing of our police ! It's a real thing .
Yes, it is thanks all you LW anti-gunners who have been pushing hard for years to let only the police and the military have guns.

Boston Marathon Bombing:
boston3.jpg


Ferguson:
police-in-ferguson.jpg

You have it backwards . This all started wh the cons and their patriot act .

And don't get me started on the Boston bombing!!
 
the more I think about the Dallas kill it the more I think it's the next big civil rights issue.

First I figured it was a stun grenade , but now it's more like they were out to blow up the guy.

Drones in war zones is one thing , drones used by local police is another .

Very grey area . You can use deadly force if it's a situation where you need to protect lives . But if a peep is just dealing wh a robot , is anyone's life in danger to justify deadly force ?
Well you can bet there is no constitutional law on it yet, since they did not have bots in 1789.

There have been no SCOTUS cases on it yet and no statutes at the Federal or state level.

So this is an area of completely new law.

The argument in favor of the bot is that it is safer than risking a fire. And burning-out a holed-up perp is a fairly common law enforcement procedure. The teargas usually starts the fire, as at the Branch Davidians Compound.

I don't see a problem with it unless the state legislature does.

I don't see any Federal issues at all.
 
Militarizing of our police ! It's a real thing .
Yes, it is thanks all you LW anti-gunners who have been pushing hard for years to let only the police and the military have guns.

Boston Marathon Bombing:
boston3.jpg


Ferguson:
police-in-ferguson.jpg

You have it backwards . This all started wh the cons and their patriot act .

And don't get me started on the Boston bombing!!
Hard to tell in the English language what you 2 are even arguing about.
 
You have it backwards . This all started wh the cons and their patriot act .
Wrong for three reasons.

1. Are you denying the LW anti-gun mob has been pushing hard for only the police and military to have guns? Yes or no, please.

2. The Patriot Act was passed with a majority of Democrats in favor of it including your main nominee for President.

3. President Obama pushed for and got a renewal of the act.
 
Who even knew the police had kamikaze robots !?

Or maybe the overdid stun grenades in order to make the blast fatal??
The robot survived, so no kamikaze.

Was the intent to kill the suspect or simply incapacitate him?

This guy killed five cops.....no way they were taking him alive
They probably didn't know the body count at that time. I don't know the exact nature of how Johnson holed himself up, but he seemed to have a good handle on tactics and had thought this through. He was in a parking garage, IIRC, and there was lot of concrete around which would make a highly defensible position.

Do you recall the 1973 sniper rampage? Similar stories...and endings:
Dallas shooting bears eerie similarities to 1973 New Orleans sniper rampage
Essex was more lethal. Same strategy -- shoot and move.
 
No, Terminator started when SkyNet became self aware...
Skynet was the product of people who favored letting big government control everything because they are better and brighter than we are. Who would those people be?
 
Militarizing of our police ! It's a real thing .
Yes, it is thanks all you LW anti-gunners who have been pushing hard for years to let only the police and the military have guns.

Boston Marathon Bombing:
boston3.jpg


Ferguson:
police-in-ferguson.jpg

You have it backwards . This all started wh the cons and their patriot act .
You have it backwards . This all started wh the cons and their patriot act .
Wrong for three reasons.

1. Are you denying the LW anti-gun mob has been pushing hard for only the police and military to have guns? Yes or no, please.

2. The Patriot Act was passed with a majority of Democrats in favor of it including your main nominee for President.

3. President Obama pushed for and got a renewal of the act.

The police have always had guns .

The patriot act had a near unanimous vote by conservatives .

Cons want Pds to have all these military style weapons .
 
The police have always had guns .

The patriot act had a near unanimous vote by conservatives .

Cons want Pds to have all these military style weapons .
Why are you dodging admitting the Patriot Act had a majority of Demcracts supporting both it, the 2006 reauthorization, including then Senator Obama, and the extension pushed for and signed by now-President Obama?

The "Cons" also want the Feds to have less power while the Libs want them to have more power. Where are you on this?
 
Militarizing of our police ! It's a real thing .
Yes, it is thanks all you LW anti-gunners who have been pushing hard for years to let only the police and the military have guns.

Boston Marathon Bombing:
boston3.jpg


Ferguson:
police-in-ferguson.jpg

You have it backwards . This all started wh the cons and their patriot act .

And don't get me started on the Boston bombing!!
Hard to tell in the English language what you 2 are even arguing about.

Seriously kid you want to argue English when you use 2 in a sentence?
 
Its the return of Nazi technology from WW2

German soldiers in April 1944 with a Goliath and the remote control.
Bundesarchiv_Bild_101III-Ahrens-026-12%2C_Russland%2C_Sprengpanzer_%22Goliath%22.jpg
 
The police have always had guns .

The patriot act had a near unanimous vote by conservatives .

Cons want Pds to have all these military style weapons .
Why are you dodging admitting the Patriot Act had a majority of Demcracts supporting both it, the 2006 reauthorization, including then Senator Obama, and the extension pushed for and signed by now-President Obama?

The "Cons" also want the Feds to have less power while the Libs want them to have more power. Where are you on this?

Don't make me go to the vote scorecard !!!
 
Obama has his drone assassination program.

The bot used in dallas prevented further injury to cops.

No more discussion needed att.
 
the more I think about the Dallas kill it the more I think it's the next big civil rights issue.

First I figured it was a stun grenade , but now it's more like they were out to blow up the guy.

Drones in war zones is one thing , drones used by local police is another .

Very grey area . You can use deadly force if it's a situation where you need to protect lives . But if a peep is just dealing wh a robot , is anyone's life in danger to justify deadly force ?

If it comes to a choice between losing another cops life to a guy who just murdered
so many....

What the hell...
I say boom...
 

Forum List

Back
Top