NO! Homosexuality IS NOT NORMAL

[Bonzi]

It could be more normal, and I wouldn't object...

The number one reason so many woman object to performing oral sex is that it means they have to stop talking for 5 minutes.

No it's not, it's because women understand the only reason a man enjoys it is because it positions the woman in a role of SUBMISSION and the man in a role of control and superiority

If you really believe that is the only reason a man enjoys a blowjob- you either have never had one- or you have never had a good one.

well I'm a girl so....

So then you are admitting you really were just pulling that claim out of your butt?

Or maybe- and tragically- the situations you have been in makes you think that is the only reason why men enjoy blowjobs.

As a man, I can say with great certainty- its not because 'it positions the woman in role of SUBMISSION- the best blowjobs are when the woman is the one entirely in control.

Maybe just some like it and some don't. Not sure it really matters ?

 

[Bonzi]

You're right, it's not Normal, that's 50% + 1, it's just Natural, and has been around as long as we have as far as we can tell.

So has blindness.

Yep, and you don't try to outlaw that now do you? You also don't spend much effort denouncing it as immoral either.

I never claimed homos to be immoral. That's the argument the homonazis want. My argument is grounded in social science and logic.
You don't give drivers licenses to blind people.

That is because you can make a rational and compelling argument before the court. What is the rational and compelling argument for two same-sex adults not being able to marry? The court couldn't find one, and neither could anyone else.

There are only 2 I can think of - Religious (which won't be considered) and historical (permissiveness of homosexuality) which I don't know enough to speak on (I have read in various places of downfalls of society due to increased sexual perversion but don't have info to support that at the tip of my fingers or brain).

 

[Bonzi]

That doesn't make it normal.

Actually, it does. You might want to look a little closer at the definition for normal.

Normal - conforming to a standard; usual, typical, or expected

Homosexual behaviors are not unusual in the animal kingdom. It's seen in several species.

Sorry. No matter how many species it happens in fucking another man up the ass is not normal.

Normal or not boys, it's natural BTW, they are your equals.

Correct. God loves everyone., but only those that accept Jesus as Lord and Savior are saved. Homosexuality is a sin as is sex outside of marriage. God does not recognize homosexual marriage vows

How do you know that God does not recognize homosexual marriage vows?

While the Bible does address homosexuality, it does not explicitly mention gay marriage/same-sex marriage. It is clear, however, that the Bible condemns homosexuality as an immoral and unnatural sin. Lev 18:22 identifies homosexual sex as an abomination, a detestable sin. Romans 1:26-27 declares homosexual desires and actions to be shameful, unnatural, lustful, and indecent. I Cor 6:9 states that homosexuals are unrighteous and will not inherit the kingdom of God. Since both homosexual desires and actions are condemned in the Bible, it is clear that homosexuals “marrying” is not God’s will, and would be, in fact, sinful.

Whenever the Bible mentions marriage, it is between male and female.

 

[NYcarbineer]

Oh, this is gonna leave a mark ....

No union is more profound than marriage, for it embodies the highest ideals of love, fidelity, devotion, sacrifice, and family. In forming a marital union, two people become something greater than once they were. As some of the petitioners in these cases demonstrate, marriage embodies a love that may endure even past death. It would misunderstand these men and women to say they disrespect the idea of marriage. Their plea is that they do respect it, respect it so deeply that they seek to find its fulfillment for themselves. Their hope is not to be condemned to live in loneliness, excluded from one of civilization’s oldest institutions. They ask for equal dignity in the eyes of the law. The Constitution grants them that right.

The judgment of the Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit is reversed.

It is so ordered.​

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Article. VI.

This Constitution, and the Laws of the United States which shall be made in Pursuance thereof; and all Treaties made, or which shall be made, under the Authority of the United States, shall be the supreme Law of the Land; and the Judges in every State shall be bound thereby, any Thing in the Constitution or Laws of any State to the Contrary notwithstanding.

Yet the 5 Socialists on the SCOTUS found no problem with untethering themselves from the Constitution of the United States.

As the Constitution of the United States does not provide a fundamental right to marriage, as such does not exist outside of the natural standard of Marriage as defined by the Human Physiological Standard and the other soundly reasoned conditions required by the desire of the collective to sustain a viable culture.

How is it that people like this idiot can revere marriage as a most important and sacred institution,

and then turn around and claim that it isn't, and shouldn't be, a basic human right?

It's insanely illogical.

 

[NYcarbineer]

Oh, this is gonna leave a mark ....

No union is more profound than marriage, for it embodies the highest ideals of love, fidelity, devotion, sacrifice, and family. In forming a marital union, two people become something greater than once they were. As some of the petitioners in these cases demonstrate, marriage embodies a love that may endure even past death. It would misunderstand these men and women to say they disrespect the idea of marriage. Their plea is that they do respect it, respect it so deeply that they seek to find its fulfillment for themselves. Their hope is not to be condemned to live in loneliness, excluded from one of civilization’s oldest institutions. They ask for equal dignity in the eyes of the law. The Constitution grants them that right.

The judgment of the Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit is reversed.

It is so ordered.​

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Article. VI.

This Constitution, and the Laws of the United States which shall be made in Pursuance thereof; and all Treaties made, or which shall be made, under the Authority of the United States, shall be the supreme Law of the Land; and the Judges in every State shall be bound thereby, any Thing in the Constitution or Laws of any State to the Contrary notwithstanding.

Yet the 5 Socialists on the SCOTUS found no problem with untethering themselves from the Constitution of the United States.

As the Constitution of the United States does not provide a fundamental right to marriage, as such does not exist outside of the natural standard of Marriage as defined by the Human Physiological Standard and the other soundly reasoned conditions required by the desire of the collective to sustain a viable culture.

BUT, the Constitution does provide a fundamental right of equal protection under the law,

which means, pay attention, ANY law enacted at any level of government cannot apply to some and not others, if all are similar enough to merit that equal protection.

 

[NYcarbineer]

Conservative guys insisting that oral sex is an abomination should come as quite a surprise to most of their wives.

Waste of a post, and not much related to the TOPIC.

Is oral sex between a man and wife normal or abnormal?

It could be more normal, and I wouldn't object...

The number one reason so many woman object to performing oral sex is that it means they have to stop talking for 5 minutes.

No it's not, it's because women understand the only reason a man enjoys it is because it positions the woman in a role of SUBMISSION and the man in a role of control and superiority

So does the missionary postion, fucktard.

 

[Bonzi]

Waste of a post, and not much related to the TOPIC.

Is oral sex between a man and wife normal or abnormal?

It could be more normal, and I wouldn't object...

The number one reason so many woman object to performing oral sex is that it means they have to stop talking for 5 minutes.

No it's not, it's because women understand the only reason a man enjoys it is because it positions the woman in a role of SUBMISSION and the man in a role of control and superiority

So does the missionary postion, fucktard.

The woman is "servicing" the man, in such a way she would get no physical sexual pleasure out of it (although, some could get psychologically turned on by it).

Sex is supposed to be about expressing love. (not power and control)

If traditional sex is not doing it for you, you have issues and hang ups.

 

[Iceweasel]

Oh, this is gonna leave a mark ....

No union is more profound than marriage, for it embodies the highest ideals of love, fidelity, devotion, sacrifice, and family. In forming a marital union, two people become something greater than once they were. As some of the petitioners in these cases demonstrate, marriage embodies a love that may endure even past death. It would misunderstand these men and women to say they disrespect the idea of marriage. Their plea is that they do respect it, respect it so deeply that they seek to find its fulfillment for themselves. Their hope is not to be condemned to live in loneliness, excluded from one of civilization’s oldest institutions. They ask for equal dignity in the eyes of the law. The Constitution grants them that right.

The judgment of the Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit is reversed.

It is so ordered.​

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Article. VI.

This Constitution, and the Laws of the United States which shall be made in Pursuance thereof; and all Treaties made, or which shall be made, under the Authority of the United States, shall be the supreme Law of the Land; and the Judges in every State shall be bound thereby, any Thing in the Constitution or Laws of any State to the Contrary notwithstanding.

Yet the 5 Socialists on the SCOTUS found no problem with untethering themselves from the Constitution of the United States.

As the Constitution of the United States does not provide a fundamental right to marriage, as such does not exist outside of the natural standard of Marriage as defined by the Human Physiological Standard and the other soundly reasoned conditions required by the desire of the collective to sustain a viable culture.

How is it that people like this idiot can revere marriage as a most important and sacred institution,

and then turn around and claim that it isn't, and shouldn't be, a basic human right?

It's insanely illogical.

How about that it's too important to pervert into the lie that a man with a man is equal to a man with a woman? Can two brothers share that so called human right? If not, you're a hypocrite.

 

[NYcarbineer]

Oh, this is gonna leave a mark ....

No union is more profound than marriage, for it embodies the highest ideals of love, fidelity, devotion, sacrifice, and family. In forming a marital union, two people become something greater than once they were. As some of the petitioners in these cases demonstrate, marriage embodies a love that may endure even past death. It would misunderstand these men and women to say they disrespect the idea of marriage. Their plea is that they do respect it, respect it so deeply that they seek to find its fulfillment for themselves. Their hope is not to be condemned to live in loneliness, excluded from one of civilization’s oldest institutions. They ask for equal dignity in the eyes of the law. The Constitution grants them that right.

The judgment of the Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit is reversed.

It is so ordered.​

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Article. VI.

This Constitution, and the Laws of the United States which shall be made in Pursuance thereof; and all Treaties made, or which shall be made, under the Authority of the United States, shall be the supreme Law of the Land; and the Judges in every State shall be bound thereby, any Thing in the Constitution or Laws of any State to the Contrary notwithstanding.

Yet the 5 Socialists on the SCOTUS found no problem with untethering themselves from the Constitution of the United States.

As the Constitution of the United States does not provide a fundamental right to marriage, as such does not exist outside of the natural standard of Marriage as defined by the Human Physiological Standard and the other soundly reasoned conditions required by the desire of the collective to sustain a viable culture.

How is it that people like this idiot can revere marriage as a most important and sacred institution,

and then turn around and claim that it isn't, and shouldn't be, a basic human right?

It's insanely illogical.

How about that it's too important to pervert into the lie that a man with a man is equal to a man with a woman? Can two brothers share that so called human right? If not, you're a hypocrite.

The other poster said man/woman marriage isn't a right.

 

[Iceweasel]

Oh, this is gonna leave a mark ....

No union is more profound than marriage, for it embodies the highest ideals of love, fidelity, devotion, sacrifice, and family. In forming a marital union, two people become something greater than once they were. As some of the petitioners in these cases demonstrate, marriage embodies a love that may endure even past death. It would misunderstand these men and women to say they disrespect the idea of marriage. Their plea is that they do respect it, respect it so deeply that they seek to find its fulfillment for themselves. Their hope is not to be condemned to live in loneliness, excluded from one of civilization’s oldest institutions. They ask for equal dignity in the eyes of the law. The Constitution grants them that right.

The judgment of the Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit is reversed.

It is so ordered.​

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Article. VI.

This Constitution, and the Laws of the United States which shall be made in Pursuance thereof; and all Treaties made, or which shall be made, under the Authority of the United States, shall be the supreme Law of the Land; and the Judges in every State shall be bound thereby, any Thing in the Constitution or Laws of any State to the Contrary notwithstanding.

Yet the 5 Socialists on the SCOTUS found no problem with untethering themselves from the Constitution of the United States.

As the Constitution of the United States does not provide a fundamental right to marriage, as such does not exist outside of the natural standard of Marriage as defined by the Human Physiological Standard and the other soundly reasoned conditions required by the desire of the collective to sustain a viable culture.

How is it that people like this idiot can revere marriage as a most important and sacred institution,

and then turn around and claim that it isn't, and shouldn't be, a basic human right?

It's insanely illogical.

How about that it's too important to pervert into the lie that a man with a man is equal to a man with a woman? Can two brothers share that so called human right? If not, you're a hypocrite.

The other poster said man/woman marriage isn't a right.

Marriage isn't in the Constitution. It WAS a state's right for eligible couples.

 

[NYcarbineer]

Oh, this is gonna leave a mark ....

No union is more profound than marriage, for it embodies the highest ideals of love, fidelity, devotion, sacrifice, and family. In forming a marital union, two people become something greater than once they were. As some of the petitioners in these cases demonstrate, marriage embodies a love that may endure even past death. It would misunderstand these men and women to say they disrespect the idea of marriage. Their plea is that they do respect it, respect it so deeply that they seek to find its fulfillment for themselves. Their hope is not to be condemned to live in loneliness, excluded from one of civilization’s oldest institutions. They ask for equal dignity in the eyes of the law. The Constitution grants them that right.

The judgment of the Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit is reversed.

It is so ordered.​

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Article. VI.

This Constitution, and the Laws of the United States which shall be made in Pursuance thereof; and all Treaties made, or which shall be made, under the Authority of the United States, shall be the supreme Law of the Land; and the Judges in every State shall be bound thereby, any Thing in the Constitution or Laws of any State to the Contrary notwithstanding.

Yet the 5 Socialists on the SCOTUS found no problem with untethering themselves from the Constitution of the United States.

As the Constitution of the United States does not provide a fundamental right to marriage, as such does not exist outside of the natural standard of Marriage as defined by the Human Physiological Standard and the other soundly reasoned conditions required by the desire of the collective to sustain a viable culture.

How is it that people like this idiot can revere marriage as a most important and sacred institution,

and then turn around and claim that it isn't, and shouldn't be, a basic human right?

It's insanely illogical.

How about that it's too important to pervert into the lie that a man with a man is equal to a man with a woman? Can two brothers share that so called human right? If not, you're a hypocrite.

The other poster said man/woman marriage isn't a right.

Marriage isn't in the Constitution. It WAS a state's right for eligible couples.

Equal protection is in the Constitution.

 

[Iceweasel]

Yet the 5 Socialists on the SCOTUS found no problem with untethering themselves from the Constitution of the United States.

As the Constitution of the United States does not provide a fundamental right to marriage, as such does not exist outside of the natural standard of Marriage as defined by the Human Physiological Standard and the other soundly reasoned conditions required by the desire of the collective to sustain a viable culture.

How is it that people like this idiot can revere marriage as a most important and sacred institution,

and then turn around and claim that it isn't, and shouldn't be, a basic human right?

It's insanely illogical.

How about that it's too important to pervert into the lie that a man with a man is equal to a man with a woman? Can two brothers share that so called human right? If not, you're a hypocrite.

The other poster said man/woman marriage isn't a right.

Marriage isn't in the Constitution. It WAS a state's right for eligible couples.

Equal protection is in the Constitution.

Yes, black men should be treated the same as white men by government.

 

[Seawytch]

It's normal...just uncommon. Rather like being red haired or left handed.

I have to disagree on the left-handed part of that because it's not really uncommon. Approximately 30% of the population is left-handed.

Okay...still in the minority (and once considered an evil to be eradicated)

My Dad can write with either hand because he was born left-handed but was forced to be right-handed. It's almost unbelievable the foolishness that people will believe because the church said so.

Hey, it's no more foolish than the church calling blacks "mud people" or thinking same sex consenting adult relationships are a sin.

When does "the church" call blacks "mud people"?

Blacks are part of "the church" too. You know nothing of it.

Anti-miscegenationists -- persons opposed to interracial marriage -- come in a variety of types:

• Some are simple racists -- most often white supremacists -- who regard all non-whites as intrinsically inferior to all whites. Non-whites are often referred to as the "mud" races.
• Others believe that God divided humans into different races and expected them to remain separate from each other forever.

Biblical Passages Used to Condemn Interracial Marriage

 

[Seawytch]

Sorry. No matter how many species it happens in fucking another man up the ass is not normal.

Normal or not boys, it's natural BTW, they are your equals.

Correct. God loves everyone., but only those that accept Jesus as Lord and Savior are saved. Homosexuality is a sin as is sex outside of marriage. God does not recognize homosexual marriage vows

How do you know that God does not recognize homosexual marriage vows?

because the Bible says men laying with men is an abomination in God's site.

It doesn't say that about women. I wonder why.....

Because god and Vivid video seem to have the same policies, girl on girl is hot?

 

[Seawytch]

I could debate divorce and sex before marriage with the same conviction.

Okay...but would you try to pass laws prohibiting non virgins and divorcees from marrying...

 

[Redfish]

Yet the 5 Socialists on the SCOTUS found no problem with untethering themselves from the Constitution of the United States.

As the Constitution of the United States does not provide a fundamental right to marriage, as such does not exist outside of the natural standard of Marriage as defined by the Human Physiological Standard and the other soundly reasoned conditions required by the desire of the collective to sustain a viable culture.

How is it that people like this idiot can revere marriage as a most important and sacred institution,

and then turn around and claim that it isn't, and shouldn't be, a basic human right?

It's insanely illogical.

How about that it's too important to pervert into the lie that a man with a man is equal to a man with a woman? Can two brothers share that so called human right? If not, you're a hypocrite.

The other poster said man/woman marriage isn't a right.

Marriage isn't in the Constitution. It WAS a state's right for eligible couples.

Equal protection is in the Constitution.

yes, the mentally ill are entitled to equal protection. no one ever questioned that.

 

[Seawytch]

Oh, this is gonna leave a mark ....

No union is more profound than marriage, for it embodies the highest ideals of love, fidelity, devotion, sacrifice, and family. In forming a marital union, two people become something greater than once they were. As some of the petitioners in these cases demonstrate, marriage embodies a love that may endure even past death. It would misunderstand these men and women to say they disrespect the idea of marriage. Their plea is that they do respect it, respect it so deeply that they seek to find its fulfillment for themselves. Their hope is not to be condemned to live in loneliness, excluded from one of civilization’s oldest institutions. They ask for equal dignity in the eyes of the law. The Constitution grants them that right.

The judgment of the Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit is reversed.

It is so ordered.​

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Article. VI.

This Constitution, and the Laws of the United States which shall be made in Pursuance thereof; and all Treaties made, or which shall be made, under the Authority of the United States, shall be the supreme Law of the Land; and the Judges in every State shall be bound thereby, any Thing in the Constitution or Laws of any State to the Contrary notwithstanding.

Yet the 5 Socialists on the SCOTUS found no problem with untethering themselves from the Constitution of the United States.

As the Constitution of the United States does not provide a fundamental right to marriage, as such does not exist outside of the natural standard of Marriage as defined by the Human Physiological Standard and the other soundly reasoned conditions required by the desire of the collective to sustain a viable culture.

How is it that people like this idiot can revere marriage as a most important and sacred institution,

and then turn around and claim that it isn't, and shouldn't be, a basic human right?

It's insanely illogical.

How about that it's too important to pervert into the lie that a man with a man is equal to a man with a woman? Can two brothers share that so called human right? If not, you're a hypocrite.

The other poster said man/woman marriage isn't a right.

Marriage isn't in the Constitution. It WAS a state's right for eligible couples.

Procreation isn't in the Constitution. Interstate travel isn't in the Constitution. Does that mean you don't have a fundamental right to procreate or travel from state to state?

Marriage hasn't been a "state's right" since 1967...get over it already.

 

[NYcarbineer]

How is it that people like this idiot can revere marriage as a most important and sacred institution,

and then turn around and claim that it isn't, and shouldn't be, a basic human right?

It's insanely illogical.

How about that it's too important to pervert into the lie that a man with a man is equal to a man with a woman? Can two brothers share that so called human right? If not, you're a hypocrite.

The other poster said man/woman marriage isn't a right.

Marriage isn't in the Constitution. It WAS a state's right for eligible couples.

Equal protection is in the Constitution.

Yes, black men should be treated the same as white men by government.

Equal protection covers gender as well. In fact equal protection covers any person or persons who are sufficiently similar to any other person or persons.

 

[Exquisite]

Is oral sex between a man and wife normal or abnormal?

It could be more normal, and I wouldn't object...

The number one reason so many woman object to performing oral sex is that it means they have to stop talking for 5 minutes.

No it's not, it's because women understand the only reason a man enjoys it is because it positions the woman in a role of SUBMISSION and the man in a role of control and superiority

So does the missionary postion, fucktard.

The woman is "servicing" the man, in such a way she would get no physical sexual pleasure out of it (although, some could get psychologically turned on by it).

Sex is supposed to be about expressing love. (not power and control)

If traditional sex is not doing it for you, you have issues and hang ups.

Oral sex is just as much about expressing love as intercourse is and enjoying it as well as "traditional sex" is natural. It's not about dominance, it's about pleasure and most men reciprocate.

Your comments in this post and other ones are showing that you have "issues and hang ups" about sex. That's sad.

 

[Igrok_]

This is not normal and not as new achievment of civilization as american propaganda is trying to show it. Enough to read a Bible to be aware of it. Everybody knows the story of Sodom and Homorra, everybody knows that barbarians did such sins and now uncivilized nations think that murders, robberies, sex with animals, pedophilia and homosexuality is normal. So, USA is now one step closer to such nations.