candycorn
Diamond Member
Seems like it was the same story in 04…
They came back then. Not sure they can come back again. It’s a different, much more bitter nation. Creating optimism over an individual’s situation isn’t as important as “sticking it” to someone who supposedly did you wrong it seems.
The Democrats aren’t good at playing that game.
I don't think 2004 and 2016 have anything in common, other than superficial accidents. I don't think the Democrat brand is "out" in any way, other than wingnut wet dreams. Clinton won the popular vote, the House was basically unchanged and reflects nationwide gerrymandering, and the Senate remained essentially unchanged, largely reflecting incumbency success.
If anything, the question of greatest importance is whether both major parties have jumped the shark (at this point I think they both have), and whether they can maintain their shared position atop the false dilemma. Let's look at the Presidential elections this century. Bush, then Obama, now Trump. One dynastic figure, and two personality cults. Both parties have failed to offer anything of substance to the American people since the 20th century. It seems clear to me that our political parties, as they now stand, have rounded the same kind of corner as a large businesses that no longer give a shit about satisfying customers. They've so deeply inserted themselves into the market that they can treat the public as if they are our client.
Democrats and Republicans now account for less than half of all registered voters. If anything, I think we're primed to possibly see D-R paradigm be replaced in the next decade. If one goes, they'll both go.
Good point. Also one must remember that HRC was not supposed to win if history is any indicator.
I was jus saying that the next DNC President is probably going to be more like Mike Rowe than Mike Dukakis.